With yesterday's L.A. County Plastic Bag Ban, The Los Angeles Board of Supervisors proved themselves superior to our California State Legislators in standing up to the petrochemical and plastic bag manufacturing industries. The day began with an animated press conference in front of the Board of Supervisors' Building and facing the Los Angeles Cathedral. The presence of the dramatic cathedral rising above and facing the speakers seemed to elevate the call for delivery from plastic bag pollution, as if plastic bags are yet another, albeit recent, addition to biblical plagues. Clearly for the Supervisors and the assembled environmentalists who had spent years and vast resources both tackling plastic pollution and meeting the procedural challenges to regulation set forth by chemical industry lobbyists, the plastic bag plague is indeed more frustrating than locusts. Speakers included Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas who was fiery in his denouncement of the plastic bag as an urban and coastal pollutant. "It's time to ban these damn bags!" he said, giving a clear preview of his vote a few hours later.
The vote to ban plastic bags followed party line with the three Democrats: Gloria Molina, Mark Ridley-Thomas and Zev Yaroslavsky voting for the ban, and Republican Michael Antonovich voting against. Antonovich repeated a claim often voiced by chemical industry lobbyists that low-income people would be forced to buy plastic bags to pick up their dog waste and carry their lunches.
Anotnovich's line of reasoning drew the indignation of recent college graduate Vanessa Molano who stated, "I am one of those low income people you are referring to. I am insulted that you think poor people don't care about our environment. I wonder who you care about -- your chemical industry friends or people like me."
The victory offers some satisfaction to the extensive coalition that recently took a state wide plastic bag ban all the way through the state assembly, with the support of Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, only to see the legislation die in the state senate after heavy lobbying by the American Chemistry Counsel. Assemblymember Julia Brownley (D), author of the state bag ban bill that was defeated, (AB 1998, the Single Use Plastic Bag Reduction Act), assured supporters yesterday that she will revive the legislation this session.
Though legislative controls on plastic pollution in California, and in this nation, may prove to be incremental, there will be a tipping point for multi-territorial businesses when it is in their interest to stop providing plastic bags since more and more jurisdictions will ban them. Across the globe, 25% of the world's population already lives in a jurisdiction where plastic bags are either banned or have associated fees. In California, Rick Eiden of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (the UFCW), the union that represents the people who pack our groceries, says Californians deserve better than wasted tax dollars used to clean up plastic waste and higher grocery costs that cover the "free" single use bags. He looks forward to the day when the people he represents will no longer have to ask, "Paper or Plastic?"
Fen Montaigne: The Life of an Adélie Penguin in a Warming World (PHOTOS)
California: Ban on Plastic Bags Spreads
Plastic bags pollute, reusable bags poison. Great.
America Recycles Day at UTSA, Nov. 16: 10450 plastic bags recycled
LA County Bans Plastic Bags, Fox News Wonders What Will Happen To All The Dog Poop
Please, choose to educate. It is the simple answer.
You tell them, Lisa. Your comments on the comments are great!
The reason why the state legislation got shot down is because it was simply a bad idea.
It may be this law violates the newly enacted Prop 26, which now requires a 2/3 voter approval for any taxes or now "fees" of which ordering stores to impose a 10 cent "fee" on each paper bag given. This law took effect Nov. 3. To comply with this law the LA Sups should have placed this on the ballot for 2012 or called a special election. As it stands now this law is ripe for a lawsuit based upon violating Prop 26.
I have no problem if you say just ban plastic bags, period. Fine. My problem is the Sups telling the store that they now have to charge you 10 cents for a paper bag that was free before. It is the stores choice to decide if they want to charge for a bag or not, not the governments choice to make for them!
The legislative body that approved this measure, did so on a 3 to 1 vote, or 3/4ths.
I keep several re-usable bags in the car. It's now a habit. No matter where I shop, I bring my re-usable bags with me. I have Costco sized bags, 2 insulated bags and lots of standard-sized bags. A bonus is that they are sturdy and the contents don't fall out all over the back like plastic bags.
Fees, on the other hand, are effective in reducing demand for plastic bags. Ireland is a perfect example of this. Use of the bags decreased by 90 % with a 15 cent fee. In California, The American Chemistry Counsel lobby got state legislation passed to prohibit fees on plastic bags, so a ban was the only option left on the table.