More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

GET UPDATES FROM Marek D. Chelkowski
 

Occupy Wall Street: Sign of the Times?

Posted: 11/29/11 07:58 AM ET

The Occupy Wall Street movement may be easily dismissed by the right wing of Republican Party (sounds like a redundancy), but its validity can not be disputed. In the last twenty years we have seen fundamental changes on a tectonic scale in the world of business, technology and geopolitical alignment.

The Federal Reserve under Greenspan with ultra low interest rates and politicians in Washington advocating home ownership for everyone regardless of their ability to pay created a housing bubble of gigantic proportions that will take many more years to unwind. During that time China and India powered onto a global economic stage with a huge, very cheap and very hungry workforce which directly affected the US middle class in a very negative way. While health care, education costs and everyday expenses soared, incomes of the middle class have been stagnant since 1996.

In 2008 when major Wall Street firms were bailed out by US taxpayers and went on to come back with record profits it became abundantly clear that the system was rigged in favor of haves and have nots were left holding the bag. I think the central issue for most people is fairness. One only needs to look at what happened at Hewlett-Packard in 2005 when Carly Fiorina was dismissed with a 21 million dollar golden parachute after doing a very poor job as a CEO.

It has become a modus operandi to reward bad performance in the corporate world with huge paychecks reserved only for top brass and dismiss average Joe on the spot for a job done poorly.

America has always tolerated failure -- hell, one may say embraced it -- because of our culture of entrepreneurship and seeking new fronts to fight another day.

It can be said that optimism, never giving up and getting up after a knockdown were invented in a very unique way in this great land of ours. In a democracy such as ours most people applaud success, celebrate and respect great fortunes earned thru hard work, innovation and risk taking. However what most people detest and will not stand for is crony capitalism delivered on a silver platter or through special legislation by our representatives in Washington. Most hard working Americans feel trapped, cornered and disillusioned by the present system based on political connections, corrupt politicians and overwhelming odds stacked against them. I believe that the protests started around Wall Street because it is a symbol of our times.

It should be said unequivocally that most traders, asset managers, and speculators are accountable for their losses and the Federal Reserve, politicians in Washington and US Treasury do not come to the rescue when we get clocked in the markets. As we now know the rules were different for a chosen few, after they blew out with their hugely leveraged derivatives, after creating financial nuclear winter they were allowed to come back with our money and get rewarded all over again. What a country!

So to those who say OWS is a movement against the rich, I say hogwash it is clearly a protest against unfairness and giving advantage to those who need it the least.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:20 AM on 12/01/2011
I remember the early Reagon years when college students were rioting and wondered why not one of them had a solution to whatever they were acting out their frustrations....I lived near Buffalo, NY at the time and glad I was leaving the area as it was becoming so violent with urine and feces thrown out of dorm windows at innocent people and then shootings,,,California was really out of control until Ronnie Reagon put his foot down and stopped it all....How we need someone like him today!! Someone who said what he meant and meant what he said....I never forgot that unless someone has a clear cut answer for the problem, just rioting and disturbing the peace and yes our lives as well will never ever be productive....So I have to feel the same re the Wall Street protestors that have now shut down business's at malls and even hurt the people they claim to represent. Go home and use your God given brains for a better solution!!! What u are doing doesn't work!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugotabkidnme
12:48 PM on 11/30/2011
Wall Street rigged? Many years ago, a US airline carrier's employees were negotiating new contracts when we heard of a stock tip from a distant relative who was an employee.

The airline negotiated a stock market scam with the negotiators. It proposed that the employees threaten to strike and its stock prices would fall upon the news. After the stock prices hit record lows buy the stock, then remove the strike threat and the stock prices will go back up and they will have made up the difference in pay rates and benefits with the money gained in the stock market. The strike threat was removed, the stock prices went back up and the employees publicly caved in on their demands.
Relatives made a bundle.
The system is rigged.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ortho Stice
Only the Left is in its right mind
11:52 AM on 11/30/2011
This is a bit off-topic but close. Last week, the headline screamed "Worst Thanksgiving Week Ever" as the Dow fell 700 points. This week, the Dow is up 700 points, including over 400 today alone. Where are the headlines about that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
freedomny
99% = TBTF
09:50 PM on 11/29/2011
OWS is not against the rich....it is about reforming the current system that is inherently unfair. Do any of you actually believe the the stock market isn't rigged? Why do you think the average investor no longer wants to play in that sandbox?

I used to work at a TBTF bank. After leaving and going to a financial institution who doesn't give money for lobbying, who cares about their customers without fleecing them with hidden fees, and who takes their corporate mission in a responsible manner...I have come to realize that what is being sold to Americans as "capitalism" is really nothing more than a rigged game designed to benefit the few, but not the majority of Americans.

Banker supporting OWS and ethical capitalism.
photo
Greg Mirsky
Riga dimd, Riga dimd, Kas to Rigu dimdinaj?
11:59 AM on 11/30/2011
OWS'ers are not proposing changes to the System but demanding giveaways. That is Socialism, plain and simple. How do I recognize it? Born, raised, and educated in the USSR, baby.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugotabkidnme
12:59 PM on 11/30/2011
Please link us to the demanded giveaways .
07:14 PM on 11/29/2011
Nice piece.

Might also be worth noting here the positive benefits to the overall economy of greater income equality (see, for example: http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/10/13/the-instability-of-inequality/)- more people with some money to spend is better for growth than a tiny number of people with lots...
05:29 PM on 11/29/2011
Not wealth redistribution - but fairness redistribution.
04:02 PM on 11/29/2011
Miley Cyrus has offered her support for OWS. Keep up the good work people. You have some really intellectual heavy weights backing you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
11:48 AM on 11/30/2011
And you're a perfect example of the intellectual lightweights opposing it.
03:33 PM on 11/29/2011
Overall a very good piece. However I don't believe your point about the fed and home ownership is entirely accurate or perhaps oversimplifies the situation a bit.

The fed was indeed heavily promoting home ownership and greenspan was even cheerleading for a bunch of terrible mortgage products. However it didn't force the banks suddenly make poor lending choices. That part [regardless of their ability to pay] came about because of a few other factors:
1) Everyone involved on the banking side thought they were selling off the risky part of the mortgages to someone else
2) Most believed these mortgage backed securities were safe anyway because of their AAA rating
3) Because the fed kept rates so low, there was huge demand for higher rate securities. Mortgage debt fit the bill perfectly and much to the delight of those originating these mortgages, subprime loans were more profitable than high quality loans.

So yes, they were encouraged to help low income families purchase homes but they weren't encouraged to throw sane lending principles out the window. Greed led them to make that decision.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Think4myself
03:22 PM on 11/29/2011
The game is rigged and this level of income disparity only creates conflict for both classes - whether or not your heart is in the right place. If we continue in this economic vein we can expect to continue to see unrest. It's as simple as that. The game rigging against working people is immoral.
photo
budanatr
US Expat in EU
01:20 PM on 11/29/2011
Well said Marek. Thank you.
photo
Capitalism Is King
Obama Has Made Things Worse!
12:57 PM on 11/29/2011
"So to those who say OWS is a movement against the rich, I say hogwash it is clearly a protest against unfairness and giving advantage to those who need it the least."

Hey Marek, OWSers have stated that the movement is against the rich along with a billion other things. When you figure out what they are really for and against, please let us know. No one seems to understand it including OWS.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ultrawiz
Holding the Middle Ground
03:43 PM on 11/29/2011
If that doesn't sound like the Faux Noise pitchline i don't know what does. The OWS has made it clear from day one that their #1 priority is to get money out of politics. I know it takes rubbing a few brain cells together to understand this concept, but please give it a try.
05:51 PM on 11/29/2011
This from a guy with "Capitalism is King" as a moniker. And he doesn't know bailouts at nearly zero interest domestic and foreign is in effect -government rigging markets with preferential treatment towards entities. OWS is about many things cause we have much to fix but its been said over and over that it focuses on fairness. It's also a movement to redefine capitalism back towards risk collateralization. Essentially if the banks know they have the cards to leverage "too big to fail", gov. insured securities or cannibalistic derivative systems then what about the financial products market is capitalism? I think its been clear to anyone with an 8th grade reading or research level - Most Americans. If you persist with ignorance then I think its a cleary your own bias.
photo
Opposition Research
Studying the enemies of civil liberty for 20 years
12:06 PM on 11/29/2011
Very good piece. One thing that has always troubled me about the way that OWS frames itself by its slogan, the 99%, is that it arbitrarily divides good and bad by a wealth line.

And, I say this as someone who unwaveringly defends OWS from all attackers.

Not all of the 1% are people who unethically use the existing system to their own enrichment and the impoverishment of others. There are many wealthy people with consciences and senses of shared responsibility.

It's the unethical foundations that have been woven into our present system that are at fault. The system, including our tax laws, look upon work as an inferior way to make money. *Work* for a decent paycheck, and you pay a higher tax rate than someone who merely moves money around and lets the work of *other* people "grow" his money *FOR* him. Work for it, pay upwards of 25% in federal income tax or more. "Grow" it without lifting a finger of your own, and get off easy at 15%.

This system benefits the already-haves in direct proportion to what they already have.

But the Republicans, rather than correctly pointing out the error in demonizing all of the wealthy, choose to defend the faulty, unethical system.

Stick with the fairness angle, OWS, and you'll have the ethical upper hand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NrthrnLord
Prince of a very small part of the universe.
10:35 AM on 11/29/2011
did you mean 'tectonic'? first paragraph Freudian slip there, homes...hmmm.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:15 AM on 11/29/2011
I believe that the focus of what is now called OWS will eventually come to rest upon the enabling crime: the High Crime of Bribery. (Which was expressly forbidden by Article 2 Section 4 in the original text of our Constitution ... any "Supreme Court decision" to the contrary notwithstanding.)

Let's face it: as per http://www.opensecrets.org, in 2010 the sum of $3.51 Billion (that's with a "B") was paid by 12,941 full-time ... bribers ... to the roughly 650 people who are in Congress. There is absolutely zero way to consider this to be anything but bribery; anything but corruption. (The very lame attempt by "Citizens United" to say otherwise is, frankly, the proof of the pudding.)

To continue: We see more than $1 Trillion being spent on Wars that were never declared, that were never authorized every two years by Congress, both as the Constitution demands. Why? "Ike" knew the answer. There's gobs of money in it, that's why.

To continue: We see outrageous financial swindles being committed, and the SEC is "settling" just as fast as they can and shredding papers by the truckload. Why? "The fix is in."

OWS reminds me very much of "driving the money-changers from the Temple." This government, and the country that it governs, is not a place of business and it most certainly is not a venue for high crime.

High Crime is Real Crime.
05:54 PM on 11/29/2011
I hope we can change the system brother!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:27 PM on 11/30/2011
So true.
10:06 AM on 11/29/2011
Couldn't agree with you more. "Fairness" is a subjective term however, that can be applied differently by people considering the same event, so it's a word to be used carefully. For example, I don't consider it "fair" that the Banks took on excess risk with their economic situation and when things went bad, they received a huge lifeline from our Government. However, is seems that when an individual took too much risk for a home they wanted to live in, they were held accountable, lost the home and all they put into it. There was no help for them (please don't remind me of HAMP and such as they were pitifully small and ineffective programs). Justice might be a better word, but that also has problems as justice is based on the laws created by a particular entity. An example would be segregation laws in the old south. They were laws on the books sot one could say justice was being served. I think we need to conside the use of the word "moral". While different people will again have some different interpretations of "moral" at least we would have some shared definitions of the idea of morality. A society is based on shared morality and can be best understood by the majority of people in our country.
01:40 PM on 11/29/2011
The "lifeline" was paid back to the government.. with interest .. why do Libs seem to always leave that part out ?
05:02 PM on 11/29/2011
Your brain chemistry is off. Did you know that because of the financial crisis, entire countries crashed. Millions of people got hurt. And whereas some monies were paid back...

There are a list of monies that are permanently gone. How about the executives from Fannie Mae that are asking for another $7.8 billion but are in congress asking them not to interfere with spending $21 million for 13 people bonuses.... because $900000 a year isn't quite enough.

Sigh why do I bother.

I'm going to start spotting the David Pulliam bots as faux news zombies....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheRoosterman
Crazy Texan
05:37 PM on 11/29/2011
They should have never received the money in the first place. In a "free market" they all would have failed. Why do Con's always leave that part out?