iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lisa Haisha

GET UPDATES FROM Lisa Haisha
 

Why I Both Love and Hate the Occupy Movement

Posted: 02/16/2012 5:33 pm

Over the past months, much has been written about the Occupy movement. Critics bash the movement, calling protesters "lazy freeloaders who should shut up and get a job," while supporters praise the movement, donating money, time, and supplies. Regardless of where you stand on the spectrum of support, one thing is certain: the Occupy movement has started a new dialogue between people, which in many respects is its main goal.

While critics may view Occupiers as unpatriotic and annoying, Occupiers are really following in the footsteps of our country's founders. Think back to your grade school history classes and you'll see that the United States was founded upon protests. From the Stamp Act of 1765 to the Boston Tea Party in 1773, protests are what shaped our country and helped us become a free nation. So why frown upon protesting today?

Here's why: The Occupy movement is powerful and shows the world how anyone can be just as powerful and make a difference. Instead of looking to others -- such as politicians and big business -- to make the changes society needs, the Occupiers are proving that power rests in each individual. The Occupy movement shows that anyone -- from a war veteran to a homemaker to an unemployed worker -- can stand up for what's right and change the country, even the world. For many in power today, that's a scary thought. And that's why I love the Occupy movement.

Critics of the Occupy movement attempt to undermine the movement by questioning its validity when protesters don't have any set list of demands. They claim that all successful protests have a succinct list of things they want changed. What the critics fail to see is that the main point of Occupy is less about generating solutions than about generating pressure, solidarity, visibility, and discussion. Remember, Occupy is a movement; it's not a list of demands. It's a call for wide-sweeping change, not a shot at single-issue reforms. And that's what makes the movement different and great. As one protester's sign beautifully proclaimed: "Don't confuse the complexity of this movement with chaos."

What I find most interesting about the Occupy movement is that it provokes a response from the state, and the state responds in the only way that it knows how -- with force, control, and violence. Nowhere was this more obvious than at UC Davis, when police attacked seated students with a chemical gas. It seems that the Occupy movement forces the state to show its hand. And it shows us that our society has not changed much in the past 200 plus years.

A Bittersweet View

While I believe in the Occupy movement and applaud the protesters for bringing key issues to the limelight, there are a few things I hate about it too. For one, I can't help but question their approach and the way they are organizing (or perhaps not organizing) their protest. I wonder if they'd get better results, more awareness, and more support if they had a bit more of an organized structure.

It seems from watching the protests around the world, and even seeing protesters in my own city, that minorities and the underprivileged -- the people who need the message the Occupy movement stands for the most -- actually suffer the greatest consequences in the Occupy movement. For example:

• Family Supporters -- People whose livelihood and family income is reliant on them attending their jobs the next morning cannot afford to camp out with the Occupy movement, nor is it necessarily safe for them to do so. Could there be some other way for working people to join the message without risk losing their job, especially in a time when jobs can be hard to come by?

• Homeless -- The Occupy camps easily become safe havens for individuals who don't have a safe place to go. Along with social activists, the camps attract homeless people and others who may not really be there for the cause but who just need food and a tent to sleep in.

• Women -- One of the greatest concerns for Occupy LA is that women in particular do not feel safe staying there. This is really a reflection of a larger issue that is often masked in our society. Safety, especially for women, must be addressed more strongly.

• Undocumented Immigrants -- Undocumented people are exploited for their labor in this country but are denied particular rights and privileges extended to full citizens. These people have as much (if not more) at stake in the Occupy movement but have to be extremely careful when protesting due to being possibly deported, even though their voices add to the beautiful communication that takes place in these Occupy hubs.

Occupy... Tomorrow

Love them or hate them, the people involved with the Occupy movement have no intention of going away or disbanding. But even if they did, they definitely started a new global discussion about society, about equality, and about the rights of every individual that will carry on for years. I certainly hope the dialogue moves forward and that it embraces a format that enables everyone to participate, listen, and learn. The time for real change is now.

 

Follow Lisa Haisha on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@lisahaisha

Over the past months, much has been written about the Occupy movement. Critics bash the movement, calling protesters "lazy freeloaders who should shut up and get a job," while supporters praise the mo...
Over the past months, much has been written about the Occupy movement. Critics bash the movement, calling protesters "lazy freeloaders who should shut up and get a job," while supporters praise the mo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:31 AM on 02/21/2012
We the people have become so used to tyrany that we have forgotten what freedom looks like. We pass laws that are so large and all ensompassing that they are incomprehensible. Our answere to every problem has become, pass a law. When a rare good law comes along, a law truley needed, our elected repreeasentatives add on sountless amendmendants, as hitchhikers, some related and some remote to the law as orriginally crafted. Each law without exception removes freedom of the people. Most of all we need to occupy the legeslature.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thatsNotWhatIHeard
some people want tacos, others want ALL the tacos
10:53 AM on 02/18/2012
I do wish they could organize more meetings / protests / marches / whatever during after-work hours. So much of it takes place between 1pm and 5pm, kinda limiting input and support to mostly people without daytime jobs.

Maybe even open some issues up to online forums to get a census check among the wider country.

anyway, i like that your issues with occupy are workable, fixable issues; keeping it constructive!
photo
Todd Downing
Occupy Los Angeles
12:13 AM on 02/20/2012
We can all do something - that is what is so beautiful. I myself am a part-timer... the health of my dog requires a quite, unchanging environment. But I would go to GA at night sometimes - bringing food and water. And I would show up for week-end marches. Now that LA has been raided, I actually find my contributions counting for even more and that it is possible as a part-timer the campers recognize as being with them since Oct. 1st, to organize marches and actions and facilitate outreach.
We all do what we can and what fits best to the realities of our own lives - even if that is having a friendly word about Occupy to our friends, co-workers, and families. And trust me - it IS appreciated within Occupy. Thank you for caring. =)
photo
smarti
We're all mad here..
05:05 PM on 02/17/2012
Well said. I think that about captures my own feelings about OWS too. I love the fact that OWS changed national dialogue in a direction about wealth inequality and wealthy influence in government. The whole 99% thing. But I am concerned about the limitations of the movement as far as being able to gain broader ground with the majority of the 99%. A lot of that has to do with media portrayals that have cemented an image of the OWS as one that is not representative of the "middle class". I also have concern about a perceived lack of minority involvement and support in the movement, particularly from minority advocacy groups. Particularly since minorities are disporportionately impacted by policies that drive down the 99%.

On the other hand, I would not like to see OWS become "corporatized" or "lobby-ized" in its efforts, as is the case with the Tea Party. Once that happens, it becomes too easy to discredit the group as just a front face for one or another special interest group. I think OWS can start the dialogue and keep it alive, but ultimately it's up to the 99% to create its own "sub-movements" and specific actions to have the movements' goals coalesce into real policies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jondrea Smith
untied dog in a dogmatic society
04:34 PM on 02/17/2012
Occupy is a step and not the endgame. One thing it is doing and doing well is raising the outcry against the issues that have plagued the population at large for quite some time now, and they are showing that the status quo is heavily defended and repression is its favorite weapon. Where it goes from here is yet to be written, but I'm enjoying the read so far. Occupy something...
03:45 PM on 02/17/2012
You are right about the shortcomings. I have supported Occupy, on occasion by being able to actually be at a protest, and more frequently by participating in online discussions. As a fulltime, unionized worker, I support all of the reforms they stand for, but I cannot run down to protest during my job hours. And the camps oftentimes get bogged down in "how to we make the camp work on a day-to-day basis?" issues. So what you get is a communal movement that hits the streets for rallies.
That's very good, and it is why they have gotten headlines and changed (some) of the political discourse. But the majority of people that Occupy needs to connect with - regular working people - can't live communally in the camps with them. The MSM ends up filling that void, and more often than not, it's with negative disinformation about Occupy.
I think Occupy either doesn't realize how much this is undermining their momentum, or is just at a loss as to how to solve that problem.
photo
Todd Downing
Occupy Los Angeles
12:20 AM on 02/20/2012
Though I do not speak for Occupy I can tell you that Occupy has struggled with even addressing the negativity and down right lies the MSM media puts out there as the MSM is part of the very broken system most of us Occupiers really want nothing to do with. And that's really what it is - we know what we are doing and that our actions come from a place of concern for each other - the people who cannot be with us but would if they could - and a love of our country and planet. MSM will never portray us in a positive light so why bother trying is the main argument. But some of us think we can perhaps us that paradigm for our favor. Just know - we support you and your union brothers and sisters and hope to make the world a better place for all workers. With or without the help of the media. And please forgive us when and if we falter. We're kind of making this up as we go.
photo
Joe Mickey
co-founder of The Tibetan Photo Project
03:10 PM on 02/17/2012
Given the time and the number of people, OWS has been effective in creating discussion but not any concrete action of major significance and that is its great failing or weakness.. As for other similar movements such as Egypt... in the end, without a defined goal... they did not get what they wanted.

The Civil rights effort had a defined goal... Ghandi had a goal... OWS has managed to yell very loudly that Bad is Bad, but they have had little real effect in changing anything.
photo
Todd Downing
Occupy Los Angeles
12:23 AM on 02/20/2012
Really?
02:53 PM on 02/17/2012
The Agenda I have been pursuing since Oct.15 and will continue to engage in my future with any Occupation:
From "The Storm before the Calm"
by Neale Donald Walsch

1. An acceptance, at last, of the true identity of ALL humans as an aspect and an individuation of Divinity.
2. The embracing by more and more people-ultimately, millions-of the truth of the Oneness of ALL life and humanity.
3. An understanding of why we are here upon the earth; a clarity as to the soul's agenda.
4. An end to abject poverty, to death by starvation, and to mass exploitation of people and resources on the earth by those in positions of economic and/or political power.
5. An end to systematic environmental destruction of the planet.
6. An end to the domination of our culture by an economic system rooted in competition above cooperation and in the continuing quest for economic growth.
7. An end to the struggle for Bigger/Better/More.
8. An end to all limitations and discrimination holding people back whether in housing, in the workplace... or in bed.
9. The providing, at last, of an opportunity-one that is truly equal-for all people to rise to the highest expression of Self.
10. Not just the putting into place of social adjustments for the sake of "social correction," but as a living, on-the-ground demonstration of who we really are as a species
03:52 PM on 02/17/2012
Noble sentiments, I'm sure. But will this world you envision be populated with PEOPLE?? It seems like liberals always forget to take into consideration HUMAN NATURE.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thatsNotWhatIHeard
some people want tacos, others want ALL the tacos
10:56 AM on 02/18/2012
that's quite a broad brush, haha
photo
Roelvdwegen
Truth & Justice are Liberally biased
07:12 PM on 02/18/2012
Changing the world starts with changing yourself.

Personally i would like to think this speech may one day be a reality,
http://youtu.be/WibmcsEGLKo
02:50 PM on 02/17/2012
Maybe I misread something but I'm not sure how housing and feeding the homeless in Occupy camps is detrimental to anyone?

"It seems from watching the protests around the world, and even seeing protesters in my own city, that minorities and the underprivileged -- the people who need the message the Occupy movement stands for the most -- actually suffer the greatest consequences in the Occupy movement. For example::

Homeless -- The Occupy camps easily become safe havens for individuals who don't have a safe place to go. Along with social activists, the camps attract homeless people and others who may not really be there for the cause but who just need food and a tent to sleep in. "
02:58 PM on 02/17/2012
It's detrimental to the image of the movement. The camps have homeless people, some of which are a little deranged, and the mainstream media portrays frames them as the image presented to the world to represent the movement. There's absolutely nothing wrong with taking care of them, it's when the "naysayers" spin the story to make it seem like that's the only "type" at the camps that it becomes a problem.
02:44 PM on 02/17/2012
Lisa,

We fully understand your frustrations. Everyone wants it to work; organizationally it is structured about as poorly as possible. This is the reason for our urge to move towards an organized, internet based movement.

Our recommendations read: Solidarity is just a word unless put into practical use--We encourage
1. Linking of all Occupy cities so all involved are on the same page 2. A national vote to finalize the list of Demands 2. Grow to 12-15 Million overall OWS supporters by Election Day, 2012. 3. We endeavor to exert enough power by sheer numbers and organization to become a respected (and feared) voting bloc 4. Help to facilitate an organizational structure nationally; leaderless is proving to be a failed strategy. We urge for OWS to implement state and city coordinators or link up with other sites to begin a new movement (OWS 2.0) that is highly organized and effective; primarily internet based. NO GA attendance will be required to participate.

This is our intent: To effectively ORGANIZE and clearly communicate the BENEFITS of The OCCUPY philosophy / platform to a far greater audience. To do this, we believe The Occupy Movement needs MAJOR CHANGES to adapt to and overcome the barriers. Too many people who want to participate, especially via the internet...are disenfranchised.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Occupy-Wall-St-Phase-Two-Advocating-Change-for-The-OWS-Movement/237495236307425?sk=info
02:17 PM on 02/17/2012
The Occupy movement is a general invitation to the public to respond to worldwide corruption and it's cascading effects, and therefore, can only be judged by those brave enough to show up for it. The relentless internet criticism from people who are not taking indirect action, or not involved, and are suggesting how "we should do things" is meaningless. Come to a GA.
02:50 PM on 02/17/2012
That requirement is far too restrictive and will eventually be the issue that will kill the movement.

200,000 name petitions, thousands of calls to Capitol Hill and emails to the same have proven to be remarkably effective in the last 6 weeks.

These strategies will accomplish more than 3000 General Assemblies. Occupy is in the dinosaur age, when a computer and 10 times the participants will do the job. We have a strategy that will work

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Occupy-Wall-St-Phase-Two-Advocating-Change-for-The-OWS-Movement/237495236307425?sk=info
photo
Ralphiec88
Not Lib or Con, so I aggravate everyone
03:47 PM on 02/17/2012
OK, here's an OWSer who gets it. There might be hope for the movement after all.
08:46 PM on 02/18/2012
My remark concerned internet criticism toward OWS by people with no direct experience with OWS, or, experience with direct action for that matter. NOT comparative data of strategic efficiency! A foundation of OWS is community building with real people meeting with real people. If you want to put your two cents in about whats going in the world, or want to help the movement, the best way to do that, is to go in person. Otherwise your yelling "pass the damn ball" at the TV screen. Community building, not mere legislative accomplishment. I know that's hard for folks to comprehend. But c'mon. Let's put some heart into things, and our presence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1deepstar
11:20 AM on 02/17/2012
We are Legion. We do not Forgive. We do not Forget. Expect us.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
08:55 AM on 02/17/2012
Nowhere in the article, particularly in the part about what the columnist "hates" about the movement, did she mention that these people are costing cities millions of dollars to clean up their mess! The cash-strapped cities do not need this and their citizens are going without needed services because of this. And the statement that the "safety of women must be addressed more strongly" is short on solutions about how that might be accomplished. Since the police are accused of reacting too strongly then just who is going to step up and address the safety of women more strongly?
02:21 PM on 02/17/2012
Wait a minute. Who is costing cash-strapped cities a lot of money? Be careful of propaganda, which the state is always happy to apply. I think if you did the research you would find other entities sucking the cities dry of resources, FAR more than the occupy movement. Let's direct our energy to those sources, not the sources who are fighting for justice.
photo
Ralphiec88
Not Lib or Con, so I aggravate everyone
03:42 PM on 02/17/2012
Somehow I doubt that that preventing marchers from taking over the Oakland convention center and cleaning up after the vandalism was free.

Wait, don't tell me, let me guess: "agent provocateurs!!"
03:55 PM on 02/17/2012
So....just who are you referring to that is costing cash-strapped cities a lot of money? The homeless? The criminals? Please enlighten me.
photo
Jim Prues
Founder, World 5.0
09:54 PM on 02/16/2012
Occupy is not going away. It is merging and converging with the other social movements of our time to help create a whole new system based on a system of ethics and the power of Love. We even have a name. World 5.0. The time is always Now. The answer is always Love.
photo
Ralphiec88
Not Lib or Con, so I aggravate everyone
03:42 PM on 02/17/2012
Has Occupy embraced your World or are you just hoping they will?
07:23 PM on 02/17/2012
As I asked under Brent Talbot's post, just who in this divided society is going to live in World 5.0? Human nature is not, I'm sorry to tell you, all ethics and love and never will be. Even if you somehow accomplished that in the U. S., what about our enemies around the world?
photo
Ralphiec88
Not Lib or Con, so I aggravate everyone
07:24 PM on 02/16/2012
I'm so tired of the spin that the "State...responds in the only way that it knows how -- with force, control, and violence". Reality is far more nuanced. Poorly trained cop wannabes making stupid decisions are not the state. Cops keeping people from taking over a public building are doing their job. Cops facing rock and bottle throwers respond with tear gas. Are there abuses? Absolutely. But lumping all police actions into one "state" is every bit as dishonest as lumping all OWSers in with the criminals and unwashed in their midst.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1deepstar
11:25 AM on 02/17/2012
When the Department of Homeland Security coordinates assaults on Occupy protests in 18cities at the same time, on the same night, we can consider that the State is responding with force... The same way it blacked out the news for four days when OWS began and there is never, ever, a public estimate on our numbers provided through the media....
Yes, the State is opposing us. Its calculated, planned and they use as much force as they think they can get away with. They know better but do it anyway... Recall Chief Bologna in Zuccotti park.... very abusive, not accountable.... nearly as I can tell there has been no accountability for any of the serious injuries caused by police malfeasance like shooting a protestor in the head with a CS canister, or group pounding a protester into a coma....spraying peaceful protesters while sitting down with CS, etc..... Rest assured, the State opposes us. Thus we have NDAA and Patriot Act and DHS controlling dissent on behalf of the Gov which is firmly driven by corporations and businesses and banks......
photo
Ralphiec88
Not Lib or Con, so I aggravate everyone
09:02 PM on 02/17/2012
This is cherry picking of facts combined with outright fantasy.

Olsen was hit in the head by a tear gas canister, but no one could reasonably say he was targeted. Yet you seem to ignore the rocks and other objects thrown at police OWS protesters in several cities.

A simple Google search for "hundreds" or "thousands" and "OWS protesters" would contradict your claim about media estimates.

And the 4-day "blackout"? Please. There are protests every day in NYC. The fact that OWS wasn't covered to your satisfaction until it gained some momentum is hardly a blackout.
-swift
Can you put your country before your party?
11:35 AM on 02/17/2012
Besides the poor decisions of individual police, there were several efforts that could only be coordinated from the top that were not about public safety and clearly about breaking up the protests. Chief among them, telling protesters they could march in New York City, then marching them into a dead end and arresting hundreds of them. That took specific planning and execution from the highest levels of city government down to the uniformed officers.