Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lloyd Chapman

Lloyd Chapman

Posted: December 1, 2010 08:22 PM

The Obama Administration has included language in the defense authorization bill that may allow senior Department of Defense (DoD) officials to secretly "blacklist" government contractors at their discretion and without notice to the contractor or accountability to the public.

Section 815 of S. 3454, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, has drawn sharp criticism from advocacy organizations like the American Small Business League (ASBL), Tech America, and the members of the Acquisition Reform Working Group.

In particular, small business advocates have raised concerns that Section 815 represents a blatant power grab placing small businesses directly in the line of fire. The ASBL believes the inclusion of Section 815 in S. 3454 may significantly harm America's 27 million small businesses and could lead to the following:

1. The legislation will allow contractors to be secretly "blacklisted," and excluded from DoD contracting programs.
2. The blacklisting allowed under Section 815 could result in "de facto" debarments of federal contractors across the federal government without due process.
3. Section 815 does not require DoD to notify or justify its decision to blacklist companies.
4. DoD's determinations regarding its secret "blacklist" would be protected from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), protest at the Government Accountability Office (GAO), or action brought in the federal court system.
5. The legislation represents a reduction in competitiveness in federal contracting programs, and as a result could lead to increased costs of goods and services.
6. The legislation consolidates DoD acquisition authority on over $300 billion a year in defense contracts into the hands of a small group of high-level Pentagon officials.
7. The legislation will lead to a reduction in transparency, accountability and oversight in federal contracting programs and opens the door to unparalleled and perhaps unconstitutional abuse.
8. Could allow large contractors like Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman with significant clout at the Pentagon to eliminate their competitors with more efficient and cost effective products.

President Obama promised the most transparent administration in history, and now his administration is proposing the secret blacklisting of government contractors without due process. This legislation opens the door to unparalleled opportunity for fraud and abuse, and without question will be used to threaten and intimidate small businesses that take issue with DoD's small business contracting practices.

 

Follow Lloyd Chapman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LloydChapman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:58 AM on 12/16/2010
I just read the full text of this section. I did so becuase of a worried small business owner receiving fearful emails containing the content of this blog. Unnecessary. I am directly connected, in the small business world, to this and have no opposition. This section applies to "covered systems", the USC states those systems are intelligence systems (cryptologic, command and control, protected in the interest of national security). Qualification of contractors is not new, and this section prevents just any IT firm from working in an arena that is highly specialized. The head of an agency with the basis of a joint recommendation by the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information Integration makes the call. Believe me, they know better than us on this. This section is NOT a true blacklist, is in the interest of security, will not cut out small businesses who are qualified. The section can be read here:http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s3454/text
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrimJack
no matter where you go...there you are
11:36 AM on 12/16/2010
Wow, that sounds like a very "government official" response...when you look at history within this country and others, some of the greatest abuses and atrocities have been committed under the guise of "national security." I have read the section being referred to hear and came to the completely opposite conclusion...why should two people within the Pentagon be allowed to blacklist anyone under the guise of national security with no means allowed to rectify the situation and have it done completely in secret...fascist police state here we come...

This is just another blatant power grab by DOD officials who are aligned with the corporate interests of the military-industrial complex in order to enrich themselves more at the cost of the American people...

Ben Franklin said "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Gunn
11:44 AM on 12/16/2010
Mrs. Mueller, I don't know where you are getting your intel, and/or your inherent trust of the Department of Defense to make decisions that protect the global supply chain, while at the same time protecting the interests of the nation's contracting community, but you're wrong. This legislation is clearly a blatant power grab by the Department of Defense. While you're correct that the section applies to covered systems, you're wrong because the definition of covered systems can be interpreted broadly enough to encompass businesses who are providing a broad spectrum of IT products to the federal government. Moreover, in addition to the clear erosion of transparency and accountability this legislation represents, the ASBL's concerns are reinforced by concerns from organizations like the Acquisition Reform Working Group (TechAmerica, U.S. Chamber of Commerce), and the Project on Government Oversight (POGO). Your comment from the ivory tower of government (Department of Energy) is misleading and attempts to obfuscate the issue with a series of DoD talking points.
01:02 PM on 12/16/2010
Mr. Gunn, Your statement that my comment is misleading is interesting seeing as how I this blog post misleading. Are you sending scary emails to small businesses too on behalf ot eh ASBL? I have simply provided an opinion based upon my reading of the legistation and not based upon the spun interpretation of this blog post. My concern is with the post casting a very wide net in saying "DoD Programs" when in fact, it is these "covered systems" within the DoD that are affected. My concern is with local small businesses receiving emails with this spun, misleading, inflamatory information and freaking out. If the facts were reported, I wouldn't have commented. I have no relation to the DoE, but have been on both sides of the government table with regards to acquisition. By the way - the exclusion of vendors already happens - this is nothing new.
I will say I am uncomfortable with one part - "shall not be subject to review in a bid protest before the Government Accountability Office or in any Federal court." and that is the one point in the blog post that is clear and correct as it relates to the actual legislation language.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
09:21 AM on 12/06/2010
blacklisting is needed, but it must be open and well publicized , the secret holds syndrome is an invitation to criminality in government.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lloyd Chapman
President of the American Small Business League
01:03 PM on 12/15/2010
There is absolutely no reason to allow this kind of consolidation of power in the small business community. Additionally, the secrecy that this proposal has been shrouded in is unreasonable, and you're right is an open invite to criminality in government.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amber15
08:23 PM on 12/05/2010
if this passes and the direction our govt is headed, the only way we, the people will know anything is to depend on wikilieaks and the like for our information.....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lloyd Chapman
President of the American Small Business League
01:04 PM on 12/15/2010
And that's only for the big stuff. It's the business community that will feel this proposal the most. During this tough economic time, this is the last thing the business community needs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leoluminary
07:01 PM on 12/05/2010
Oh and by the way.....let's not forget the "Rethug drum song" "The government doesn't create jobs" while we discuss the list of government contractors
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
03:57 AM on 12/05/2010
Getting the Laws Republicans put in place to prevent Audits of Military Contractors forces the President to do something to make these Contractors fulfill the Audits required in the Contracts .

Republicans past a rule allowing the Contractors to decide when they would be Aduited and where they would be Audited !!!!!

Hard to have the Contractor answer questions about something in Iraq back here in the USA !!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorkosan
PhD Chem E, HBS
01:36 PM on 12/04/2010
This a bad idea - make the list public. Otherwise just imagine the "other guys" ( whatever your affiliation) are in power.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lloyd Chapman
President of the American Small Business League
01:06 PM on 12/15/2010
Without question, you're right. This is a very bad idea. We really need the community to get behind a push to prevent this language from ever becoming law.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
booker52
avid reader
05:27 PM on 12/02/2010
Gee and I thought all contracts were no bid to Haliburton or Blackwater.
ThePeacemakers
Concerned Citizen
04:31 PM on 12/03/2010
They're going for ALL of them now.
But any no-bids that went out...they've been on the front end.
05:26 PM on 12/03/2010
Who do you suppose has lobbied for this piece of secrecy garbage? Imagine the Cheney daughters sitting in a back room deciding who gets put on the black list.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrimJack
no matter where you go...there you are
01:41 PM on 12/02/2010
too bad the distraction of DADT repeal has everyone distracted so no one will notice issues like this one...it is the whole "look over here, look over here at this nice shiny object...while I take your wallet."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MalleusMaleficarum
Global nomad.
08:25 AM on 12/02/2010
While a blacklist should be a whitelist -- we need to know which companies are blacklisted. If Blackwater/Xe is on the list, Bravo!! If Halliburton is on the list, Bravo!! If KBR is on the list, Bravo!! Get the picture?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrimJack
no matter where you go...there you are
01:42 PM on 12/02/2010
that would be great...unfortunately not likely to happen, my guess is that some of those people are the ones who help get that language included in the bill...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
08:23 PM on 12/02/2010
Blackwater/Xe provides excellent services.  Thank you Mr. Prince.  Halliburton and KBR sucks, it is too big and mostly subs everything out. 

Companies should be rated on how well they do a service, not political feelings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
09:26 PM on 12/02/2010
yeah. Xe is great if you have no problem with collateral damage, which they certainly don't.

i recall how pleased i was the day they lost 4 of their men. toasty little memory there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuiltD
10:36 PM on 12/01/2010
All I had to do is take my Bush is hitler sign and slap Obamas face on it