Imagine awaiting the birth of your child from a jail cell. That's a reality for countless women around the country, sentenced for a crime while pregnant. Another reality: once they deliver, chances are they'll be separated from their child within hours as the baby is taken to relatives or foster care. When you're a pregnant inmate, you can't exactly keep your baby with you in prison. Or can you?
Sharlene Henry, 29, was pregnant when sentenced to seven-years for criminal possession of a controlled substance. The thought of having her baby in prison was so devastating that she almost decided not to. She scheduled an appointment to end the pregnancy, but ultimately couldn't do it. As fate would have it, Henry was sentenced to New York's Bedford Hills Correctional Facility for Women. The prison houses the country's oldest prison nursery, a program allowing non-violent offenders with relatively short sentences to keep their babies for up to 18 months. Now, Henry is raising seven-month old Delilah with her in prison, a crib right there in the cell.
Prison nurseries are a new trend emerging in the criminal justice system. There are nine nurseries nationwide and more than half have opened in the last 15 years. They're partly a result of a new sense of social responsibility and the Department of Corrections' desire to keep families intact. But they are also the result of sheer numbers: there are more women in prison than ever before, and more need for programs like these.
I visited two nurseries for my special report "Mara Schiavocampo Reports: Mothers Behind Bars." At Bedford Hills, where I met Sharlene and Delilah Henry, there are nine babies, as well as a few women waiting to give birth. The wing where the infants live looks typically institutional; fluorescent lights, linoleum flooring, mint green walls.
I also visited the Ohio Reformatory for Women, the state's largest female prison. Their nursery also has nine babies, but a completely different vibe. It is set up to feel like a home, and features a large living room with couches, stuffed animals and television. Years ago the inmates painted the walls with Sesame Street characters like Big Bird and Cookie Monster.
Though the two facilities are vastly different, their goal is the same. Both seek to keep babies with their mothers so they're not deprived of a parent. The programs may be beneficial for the mother too; studies have shown that women who go through prison nursery programs have lower re-offense rates than other inmates.
But critics argue the Department of Corrections shouldn't be in the childcare business, given that their primary role is for punishment and rehabilitation. Plus, the programs are expensive, about $24,000 a year per infant. That's taxpayer money, though in some cases the programs are covered by government grants.
But proponents, like the Warden in Ohio, argue that if you don't spend the money now, you'll spend it when the moms commit another crime and come back to prison, or the babies - deprived of the mother-child bond in infancy - come back as adult inmates. And while taking the babies away may save money, ultimately it could have a much greater emotional cost, for both mom and baby.
Check out video and other multimedia elements for this story at www.TheGrio.com. More can also be found in the May issue of Essence Magazine, on newsstands now.
I would love to hear the difference between taxpayer money and a gov't grant. That's quality reporting and writing.
Pay now, or pay later, totally up to you.
Second, government grants are paid for by taxpayers. And grants don't last forever.
This may be good for both mother and child, but I'd like to see a study done to determine if it has any long term effect on both mother and child. However, if the cost of a child spending the first 18 months of life in prison (and that sounds so awful for the child) is equivalent to the child the cost of the child being in foster care, then the money could be transferred from the state family services budget.
http://www.outandemployed.wordpress.com
Allowing a woman to get out because she is pregnant is sexist. If a woman can get out to have her baby, men should be able to get out while their wives have babies.
They are in prison because they broke a serious law, a minor law would have landed them in the county jail.
I don't care how much an inmate wants to keep their child. If an inmate gives birth in prison her parental rights should be immediately terminated and the child placed for adoption. When that child reaches age eighteen they should be provided with as much of the history of their genetic parents as possible, despite any objections from their adopted parents.
It is not cruel to remove a child from the care of a prison inmate. But it is cruel to keep that child in the inmate's care. We need to end how a criminal parent turns their child into a criminal.
For once the child and society as a whole should have their rights superior to those of inmates.
She stole thousands of narcotic pills, we will never know how many. She was treated to a luxurious rehab in the desert.
We need to treat all drug abusers that way.
Locking up people for physical and mental addictions is ludicrous. Use the money for education, training, and reintegrating them into society to raise their kids and become productive instead of destructive.
Of course that wouldn't behoove law enforcement, the court system, lawyers, or the prison system who will cry foul.