More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marc Porter Zasada

Marc Porter Zasada

Posted: December 29, 2009 10:28 AM

I have a request for greater Los Angeles in the coming decade. It's not a simple request, but it's simply stated: Over the next 10 years, I want you to become a city--that's right, a real city, like London or New York, Paris or Tokyo.

Okay, maybe a collection of cities.

In any case, I mean you should try to cease being a collection of freeways and malls, a sprawl of half-imagined neighborhoods, or a loosely-shuffled deck of cluttered boulevards and cultural icons.

Over the next 10 years, I want to find myself joining large crowds strolling nighttime streets. I want to hop cheerful and efficient subways and find them filled at all hours. I want to leave a theater at 11:30 and stop off next door for a late night snack. I want to visit many highly charming parks, where I find numerous benches and baby prams and pushcarts selling popcorn and hot dogs. I want to encounter endless stretches of outdoor cafes, competing fiercely, and pushed one up against the next. I want to book streetside tables and sip coffee while watching masses of humanity transported on shoe leather.

In fact, I want to find it harder and harder to get around in a car, and easier and easier to get around on foot. I want to visit fewer big venues and encounter more little shops; climb fewer on-ramps and drop quarters into more parking meters; stop at fewer mini-malls and walk on wider sidewalks.

In general, greater LA, I want you to finally give up that weird, tedious, half-ironic "no there there" aesthetic and adopt a "there everywhere" chic. I want you to give up being an awkward beast, and evolve into a coherent metropolis.

Okay, I know you have your challenges: fragmented government, weak city planning, absentee landlords, ferocious gangs, too few cops, too many noir film locations, a focus on glitz instead of substance.

But you've shown it can be done. I mean, when I look around, I can see you've made a lot of progress over the last 30-odd years, and you could be on the verge of something big. You built a few rail systems. You fixed up Pasadena, Glendale, Culver City, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills. Parts of West Hollywood and Downtown. Yes, I can now stand on certain corners in such centers, or stroll three or four blocks at selected hours, and almost believe I am in a real city...as long as I don't wander too far from my car, or turn down a side street.

You've made progress, but I'm sorry: I want Rome, or at least Chicago. Not as shopping mall theme parks operated by Rick Caruso, but as true city blocks. I want genuine urban experiences, and I want them here.

Don't tell me that a "world city" kind of life is impossible in Southern California, third wealthiest urban area on earth. Don't explain how you seem to attract strange, intensely private people, only interested in fixing up living rooms and backyards; folks only interested in cocooning in cars or museums or concert halls; only interested in creating rec rooms or theme bedrooms, building "outdoor rooms" to be featured in L.A. Magazine or decorating hip minimalist parlors to be profiled in Angeleno.

And if we really are like that, then I want us to change. In the coming decade, I want us to become different than we have been. I want us to want to be more like the people in other great urban areas and less like our cliché vision of ourselves.

I know this will take extraordinary effort, because yes, in a real city, people become passionately involved in civic life. They care what happens down the street and in city hall. They take an interest in the whole curio shop and not just their own velvet-lined box.

I want to begin by appealing to our wealthiest citizens, whether they owe their fortunes to TriStar or Coldwell Banker. Not just because they have the means, but because they know how to get things done. Over the coming decade, I want to challenge our wealthiest citizens to get out of their estates and Maseratis and theaters and galleries and pour their hearts into public parks and bike paths and open areas here in the town in which they have made their fortunes. Maybe that means adopting a recreational facility or an urban square, a stretch of beach or the boulevard around a favorite concert hall. Maybe it means sponsoring an outdoor festival or supporting the politicians who care about trains and trolleys.

Yes, we have Eli Broad. But I figure we need at least six more Eli Broads, and we need at least five of them to focus on public space. Millennium Park, anyone?

But of course I really mean to direct this request to the whole metropolis. As the New Year starts, I want to challenge all of greater LA to take a moment and imagine what the best aspects of the word "city" might mean to you and yours and everyone who lives in this remarkable but as-yet-unfinished place.

 
 
 

Follow Marc Porter Zasada on Twitter: www.twitter.com/theurbanman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:50 AM on 01/06/2010
I live in one of those urban clusters, West Hollywood. I love being able to walk to most essential services, eat at one of a dozen indoor/outdoor places, etc. I ride the bus and take the subway whenever possible not because it is more convenient but because I believe that opinions such as Marc's need to be met with actions not just talk.

For years I opposed the further densification of my little city, but have become convinced that only if we strangle auto traffic will we finally stop widening the 405 for $1 billion so that a few can save 5 minutes and invest in the public transportation system we had when I was a child -- world class.

Yes, it is already near gridlock on Santa Monica Blvd. MTA buses now travel nearly as rapidly as I can in a car to downtown. I only hope I live long enough for people to stop being so "precious" and get on the bus, ride the rails, and join humanity.
02:21 PM on 01/02/2010
Good article. Having grown up in the LA suburbs and having lived in Manhattan for 4 years to get a 'real city' experience, I understand your views.

The ‘manhattan of LA’ is a region that stretches from the Westside to downtown LA, north of the 10, south of the sunset / Hollywood blvd. This is where 80% of the highrises are, 80% of the best restaurants, 80% of the nightlife, cultural offerings, etc.

The valley is queens / Brooklyn, south LA is the Bronx, the SGV is another borough and so on. The greater LA region will never densify to reach your expectations, but the 'west-central' or central LA core will. The key is the completion of the subway down Wilshire and up through West Hollywood. The dense transit-oriented development will follow as will more walkable neighborhoods.

I would say that LA is definitely getting there. I have now lived in the Beverly Center district for four years and rarely use my car except to get to downtown for work for which I take 1 street, Wilshire blvd.
We already have a nice core of dense neighborhoods that are very close in proximity to each other (downtown, Hollywood, k-town, mid-city west and Westwood).

It's just a matter of time before they all connect. I would say 10-20 years is doable with Measure R projects coming soon.
02:15 PM on 01/02/2010
Good article. Having grown up in the LA suburbs and having lived in Manhattan for 4 years to get a 'real city' experience, I understand your views.

You have to realize that the 'manhattan of LA' is a region that stretches from the westside to downtown. This is 80% of the highrises are, 80% of the best restaurants, nightlife and cultural offerings. The valley is queens / Brooklyn, south LA is the Bronx, the SGV is another borough and so on. The greater LA region will never densify to reach your expectations, but the 'west-central' or central LA core will. The key is the completion of the subway down Wilshire and up through West Hollywood. The dense transit-oriented development will follow as will more walkable neighborhoods.

I would say that LA is definitely getting there. I have now lived in the Beverly Center district for four years and rarely use my car except to get to downtown for work for which I take 1 street, Wilshire blvd. In 10 years, there are plans to build two subway stops within walking distance.

We already have a nice core of dense neighborhoods that are very close in proximity to each other (downtown, Hollywood, k-town, mid-city west and Westwood).

It's just a matter of time before they all connect. I would say 10-20 years is doable with Measure R projects coming soon.
10:23 AM on 01/02/2010
I totally agree with you. As a fairly new resident to Los Angeles, I really love the city, but it doesn't really have a central core, but lots of small areas. People from Santa Monica don't go to Pasadena, or people from Culver City don't go to Long Beach, well at least not on a regular basis.

It would be great to have a transit system packed to capacity that goes from here to there. Right now, traffic is the number one reason people don't often get out of their own neighborhoods. LA has so much to offer, but it's not being used. That's a shame.
02:20 AM on 01/01/2010
I totally agree with you. others that are hating on you, i wonder if they have been to any of the big cities you mentioned, like NY. I went to NY (Manhattan) recently in September and fell in love. i came back to LA and was like, this place sucks compared to NYC. I would love it if we could actually get our Metro system up and going like NY. I want a 24/7 city where bars close at 4am like NY. i keep telling my husband i am trying to find a way for us to move there, because i know in my heart, LA will never stop SPRAWLING up hills. besides, LA and CA in general has become way to conservative for me.
08:29 PM on 12/31/2009
I would rather LA accept itself for what it is, rather than try to be something that it's not. A cleaned-up and livable downtown would be wonderful. But own it's own terms. Not a fake-NYC or fake Paris.
12:39 AM on 12/31/2009
This was a fantastic piece. I don't expect to see any of these changes occurring overnight in Los Angeles, but the progress you dream of certainly feels as it's in the works. I lived in L.A. for 20 years but moved to New York12 years ago. I come back a few weeks out of each year, and each time, I am moved by L.A.'s glacial but steady evolution towards the city you envision. I think it will take decades, but true urban vibrance on a street level is creeping up through the cracks, slowly but surely. Hopefully it will happen before we run out of oil completely.
10:04 PM on 12/30/2009
Sorry Marc, it looks like you didn't get the memo. LA is already a great world city!!! I agree that a city should evolve and change. But no other major city in the world has evolved and changed more dramatically than LA over the last 100 years--and it's still evolving today. And what's so great about it is that LA is still unique and quite distinct from its older siblings on the East Coast and in Europe. The fact that it doesn't conform to convention in its creative expression of urbanity is what makes the place so alluring and original. LA sets trends, it doesn't follow them.

The problem is not LA. Maybe it's you. It seems like you have not embraced the LA way of life. Perhaps your dream of living in a "real" city would be best realized by moving to one that meets your idea of what that is.
11:23 PM on 12/30/2009
I feel this is a rather common opinion, but I can't help but feel it is one incredibly deprived of perspective.

The "creative expression of urbanity" you refer to is about as creative as your interpretation of "urbanity". If by trend-setting, you mean large unregulated experiments on land-use and zoning by developers with little concern for community, culture, and "urbanity" - you may be right. The only catching trends I've seen LA set are the ready destruction of the history and fabric of truly urban cities; the widening of streets; the disruption of neighborhoods and communities with superhighways; the historical neglect of useful public transportation; and the replacement of enveloping, walkable, pedestrian-friendly (i.e. urban) streets with parking lots and strip-malls. Statements like "LA sets trends..." may be true when it comes to blue-jeans and sun-glasses, but when it comes to urban development, LA is stuck in the destructive mentalities of the 60s and 70s.

I don't deny that LA has expressed creativity individual architectural structures, and I do think the city has a lot to offer and great potential for positive growth and future trend-setting. But I'd call the most obvious modern additions anything but "urban". I believe a lot of people have become so accustomed to this version of LA that they actually think they enjoy it, and may even defend it to urbanists like myself. Hopefully in 10 years you'll be thanking us for seeing things a little differently. ;)
11:25 PM on 12/30/2009
I should add that I intended the previous comment to imply no personal disrespect. It is merely to address what I feel is a common opinion about LA that I feel is missing the one or two points that might make LA a truly amazing city to more than just those most comfortable behind the wheel.
02:50 AM on 12/31/2009
Incredibly deprived of perspective? Each individual's perspective is subjective and is shaped by their personal experiences, biases, preferences, and tastes along with some knowledge of history. Your high handed, dismissive tone only showcases your own ignorance and lack of perspective to even presume that there is a singular, one size fits all definition of urbanity. Urbanity evolves as cities evolve. It's defined by what's happening not by what happened in any one particular location years ago. LA's growth as a city exploded as automobiles became the preferred and primary mode of transportation in the U.S. Given the availability of mass amounts of undeveloped land the city grew outward and most American cities followed suit particularly in the Sunbelt region. You seem to suggest that city planners should have ignored the rising demand and presence of automobiles and not have built the wide boulevards and extensive freeways and should not have required adequate parking with new commercial and residential developments. What a catastrophic error in judgment that would have been. This is LA. We like our cars, we like plentiful parking spaces, we like wide boulevards, we like multiple lane freeways, although we appreciate public parks we especially like our single family homes with their own private gardens and yards, we enjoy nature and prefer natural scenery to man made. LA is an amazing city, and it will continue to evolve in a way that is practical and complimentary to the way of life we know and prefer here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mslindac
09:41 PM on 12/30/2009
If you make it "harder and harder to get around by car," what are handicapped people supposed to do? You expect mothers of several kids to wheel all of them around in strollers or put them on leashes? What happens when we have a cold, wet winter where you catch pneumonia if you stick your head outside? If this is your ideal city, move to West Hollywood, where they have lots of sidewalks but parking gets worse all the time. You sound like a spoiled city-dwelling bachelor who thinks the whole world should revolve around him. I'd rather see an L.A. that tries to accommodate all of its citizens, not just hipsters who want to stay out all night without having to pay for parking.
11:39 PM on 12/30/2009
"I'd rather see an L.A. that tries to accommodate all of its citizens, not just hipsters who want to stay out all night without having to pay for parking."

In some ways don't you think the last part of that sentence could currently be replaced with "not just those who enjoy sitting on the highway for four hours, spending 45 minutes traveling 10 miles, and and who don't mind that cancerous yellow haze that hangs over the city"? Trust me, you've got quite a while before the hipsters have their way and you can comfortably and quickly commute across the whole city while reading a book or watching reruns of "Dancing With The Stars" on your iPod.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:07 AM on 01/04/2010
"hipsters who want to stay out all night".............wow, you sound like an old fuddy-duddy!
I'm not a "hipster" but I enjoy staying out past my bedtime on weekends.
If I'm in a restaurant in Silverlake late at night-----does that make me a "hipster?"
01:14 PM on 12/30/2009
I agree with all that but it's not likely to happen anytime soon, not city-wide anyway. L.A. just isn't centralized. It IS sprawl, you have to learn to love it. Amongst the sprawl there are some pretty cool neighborhoods. I also wonder if people who rant about L.A.'s car culture have actually bothered tried out public transit, and I don't just mean the trains. I'm 29 and I've never owned a car and I've lived in L.A. all my life. I'm a busser. It's not always easy but it gives me a perspective on the city that few here have. It also throws you into a rolling box with a collection of people you wouldn't normally come into contact with. Also; more time to read. Or nap. I certainly wish the trains were more developed but I also wish the buses were less stigmatized. I do wish it was more organized and centralized but I still bloody love this town. To me it is as beautiful as it is ridiculous. But then, I like my beauty a little bit ugly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:12 AM on 12/30/2009
I want to make enough money to live in NY, Paris and L.A. Not that that will happen, but that is my dream.

Having the isolation in L.A. is the point, for me, so I hope you get to move to another place and leave L.A. as it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VictoriaP
Do Your EFFING Jobs, DC Politicos!!
12:03 AM on 12/30/2009
Great article. I feel the same way and wonder why it is so difficult to create an amazing metropolis, especially given that we already have most of the required ingredients. I think that our geographical expanse that lacks alternate, efficient transportation is a big culprit. Another problem is the lack of visionary, effective leadership at City Hall. Antonio has failed us miserably.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Gershon Hepner
06:40 PM on 12/29/2009
Bravo, Marc. If you want it, it is no dream, as Herzl says deaming of Altneuland. People still come to LA to see Disneyland, but the time will surely come when its atractions will have greater depth. But it will take more boosters like Marc to make people aware of them.
03:03 PM on 12/29/2009
I was laughing out loud at your article but then sighed deeply because I agree with you. I think one problem we face living in LA is that we have no city center. We don't have a Rockefeller Center or a Times Square where we can all go to celebrate as a city. For that matter, we don't have a Central Park either! I think we have to start with the education of our kids. Open them up to different worlds of music, art and culture so they crave it and want to have it in our city as they do in Rome, NY, Paris or Tokyo. Of course we have pockets of it but another aspect of our city life is that you have to DRIVE to it.
I enjoyed your article....it was true and food for thought.