Miss USA - No Crowning Achievement for Same-Sex Marriage

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

When the world seems to be teetering on the brink of one disaster or another on a daily basis, it seems silly to bother myself with the fate of Miss California, Carrie Prejean. But here I am, having lots of feelings about what has happened since the night she became first runner-up in the Miss USA pageant.

As most people know by now, on April 19th, Miss (using "Ms." In this case seems somehow...wrong), Prejean lost the title of Miss USA to Miss North Carolina, Kristen Dalton. Some believe Prejean's loss, at least in part, was precipitated by her answer to a question posed by Perez Hilton. He wanted to know if she believed the rest of America should follow Vermont's example and legalize gay marriage. The young woman, a picture perfect example of what we all imagine an American beauty pageant winner looks like (or at least did look like in the 1950's -- wavy tresses of golden hair, sun-kissed skin and blinding white teeth), stumbled for a few moments, " In my country..." she stammered, then regained her composure, and continued, "in my family, I think...that I believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman." She quickly went on to say that she meant no offense to anyone, but that's how she was raised and it is what she believes.

That night, immediately following the pageant, Mr. (now here's a place where "Ms." seems slightly more appropriate) Hilton, video blogged a scathing commentary on her answer. He called Prejean a "dumb bitch" and went on to recite what he thought she should have said. He believes that the answer she gave was one that inspired division, not unity, and that is the reason he was thrilled she did not take the crown. Apparently her stand against same-sex marriage had nothing to do with it.

I propose that Mr. Perez's question inspired division, not Miss Prejean's response; not to mention that referring to her as a "dumb bitch" didn't exactly win over anyone who was already sure that same-sex marriage would be the death of us all.

Subsequent to that evening, there's been a lot of hoopla about the Miss California organization paying for Prejean's breast augmentation, and some photos of her modeling panties, covering her top half with her arms. Some are even calling for her to be stripped of her state crown. The sudden interest in these technicalities of pageant business must be seen in light of her controversial response to Hilton's question. If she had given the "correct" answer, would anyone be gunning for her like this?

Once again, I find myself rooting for the "other team" -- and I don't mean gays and lesbians. I adamantly disagree with Miss Prejean, but she was asked her opinion, and she gave it. I believe, in my heart and soul that same-sex marriage is where we are heading. It's a matter of equal rights under the law, and will, I believe, eventually be battled out, and won, in the courts if it doesn't get worked out at the ballot box. Miss California's argument against same sex marriage, and my argument for it are, ultimately, immaterial. Thank god, in "my country," we have a Constitution, and a Bill of Rights and eventually, although sometimes inelegantly, we get to the fair and just answers to such questions. But on our way there, don't we all deserve to say our peace without fear of reprisal? Prejean did not attack homosexuality; she was not violent or cruel. She simply stated what she believed, and only after she was asked.

I would tell Miss Prejean, if she were interested, that her answer was imprudent -- not because it goes against what is good and decent, but because, once you alienate gay men, who, besides other pageant participants, a few little girls and Donald Trump, really finds beauty pageants relevant anyway? The entire conceit of Miss... anything, in this day and age, is a bit of an anachronism. I know, I know, the winner gets a scholarship...blah, blah, blah...and I'm sure I'll get lots of flack for saying it, but asking women who are being judged largely for swanning around in swimsuits and evening gowns, their opinions on burning social topics of the day is a bit like requiring your dental hygienist to hold a degree in medicine.

So, why don't we all take it down a notch? Perez, how about sticking to questions like, "If you had a super power, what would it be?" and Miss Prejean, please don't become the poster girl for "opposite marriage." Miss USA should beautiful, poised and, above all, agreeable.

Then again, maybe I've got this all wrong. Perez Hilton will be invited back to judge next year and the pageant will be a ratings winner when people tune in to see what he'll say. Carrie Prejean will be the next superstar Fox commentator and get her own show. The ugly business of beauty pageants will continue, and the wheels of justice will grind slow, to their fine, and inevitable destination.

 
Comments
9
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- jalowe1957 I'm a Fan of jalowe1957 41 fans permalink
photo

Carrie Beljean: Coming soon to a Hooter's near you...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 05/26/2009
photo

My favorite t-shirt at gay pride last year was "If gays are allowed to marry, who will blow your husband?"

Thanks for the great article.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 05/19/2009

I'm always amazed with the ingenuity of the media machine's ability to turn anything and everything into something it's really not. Much ado about nothing in my opinion, but as you point out, news makes news or news has to be created. Anyone and everyone can be a star for a moment or 10 and people can get their own shows, and non-news can do the same. Who cares really. Someone I guess, because ratings must be the indicator and they show someone's watching. it played out beautifully during the election campaigns in the form of Sarah Palin when every move she made seemed to be news. Now she's making a lot of money writing a book (or is she?) which is no doubt part of her strategy as she prepares to launch her next campaign. YIKES!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 05/18/2009

I don't think it is nearly as disturbing that Miss Prejean had a personal opinion about same sex marriage that is different than mine or that Mr. Hilton (who is a self parody) is having more than his 15 minutes. What bothers me is that in the era we still are agrandizing plastic beauty icons. What happened to breaking down the stereotypes in our post-Obama culture.
Does anyone else see the similarity between baseball players pumped up on steroids and pagent contestants pumped up on silicone and collagen. It's all done for the marketers and the pursuit of the holy dollar. We sell our souls and we end up with inflated derivatives markets, inflated home run totals and inflated breasts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 05/18/2009
photo

Um, maybe the photos are "technicalities," but it's my understanding that she HAS violated other contractual obligations by not bothering to show up at things she was scheduled for, which is, presumably, the main "duty" of Miss... anything, as well as actively getting involved in political activities (the so-called "National Organization for Marriage")

Actually, she's getting PREFERENTIAL treatment because of her stance and religion. If everything were exactly the same, and she'd given a pro-gay marriage answer, she would have been dethroned.

I'd also like to point out something that I haven't seen remarked on anywhere. Like a good little Republican, St. Carrie of La Hoya is attempting to rewrite history. Her original answer wasn't any kind of principled stand, witnessing to the heathens in the audience. She didn't even mention her religion. In fact, with the "it's the way I was raised," and the timid, whimpery little "I don't want to offend anyone," she almost seemed to be APOLOGIZING for her opinion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 05/16/2009
photo

And the other point that hasn't been mentioned is that she didn't answer the question, which was, "Do you think other states should follow Vermont and Iowa in allowing same sex marriage?" At that point she could have simply answered that it should be up to the voters of the state, such as in California, Florida, Arizona, etc., Or that Government at any level should stay the hell out of people's bedrooms, in nicer terms, of course.
That way she could have avoided any real controversy. BTW, I had Ms. Arizona ahead of her on points long before they got to that stage and Kristen Dalton was definitely the best in show and deserved the win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 AM on 05/17/2009
- mollymac I'm a Fan of mollymac 15 fans permalink

La Jolla.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 AM on 05/20/2009
- thebigbike I'm a Fan of thebigbike 2 fans permalink

Except for perez hilton, I haven't run across anything that would count as an "assault" verbal or otherwise on ms prejean. could someone give me some citations or blog spots or something? all of what i've read -- if critical of ms prejean-- has been in the "more in sorrw than in anger vein" or ore commonly in defense of her right to state her opinon. however as we know from right wing tv and radio,stating one's opinions in a public forum can lead to vociferous opposition.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 05/15/2009

why this nonstop assault on a young girl who offered her opinion in response to a question?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 05/15/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect