iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lisa Wexler

GET UPDATES FROM Lisa Wexler
 

Stop Wasting Our Money

Posted: 04/26/2012 1:30 pm

Tuesday's abysmal turnout to vote in the Republican presidential primaries in New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Delaware and Rhode Island merely confirmed what all of us already knew -- there is no Republican presidential race for the nomination. Mitt Romney already won. And If the Republicans really mean what they say about saving taxpayer money, the GOP would cancel the remaining primaries. By doing so, they would be saving states millions of dollars that are being unnecessarily spent on contests that are meaningless exercises, and that barely bring out their own party faithful. Yesterday, even the Republican National Committee recognized Mitt as the presumptive nominee, announcing that they would be officially working with his campaign.

Here are the pathetic facts of my own home state, Connecticut: On Tuesday, only 58,000 people, more or less, bothered to vote, out of the pool of 427,000 eligible Republicans. That represents a whopping 14.4 percent turnout of Republicans. Of that total, Mitt Romney received 40,000 votes, or 67 percent. This high percentage for Mitt held throughout all the other states which voted on Tuesday. One listener to my radio show told me that when he voted, he was the sole person at the voting booth, but counted 38 other workers at the station. Most are volunteer, but some are paid to be there. These numbers and percentages were consistent throughout the other four states as well.

Of course, to accomplish the worthy goal of actually saving the taxpayers money, the Republicans would need to make some sacrifices. Egos would need to be pushed aside for the greater good. Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul would need to call the whole thing off, instructing their delegates to unite in the cause of Mitt, and cast all their votes for Mitt at the convention. Requesting a cancellation would require all of them setting aside their own ambitions, their own needs to be center stage, their own addictions to the special kind of fame that comes with running for president.

So Messrs Santorum, Gingrich and Paul, if you men really mean what you have said on the campaign trail about cutting wasteful spending, this one is a very easy call. Perhaps in exchange for your graceful exit, the RNC will aid you in paying off all that campaign debt you so willingly incurred, debt incidentally that you keep telling us we can no longer afford to carry.

I am calling you on your rhetoric, asking you to put your ego where your mouth is, asking you to unite in calling for a cancellation of the remaining primaries, not merely for the good of the Republican party, but for the good of the entire electorate, whose taxes go to state budgets which are already strained to the max. Will you do it?

 

Follow Lisa Wexler on Twitter: www.twitter.com/lisawexler

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:16 PM on 04/26/2012
Alternatively,
We could save a FORTUNE by just doing away with elections entirely.

Maybe we should just tell Obama, 'hey dude, just stick around, you've already passed a bunch of laws that have pushed us towards a dictatorship, you might as well just take over for good.'

Or, we could go with the broken process we have now, and at least get SOME say in the matter.

Although technically, to this independent voter originally from CT, There isn't much difference between Obama and Romney to speak of.

I think its kind of funny that the argument against republican primaries is to spend less taxpayer money in a state that is blue, and thus doesn't care. One could argue a lot of recent laws passed favor spending taxpayer money on things that are against what the majority of the countries population wants.Like wars, for example.

So its ok to back a sitting president who has started and continued wars that are not in public favor, but its not ok to spend 1/1000th of that same budget on a method that gives people the voice to at least try to voice their opinion ? weird.
01:58 PM on 04/26/2012
I'd like to know when the Republicans and Democrats convinced the states to give them taxpayer money. I find that objectionable: states shouldn't play favorites with political parties. In my opinion it is way past time for the two-party system to be replaced with a multi-party system. Let each party use whatever process it wants to nominate a candidate for a general election. But no party should get taxpayer funding for it.
01:57 PM on 04/26/2012
Yes, re-energize your party by not allowing them to have a voice (even before the results are 100% finalized). If nothing else, the primary is a way to gauge enthusiasm and potential turn-out for the general election. But by all means, lets tell the remaining states that because they were chosen to participate last that they no longer have the right to participate and make their voice heard within their own party. And go ahead and start accepting the challenges from within the party as every state opts to push their primaries up to the front of the calendar for the next cycle.