More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lloyd Chapman

GET UPDATES FROM Lloyd Chapman
 

President Obama's Claim About Shrinking Government is a Publicity Stunt

Posted: 01/16/12 08:20 AM ET

President Obama's latest claim that he's going to shrink government by combining the Small Business Administration with the Department of Commerce is laughable.

He called a national press conference on the subject of shrinking government to only announce that he wants to combine one of the smallest agencies in the federal government with the Department of Commerce and several other federal trade and commerce departments.

This is really absurd.

He's got to be the first president in recent history to hold a national press conference to announce only saving $3 billion dollars over 10 years -- that's only $300 million dollars a year.

If Obama really wanted to talk about shrinking government, he would talk about some of the larger agencies. The purpose of shrinking government is to reduce federal overhead while cutting out unnecessary inefficiencies. The Small Business Administration is not an unnecessary inefficiency, however. It is the only federal agency that exists to ensure that U.S. small businesses, which create 90 percent of all net new jobs in the nation, receive the 23 percent of all federal contracts congressionally mandated by the Small Business Act.

To put this issue in perspective, the $3 billion dollar savings over the next 10 years that President Obama is proposing to achieve with the consolidation of six federal trade and commerce agencies (including the SBA) is equal to only .0005 percent of the projected $6 trillion to be spent by the Pentagon over the next ten years.

Of course, I have been predicting the federal government would do this for years. On November 25, 2008 I issued a press release predicting that President Obama would attempt to close the SBA by combining it with the Department of Commerce. I made the same prediction in November 2010 and also criticized Republican efforts to attempt a similar merger in August 2011.

Here's the truth about what the President is doing:

This is a publicity stunt that diverts public attention away from a typical government trick to get rid of a federal agency -- combine the agency you don't want to keep with another department, like the Department of Commerce -- Reagan did the same thing with the Minority Business Development Agency.

The pentagon and the nation's top defense contractors have been pushing the elimination of the 23 percent federal small business contracting goal for decades; this is just the latest attempt by the corporate giants that run Washington to try to get 100 percent of all federal contracting dollars into their pockets. The federal government is the world's largest purchaser of goods and services -- eliminating the 23 percent contracting goal would be a major detriment to small businesses.

When you look at the facts, I've already seen reporters on national television referring to this $3 billion dollar cut over 10 years as 'a drop in the bucket'. Why then would President Obama hold a national press conference to announce saving a 'drop in the bucket'?

He's running for re-election, that's why. This is just a P.R. campaign.

To try to say that we're going to shrink government by combining the SBA with the Department of Commerce is an insult to the intelligence of every taxpayer in the country.

This is all about Obama trying to get re-elected and working to defeat who ever the Republican frontrunner becomes.

Unfortunately, at a time when our nation is in the midst of the worst economic downturn in 80 years, the last thing we need is to take the only agency that helps the 28 million small businesses in America create over 90 percent of all net new jobs every year and combine it with the Department of Commerce.

We should be doing just the opposite. The SBA's budget should be increased ten-fold and federal programs to help America's chief job creators should be expanded dramatically.

And this isn't the first time he's abolished federal small business contracting programs. Obama already announced several months ago plans to eliminate the oldest federal contracting plan for minority-owned small businesses -- on September 9th, 2011 the Obama administration announced plans in the federal register to end the Pentagon's 5 percent contracting goal for minority-owned small businesses.

It's a tragedy that this didn't receive more attention in the mainstream media. After all, here's the nation's first African-American president and first African-American Attorney General ending the only federal program to direct federal infrastructure spending to minority-owned small businesses.

And now he's going after more small businesses.

I hope that nobody is fooled by his little dog-and-pony show.

This is a tragedy and the truth about this will be sadly under-reported in the mainstream media. I just hope Congress doesn't let him get away with it -- and I'm going to do everything I can to stop him.

 

Follow Lloyd Chapman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LloydChapman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suddenfun
Subvert the dominant paradigm
01:45 PM on 01/25/2012
We let Bush strap a cinder block to our necks with the Dept. of Homeland Security. He played right into Osama's desire to bankrupt the US by creating a huge unaccountable agency that accomplishes little...The TSA too...we have solved the problem of terrorist takeovers of jetliners by the fact that passengers will not allow it anymore...that was done day one but we had to go and buy scanners that don't work and institute regulations that only make traveling miserable and accomplish nothing. In brutally frank terms you don't spend 13 billion dollars to prevent the next single plane crash and that is essentially what we have done. Flippin stupid as it gets...but then what should we have expected from "what me worry" Bush. Yeah he grew government like a cancer.
08:56 PM on 01/16/2012
It could be - however it's calling the bluff of the Republicans !
Are they going to agree ?

Political ploys are everywhere ! This is a good one. !
photo
aliceandthecat
the most curious thing I ever saw
04:48 PM on 01/16/2012
What a relief...I thought O was actually caving to Teapublicans, and castrating our already amputated government services. A publicity stunt! That's a load off my mind. Now I can go back to fretting over my student loans, my inadequate housing (and possible loss thereof), age discrimination (I'm past 40), my losing my Pell Grant despite being a STEM major with a 4.0 and, my personal favorite, my food insecurity.
04:26 PM on 01/16/2012
I'm not an economist or a small business owner, but one of the problems with the SBA is the definition of "small". If, in fact, this department worked for "small" businesses, then someone needs to explain why WALMART is included. The problem with the author's contrived whine is that unless the SBA actually works for "small" business, not "large by size but small by faux definition, then all this squawking will fall on deaf ears. How about instead, getting legislator's to redefine "small" by size - I'm sure the GOP House will really jump on that! HA HA!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blogging Patriot
Serf-ing the Economy
05:29 PM on 01/16/2012
I owned a networking company in DC back during Clinton. He made a big show of moving contracts to small and minority owned business. When the bidding finally opened for the desktop management contracts the minimum experience required was managing at least 50,000 seats for 5 years.

This is what they considered a small business opportunity.
03:57 PM on 01/16/2012
He is doing this because he fears Ron Paul. Where did he get the idea for shutting down Dept. of Commerce?---Ron Paul. Last Wednesday he started talking about closing bases in Germany. Where did he get that idea from?...Ron Paul. Obama is running around like a chicken with his head cut off. He can't stand it when all the young and cool people aren't voting for him! Next week he will probably end the Fed! HA-HA-HA! I LOVE IT!
photo
TheCommons
I didn't quit. You just bored me.
04:35 PM on 01/16/2012
Nobody in his right mind fears Ron Paul.
05:50 PM on 01/16/2012
Then why is he trying to appease all the Paul supporters who once voted for him? Sounds like a scaredy-cat to me!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
01:52 PM on 01/16/2012
To me, the highlight of Obama's press release was his shadowy request for increased "Executive" powers without Congressional oversight. Combining agencies was just a smokescreen. Giving or expanding Executive powers can only spell disaster when used by whom we all know to be a poor leader and by someone who has only managed to steeply raise America's debt ceiling (to the point of suspecting this of being his intent).
02:10 PM on 01/16/2012
Bush isn't still President. We have a good leader now. You must not have realized that we had an election in 2008 and got rid of the people who wrecked our economy and spent us into a debt, started two wars on false pretenses and look this country over a cliff.
photo
HR Mickelson
Watch out for 'opinion rich and fact free' info
01:42 PM on 01/16/2012
The agency that should be shrank the most is the Defense Department. Let's see what small business thinks about that!
02:13 PM on 01/16/2012
Without a defense department we have no economy left. We shipped everything else overseas along time ago. We only make death and 6 out of the richest counties in the country are filled with people who work in the defense department. With that kind of money and Citizens United, those who benefit from defense contracting will send hundreds of lobbyists to Washington and buy every Congressman, Senator, ten times over.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
01:38 PM on 01/16/2012
Maybe this is a small enough consolidation to try it out. Kind of a practice consolidation? Instead of taking on the Biggest agencies at first?

Don't know, just a thought.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
01:14 PM on 01/16/2012
With less than ten months to go till election, everything Obama does is a publicity stunt.

I read the other day that Reagan was an actor who governed like a politician, while Obama is a politician who governs like an actor. Indeed, it's like he's playing a role instead of filling it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PostRationalDissonance
02:06 PM on 01/16/2012
Our nation's citizens by and large behave like an audience. It's as if we are merely watching people play roles instead of scripting them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wesleypresley
Marxist since 1968
12:56 PM on 01/16/2012
When Republicans say shrink government what they really mean is to deny people social security and medicare. Or Republicans mean destroy agencies that make sure your food and water are safe. Republicans would never shrink the Pentagon because nothing makes a Republican happier than a new war with lots of new weapons for killing people. Small government is a Republican lie to trick people out of the wealth of their hard work.
12:37 PM on 01/16/2012
Austerity is going to be painful for everyone. If you cannot raise the Revenue than some things have got to go. President Obama is dammed if he does and dammed if he don't.
01:31 PM on 01/16/2012
"Austerity" is a myth being pushed by the elite and crammed down the throats of the less well-to-do to pay for a mess that they had absolutely nothing to do with creating. It's a shame so many people are buying it.
02:16 PM on 01/16/2012
Everyone? The top 1% of the richest 1% will never see an ounce of pain from 'austerity' measures nor will Congressmen, Senators, or any other politician. Add to that all of the Defense contractors and Wall Street Barons and your everyone is everyone who is not filthy rich and well connected in Washington.

You and me, maybe, and all of the stupid minions who will probably vote in Republicans to continue the wrecking ball policies perpetuated during the Bush years. However, don't say 'everybody' because those who make the rules will be jetting off to their villas in France as we all eat cake.
photo
undertheinfluence
POW in my own home country
12:26 PM on 01/16/2012
And the first one of the GOP contenders to jump on Obama's bandwagon was.....Perry.

"Small ideas by small minds, for small business"...a bumper sticker just waiting to happen!
11:30 AM on 01/16/2012
Combining agencies doesn't mean that the SBA will lose the contractor benefits. What are the details of the mergers? I agree that the DOD/Pentagon agencies are way too large with way too many perks and dollars that they can't even account for and I believe Obama also stated that he would be reducing their budgets as well, to the outcry of Repubs and Blue Dog Dems who drag out the "not keeping us safe" argument.
photo
undertheinfluence
POW in my own home country
12:29 PM on 01/16/2012
The GOP will tell you, Governement can't , and shouldn't do things to improve the lives of the American people. It should only protect them, by spending trilions of American taxpayer dollars on endless wars for profit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mantra
07:01 PM on 01/16/2012
and in subsidizing theoretically successful companies like Romney's Bain Capital, or bailing out the financial establishment in a most uncapitalist manner. So its Socialism for the rich and a new and creative Capitalism for the rest of us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artanis71
Colbert Super PAC unleashed in 2012
11:28 AM on 01/16/2012
"The SBA's budget should be increased ten-fold and federal programs to help America's chief job creators should be expanded dramatically." - Of course he is running for re-election and after over 3 years of every conservative yelling how Obama is massively increasing the size of government, Socialism, record number of new fed employees, etc., do you think he could increase 1 penny of funding for the SBA or even if he tried every corner of the nation the GOP would be screaming "See he increasing wasteful spending of big government"?
01:32 PM on 01/16/2012
Guys like the author of this piece are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
photo
HR Mickelson
Watch out for 'opinion rich and fact free' info
01:44 PM on 01/16/2012
I could not agree more.
01:35 PM on 01/16/2012
By "author" I meant Chapman, the so-called "small business advocate." Sounds like another bought and paid for lobbyist to me. It's not the oldest profession in the world, I don't suppose, but it's very comparable.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lloyd Chapman
President of the American Small Business League
07:29 PM on 01/16/2012
In response to comments that accuse me of being a paid lobbyist with an undisclosed agenda, I would suggest doing your homework. I have being fighting for small business rights for twenty years now to correct the injustices committed against small businesses by our political leaders-- and do you know why I advocate for small businesses? It's because they create 90 percent of all net new jobs; supporting U.S. small business is therefore akin to supporting a healthy national economy. In sum, I am not a corporate pawn, nor a lobbyist paid by corporations, affiliated with PACS or chambers of commerce, none of that. I am solely a concerned citizen working to correct a glaring, fraudulent scandal. To that effect, I founded the American Small Business League as an independent small business advocacy/watchdog organization because there is no one else in this nation who has committed themself to addressing federal small business contracting. Were small businesses to be treated justly, I think our nation's economy would be far better off than it is today.
10:49 AM on 01/16/2012
Yep! We might have known that someone would be against ANY attempt to cut big government, especially if they did not invent it themselves.