No Spam Filter? You've Got a Bigger Carbon Footprint

75 percent of this wasted energy is by us, the end user--consumed during all that time it takes us to delete the unsolicited junk. Therefore, having a smart spam filter is not only necessary for our sanity, it also has the global equivalent of taking 2.3 million cars of the road.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

You could be racking up your electric bill by just letting spam slip into your inbox. Yes, even when you haven't the slightest desire to "watch Avril Lavigne naked," "purchase cheap and affordable drugs online," or develop a friendship with Melinda who cheekily says "I like that smile big boy," (no matter that you happen to be female).

spam cans photo
We are talking about the virtual spam here, not the meat delicacy, but you get the point. Photo via Flickr.

spam gmail photo

As well as cutting productivity, spam email harms the environment, wasting enough energy each year to power 2.4 million homes. Each year, 62 trillion spam emails are sent, wasting 33 billion kilo watt-hours (KWh) of power.

The report shows that 75 percent of this wasted energy is by us, the end user--consumed during all that time it takes us to delete the unsolicited junk. Therefore, having a smart spam filter is not only necessary for our sanity, it also has the global equivalent of taking 2.3 million cars of the road.

Looking for more ways to green your computer usage? Set your computer for energy savings, invest in an eco pc, and try out these 7 energy saving downloads.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot