Lowell Peterson

Lowell Peterson

Posted: July 9, 2010 02:11 PM

Media Consolidation: Bad for Democracy and Not Even Entertaining

What's Your Reaction:

What happens when the media are owned or controlled by a diminishing number of large corporations? The Federal Communications Commission requested comments on that question as part of its quadrennial review of its media consolidation rules. You can read our submitted comments here.

The members of the Writers Guild of America, East see first-hand what happens when too few entities control too much of what the American public watches and listens to, both in the entertainment realm and in news. Democracy depends on the vibrant exchange of ideas; on information presented in coherent, meaningful ways; on independent thought which is not tailored for commercial advantage. Consolidation of ownership and power in the media removes these vital elements from the marketplace. Instead of a town square where ideas flow freely, the news business becomes more like a shopping mall dominated by a small number of megastores. This thwarts the public's interest in robust, well-informed discussion of the critical issues of our times.

At some point there will be a new business model for high-quality journalism but we all recognize that the news business is under financial pressure. We think the federal government should increase funding for public affairs programming until the economics sort themselves out.

Media consolidation also hurts the entertainment business. The identity and progress of a society is related to the quality, number, and diversity of stories the society tells itself. We build our identities in part through the dramas and comedies we watch. Niche audiences are important -- particular communities with their own experiences and interests. If media are owned by smaller and smaller numbers of larger and larger conglomerates, the tendency is to sell to the mean -- that is, to create programming that aggregates the largest audiences.

Increasingly, the same company that provides consumer access to the Internet also provides access to television; that is, the ISP is also the cable company. As the proposed joint venture between Comcast and NBC Universal demonstrates, this convergence will place control of three central elements of the media market into the hands of a small number of corporate entities: distribution of television programming by cable; access to the Internet; and content production. We have asked the FCC to consider this development as it updates its media consolidation rules.
____________________________________
The Writers Guild of America, East is a labor union representing writers in motion pictures, broadcast, cable, news and digital media. We are members of the Coalition for Competition in Media.

 
 
Comments
8
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thinklongterm   11:03 AM on 7/13/2010
300 channels of Law and Order rerun marathons everyday. NCIS, CSI, etc. We're not fooled. Having the same channel on 3 different places does not mean that we have more choices. Its time the FCC did its job and set rules that protect the consumer.
RobinSeattle   04:32 PM on 7/12/2010
As bad as the news media is now, the fact of the matter is that, with the advent of the Eyewitness News format in the early 1960's, tv news has been headed deeper and deeper into the dumper for over four decades now. Local news is basically operated and put together by advertising hucksters masquerading as news producers with a significant tincture of fear and frat house style humor (your song and dance weatherman and snarky sports guy) while substantive reporting, especially with regard to what goes on in state, county and city governments, is almost totally ignored. And forget international news.

Eyewitness News was the start of infotainment with its most logical and ugliest manifestation being Fox News. The folks who created the Eyewitness News format should be forever reviled by all thinking Americans, though, ultimately, it is the public's fault for allowing itself to be suckered into watching it.

Start turning local news off, folks. It does you no good and its protrayal of the world is highly distorted.
photo
tedmore123   12:31 PM on 7/12/2010
300 channels of crap...that's a choice? Bring back analog tv too, digital sucks; the wind blows a little bit and the channels fracture into little squares and the sound cuts out. With analog, if the channel was weak, you could get sound and a fuzzy picture; but you got the picture.
ThePeacemakers   04:18 PM on 7/12/2010
300 channels of repeats.
photo
Ozarks   10:30 AM on 7/12/2010
Sumner Redstone at 87is owner of Viacom, Inc and CBC , Murdock at 79 owns Fox, and Disney owns ABC. Maybe , like Genghis Khan when these guys fade away their relatives thru "royal family squabbling" will break up these oligarchies.
photo
ProfessorDuh   09:55 AM on 7/12/2010
Hundreds of channels, and I have my choice between Americans humiliating themselves in a desperate, crazed bid for celebrity and a wide selection of nice, skin-slicing forensic autopsies.
RobinSeattle   04:34 PM on 7/12/2010
You forgot food fights masquerading as news shows.
photo
ProfessorDuh   04:38 PM on 7/12/2010
And food shows masquerading as fights.

Twitter Edition