iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lou Leonard

GET UPDATES FROM Lou Leonard
 

Losing the Top of the World: Breaking the Arctic Sea Ice One Record at a Time

Posted: 09/21/2012 5:57 pm

In our world of information overload, we get used to hearing of records being broken. Even so, some moments stand out: Usain Bolt smashing the 100-meter dash record in Beijing, despite easing up before the finish. In 1998, Mark McGuire hitting 70 home runs to crush Roger Maris' nearly forty-year-old record of 61 in a season. We remember these moments because breaking the record seemed to signal the beginning of a new era. You could tell something had really changed.

In 2007, the scientists who make their living studying Arctic ice were stunned. That year the sea ice plummeted to a new record - 23% less than the previous low point. The bottom had fallen out of earlier projections of the speed and extent of Arctic sea ice loss. That 2007 record was one of the key global warnings that catapulted climate change into the public imagination. It was a game changer.

Three weeks ago scientists and climate-watchers were buzzing again with news: the startling 2007 record had itself been broken. I wrote about it then. But at that time, we only knew that a game-changing record had been broken. We didn't know whether the new record itself would be game-changing. Now we do.

Since the 2007 record was surpassed in late August, Arctic ice levels have been dropping, and dropping and dropping. Due to a combination of warmer water, warmer air and strong winds, Arctic sea levels dropped almost another 20% in 20 days. This is an area the size of Texas - lost in three weeks. When the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) finally determined that we'd reached bottom for this year, sea ice levels were 50% below the average from 1979-2000.

As in 2007, this new record demonstrates a significant shift in our expectations for the speed at which the Arctic is disappearing. As NSIDC Director Mark Serreze said, "We are now in uncharted territory." Just a few years ago scientists were projecting summer sea ice would remain in the Arctic through mid-century or even until 2100. Now some scientists are saying the Arctic could be ice-free in the summer within two or three years.

The disappearing sea ice not only has major implications for the Arctic ecosystem itself, but scientists now believe that these changes influence weather throughout the Northern Hemisphere. The strength and trajectory of the jet stream is affected by the temperature difference between the Arctic, north of the jet stream, and the areas south of it. The greater the temperature difference, the stronger the jet stream. As that difference decreases, thanks to a warming Arctic, the jet stream tends to weaken and to wobble, introducing more north-south waves into the usual east-west trajectory of the stream. A weaker and wobblier jet stream means that weather systems tend to linger, producing more extreme events like droughts, heat waves and floods. And a winter wobble can also produce unusually heavy snow storms in unusual places, such as Washington DC's so-called "snowmageddon" in 2010.

So when we look closer, many of the record-breaking weather events we've witnessed in recent years - from heat waves to droughts to the disappearing Arctic sea ice - are not isolated, but connected. And in this new era of extremes, we aren't just breaking records. By continuing to pour carbon pollution into the atmosphere we are rewriting the rulebook for the future of life on Earth.

 
FOLLOW GREEN
In our world of information overload, we get used to hearing of records being broken. Even so, some moments stand out: Usain Bolt smashing the 100-meter dash record in Beijing, despite easing up befor...
In our world of information overload, we get used to hearing of records being broken. Even so, some moments stand out: Usain Bolt smashing the 100-meter dash record in Beijing, despite easing up befor...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:57 PM on 09/23/2012
As bad as drilling for oil, fracking for methane is nuts. CH4 is 100 times more potent a GHG than CO2. CH4 is now bubbling up in creeks in Pennsylvania, where it started. Fracking is now going worldwide. Do you think companies capture all the methane released from fracturing the rock strata? Me neither. Add that to the 1000 meter wide plumes of methane coming from the Arctic ocean floor, and we have a real bad situation getting a whole lot worse. Good news - boat sales should increase!
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
05:59 PM on 09/23/2012
I'm fascinated at the narrative of life-as-usual, including the desperate need to drill and dig for more carbon really fast. How is this possible? You're in an office. A plane just flew into the building next door. You are told you'll have to evacuate. But you first clean up your desk and pick a scrap of paper off the floor. Then you call a supplier to remember your order. Are you crazy? Or are human beings just programmed to go with the old program? I'm curious; shouldn't we be behaving a whole different way from the way we're doing?
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
10:49 PM on 09/22/2012
You're good at connecting dots.

By the way, this situation seems to be a free fall.

The ground is starting to rush up.

I wonder if I remembered to pack my parachute.

Please advise.
11:36 AM on 09/23/2012
Heh! Joe Kittinger made a similar comment. He was describing the rapidly approaching cloud deck though. And..... he did have his parachute. In other words, you have made an excellent analogy.