More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Manuel Villacorta

Manuel Villacorta

Posted: December 13, 2010 09:17 AM

After 13 years of using the same Points System, Weight Watchers has overhauled its weight-loss program. What used to be a simple equation of calories-in/calories-out is finally being addressed with deeper complexity. It's high time that the company recognize food for all it provides: proteins, carbohydrates, fat, fiber, and micronutrients. So kudos to Weight Watchers for this long-needed adjustment to its plan. But beware! It still sadly misses the mark.

With Weight Watchers' new system, points are increased for fat content and decreased for fiber content. Fruits will now carry zero points. While point changes for fat and fiber are an obvious and necessary improvement, no fruit contains a zero status. A whole mango, large banana, or cup of grapes--while providing health-promoting antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals--still contain 340 calories.

Let's do some math. If you ate this recommended serving of fruit per day every day for a year, it would bring a total of 123,760 calories and a weight gain of 35 pounds! Now, in no way does that mean we should avoid eating fruit, but we surely should not discount the calories it contributes either. Furthermore, fruit mainly consists of carbohydrates, which are as necessary as protein and fat. A diet of fruit and vegetables may cause you to lose weight, but do you have the appropriate combination of proteins for cellular repair and regeneration -- or the good fats for optimal brain and cellular function?

There is general confusion about healthy being synonymous with "all-you-can-eat." The zero status of fruit will only add to this misunderstanding while ignoring the core principles of weight management: balanced portion control and a healthy overall lifestyle. You may lose weight by staying within your allotted points on a diet of Twinkies, but will that weight loss be maintained long-term? Will you get enough nutrients? And do Twinkies provide you with quality of life?

As a registered dietitian and a national media spokesperson for the American Dietetic Association, I believe in understanding food, not in numbers. A 60-calorie banana will never equal (except in caloric value) a 60-calorie cookie! As a professional nutritionist with more than six years of experience in private practice, I would encourage you to eat the banana or the cookie--whichever you prefer--but to also understand the health implications of your choice.

It's time to stop demonizing food and assigning scores or numbers to it. In weight loss, there is no good or bad, there is only you and the established nutritional knowledge that is available to empower you and to guide you toward making the right decisions about what you eat and how you live your life.

Thank you, Weight Watchers, for finally acknowledging the different constituents of food. But perhaps you should leave nutrition to the sound, scientific evidence-based practice of nutrition experts.

Manuel Villacorta is a registered dietitian in private practice in San Francisco, California. He is a national media spokesperson for the American Dietetic Association and the founder of Eating Free.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:56 PM on 12/21/2010
MV's post is ridiculous for several reasons. The "35 extra pound" claim ignores that that would have to be in excess of your caloric needs. WW is science-based and flexible -- unlike MV's advertised program. The post is entirely contradictory: "It's time to stop demonizing food and assigning scores or numbers to it. In weight loss, there is no good or bad, there is only you and the established nutritional knowledge that is available to empower you and to guide you toward making the right decisions about what you eat and how you live your life." Inherent in his statement is that there are "good" and "bad" decisions (i.e. "right decisions"). WW promotes easy, sane decision making -- an apple instead of chips, even thought they may have the same calorie content -- fish over ground beef. The admonition that WW should leave its work to "nutrition experts" is laughable -- as it somehow implies that WW is just making this up as it goes along and that the overpriced nutrition counseling provided by MV is the only way to go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LukeTunyich
Biomechanics and Health
09:50 PM on 12/16/2010
Quote:
“Watchers has overhauled its weight-loss program. What used to be a simple equation of calories-in/calories-out ................â€

It used to be like that because medical science researchers on obesity and the rest of people involved in prevention and treatment didn’t know that human body excretes calories. That is my opinion. If you think that I am wrong, please correct me.

Here is the link to the article; “Misconception about Counting Calories and Weight Management†http://www.biomechanicsandhealth.com/calories.htm that explains a little bit more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynneSpreen
www.AnyShinyThing.com, For Smart Women
09:30 AM on 12/15/2010
After 15 months on WW I finally reached my dream weight. On the day I qualified for Lifetime status, they introduced the new program, which punishes me for eating my beloved breads and attempts to encourage more fruits and veggies, which I've already adapted to eating plenty of.
So, forget it. I am sticking with the old program, even though I know they mean well.
www.AnyShinyThing.com, A Blog for Smart Women of a Certain Age
12:23 AM on 12/15/2010
In the end it's about calories in - calories out. Fruits do contain calories and sugar and you will gain weight if you eat them with blatant disregard for their caloric content. I love fruit and eat it everyday but teaching that fruit does not count towards weight gain is very misleading.
12:21 PM on 12/15/2010
That is the whole problem, it is not calories surplus and deficit. If you eat an "extra" 10 calories a day for 40 years you are going to gain 40 lbs...that is complete bs. Something more is going on...these issues need to be discussed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeannette Lacey
12:22 AM on 12/15/2010
Back in '93, I lost 34 pounds on Weight Watchers, but back then, they still had the old "portions: system. You were allotted so many breads, proteins, fats, etc. It worked. I gained about 15 of it back and in 2000, decided to return to WW. Not only did the points system not work for me, I'd lose a few ounces one week and gain more back the next! I tried points three more times, and it didn't work. ANd this new system doesn't looks much better. I think they need to go back to the original system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynneSpreen
www.AnyShinyThing.com, For Smart Women
09:33 AM on 12/15/2010
Jeannette, I think it's about finding what works for you. The Momentum (most recent) program worked best for me, whereas previous programs didn't. My class leader still follows the Core program - it works for her. Best wishes.
www.AnyShinyThing.com, A Blog for Smart Women of a Certain Age
02:25 PM on 12/15/2010
The problem is that calories restriction of any kind, which is ALWAYS what Weight Watchers sells, ruins your metabolism. Each time a person tries calorie restriction it will be less and less effective on them until it just doesn't work any more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VanessaFas
07:44 PM on 12/14/2010
I heard about the fruit equals zero points and I laughed. Even I know that doesn't make any sense, and I am not a dietician. It's sad when Weight Watchers does this, and misguides the public. And it's sad when the average American is too foolish to see this is false. Fruit raises your blood sugar, adds weight, and sweetens your sweet tooth. Eat all the vegetables you want, they are zero points. Salads are your friend. Limit your fruit, or else....35 pound weight gain (according to the article)!
08:13 PM on 12/15/2010
Actually a serving of berries a day is okay. They are lower in sugar and have antioxidants. It's unrealistic to avoid all fruits, all the time, so if you must eat fruits, eat berries. And of course, lots of veggies all day (not too many carrots or peas, though).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eve mahar
04:41 PM on 12/14/2010
I've been following weight watchers for years, and the increase in points for fat grams and decrease for fiber has already been a part of the points system for at least the last 8 years.

The 0 point fruit rule may be questionable, but let me ask you this:

Who gets fat from eating an apple? Or twenty apples? Lets be real here. I struggle with my weight but I would never ever say I got fat from eating fruit. Weight Watchers changed the fruit rule to encourage people to pick the apple over the cookie.
10:00 PM on 12/14/2010
An apple is certainly a superior choice to a cookie, but apples can provide enough sugar to stall weight loss. In fact, I've konwn plenty of people whose weight loss stalled over eating apples!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eve mahar
09:43 AM on 12/15/2010
stalled, maybe- they must have been eating a LOT of apples. But my point was that you don't get fat eating apples.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynneSpreen
www.AnyShinyThing.com, For Smart Women
09:34 AM on 12/15/2010
Funny, Eve. My class leader has this look she gives us when we inquire about eating too much fruit or veggies. She says, "I don't know about you, but eating too much lettuce isn't what got me here."
www.AnyShinyThing.com, A Blog for Smart Women of a Certain Age
12:48 AM on 12/14/2010
anything that promotes more fresh produce is good...now I am not sure WW is doing what it takes but let's agree that it is a step in the right direction :)
10:51 PM on 12/13/2010
I think the world needs a lesson from Taubes, Robb Wolff and the others. Evidence suggest that current nutritional knowledge and information is incomplete and harmful at worst. What about saturated fats vs omega 6's, insulin/leptin response with carb consumption. Your current site doesn't address these issues...you are obviously decorated in your field but it is all based on the Keyes lipid hypothesis...eat good carbs and proteins, burn more calories...blah, blah, blah. It has failed the public and misrepresents how we metabolize food.
11:35 PM on 12/13/2010
Fanned and faved! If only more people were smart like you!
09:42 PM on 12/16/2010
What's failed the public in regards to nutrition information is that everyone thinks that reading a book, website, or an abstract qualifies them as a nutrition expert. This leads to diet fads, myths, and quackery. Contrary to what you may believe dietitians/nutritionists are trained in the sciences (biology, microbiology, chemistry, organic chemistry, and biochemistry). Our recommendations are based on science and just like other healthcare professionals we are required to continue our education past graduation and certification. As with all jobs things change. If there is a better way to do things and it is supported by sound evidence, you change. Why should the dietetics profession be any different? Finally, what evidence suggests that "current nutritional knowledge and information is incomplete and harmful at worst"? For who is it incomplete and harmful?
07:25 PM on 12/13/2010
Not sure where he gets his calorie counts, but according to www.thecaloriecounter.com, a mango has 135 calories, a 9" banana has 135 calories, and a cup of grapes has 62 calories. While this is not negligible, it's still far less than the 340 calories he cites and probably would not add up to much extra weight in a year, as fresh fruit tends to have a lot of water in it and would fill you up, displacing other, higher-calorie food.
04:12 PM on 12/13/2010
Incentivising natural food over processed food is good. Under the old weight watchers system, sugar free fat free kool-whip, with no nutritional value and chocked full of chemicals, was considered a "better" choice (lower points) than an apple. It was "better" to have an egg mcmuffin and a diet coke for breakfast than oatmeal and a skim-milk latte. I haven't looked into the new Weight Watchers plan carefully (you can't get all the details without signing up), but from the press, it looks pretty sensible. Most people who are trying to lose weight didn't get where they are by eating too many mangoes.
01:02 PM on 12/13/2010
Great post... this makes a lot of sense.