More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lloyd Chapman

GET UPDATES FROM Lloyd Chapman
 

Obama to Approve a Series of Anti-Small Business Policies That Will Cheat the Middle Class out of Billions

Posted: 12/23/11 12:33 PM ET

The Obama administration has quietly adopted a series of anti-small business policies that will cost small businesses and minority-owned small businesses billions of dollars a month.

In the midst of the worst economic downturn in U.S. history, President Obama is abolishing the nation's oldest and most successful program to direct infrastructure spending to minority-owned small businesses, which could cost them between $25 and $50 billion a year. The President has continued to allow billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts to be diverted into the hands of big businesses. His administration tried to cover up the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants by destroying data in the Federal Procurement Data System such as the "small business flag" and the "parent DUNS number," that allowed watchdogs like myself, and the media, to monitor the actual recipients of federal small business contracts.

And now, President Obama will reauthorize a Department of Defense program known as the Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan Test Program (CSPTP) that makes it easier for prime contractors to cheat small businesses out of billions. Under the CSPTP, large defense contractors are exempt from reporting their subcontracting actions and also exempt from any penalty of non-compliance with congressionally mandated small business procurement goals.

The idea of the CSPTP is ludicrous.

Originally passed in 1990, the CSPTP is now a 21-year-old test program. Since it was established with the stated mission of increasing federal contracts for small businesses, the CSPTP has never been investigated for it's effectiveness, despite a demand from five members of Congress in October 2010 that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigate the program. "Federal contracting data calls into question whether ... participants in the CSPTP are actually meeting their small business subcontracting goals," the Representatives' letter to the GAO said.

The American Small Business League has long maintained that the CSPTP allows large defense contractors to circumvent the Small Business Act, which requires that 23 percent of all federal contracts must be with small businesses.

With his approval of the 2012 NDAA, President Obama is opting to allow the Pentagon to prevent disclosure of federal spending to the public, media and congress, as well as eliminate all penalties for contractors that defraud small businesses.

In October, SBA Inspector General Peggy Gustafson testified before the House Small Business Committee, confirming that the diversion of federal small business contracts to large corporations has been a top management challenge for the SBA and the entire federal government for the past seven consecutive years.

President Obama acknowledged the magnitude of the problem during his campaign in Feb. 2008, when he stated, "it is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants."

Unfortunately, he has failed on that promise-- and every day of his administration the President quietly allows billions of dollars in federal funds that by law should be reserved for middle class firms to be diverted to some of the largest companies in the world.

The bottom line here is that in the U.S., small businesses equal jobs. Taxes, on the other hand do not create jobs. But for some reason, the mainstream media seems more concerned with the handful of pennies that the President and Congress are bickering over in payroll tax cuts than the billions of dollars that are diverted away from small businesses by the federal government every month.

 

Follow Lloyd Chapman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LloydChapman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:16 PM on 12/28/2011
In response to comments that accuse me of being a paid lobbyist with an undisclosed agenda, I would suggest doing your homework. I have being fighting for small business rights for twenty years now to correct the injustices committed against small businesses by our political leaders-- and do you know why I advocate for small businesses? It's because they create 90 percent of all net new jobs; supporting U.S. small business is therefore akin to supporting a healthy national economy. In sum, I am not a corporate pawn, nor a lobbyist paid by corporations, affiliated with PACS or chambers of commerce, none of that. I am solely a concerned citizen working to correct a glaring, fraudulent scandal. To that effect, I founded the American Small Business League as an independent small business advocacy/watchdog organization because there is no one else in this nation who has committed themself to addressing federal small business contracting. Were small businesses to be treated justly, our nation would be far better off than it is today.

I wrote this blog to bring attention to the fact that the President is about to approve policies that seriously harm small business. I would have done the same for any President about to make such a mistake. If you do your homework, you might notice that I was heavily critical of President Bush's moves to eliminate the U.S. Small Business Administration's funding.This isn't a Republican vs. Democract issue this is a "we the people" issue.
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
12:22 PM on 12/30/2011
I didn't think Obama knew anything about small businesses! You have clearly identified yet another area that will hurt small businesses. I'm on the Board of several small businesses and I can provide many reasons why the Feds are hurting these businesses. Healthcare costs have risen 20-30% since Obama was elected. If this continues, it will be very tough to keep our same policies. Our legal and insurance costs are also rising due to all of the new regulations from the alphabet soup of agencies.
Keep fighting for small business, they are a significant part of a solution for adding more jobs in this country. Everyone of the companies I work with are planning incremental hiring next year. That is a good thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gschear
Buhbye D. Rehberg, Sincerly, Bozeman MT
02:00 PM on 12/27/2011
Lloyd, it looks like your lobby didn't get to congress in time to be effective and so now it is time to blame the President. Did that Christmas bonus come yet or was it the jelly of the month club this time?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
12:54 PM on 12/27/2011
as has been noted below the bill was passed with bipartisan agreement in the Hose and Senate. 283 to 186 in the House, 86 to 13 in the Senate. Blaming President Obama for signing a law that Congress has approved with that sizable majority is placing blame without looking at the facts. Suppose the President did Veto this bill? The veto override vote would be swift. Much like the several bills the Republicans love pointing out that ex-President Clinton signed . Vetoing only works when Congress will listen to the reasoning behind a veto.
12:21 PM on 12/27/2011
Those who are saying the ONLY thing that Obama is doing that is anti-business is removing the requirement for 5% of government business to be done with small minority businesses, have apparently no ability to read the source material themselves, or perhaps some agenda of their own that they have not fully expressed. This was a link, right below the one discussing this aspect of Obama's policies. The others are links to the same website, from the organization American Small Business League, detailing the enormous global corporations that are on the federal government's list of "small business contractors" the government deals with, such small companies as Northrup Grumman, General Electric, Rayethon, General Dynamics, and Lockheed Martin. Perhaps no one considers this deception significant. http://www.asbl.com/documents/asbl_dataanalysis_2010.pdf.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nardwilly
06:35 AM on 12/27/2011
This man is complaining about a bill passed by both houses of congress. The 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. This bill was passed with bipartisan agreement in the Hose and Senate. 283 to 186 in the House, 86 to 13 in the Senate. The ACLU wants the President to veto it for civil liberty reasons. This guy wants the President to veto it for small business reasons. Apparently neither the civil liberty or small business reasons were sufficient for a majority of the Senate and or House to vote against the bill. Why this man balames the President, when as a lobbyist he has had opportunity to convince congress to put in the stuff he likes, I do not understand.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
research b4 you post
06:30 AM on 12/27/2011
the csptp was thrown in with the ndaa.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zbowling
software engineer, geek
02:30 AM on 12/27/2011
ABSL is not a suspect organization, like the poster below brought up.
Who else could end programs ensuring at least 5% of small business contracts go to minorities, and let all those small business contracts go right to big business mega-corps? The only way to actually heal this country economically is break up monopolies and encourage small businesses. The opposite has been happening for years.
10:42 PM on 12/26/2011
I don't think this is accurate. Government procurement is a mess. Too many give aways to big business this is true. But the requirements for contracts to be steered through small businesses and minority owned businesses (8a firms) only introduces a third party that collects a percentage without offering significant value. The feds often require small businesses to be used as "contract vehicles" for other (usually bigger companies) to sell their wares to the government. The thing is these "contract vehicles" take a percentage and don't actually provide any value. There are some loose requirements about "value added resellers". This is basically not a real requirement and I have seen first hand that is easy to get around.

If cutting out the middle man reduces gov't spending then we should do it.

It would at least expose the fact that big companies like HP, IBM, etc all get amazing access to sell stuff to the government without real competitive bidding; small businesses only get the scraps as it is.

TL;DR: this guy's article is suspect.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bob8788
Small business owner
10:33 PM on 12/26/2011
Obama: The liberal mistake that keeps on giving.
08:13 PM on 12/26/2011
Remember how fast the banks got bailed out!

Have the Justice Department hire Elliot Spitzer NOW to head a squad of untouchables to remove any crooks he can find from government, the banks, Wall Street, Main Street or wherever they are discovered.

Produce change by getting rid of the IRS and all of it's special interest rules that kill job creation and replace it with the FAIR TAX H.R 25 S.13.

Reinstate Glass-Steagle HR 1489, repeal Gramm-Leach-Bliley, pass Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge Act HR 1148, repeal the unlimited Fannie and Freddie Christmas guarantees , audit the Fed, perhaps even eliminate the Fed, repeal Obama Care and add a real government option to compete with private insurers and care providers for patients by offering free care to everyone asking for government funded care that would be given from low cost, government operated, VA style better patient outcome, hospitals for civilians, all paid for with a national sales tax, no insurance, no copays, free period, complete birth to death healthcare including free medications, dental and eye care, this could save $1trillion annually from the $2.6trillion spent last year and prevent private health insurers and providers from bankrupting us, our businesses, all of our states and the Federal Government.

Pass Buffett Congressional Reform Law and Constitutional Amendment

Breakup all of the too big to fail institutions.

Last cut the special interest red tape that is preventing us from having drastically lower cost oil, gas, energy, food.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zbowling
software engineer, geek
02:15 AM on 12/27/2011
The solutions aren't missing. Political will is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MIVOTE
Adds wisdom to knowledge
07:25 PM on 12/26/2011
CSPTP is now a 21-year-old test program. Since it was established with the stated mission of increasing federal contracts for small businesses, the CSPTP has never been investigated for it's effectiveness...is being reinstated....and its a blow to small business...

Which makes no sense at all!
photo
Areyoukiddingg
We need a Reset
06:37 PM on 12/26/2011
Small business in the U.S. is constantly being squeezed between the lack of enforcement of laws designed to protect small biz from big predatory companies, plus since the huge companies control CON-gress, they get laws passed that are impossible for small business to comply with (and stay in business).
It's gotten much worse over the past ten years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
03:34 PM on 12/26/2011
It seems like Ron Paul has absolutely nothing on Obama as far "anti-minority" sentiments are concerned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
02:03 PM on 12/26/2011
Corruption at all levels of our government due to moneyed politics,....
01:30 PM on 12/26/2011
The first reference in the article (opinion) shows the program where a 5% requirement to award govt contracts to minorities is to be eliminated. This is the blow to small business the author speaks of? Those 5% will have to compete right along with other small business contractors. Where's the issue?

The author and commenters should read the material before they throw in their 2¢.