EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Lloyd Chapman

Lloyd Chapman

Posted: September 3, 2010 07:46 PM

Last Friday, as I predicted in my August 6 and August 24 Huffington Post blogs, the Obama Administration, right on queue, released the latest Small Business Administration (SBA) fiscal year (FY) 2009 Small Business Procurement Scorecard. Anyone in the media can tell you that releasing information late on a Friday afternoon is a technique used by the government when trying to bury or hide negative news, and it worked fairly well in this case. So as expected, the Obama Administration tried to bury the release of its FY 2009 small business contracting data.

The Obama Administration acknowledged it had missed the congressionally mandated 23 percent government-wide small business contracting goal, and four of five small business goals overall. However, the government did claim to award small businesses a record amount of contracts totaling over $96 billion.

So here's a question; if the Obama Administration awarded a record $96.8 billion in federal contracts to small businesses during FY 2009, then why didn't President Obama hold a White House press conference to talk about it? Or go on national television to talk about it?

Here's why. Of the more than $96 billion in federal small business contracts the Obama Administration claims to have awarded to small businesses, over half went to large corporations. A study released in June by the American Small Business League (ASBL) found that 60 of the top 100 recipients of small business contracts were actually large businesses. Some of the firms that the Obama Administration considered to be "small businesses" are: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, British Aerospace (BAE), Rolls-Royce, Raytheon, Dell Computer, General Electric, Honeywell International Corporation.

This marks the 10th consecutive year that the government has diverted most federal small business contracts to large businesses. If any journalist tries to take on the Small Business Administration, they will get the standard answer the SBA has been regurgitating for over a decade, that this is merely "computer glitches," "simple human error," "miscoding," and that the "data is as clean as it has ever been."

In the ten years that this has gone on, not a single journalist has asked the government why the error rate on that field is over a thousand times higher than any other field in the data? And why the "miscoding," "computer glitches" and "simple human errors" always report awards to large corporations as small business awards and never the other way around? Clearly the data is not clean, nor is this issue attributable to simple human error, miscoding, or computer glitches.

In 2005, the SBA Inspector General found large corporations had received billions of dollars in federal small business contracts illegally through "false certifications" and "improper certifications." The same year, the SBA Office of Advocacy released a report that found that large corporations had received small business contracts through "vendor deception." These are all synonyms for felony contracting fraud.

So it appears that despite President Obama's campaign promises to end business as usual in Washington and provide "Change We Can Believe In," he has clearly decided to continue the Bush Administration policy of cheating small businesses out of billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts.

Since 2003, more than a dozen federal investigations have uncovered the diversion of federal small business contracts to large corporations. In Report 5-15 the SBA's own inspector general referred to the issue as, "One of the largest challenges facing the Small Business Administration and the entire federal government today." President Obama even seemed to recognize the severity of the situation when he said, "It is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporation giants."

Directing existing federal infrastructure spending to the 27 million small businesses where most American's work is our single best hope of avoiding a double dip recession. Cleaning up fraud and abuse in federal small business contracting programs is a necessary and important first step.

Unfortunately, the late-Friday afternoon release of the Small Business Procurement Scorecard seems to be a clear indication that President Obama is not the man we hoped he would be, and that he is willing to let America slide into a crippling double dip recession before he will stop the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants.

 

Follow Lloyd Chapman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LloydChapman

 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PinkFloydsDr
11:45 AM on 09/07/2010
Out news is filled with stories of financial corruption in Afganistan and China and many other places. But here is just one example of our own style of American financial corruption­. Remorseles­s, unfettered capitalism taking anything and everything it can get away with seems to be the american way of business. Unbury this story and shine a spotlight on it. Im usually a solid Obama supporter, but all presidenti­al administra­tions must be held to account for the actions taken in their name. Popular or unpopular makes no difference
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThePeoplesKey
Writer/General Disreputable Rogue
08:57 PM on 09/03/2010
Yep. Business as usual. I hate it when a writer prefaces their title to a piece with, "It's Time . . ." So I always try to avoid it in my writing. However, it's pretty obvious at this point that we will once again watch another four years go by with little or nothing changing in DC. Oh, yeah, we got the health care bill that isn't and the financial reform bill that isn't, and a dozen other things that aren't. At the end of the day (Term) it's almost a certainty now that government as we know it will be pretty much the same as government as we knew it. I'm running out of four year chunks of time to benefit from any "change" that might happen in my lifetime. And I don't hold out much hope for the kids and grand kids anymore either. They're pretty much disengaged no matter how much I nag them not to be. The fact is, I've lived my entire working life under bad government policy and like many others my age, I'm looking forward to NOT having anything to retire on because I keep losing what little I've managed to save every time the economy goes into recession. So I'm thinking maybe "It's Time" we tear it down and start over. You know, "For the kids sake." After all, probably at least half the population my age doesn't have anything left to lose that isn't already gone anyway . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seventhrama
Retired health educator/Ponderer of the Universe
09:56 PM on 09/03/2010
How easily we forget who and what we are. Granted you are frustrated­, but there are only a few ways you can completely tear down a government that is over two centuries old, and none of them are pleasant. I believe it would be more efficient if you got as many like-minde­d people like yourself and vote in the November elections. Change is the only constant in the universe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThePeoplesKey
Writer/General Disreputable Rogue
11:36 PM on 09/04/2010
I've voted in every local and national election since 1976 my friend. Take a look about you to see how that worked out. Let's not forget that at the founding of the US, we defeated a government that was over a thousand years old against all odds. Same with the French. Our government is starting to resemble Mexico more and more as each day goes by. We just have more money. And in realty, we don't even have more money. We have paper bills that represent an illusion of wealth backed by a very lethal military force that's used in a way that's clearly contrary to providing for the nation's "defense" as the Constituti­on grants. The 64 trillion dollar question is; would our soldiers kill their own friends and neighbors if asked by our leaders? And to what end? We can't even reward them with a job and a middle class lifestyle any more when they put away their weapons and come home. What do you think their reward would be for defeating their fellow citizens? A place at the table with Loyd and Jamie? They'd be lucky to be thrown a bone if recent history is any example. Back slapping, fake accolades, and parades, don't put food on the table in the US. Who will convince them? Probably not your vote sad to say.
04:07 AM on 09/04/2010
"I've lived my entire working life under bad government policy " And what have you done about it besides posting your rant on a blog? Democracy requires, demands, action by an educated populace. If all you did was complain then of course you got policies you didn't like. But also remember just because you didn't like the policies enacted doesn't mean our Democracy didn't work. Not getting what YOU want is a consequenc­e of Democracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThePeoplesKey
Writer/General Disreputable Rogue
11:06 PM on 09/04/2010
Lofty. You assume a lot friend. And you know what assuming makes out of you? Let's just take the last presidenti­al election as an example. I voted for what I was told would be change. An end to the status quo in DC. Remember? If you call what's been going on change, then not only are you an a$$, you're also deaf, and blind . . .
10:22 AM on 09/05/2010
The two greatest obstacles to democracy in the United States are, first, the widespread delusion among the poor that we have a democracy, and second, the chronic terror among the rich, lest we get it. [1941] E. Dowlin