iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Maggie Sergio

GET UPDATES FROM Maggie Sergio
 

Makers of Banned Rat Poisons Ignore the EPA

Posted: 07/17/2012 10:53 am

Last week I had the pleasure of sitting down and talking with Bill Daniels, president of United Markets in Marin County. I first met Bill in 2005 and have always been impressed by his dedication and commitment to the county and people of Marin. In talking with Bill last week, I learned that he feels a personal responsibility for the products he carries on his store shelves. United Markets discontinued selling cigarettes years ago, and recently became one of the few retailers to refuse carrying alcoholic beverages cleverly marketed and disguised as soft drinks.

My meeting last week was to chat with Bill about a resolution passed by Marin County's Board of Supervisors in May of this year. This resolution concerns over-the-counter rat poison products D-Con, Tomkat, Fleetject, Rozol, Hot Shot and others that contain brodifacoum, bromadiolone, difethialone or difenacoum. The board of supervisors is asking that retailers selling these poisons for rodent control to voluntarily pull these products from their store shelves.

These products are second-generation rodenticides designed to kill quickly by interfering with the blood's natural clotting ability. When mammals (including humans) and birds consume these poisons either directly or indirectly, bleeding to death is the gruesome outcome.

What so few consumers are aware of is that the EPA has started the process of banning these deadly poisons for the consumer market. In 2008, the EPA told the manufacturers of these products (Reckitt-Benckiser, Spectrum Group and Liphatech) that they had until June 2011 to come up with safer alternatives. The pesticide industry was given three years to come up with products that don't impact children or kill pets and wildlife.

June 2011 passed and the pesticide industry produced nothing. The EPA then began the process to ban these products from store shelves. The manufacturers then, in an incredibly arrogant and bold maneuverer, refused to comply with the EPA's request to discontinue distributing these products.

Instead these manufacturers are now fighting for their "right" to continue selling their lethal poisons.

Every year, the American Association of Poison Control Centers receives anywhere from 12,000 to 15,000 reports of children under the age of 6 being exposed to these deadly rat poisons. California Department of Fish and Game has confirmed more than 240 cases of secondary poisoning (secondary poisoning occurs when predators such as a hawks, owls, bobcats, eagles, mountain lions, etc., are poisoned because they have eaten a poisoned rodent) in California. Marin's Pet Emergency hospital in San Rafael estimates they treat approximately 100 dogs per year because of accidental exposure to rat poison.

The empirical data clearly indicates these products have adverse effects and kill so much more than just rodents. We don't need any more testing or any more evidence.

The EPA has already started the process to ban these products. As Warren Zevon sings, what is needed now is "lawyers, guns and money" as the legal battle to empower the EPA and protect children, wildlife and pets takes the pesticide industry and lobby head on.

While the legal fight between the EPA and the pesticide industry will take years, state and local governments can take action and ask that retailers voluntarily pull these products from their stores. Marin County joins San Francisco, Berkeley, Richmond and Albany in passing resolutions asking for retailers to voluntarily discontinue selling the products that have been banned by the EPA.

United Markets will discontinue carrying the products recently banned by the EPA. Additionally, they are removing gopher poisons. Gopher poisons haven't been banned; however, they usually contain strychnine as the active ingredient. Strychnine has no known antidote.

As consumers, we are in the driver's seat. We can simply refuse to purchase these products and educate ourselves on how to control rodents effectively without poisons. More information on the science based approach of Integrated Pest Management can be found here.

 
FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:35 PM on 07/17/2012
These products currently have a "caution" label that makes them available for sale over the counter. They need a "Danger" label that makes them restricted use, so that only those with pest control licenses can apply. Also, who said these are fast acting baits? Anticoagulants are slow acting multiple feed baits that have and antidote.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Maggie Sergio
10:03 AM on 07/18/2012
Hi. The banned rodenticides are classified as second-generation anticoagulants. These are extremely fast acting, and designed to kill after a single dose is eaten. First generation anti-coagulants such as warfarin (which came out in the 1970s) required multiple feedings of the bait before the animal died. Even though it takes multiple feedings for the first gen products, they still impact and kill wildlife via secondary poisoning. After multiple feedings, the amount of poison that has accummulated in the rodent's system to kill it renders it a toxic bomb and food source for any hawk, owl, bobcat, etc that eats it.
04:52 AM on 07/20/2012
I don't know where you are getting your information from, but 2nd generation anticoagulants are multiple feed baits.  Rodents die on average about 6 days after the first feeding.  Maybe if you're overdosing them in a lab they die quickly, but out in the field they are eating small doses of .005% anticoagulants it takes time.  That is why you indicator dyes in rodent droppings throughout the area around rodent bait stations and not just in the stations themselves.  Once I initiate a rodent baiting program I start seeing bodies in about 4 days.
04:55 AM on 07/20/2012
As for bobcats, hawks, etc., there is no way there is enough active ingredient in even the largest rat to hurt a large animal such as that.  They would have to eat several to even get light headed.
11:29 PM on 07/17/2012
Any idea how much animal testing goes into finding alternatives?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Maggie Sergio
10:05 AM on 07/18/2012
An extensive amount of animal testing is done in the testing of rodenticides and other pesticides. In order to get LD 50 numbers, animals are force fed varying amounts of these deadly poisons.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Maggie Sergio
10:34 AM on 07/18/2012
Extensive amounts of testing with animals is required to get LD 50 numbers for rodenticides and other pesticides.
04:38 AM on 07/20/2012
my point exactly
12:17 PM on 07/17/2012
Great article and thanks to Bill Daniels for doing the right thing!