iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marcello Arrambide

GET UPDATES FROM Marcello Arrambide
 

Apple vs. Microsoft vs. Google: Round 2

Posted: 07/02/2012 4:07 pm

I just finished reading the biography of Steve Jobs. Aside from being a must read, it told the story of how Apple revolutionized and created the computer industry as well as how Microsoft was able to capitalize on it. For years Microsoft dominated the market with its Windows software while Apple stood around watching and losing market share. Microsoft did exactly with Apple did, steal ideas from another company in order to make their own products better.

Apple stole ideas from IBM and Microsoft stole ideas from Apple.

Apple

After the return of Steve Jobs, innovation at Apple pressed on and it was Apple vs. the world once again. They revolutionized the music industry, the walkman industry (you remember the old Sony Walkman right?), the mobile phone industry, and created the tablet industry. There are rumors that they are trying to take on the TV industry and news that Siri is going to be available in cars very soon. They are already starting to change the car industry, is there an industry that they won't touch?

The only problem with innovation is once you come out with something that changes and revolutionizes the industry, everyone tries to follow (and copy) the leader.

Apple now is spending time battling with various companies to try and protect its flagship products and technology. Apple has recently won two court cases in order to stop sales of the Samsung Galaxy Tablet and the Samsung Galaxy Nexus Phone and Microsoft has one taken a page out of Apple's play book. They are coming out with their own tablet that is, wait for it, made by Microsoft.

The beauty of Apple is that they control the entire process of any of the products they develop. This allows them to build systems that connect with each other seamlessly. One of biggest things that Apple is known for is coming out with products that are impeccably designed and work with each other flawlessly.

Microsoft

Most of Microsoft's profits come from its flagship PC products, namely Microsoft Windows and a host of programs included in Microsoft Office Suite (Word, Excel, Powerpoint). Microsoft has a simple business model, comes out with a product and continue to make it better until it dominates the market. They have the ability to throw money at everything to make it the best and enough muscle to make sure that people use their products. It's either buying into a market or creating their own product and improving that product until it's the industry standard.

Want an example of this practice? Stay in your seat, I have a handful. Netscape dominated the Internet browser market until Microsoft began to bundle its Internet Explorer with Windows. Netscape was soon out of business. Microsoft released the gaming console Xbox and later upgraded to the Xbox 360. Sony's Playstation used to dominate that market until Nintendo released their family friendly Wii. Microsoft now sells more Xboxes than Nintendo and are still after the Sony Playstation for the no. 1 position.

The very first Windows programs were horrid in terms of functionality and usability. The only reason they dominate the market is because anyone can license their software. IBM couldn't develop a viable computer software and Apple refused to license their software to anyone.

The New Kid On The Block: Google

The market has changed and since no other companies were able to adapt quick enough, Google was born. They started by dominating the search engine market and are now moving into other business models in order to prepare themselves for the future. Everyone loves Google because they have a simple business model, you can use their stuff for free and click on their adds so they make money with advertising.

Unlike Apple or Microsoft, the concept at Google is to organize the world's information. In order to do this efficiently they are constantly looking for ways to make things faster. The faster they process information the more information they can organize and the more money they can make off ads.

Enter Google Chrome, the fastest Internet browser available today that is eating Microsoft's lunch in the Internet browser market. The updates to Chrome only solidify the fact they are trying to make things faster; you are able to search from the Google chrome address box, instant results on Google search, and the ability to search other websites via the address box (type in youtube.com then tab in the address box to try it for yourself).

Apple vs. Microsoft vs. Google: Round 2 -- Mobile

Apple continues to innovate and the entire world is trying to catch up. Google is the new Microsoft, the new cooler and much improved Microsoft. They are doing the same thing that Microsoft did years ago with the Android mobile operating software, except they are letting you use it for free instead of selling it with a license.

It is the new world order, open source and free vs. expensive and cool. Google just wants you to use their Android software so they can sell you advertising and control the way you see the web. Apple wants you to buy their products because they are designed flawlessly and they are awesome. You saw the PC vs. Mac commercials haven't you?

When the iPhone was released in 2007 they dominated the market, there was nothing in the world like it. Now the only viable competition is the Samsung Galaxy smart phone series that runs on the Android mobile software platform. The iPhone and Android have singlehandedly been responsible for the death of Nokia and Blackberry. Nokia revolutionized the cell phone industry years ago and Blackberry revolutionized the smart phone market after that.

Microsoft is doing what it has always done best: bought its way into the market. It created a partnership with Nokia to run its mobile Windows on all Nokia phones. What Microsoft didn't bet on was the fact that Nokia would die an early death -- they are laying off thousands of employees and losing market share left and right.

I decided early in 2012 to give Blackberry one more chance since I began to start living overseas in Brazil. Blackberry is still what a lot of people use overseas so it will be interesting to see how that changes over time. They came out with the Blackberry Torch (my current phone) which should have been the phone that they came out years ago.

Now that Blackberry is becoming non-existent I have to adapt with the times and move onto Apple or Android. I day trade in the stock market and will be looking for ways to do day trading from mobile. I am currently looking for ways to start day trading via the Apple iPad. All the programs that I use for day trading are only supported by Windows so it will be interesting to see if that changes with the changing market.

Tablet Market

iPhone released the iPad which is still dominating the market and the only competition to come close is Samsung with, wait for it, the Android operating software. Microsoft is now taking a play out of Apple's playbook by trying to release their own tablet, the Surface Tablet. Instead of just licensing the software like they usually do they have take a move out of Apple's own play book to try and control everything from beginning to end.

The only problem is that the world has changed and you can't buy into a market anymore. Branding is everything and Microsoft is now viewed as complacent and out of date with consumers. Most corporate companies aren't even upgrading to newer versions of Windows after Microsoft released the unreliable and problematic Windows Vista.

We have witnessed increased production from Microsoft from their windows line to try an catch up with the times; Windows Vista was a mistake, Windows 7 is the fixed Windows Vista, and Windows 8 is how Microsoft is going to try and break into the mobile world.

Apple vs. The World: The Future

It will be interesting to see if Apple can stay ahead of the pack now that the driving engine behind its innovation, Steve Jobs, is gone. Will they be able to continue to innovate? There are rumors that the iPhone 5 is set to be released and also a new iTV product.

Will Microsoft be able to catch up? They still dominate the PC business but how long will that last now that Apple is gaining market share with their signature Mac computers and Google is continuing to release Android products. Google did announce a deal to release a new PC with Acer with its Chromebook operating software for computers.

How will Google continue to innovate to keep things free? They are taking over with their internet explorer, Chome, which now has more users than Firefox. They just announced that you are now able to run Chrome on the Ipad & the Iphone. Google also is dominating the smart phone market by taking the lead from the Iphone with their Android software.

Who do you think will win? I am betting on Apple and Google -- Microsoft, unfortunately is behind the pack. You just can't buy yourself into a market anymore, it's about innovation and branding and Microsoft has lost both.

 

Follow Marcello Arrambide on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Wanderingtradr

FOLLOW TECH
I just finished reading the biography of Steve Jobs. Aside from being a must read, it told the story of how Apple revolutionized and created the computer industry as well as how Microsoft was able to ...
I just finished reading the biography of Steve Jobs. Aside from being a must read, it told the story of how Apple revolutionized and created the computer industry as well as how Microsoft was able to ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:41 PM on 07/30/2012
"Apple stole ideas from IBM and Microsoft stole ideas from Apple."

In the version of Steve Jobs biography I read, Apple made a deal with Xerox Parc to share its GUI technology for Apple stock. Microsoft claimed that Xerox Parc showed them same GUI tech.

As Gates proclaimed and as mentioned in the book, "No, Steve, I think its more like we both have a rich neighbor named Xerox, and I broke in to steal the TV set, and found out that you'd already stolen it."
04:25 AM on 07/05/2012
But you also say that Microsoft has lost its fight with "innovation" and "branding" while Microsoft still runs on the vast majority of computers in the market. The innovation part is coming up. In case you haven't noticed, they have completely innovated everything when it comes to their Windows phone, Win 8, and tablet industry. For god's sake, their soon to be tablet, Surface, will either be thinner than the iPad and still about as powerful if not more or the other version in which it is only slightly thicker, has a Core i5 processor that runs just as powerfully as any laptop other than the top of the line i7's. Innovating the tablet market to essentially be the future of computers. I'd say that's a big step.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marcello Arrambide
03:02 PM on 07/08/2012
The only reason Microsoft runs on the majority of computers is because they are the standard. In cellphones Nokia was the standard in the mid 90's and then blackberry took over and became the smart phone standard. How long is it going to take now that there are legitimate competitors? And if you consider computers laptops and tablets, Microsoft has no clear edge because the future of computing is tablets and there is less thatn 5% of tablets with microsoft's operating system. 60% is apple and the rest is Android.

The innovated the windows mobile phone system after failing miserably with windows 6.5. They didn't innovate anything, they tried to muscle their way into the industry buy teaming up with the dying Nokia and then realized that wasn't enough and started to improve their product. Microsoft isn't innovating that they are just trying to catch up.

Microsoft didn't make the big step, they are trying to take the big step to catch up. Lockheed Martin, the US military's largest supplier, is now using Iphone's instead of blackberries. Large corporations are already using ipads for their business and considering the fact that most business are still in Windows XP and haven't moved up to Vista, 7, and now 8, yet. I would say that Microsoft is realizing that they are dead in the water. Why would they do a complete 360 in terms of how they do business and actually make a computer when they haven't dont that before?
06:06 PM on 07/10/2012
You compared computers to cell phones, but the cell phone market waw just emerging in the 90s so I would hardly say there were standards. You said that then that Blacjkberries were the standard of smartphones, implying how they are essentially drowning from the competitors they have now, but that was an entirely different smartphone than exists now. So as for mobile phones, the market has enjoyed 2 major changes since its beginning. As for the computer realm it has only undergone shifts to tablets existing. Tablets aren't near the sales that laptops have. Meaning if the shift to solely tablets will happen it is a long time from now. Microsoft still has time in that market.

For computers, you will not see the financially reason-less Apple PCs take over the Windows PCs unless they have a legitimate reason like final cut for other areas of business, but mainly they are hopelessly behind in areas needing serious software (such as engineering fields). Speaking of the software problems, that will keep Google Chromebooks far out of the busines market. Microsoft will have that sector for a long time. You also state how businesses have not moved on from XP, but in actuality I believe the statistic is 90% of businesses are now running Windows 7.

Yes Microsoft has done a major overhaul of their OS. You and I both know it is because they realized they need to be in the tablet market better as well. That is definitely true.
04:20 AM on 07/05/2012
This simply just bothered me. The sheer favoritism you have for Apple has completely changed the way you word things from what you should have. While what you say for the most part is true, you make it sound like Apple owns everything in the world while Google is just a cool company and that Microsoft is incompetent.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marcello Arrambide
02:55 PM on 07/08/2012
I can spot quality when I see it Brett... I do not own one Apple product, not one. And when I decided to buy a new phone in January of this year I stayed with blackberry instead of going the Iphone or Android route. That basically is the way it is right now, Apple is the new Microsoft, they like to control everything and make you buy their products. But Apple has figured out a way to do it right and make things work, everyone loves google, they want to give you everything for free, they even want to give away your privacy for free
04:07 PM on 07/04/2012
Do you think that there will ever be as many Microsoft Stores as there are Apple Stores? Check this out ... :-)

http://www.marytoons.com/the_latest.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:31 PM on 07/03/2012
I'd like to see Microsoft be able to compete along with Apple and Android/Google which encompasses many companies. There are so many Android things out there by different companies it's too confusing. We have Apple, Microsoft and 2 Android smartphones in our home, 7 people = many devices.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marcello Arrambide
01:21 PM on 07/04/2012
Microsoft licenses its products to many companies and Android does the same thing with its software.. will be interesting to see how things pan out.. I personally stay away from microsoft. I think apple and android come out with better products
05:27 AM on 07/03/2012
Gee whiz..., can you please define working "flawlessly"? Can you explain the "death grip" issue? Can you explain the "mishap" by Apple when Ipad 3 4G LTE they introduced for Australian market has the wrong frequency band installed? But, interestingly enough, the late turtlenecked ex CEO of Apple explained "the death grip" issue by saying that there wasn't any design error with the Iphone, and it was Iphone user's fault because the hold it wrong when making a phone call. I betcha Apple has patented "The Grip" at the USPTO.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marcello Arrambide
01:24 PM on 07/04/2012
Lets talk about the disaster that is Windows Vista Scully....
03:18 AM on 07/03/2012
As far as Google being a new fish in the pond, its Nexus 7 is pretty amazing.. And Android's new version the Jelly Bean is simply awesome... Google here seem to have an upper hand in the battle..
Microsoft Support Services
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marcello Arrambide
11:12 AM on 07/03/2012
I agree John, most importantly because they are open source. But Microsoft always has a way of meddling in things we will see if they are able to break back into the tablet and the phone market
02:36 AM on 07/10/2012
Yeahh... That is true... The famous "Microsoft Successor technique".. Microsoft keeps releasing versions unless they get it right.. This lets Microsoft be more into the market than any other brand.. So Lets see c what MS does next...!!
Microsoft Tech Support
08:50 PM on 07/02/2012
Marcello, you say that you plan to jump on the iPhone or Android bandwagon once you finally ditch your crackberry. But then you go onto say that all your day trading apps run on Windows. If you really travel the world as much as you say, why would you not buy a Surface Pro? Why would you not give WP a try? You seem to be somewhat of a contrarian, so why follow the herd? Or are you just another cool hipster? To say that MS is not an innovator is a patently false. Every company buys or copies and then improves. Everyone. Period. Heck. Android which is Linux was copied from Unix, BSD / Minix.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marcello Arrambide
11:11 AM on 07/03/2012
Jay, I always day trade on my laptop but you do make a good point about the surface tablet. Unfortunately, Windows doesn't have the availability and volume of apps that Apple has but it is something to think about. I have played with the iphone and ipad and I have to admit that they are beautiful machines and very easy to use as well, I personally dont like microsoft because of the way they control things. Android is a possibility but I dont like how they dont check their apps for viruses and I have met many people that have had many issues with Androids because of their viruses. thanks for the comment Jay
08:25 PM on 07/02/2012
Apple copied IBM? Apple looked in at Xerox PARC, saw the future, licensed the tech, and set about making the future happen. (As opposed to others who prefer to design their products after the tomorrow has arrived.)

You described Apple as watching its market share disappear to Microsoft, but operating systems and personal computers are two different products, charted separately. Apple competes with computer manufacturers. Microsoft competes with... well, no one. Regarding Apple, except for a few disastrous years right before the Jobs II era, Apple didn't license its os.

Plus, you overrate how successful the Mac was; the early 1980s business computer was the IBM pc, then later the IBM-compatible pc, meaning its os was Microsoft supplied DOS. Many of the computers bought in the 80s and 90s were there for taking work home (running on applications installed via a borrowed company disk.) Microsoft didn't have to bet on Compaq or IBM winning: they got to be high-margin and high-volume whoever won. Apple started being wildly successful after they chose to be high-margin rather than high-volume. That was again Jobs who in 1997 said Apple didn't need Microsoft to lose for Apple to win.

Thing is, in the prognostication game, where there's no consequence for being incorrect, it doesn't really matter if one's predictions come from a precise or flawed historical narrative. So, rock on.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marcello Arrambide
09:28 PM on 07/02/2012
Danny.. you made some great points.. IBM was originally trying to develop its own platform until Apple beat them to its. Apple executives actually visited the IBM campuses and beat them to the punch. The only reason why IBM used Microsoft was because they became the industry standard by licensing their software for free. Apple was in the operating system business and they refused to license their software which is the reason why Microsoft became the industry standard which is why now they compete with manufacturers instead of operating systems. They have done the same things with the iphone and ipad and android for smartphones (and tablets) is basically our generations microsoft by licensing their software.

While much of the time tables are intertwined... Apple released its first computer in 1977 and the only reason that the IBM pc became that standard is because Apple refused to license their software to anyone and Microsoft began to license their software to everyone. I agree with you about the high margins but that was never Apple's goal, their goal was to be innovative and they created jobs, headed by Steve Jobs, that revolutionized industries. That is why they could charge a high margin. Great comment Danny like it.
10:23 PM on 07/03/2012
Incidentally, today Horace Dediu (asymco.com) produced a graph showing the multiple of DOS/Windows pcs vs. Apple Macs. The smallest multiples (more Macs per DOS/Windows pcs) were 1984 and 1990-1995. That latter period was well after the launch of IBM-compatibles and the good years ended with the release of Windows 95 and a new Intel processor (486). The worst multiple was in 2004 and has been in descent since. Best market share of new computers sold: 1984, approximately 30%. In 1985 that share fell to 6% and the early 90s saw shares of approximately 15%.

The story I have seen reported is that IBM chose to pick up existing elements rather than self-develop — and retain all the ip rights — in order to speed up getting to market.They approached Gary Kildall who had written the widely used os CP/M. Reportedly the suits freaked out Kildall's wife and Kildall, vacationing at the time, okayed her telling them to take a hike. IBM had already acquired the rights to Microsoft BASIC and, following Kildall's refusal, asked Gates if the company had an os. Microsoft didn't, but it very quickly acquired QDOS (Quick and Dirty OS) from its creator, and licensed it to IBM, on a non-exclusive basis.

In my book, it is a tossup whether that concession by IBM or 20th Century Fox's disinterest in the Star Wars merchandising represented the greater transfer of value into a satellite entity's pockets.
07:48 PM on 07/02/2012
actually apple didnt innovate
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marcello Arrambide
09:29 PM on 07/02/2012
What do you call the Iphone? And Ipad? Ipod? They innovated the entire tablet industry...
01:17 PM on 07/03/2012
Actually microsoft had come up with the tablet idea back in 2002
Iphone was more of a copy paste of samsung
but ipod was the only thing they actually created
04:32 PM on 07/02/2012
I suspect the author here has not spent any considerable time with a Windows Phone lately. Microsoft does indeed innovate and their new Windows Phone proves that! Sure, they were behind the pack, but evidence shows that they are finally at par with Apple and Google and once Windows 8 comes out will probably be better on many levels with their broader ecosystem.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marcello Arrambide
09:35 PM on 07/02/2012
Jennifer.. I have used the initial version but haven't used it ever since they came out with version 6.5 or 6.1 if I am not mistaken. Now with Android and the Iphone there is no need to try Microsoft. I never said that Microsoft didn't innovate, just like every other massive company they failed to adapt when the internet and mobile took over. They teamed up with Nokia to become an instant leader in mobile, they bought into yahoo to become an instant player in search. Nokia is now dying and Bing (and Yahoo) are holding its own but they are clearly outmatched by Google. Im afraid no one cares about Windows 8, its either Apple or Android.. soon someone will come out with an operating system that will unseat windows. It is already showing since corporations haven't upgraded to Windows 7.. most companies are still running Windows 2007 or Xp
03:36 PM on 07/03/2012
Precisely what Jennifer said, you haven’t tried the windows phone. Version 6.5 is called windows mobile 6.5 which is antique, horrible, I had one and did not like it. Windows phone start from 7.0, and I have been an early adopter windows phone and I think its simply awesome,

I have even used an Iphone, was very smooth, but never had a wow factor, true it was awesome compared to windows mobile6.5 or any basic phone, but windows phone I felt like was much more smoother and faster. Everything was so much more easier and direct with windows phone. I even have an IPAD and an itouch right now. Itouch I use in my car, IPAD,… well got tired of it.

I am actually waiting for Microsoft Surface Pro and I believe its so much more than an IPAD, almost same size, light but does so much more than an IPAD.

You kept comparing the Iphone and Android over Windows Phone 8, Just curious if you had done your research, (I have been following all three very closely) other than the Apps, what else does Iphone and Android excel over Windows Phone 8
03:47 PM on 07/07/2012
I upgraded our company to Windows 7 over a year ago. Most companies will absolutely upgrade to Windows 7, and if you ask folks in IT, I'm sure they'd love to do it. The biggest issue for most companies is cost, not function when comparing XP/7. If your current model is working fine, why pay money to change?

Maybe they wouldn't love the initial work involved in the upgrade, but there is no doubt Windows 7 is head and shoulders above XP.