iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lloyd Chapman

GET UPDATES FROM Lloyd Chapman

Executive Order Could Slash Jobs Deficit

Posted: 08/03/11 01:33 PM ET

The game of political chicken over the debt ceiling has ended without a clear winner, and the American people can once again collectively roll their eyes at their dysfunctional government. Now an appointed Congressional committee, the so-called Super Congress, will look for new ways to relieve the national debt. It is an understatement to say that I do not expect a revolutionary breakthrough.

Congress' focus is in the wrong place. The biggest challenge the U.S. faces right now is the jobs deficit, not the budget deficit. Unemployment rates determine a healthy and functioning economy, and those rates are reaching new heights.

If President Obama is serious about trying to stimulate the economy, create jobs and balance the budget, his most effective tool is a simple executive order.

The U.S. Census Bureau tells us that small businesses create 90 percent of all net new jobs. The Kauffman Foundation found that small businesses create nearly 100 percent of all net new jobs. Moreover, small businesses employ more than half the private sector workforce, are responsible for half of the GDP and account for 90 percent of all U.S. exports.

Recognizing the vital role small businesses play in stimulating the economy, in 1953, Congress passed the Small Business Act requiring federal agencies to award a minimum of 23 percent of all prime contract dollars to legitimate small businesses. Yet, since 2003, a series of federal investigations has found that most of those dollars are diverted to large corporations.

The Small Business Act defines a small business as independently owned. That definition excludes any publicly traded companies. Also, when determining if a business is small, the number of employees of any parent company and all affiliates must be considered. Therefore, no Fortune 500 firm or publicly traded firm can be considered a small business.

Yet, in fiscal year 2010, 61 of the top 100 small business federal contractors were actually large firms. During a July Senate hearing aimed at discovering why large corporations like Lockheed Martin received billions of dollars in small business contracts, Senator Claire McCaskill expressed dismay that the SBA had allowed this to happen. She said it is "time for all of us to take a hard look at the way the government does business."

I could not agree more. If President Obama wants to create jobs and stimulate the economy, a simple executive order stating that government agencies can no longer report contracts awarded to publicly traded companies as small business contracts would suffice. Considering the federal acquisitions budget is around $1 trillion, this would redirect upwards of $200 billion per year in existing federal infrastructure spending to small businesses and the middle class.

The key phrase is "existing federal infrastructure spending," which means it does not require new taxes or new spending. This is money that the government currently spends. President Obama just needs to redirect it to companies capable of creating jobs. Furthermore, it would solve a ten-year-old contracting scandal that has been covered by virtually every major newspaper, television and radio outlet in the country.

If the American people took a survey asking if Fortune 500 firms should receive small business contracts, virtually 100 percent would laugh and say no.

But this is not a preposterous question.

Every day that President Obama has been in office, hundreds of millions of dollars in small business contracts have been knowingly, willfully and intentionally diverted to large corporations that have not created one net new job in America in more than thirty years.

President Obama said he would leave no stone unturned in trying to create jobs. Well there is a massive rock pile made up of Lockheed Martin, General Electric, Raytheon, Italian defense giant Finmeccanica, among several others, receiving small business contracts waiting to be turned.

 

Follow Lloyd Chapman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LloydChapman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 124
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
02:29 AM on 08/08/2011
I sent in an email to a government agency that had asked for suggestions to save money. They sent me a reply that said my suggestion didn't meet the defination of what they were looking for and therefore was not passed on. Here's the suggestion: Upgrade all Federal government office buildings to LEED standards. LEED is at the forefront of the Green Movement and would pay for itself in 1-4 years, and after that would rack up savings year after year. A big plus would be the jobs in the construction industry, created to complete the upgrades. Upgrades involve, the plumbing fixtures (low flow), lighting, and HVAC sytem upgrades. Again, the biggest thing would be the 1,000s of jobs created. All in the private sector and rules could be written to hire local contractors-not huge national firms. And saving millions a year and conserving national resources isn't a bad deal either.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
10:59 AM on 08/04/2011
the government says it wants to spend with small business, and then it makes a large set of rules that not many small businesses can comply with much less have a staff to read through the regulations. the best way the govt can get things going are to increase the guarantee on sba loans or lower the equity positions. yes, they will increase the default rate some and probably eat a few billions, but the rewards will outweigh that with more jobs and more successful small businesses.
alunsulen
Digging the liberal hatred!
07:46 AM on 08/04/2011
So big companies will slash jobs which the small business will (hopefully) absorb. How is that supposed to solve anything?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
09:18 AM on 08/04/2011
Studies show that small companies will be more innovative and grow. Think of the government money as "seed" money. In addition, the small companies are not rife with corruption. The CEO will not be buying $1800 trash cans and billing the government for it.

And small companies will not hide revenue in Swiss bank accounts, or do the "Double Irish" or "Dutch Sandwich" tax dodges. It is illegal for all companies to move money across international borders for the purpose of evading taxes, but big companies get away with it.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
11:02 AM on 08/04/2011
its call decentralization....its the best hope for american jobs. lets say a small software firm in ca employs 10 people to write code for a project.....a large corp probably would employ 10 folks overseas and pay 1 project coordinator in the states to do it. large corps pay a lot of middle and upper management and sub the work out overseas....small companies are the upper and middle mangement all in one....a lot more efficient.
06:33 AM on 08/04/2011
I love the way that none of the articals that state small business create all the jobs never define what they mean by small business.
Small firms that are competing with the big corporations for Federal business don't stand a chance. If they do win a sizable contract as a small business, it is not long before their competition will buy them. The sham is a small business seeded with venture capital loan, setup as a minority firm so they have preference in fed contracts. Once they win a nice big contract, they sell out to a larger corporation for a tidy profit. The venture capital firm collecting most of the money since they get their loan back with interest and their equity share. Nothing illegal, just not what was intended.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
09:34 AM on 08/04/2011
This are the kind of "false facts" that stifle the conversation. There is a government standard for "small business", but it is legalese, and would have ruined the readability of the article if the author included them (the SBA rules can be found at: http://www.sba.gov/content/what-sbas-definition-small-business-concern).

The rule setting aside a percentage of business is designed to overcome the big corporations advantage in bidding. A company like Lockheed Martin has tentacles throughout Washington, so this rule must be enforced for small businesses to have a chance.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lloyd Chapman
President of the American Small Business League
12:19 PM on 08/04/2011
I think that you may be missing the issue here. The Small Business Act mandated 23 percent of federal contracts be awarded to legitimate small businesses so that these small businesses compete amongst themselves for that 23 percent, rather than compete against corporate giants. Your claim that "If they do win a sizable contract as a small business, it is not long before their competition will buy them." doesn't have a foundation in any evidence that I am aware of, and I have been a small business owner and small business advocate for over twenty years. As for the definition of small business, there are various size standards (called NAICS codes) that apply to different types of companies (manufacturing, telecommunications, etc.), but I think you would agree that General Electric, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, AT&T, Xerox, Rolls-Royce, British Aerospace Engineering, companies like these are not small businesses right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Dillard
02:52 AM on 08/04/2011
This is a very good idea; but good ideas that do not support the agenda of the plutocracy don't have a chance right now in these United States. It's not a matter of which party is in power or who is president. It's the fundamental structure of the government. It's willing to take itself hostage and blow its own brains out if it doesn't get what it wants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
09:37 AM on 08/04/2011
True, but there is a fundamental change occurring in Washington. The Tea party has so overstepped themselves, a backlash is as large as a tidal wave is in movement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Dillard
03:05 AM on 08/05/2011
Becky, I wish you were right. Where are the signs of that backlash? I don't see them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Dillard
02:51 AM on 08/04/2011
This is an excellent idea. Those posters who use this as an excuse to rail against Obama miss the point. However, the issue is not Obama. No president will shift those funds to job creating small businesses unless he or she is forced to do so by public outcry. The real mystery is why a president who should be very, very worried about his re-electability would NOT take such a step. The implication is either that 1) he will do nothing to alienate his funding sources, or 2) he really believes that deficit/reduction/austerity will get him re-elected. If it is the first, he is simply another tool of corporatism, basically a Republican. If it is the later, he is simply another tool of corporatism, basically a Republican. If that is the case, I don't understand why Republicans want to defeat him. Don't they understand that he has already given them more in tax cuts than they would have gotten out of a Republican president? Why aren't they dancing in the streets? Well, it's because there is a basic problem that comes up when you combine greed with an unwillingness to compromise: chronic over-reach. You have a good thing; you want more of it - the management of all that social security money, for example. Chronic over-reach always brings the house down sooner or later.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronald Malaney
01:37 AM on 08/04/2011
Lloyd, your plan is just robbing peter to pay Paul. this may do a little good, but not solve anything. A better plan would be to promote and help to start up mining, logging,drilling,manufacturing, and ranching, instead of blocking them all.
put a 100% tax on all imports.
restart the civilian conservation corp, with maybe some twists. they can help the start up businesses at a low pay subsidized for 2 years. or the ccc could help them start something of their own.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lloyd Chapman
President of the American Small Business League
12:29 PM on 08/04/2011
While I appreciate your comment and interest, I will have to quibble with your characterization of a small business employing 50 people and General Electric as equivalent (robbing peter to pay Paul). Furthermore, the only "robbing" is being perpetrated by these mega-corporations: they are being awarded federal contracts that are legally supposed to go to small businesses. All I am saying is follow the law (rather than continually breaking it for over a decade) and end the diversion of small business contracts to the most powerful companies in America, Europe and Asia. Check out http://www.asbl.com for an abundance of data on the issue, as well as the various federal investigations that have continued to find fraud, waste, and abuse in the awarding of federal small business contracts. Thanks again for your interest in this issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronald Malaney
04:29 PM on 08/04/2011
thanks for the reply. I to believe in following the law on this and law breaking needs to stop. I was just pointing out that move 1000 jobs from a big company to small companies, is still 1000 jobs with no gain for American employment. they might spend or use the profit differently, for some gain in the economy, but they may also be more apt to fold as a company leaving us holding the bag. I personally only want American only businesses to get any government contracts for sure, and small and or local business get at least a even shot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
innerpuppie
The truth is an absolute defense...
01:28 AM on 08/04/2011
Obama will do nothing of the sort. He would no more 'hurt' his buddies who run large corporations than he would toss Bo out the back door. He loves them both and will stand by them both - even as both leave poopie on the WH lawn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris1962
NYC
01:12 AM on 08/04/2011
>>>The U.S. Census Bureau tells us that small businesses create 90 percent of all net new jobs.>>>

So, by all means, let's put the burden of CrapCare on their shoulders. THAT should surely create jobs.

I don't know how long it's gonna take for liberals to figure this out, but Business is riding one-term Obama out.
11:57 PM on 08/03/2011
In some ways, I am not surprised at this, but, at a base level, I am stunned. That companies like Bechtel and Lockheed-Martin somehow qualified as "small businesses" made a bit of a round in the liberal media a while ago, mostly in the context of their tax structure. The existence of a set-aside like this did not make it into those discussions.

I cannot thank you enough for writing this article. I can't do much, but I can contact my Congress-critters, and at least remind them of this. You are absolutely right - if real small businesses got those contracts, it would have a huge impact on unemployment. That some of these contracts go to non-US based companies is outrageous. Real small businesses don't outsource their jobs.

Thank you for this article. And for your comments in the thread itself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Furtenbacher
No one you know...
11:56 PM on 08/03/2011
Huh! Studied law - organized communities - go figure!
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
10:20 PM on 08/03/2011
We have two and a half years' worth of Obama's "shoulda woulda coulda" which has produced nada.
chux3863
There's no next time.It's now or never
09:55 PM on 08/03/2011
I can't beleave that there is'nt a single person in the congress to stand up and do this we can spend over 15 billion a month to nation build over in the middle east.And by the way THEY DON'T WANT US THERE .Our infrastruture is crumbling and stuck in the 19 century.We need to do what the other countries around the world are doing.Investing in our country and hopefully leading in this century.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
larrystalcup
01:16 AM on 08/04/2011
yes, it is NOT just obama......i suspect the truth is that the small businesses do not have the money to lobby congress for the contracts.......
09:41 PM on 08/03/2011
Excellent article..If this obama is re-elected, I can assure you that this country will be comparable to third world nation, depending on the government to lead us around like sheep. obama has managed to persuade liberals to believe that the entrephenuers, small business and corporations as the evil doers, that stole opportunities from the poor for their own personnel gain, so the 'distribution of wealth' is appealing for the lazy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
innerpuppie
The truth is an absolute defense...
01:29 AM on 08/04/2011
Piffle.
photo
LightShadow62
The answers are not found in the extremes
09:38 PM on 08/03/2011
It is time to reexamine the definition of 'small business'.

I own a real small business, a couple of employees and a gross income below 7 figures. Contrast that to a hedge fund manager, also considered a small business especially by the GOP, with a couple of 'assistants' and profits in the billions.
Under the current SBA definition Koch Industries is a small business, never mind that Koch Industries owns several multinational corporations.
Under the SBA definition a company with 500 employees is a small business, well that 'small business' would need more than $20 million a year just to pay its employees $15 an hour. That is not small.

Time to put a monetary line in the definition of a small business, let's say $100 million a year. That is a reasonable figure for a company with 200 employees. Then set a mid-sized business category with a slightly different set of criteria and programs.

The reality is that too many of the SBA resources go to these mid-sized businesses while actual small companies are left out in the cold.