Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lorraine Devon Wilke

GET UPDATES FROM Lorraine Devon Wilke
 

No, Virginia, There's No War on Christmas

Posted: 12/09/11 09:33 AM ET

Write that down a few hundred times. Say it out loud a few times more. This is important, Virginia, because some would have you believe if you say something often enough and loud enough it becomes truth so -- just in case the theory holds -- let's be sure what we're repeating is actually true.

THERE'S NO WAR ON RELIGION.

THERE'S NO WAR ON CHRISTMAS.

Snopes.com would put a big red FALSE all over it because... it's all made up.

Amazing, isn't it? Because if you did a search on "war on religion" or "war on Christmas," you'd be bombarded with all sorts of links and most would come from the radio stations, periodicals and cable news networks favored by Right Wing Fundamentalist Christians. You remember them, the ones who believe God is a Republican? They're baa-ack.

I'm pretty sure I disabused you of the God-partisanship notion by way of my appropriately titled article: God is Not a Republican published earlier this year. Let's see if we can shine some equally needed clarity on this latest kerfluffle.

People hate change. Hate it. Change-hate is endemic, likely caused by some evolutionary hiccup that suggests change means death while the status quo equates security. Silly, toddler-oriented stuff but we grownups are expected to transcend this developmental stutter to realize change can actually be a boon, or, at the very least, an inevitable fact of life over which we have little control and no choice but to accept and adjust accordingly. But still, we hate it.

So let's go back to the starting point on all this. The inciting incident behind the United States was the fierce and zealous quest for religious freedom. Back in the old Commonwealth there was far too much ungodly micro-management followed by various forms of death and destruction, rampant pillaging and the wanton decimation of perfectly good statuary, all leading to the burning desire of the religiously uncooperative to get the hell out. The plan was to carve out an existence in the new country based on the pure and simple logic of freedom... well, that and Manifest Destiny and its messy imperialistic annihilation of the Native People but that's another article.

Given the religious freedom mandate, it was incumbent upon the Founding Fathers to get it right. Hence, as they were drawing up the business plan for America commonly known as the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, they were generous with the freedom verbiage, resulting in the essential and oft-cited First Amendment.

In a particularly clear and cogent analysis, the Anti-Defamation League put it this way:

Separation: Good for Government, Good for Religion

The right to freedom of religion is so central to American democracy that it was enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution along with other fundamental rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

In order to guarantee an atmosphere of absolute religious liberty, this country's founders also mandated the strict separation of church and state. Largely because of this prohibition against government regulation or endorsement of religion, diverse faiths have flourished and thrived in America since the founding of the republic. Indeed, James Madison, the father of the United States Constitution, once observed that "the [religious] devotion of the people has been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the state."

Americans are still among the most religious people in the world. Yet the government plays almost no role in promoting, endorsing or funding religious institutions or religious beliefs. Free from government control -- and without government assistance -- religious values, literature, traditions and holidays permeate the lives of our citizens and, in their diverse ways, form an integral part of our national culture. By maintaining the wall separating church and state, we can guarantee the continued vitality of religion in American life.

Yes, by maintaining religious neutrality in taxpayer-financed environments like public schools and government buildings, we are doing just that: showing respect to all religions by disallowing the religious display of any one at the exclusion of others.

The "war on religion" crowd might argue, "the United States is a Christian country" but history would beg to differ. Conservative columnist and author Richard Brookhiser, who has written prolifically on the history of America, was quoted in the New York Times article How Christian Were the Founders?:

I don't think the Founders would have said they were applying Christian principles to government. What they said was "the laws of nature and nature's God." They didn't say 'We put our faith in Jesus Christ."

That same article states:

"...the founders were rooted in Christianity -- they were inheritors of the entire European Christian tradition -- and at the same time they were steeped in an Enlightenment rationalism that was, if not opposed to religion, determined to establish separate spheres for faith and reason."

In other words, the Founding Fathers did not build a Christian government, they built a government that deigned religion a separate and private matter. And while Christianity may still be the statistical frontrunner amongst American religions, its numbers have greatly diminished as our country grows more and more diverse (even Right leaning Fox News wrote on the topic in Where Have All the Christians Gone?). Not a bad thing, but certainly change.

And here's where we loop back to the "people hate change" part.

All this diversity and cultural evolution with its expectation that we embrace new religions, accept that not everyone believes in a Christian God or wants a crucifix on the courthouse lawn, is utterly exhausting to the status quo. They see it as a denouncement rather than an evolution. They're not hard-wired to openly embrace other beliefs; they're hardwired to circle the wagons, declare their dominance, convert, proselytize, convince; close their eyes to shifting demographics. So inevitable and unavoidable change is not only a bad thing, it's...war.

When the government shows its respect for all religion by adhering to the Constitutional decree to keep government space free from depictions of any one religion over another, it's war. When terms like "Christmas" are eschewed in lieu of "holiday" out of respect for those who don't celebrate the Christian event, it's war. When "Jesus" or "God" references are removed from political speeches or declarations out of respect for those who do not believe in Jesus or God, it's war. And when Christian prayer is not allowed in public schools out of respect for those who are not Christian, oh yeah... it's war.

But tell me, Governor Perry, when you talk about "prayer in school," do you mean all prayer? Would you object to Muslims pulling out prayer rugs and bowing to Mecca? Jews opening their Torah and chanting during lunch hour? Would you mind a Native American prayer dance, a Sikh kirtan, or a New Age affirmation litany?

What you mean, Governor Perry, is you want the prayers of one religion, your religion to be allowed. You want the verbiage, customs, traditions and beliefs of one religion, your religion, to be vaunted over all others because you and those who think like you believe this country belongs to your religion.

It doesn't.

It belongs to all of us. Our Founding Fathers insured that we are all blessedly free to practice whatever religion we chose or no religion at all. We are free from expressions of religions we don't espouse being enforced upon us in places and environments funded by our taxes. We'd be wise to keep the question of religion out of elections, understand that ethics and honor are independent of religion, and accept that no religion trumps another.

That's not war, Virginia, that's wisdom. Write that down a hundred times.

And have a really happy... Christmas Holiday!

 

Follow Lorraine Devon Wilke on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LorraineDWilke

 
 
  • Comments
  • 127
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
06:36 PM on 12/23/2011
Tell us oh sage of the ages, what else is true or false? We got us a menorah on the white house lawn. How about a nativity scene? Or is that against the leftist truth?
11:19 PM on 12/12/2011
As Perry's numbers plumett, he becomes more agressive and outrageous. What a hypocrit, he is. I don't think he believes in anything, but Rick Perry's career. We all know he holds the record for executions and wants young kids to be able to get the death penalty. He'd better start praying. Powerful piece, Lorraine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnyraindog
Hi Mom!
10:52 PM on 12/09/2011
The whole founding fathers formed a christian nation nonsense has been debunked too many times to count by historians and political thinkers of all stripes.George Will ,certainly no liberal, wrote a nice little essay taking the becks and others that have been pushing this notion to task.This would be where Newt loses any claim to respect as a historian he knows better but recently has been trying to make this argument to pander to the republican evangelical part of the base.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:19 PM on 12/09/2011
"The inciting incident behind the United States was the fierce and zealous quest for religious freedom. Back in the old Commonwealth there was far too much ungodly micro-management followed by various forms of death and destruction, rampant pillaging and the wanton decimation of perfectly good statuary, all leading to the burning desire of the religiously uncooperative to get the hell out."

Yes. And as a result, July 4th - or 4 July, as we call it - is a major holiday here in Britain. It's when offer prayers of thanks and celebrate getting rid of you lot. Ot's not much publicised, the British being so polite and all.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dan Bimrose
a liberal
09:45 PM on 12/09/2011
I could not have said it better myself. Well done!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markpkessinger
09:38 PM on 12/09/2011
Some of us are old enough to remember when the use of the phrase "Happy Holidays" began to be used more widely. It was never, as FOX and the rabid right would have folks believe, any kind of conspiracy emanating from the left. On the contrary, it was a practice that started in the late '70s among retail merchants and business owners, who wanted to find a way to celebrate (or is that exploit) the Christian holiday season but without needlessly alienating non-Christian customers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnyraindog
Hi Mom!
10:46 PM on 12/09/2011
That and the fact that you were refering to Xmas eve, new years eve and new years day.
10:53 PM on 12/10/2011
Excellent point!
08:11 PM on 12/09/2011
Brava, Lorraine! Pitch-perfect!
06:31 PM on 12/09/2011
Egypt: Mobs beat Coptic Christians in the street, burn churches

India: Mobs attack Christians in the street, burn churches

Nigeria: Muslims and Christians attack each other, burn each others' places of worship.

USA: Government does not allow any one religion to use public schools to proselytize or to impose religious practices on others or to use "religion" as an excuse to discriminate

"Help! Help! We're being oppressed!"
05:57 PM on 12/09/2011
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or promoting the free exercise thereof" That is what the constitution says about freedom of religion, nothing else. Putting christmas symbols on public property in no way contradictory to that phrase. since 83% of the Americans are Christian, of course they're should be more money spent on Christmas symbols than others
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markpkessinger
09:30 PM on 12/09/2011
The Supreme Court has pretty consistently disagreed with you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jamie R
09:57 PM on 12/09/2011
As usual, the devil (no pun intended) is in the details. Clearly, having a teacher begin each day with a Christian prayer is proscribed. But what about a group of students who get together on school property with a faculty sponsor to read the Bible after school is out? Some would say such behavior is proscribed, others would say it's OK. That's where the courts come in. They get to decide on the specifics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Milburn
You can't fix stupid...but you can elect it.
05:26 PM on 12/09/2011
Truth to power. You go, girl!
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
05:18 PM on 12/09/2011
Well, "christian" prayer IS allowed in school. just not led by or performed under the auspices of the school. just not interrupting the schedule of the school. As the old cliche has it, "as long as there are math tests, there will be prayer in school " ( bet I'm not even the first to say that in these comments)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guardian Weasel
reared on a diet of prejudice and misinformation
05:03 PM on 12/09/2011
Thank you, Lorraine, for speaking the truth to those who refuse to listen to it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Claude Hosch
A single bracelet does not jingle
04:44 PM on 12/09/2011
MS. WILKE, THATS NOT FAIR!. You asked Mr. Perry more than one question at a time. lol
IMOPINIONH8D
because I want it empty...
04:36 PM on 12/09/2011
If there was a war on Christmas why do we get a paid holiday for it? I wish the other religions would get their religious leaders birthday turned into a federal holiday I could use the time off.
04:22 PM on 12/09/2011
No Ma'am, it turns out that the Religious Right is VEHEMENTLY anti-prayer in schools when that prayer is addressed to Allah. We have many Somalis in Minneapolis, and our local rabid Family Values columnist couldn't write enough words against them praying at the local community college or having prayers at a local charter school. The truth of the matter is that Christmas was outlawed in many states up until the 30s in some locations.