iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lorraine Devon Wilke

GET UPDATES FROM Lorraine Devon Wilke
 

Nuns Gone Rogue

Posted: 08/14/2012 5:20 pm

How do you solve a problem like Maria?
How do you catch a cloud and pin it down?
How do you find a word that means Maria?
A flibbertijibbet! A will-o'-the wisp! A clown!

Remember "Maria," that unforgettable ditty from "The Sound of Music" sung by a bevy of cloistered nuns in response to the very un-nunlike antics of the irrepressible Maria? That song popped into my head recently, some time after reading copious copy on the shenanigans of those rogue nuns of the Leadership Conference of the Women Religious; got me imagining Cardinal Levada and the Vatican Bishops all singing along, keeping step with some peppy papal choreography: "she'll outpester any pest..."

2012-08-14-IMG_2988.JPG

Anyway, as I followed this head-shaking story, I found myself, once again, incredulous at why another religion has made it their focus to publicly push not only against a more inclusive view of humanity, but the inexorable evolution of cultural thinking. Their clear and desperate need to NOT change has left the Catholic Church wheezing on weary air, losing its youth in droves, and perpetuating a brand seen as antiquated, patriarchal and intolerant, rather than one that's contemporary, vibrant and eager to embrace the widest possible definition of compassion. It must be exhausting to be so convinced of one's doctrine that you'd sacrifice your very best and brightest (that'd be the nuns) for a status quo that's on the wrong side of history.

This from Laurie Goodstein's NY Times article on the topic:

The Vatican's "doctrinal assessment," issued in April, accused the nuns of a host of transgressions, including featuring speakers at conferences who did not adhere sufficiently to Catholic beliefs, advancing "radical feminist themes," permitting "corporate dissent" on church teachings against birth control and homosexuality, and being silent in the church's fight against abortion and same-sex marriage while pouring energy into working for the poor and disenfranchised.

Let's look at that last line again: "...pouring energy into working for the poor and disenfranchised" -- instead of putting their efforts into proactively upholding a regressive doctrine of intolerance towards women and gays. What in God's name (literally) were they thinking?!

The bigger question is: What is the Vatican thinking?

How they're thinking is clearer: like the mostly old, systemically sexist and deeply out-of-touch men who run the Church think. But frankly, thinking as a practice is not particularly applauded in the Catholic Church. One is simply expected to adhere, ask as few questions as possible, debate fewer, and accept dogma as a "matter of faith," rather than digging deeper toward logic, compassion and greater understanding. In Judy Woodruff's interview on PBS NewsHour with Christendom College's Donna Bethell and Jeannine Hill Fletcher, a theology teacher from Fordham University, that point was made clear. Despite Ms. Hill Fletcher's assertion that Vatican II proved the Church capable of change, Ms. Bethell, Chairman of the Board of Directors at Christendom, countered that the nuns in question are expected to be "fully on board" with Church doctrine, adding that "there are doctrines of the Church that are not open for debate." Not hard to figure which ones!

OK, here's a random analogy: remember when you were dating and despite the various shortcomings of your beloved you were absolutely convinced they would change for the better? Then life taught you they usually don't and you wisely learned to choose and accept a person for exactly who they were with no expectation of change. If they met your criteria, great; if not, best to move along. Let's frame this fracas with the Women Religious vs. the Vatican in a similar light:

The Catholic Church is no secret. There can be no one involved who doesn't know what they're about, what they teach, their official stance on homosexuality, same-sex marriage, women's reproductive rights, abortion, euthanasia, even the advancement of women in the Church. It's all painfully clear and there's no doubt what you're getting into. So if you do sign-up, you should be "fully on board." If you're not, move along. Yet, like the gooey-eye girl convinced that the rigid, intolerant, homophobic guy she loves will ultimately change into someone more admirable, the nuns, and other liberal thinkers like them, seem to be operating on the basis that the Catholic Church will change into that contemporary, vibrant organization eager to embrace the widest possible definition of compassion.

That's not going to happen. They won't. Forget Vatican II, forget any hope stirred by the occasional free-thinking priest; forget human evolution, modern issues, the historical shift toward greater acceptance of all people. Forget the fact that Jesus sat with prostitutes, cared for lepers, and told us to love one another as we love ourselves. Ignore the fact that biblical comments on homosexuality are cherry-picked while others supporting slavery, sleeping with your brother's wife or eschewing shellfish are ignored. None of that matters. They're not going to change. Ever.

2012-08-14-IMG_3448.JPGSo since the Catholic Church is not going to change, unless one is fully on board, there's no reason to be there. In fact, to stay implies agreement with its doctrines, agreement with its worldview, agreement to BE Catholic in the fullest sense of the word. If, instead, you believe in equal rights for the LGBT community, rights of women to choose and have access to reproductive healthcare; rights of women to be honored and respected in positions of leadership as priests within the church, then you are NOT a Catholic and not in the right place. And as we learned with that unchanging paramour, that's the time to move on.

I'm with the nuns and their enlightened focus on social justice, civil rights and catholic thinking. (Did you know that Catholic -- with the upper case C -- means "of or relating to or supporting the Roman Catholic Church" but lower case catholic means "of broad or liberal scope"? I find that truly ironic.) But they did sign-on to be Catholics with the upper case C and that comes with expectation and limit, the kind that stymies the scope of their mission statement. Therefore, they would be better served by leaving and joining -- even starting -- a religious movement that embraces and supports their efforts. Others have done it throughout history and it seems time to do it again.

Please do, Women Religious. We need your vital energy and compassionate service. Don't let the Vatican disempower you with doctrine; find a way to carry on with dignity. The world needs you -- unfettered.

Photographs by Lorraine Devon Wilke: www.lorrainedevonwilke.com

 

Follow Lorraine Devon Wilke on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LorraineDWilke

FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:08 AM on 08/16/2012
Great article. Your very best to date...
06:32 PM on 08/15/2012
Hi, I saw your article after I had just finished posting my own version of basically the same thing you were say. I couldn't agree more with you. May be time to let the sleeping dog lie, and move on and use that energy towards something that is more supportive. Here is the link to my article.
http://loveliveandlaugh.com/go-girls-stand-man-nuns-challenge-vatican/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
04:01 PM on 08/15/2012
I absolutely love what these "rogue" nuns are doing. "Nuns on the Bus" gives me reason to hope for Catholic women everywhere. Thankyou LDW for a most wonderful blog. You nailed it!
photo
TimFredrickson
Klaatu Barada Nikto
03:21 PM on 08/15/2012
Apologies to Pink Floyd:
"Hey Pope, Leave those Nuns alone...."
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
01:38 AM on 08/15/2012
The Vatican doesn't think. It is a cloistered little world with no grasp on reality at all. Their ignorance and denial reach the level of psychosis.
09:55 PM on 08/14/2012
Why stay Catholic, if you are progressive and liberal and a woman? It might not be a persuasive reason for many, but some of us stay because (1) we believe in the mystery of God at work in history and in the Church, eventually bringing good from very fallible people which includes the hierarchy as well as the rest of us, and (2) why should I leave? It is my Church too, and I happen to sincerely believe that the leadership is on a distorted, sinful path. Of course, they hold much power...and that means the story could end badly in the short term (ref: what happened to Jesus, to Joan of Arc, etc).. But that brings us back to point (1) -- this is ultimately about seeking to know and love God as revealed in the person and life of Jesus. It is NOT about the Vatican, even if they think so.
Anyway, one woman' opinion. It is a tough place to be.
10:39 PM on 08/14/2012
The Episcopal Church welcomes you.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
01:39 AM on 08/15/2012
Some women feel called to try to save the church from itself. I wish them luck.
photo
TimFredrickson
Klaatu Barada Nikto
03:22 PM on 08/15/2012
Some of those women are now classified as martyrs.
09:36 PM on 08/14/2012
I would say I am not leaving..you are..if you are involved in any of the scandals, coverups, bullying, etc. The law is going to file down some of the fangs on some of the bullies. I do like the idea of choreographing people...I have wondered though why you never see a nun in overly fashionable clothing..don't see me in it either..but the bishops etc., as so many have commented, are like peacocks. We have to get the nuns some prettier clothes I think..maybe they could borrow some from their overseers. And I have been reading up on the words of the late (as in murdered) John Paul I..I am not sure he said this or someone did..but someone in high authority said part of the problem with the whole abuse situation is that some men are actually attracted to the dressing up and the particular clothing extravagances. Like fetish. Creepy but it rings a bell. Hope it is not true and I am sure most of them have to be dragged kicking and screaming into some of their outfits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nunsuch
History professor and Catholic feminist
09:13 PM on 08/14/2012
Once again, a story about professional, 21st-century women is illustrated with totally inappropriate, elderly nuns in full habits that LCWR sisters haven't worn in half a century. WHY?? Makes NO sense, and is not funny, either. Would you illustrate a story about progressive, African-American women with Aunt Jemima?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lorraine Devon Wilke
Writer, photographer; rock & roll vet
10:43 PM on 08/14/2012
Those are both contemporary photographs taken of contemporary nuns. They may not be the nuns of the LCWR, but the images are being used to illustrate a story about nuns. Some nuns wear habits, some do not. Clearly what clothes they wear is not even close to the core issue of the story and your comparison to Aunt Jemima is offensive and completely off the mark.

I'd suggest you focus on the points being made, agree or disagree, but given how much about this story is insulting and diminishing to the women involved, to fabricate faux insult where none exists does them a disservice.
photo
TimFredrickson
Klaatu Barada Nikto
03:24 PM on 08/15/2012
Lorraine, Love your stuff. Insightful and thoughtful as ever.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nunsuch
History professor and Catholic feminist
10:29 PM on 08/15/2012
How many sisters have you actually talked with about these issues, Lorraine? The very many I know and have discusses this matter with ARE disgusted with the misleading stereotypes.
08:42 PM on 08/14/2012
then i'd call back the singing nun , to ans. the problem of maria ......
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Rastrelli
08:06 PM on 08/14/2012
This is a fantastic post. Well said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dave377
07:49 PM on 08/14/2012
Wow, Lorraine. You pretty much said it all. Frankly put.

IMHO In their current mentality they wouldn't accept Christ either were they to discover him ministering to today's sinners. Dogma & hierachy apparently trump love for fellow man & openness to the promptings of the spirit.
07:33 PM on 08/14/2012
What are they (the Catholic hierarchy) thinking?

The believe modernity, the culture of Western Europe and the American liberal urban-coastal upper middle class, is a short-lived historical anomaly. They assume that aging indigenous populations will soon die off because their feminist women refuse to breed, and will be replaced by healthy, young immigrant breeding stock from traditional cultures in the Global South.

Then it will be back to business as usual: traditional male-headed families, where there’s always room for another little one at the table, deferring to the priest and sending their brightest lads to seminary. The picture is one of a wealthy peasantry—materially well-off, but still a socially conservative peasantry that maintains traditional “family values.”

All empirical data suggests that this isn’t going to happen. When the material conditions of people’s lives improve, when have access to technology, decent government and education, which the Catholic Church wants for them, they embrace modernity. Birthrates drop, women enter the labor force and demand equality, the population rejects “family values”—and religious institutions that support them. This is happening in the Global South and amongst 2nd and 3rd generations of immigrants.
06:05 PM on 08/14/2012
Well written article about the antiquated and surely ridiculous views still held by the Catholic Church.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
03:52 PM on 08/15/2012
x2 and FF