iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Margaret Wheeler Johnson

GET UPDATES FROM Margaret Wheeler Johnson
 

Jodi Kantor's 'The Obamas' Was Called What In The New York Times Book Review?

Posted: 02/19/2012 2:43 pm

So here we are again. I thought after the Great Jonathan Franzen Debacle of 2001, no man would ever again dare to suggest publicly that there is an inferior class of books that only women read. Then Douglas Brinkley did it in this morning's New York Times Book Review. In his review of Jodi Kantor's "The Obamas," published in January, he wrote:

Call it chick nonfiction, if you will; this book is not about politics, it's about marriage...

"Chick nonfiction": With those two little words, Brinkley provoked a wave of outrage on Twitter and elsewhere.

Author Jennifer Weiner, who has argued in the past that female writers are under-appreciated by critics, weighed in, as did Slate's Dahlia Lithwick and the New Yorker's TV critic Emily Nussbaum. (Scroll down to view their tweets.)

Weiner also told TABLET magazine in an email this morning:

"My suspicion is that if a male reporter had written a detailed, well-researched, revealing book about the First Marriage, it would have been praised as a serious work of journalism. However, when the old, pernicious double standards still apply, if it's a lady doing the investigation, the personal can never be political ... it can only be gossip, and the writer, however skilled a reporter, is still merely a chick."

I assume that by "Chick Nonfiction," Brinkley meant stories women are thought to enjoy reading -- you know, books with anecdote and narrative, books not about the policy decision but about the emotion and relationships that influenced the policy decision.

Is Brinkley suggesting that men don't enjoy this sort of writing? Because if so, he is also basically arguing that no man enjoyed "The West Wing."

It sounds like he thinks "The Obamas" belongs to that set of nonfiction books that are not textbooks or manuals, that are not about economics or warfare or statistical analysis but about marriage, divorce, love, sex, and the absurd joy, hardship, and tragedy family involves. It sounds like he means it's a book about the kind of stuff you think about when you're looking back on the most important moments in your life. It sounds like he doesn't understand that it doesn't get more serious than that.

What's your reaction to Brinkley's review? Tweet it @HuffPostWomen using #chicktweets or #chicknonfiction, and we'll include it the slideshow below.

SLIDESHOW: Twitter Erupts Over NYT Book Review Of 'The Obamas'

 

Follow Margaret Wheeler Johnson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mwjohnso

FOLLOW WOMEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,231
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (51 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:40 AM on 03/04/2012
I think this is a case of someone trying to get a "bandwagon" going, for the rest of us to jump on. Is this author proposing that it is a great work of journalism and that is is only being overlooked because the author is a woman? I think if it had been written by a man, it would still sound the same and I still wouldn't want to read it. Is the author of this article offended by the term "chick flick" too? What's the big deal? Women typically do like to read and watch and do, much different things than men. Does that mean that only women would like this? I for one cannot answer that, and I don't think anyone else can either. But in the end, who really cares?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mr Universe
Shiny, let's be bad guys
10:37 PM on 02/22/2012
Anybody catch the irony of this story being posted in the women's section of HP?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:44 AM on 03/04/2012
Oh, good one Mr. Universe. Yeah Huff Post. Way to validate your women authors.
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
06:44 PM on 02/22/2012
And what's wrong with chick nonfiction? A better description would take more words: Relationship propaganda for women of the way the Obamas want us to think things are between them which we all know can't be true all the time - and won't interest men in the slightest.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:45 PM on 02/22/2012
Personally I don't get turned off by the term "chick lit" or even "chick flick." In fact when someone describes a book or movie as such, I know exactly what to expect and more times than not I'll buy it, read it or watch it. For anyone else who feels the same way, here's a list of great chick lit...I've read most of them!

Chick Lit Worth Reading
http://www.skinnyscoop.com/list/citychic/2011-female-fiction-must-reads
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:00 PM on 02/22/2012
A woman writes about THIS presidential marriage and it is labeled "chick nonfiction". However plenty of books about presidential marriages have preceded this one. There are tomes written about the principled and loving matrimonies of Richard and Patricia Nixon, Gerald and Betty Ford, Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter, Ronald and Nancy Reagan as well as George and Laura Bush. These titles are considered biographical nonfiction.

Rather than join in the common contretemps about Brinkley's chauvinistic remark perhaps a more critical analysis of his observation questions if Douglas Brinkley considers a book about the Obama marriage a downmarket title compared to books about other presidential marriages?"
09:33 AM on 02/22/2012
I "dare to suggest" that women and men are different. I daresay a woman *cannot* do anything that a man can do. For example, men create infrastructure, and women do not. Women function only within infrastructure created by men, like a nation, like democratic process, like a family. Men create concepts like north, south, east and west. Men create ethics. And so on. Without these things chaos ensues. So the reason society is degenerating is because male responsibility and authority have been removed. Tyranny takes their place and causes more chaos. Every society that has removed male authority has disintegrated. The Taoists state that without the Yang the Yin will disappear. The whole non-Western world knows this, but white people are ignorant, and always have been. Worse than ignorant, stubbornly self-righteous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OliviaBolivia27
from the Sosialistisk Venstreparti of Wisconsin
08:40 PM on 02/22/2012
You must be joking!
09:10 AM on 02/24/2012
I am not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fpwillson
Fighter for justice and the truth
12:06 AM on 02/23/2012
I suggest that you buy a 30 foot extension ladder. No step ladder is going to get you up and over that ego of yours.
09:13 AM on 02/24/2012
I'm not at all interested in what you think of me. I am, however, very interested in what you think of what I said.
06:00 PM on 02/21/2012
Women are often underestimated due to their sex and I find it ridiculous. Just because we do not have the same body parts of a man makes us no different from them. In our world women have actually invented so many brilliant things (and not just in the field of literature). People just need to open their hypocritical eyes and realize we are all equal and it about time we get the same treatment.
photo
VeryGrood
only class worse than micro-bio was molecular-bio
04:39 PM on 02/21/2012
Clearly this review is incorrect. I mean.... The fact that women are reacting so emotionally for being characterized as 'emotional' shows that there is nothing at all to this idea.

The phrase 'chick flick' is still pretty common... And I haven't heard anyone complain about that. It must be a.slow news day.
01:49 PM on 02/21/2012
Om bad choice of words. But it is a chick nonfiction novel.
12:41 PM on 02/21/2012
Women also react emotionall­y to the suggestion they react emotionall­y, ironically­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kurt Reply
09:16 PM on 02/20/2012
I don't know about the book being chick non-fiction, but this article by Margaret Wheel Johnson certainly is. But, what can you expect from a woman who can't even make up her mind about what last name to use.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackieSmith890
01:41 AM on 02/21/2012
wow, great point. her name really has an impact on what she's saying. foolproof logic.

then we wonder why colleges have affirmative action for boys now. this section isn't for you. go diddle yourself to internet porn.
photo
seltzer5000
GOD FAMILY GUNS COUNTRY
07:19 PM on 02/20/2012
I posted earlier I hold in reserve Mr. Obama stating that he is a Christian based on his current and past record in whole.I disagre with Mr. Obamas policies. That being said
I do believe there are a few Democrats that are Christians. I don’t know of any left wing liberals. So I ask the following question for any Democrats or Left wing Liberal Christians. PLEASE write back what Chapter and verse of the Christian BIBLE in the New Testament that you do not believe or agree with ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
horsestoy
opinionated but will listen to opposing views.
08:33 PM on 02/20/2012
Most Democrats I know are left wing liberals! And I don't think Obama is a Christian! he may say so, but it isn't true. There are a lot of articles, verified by snopes, about it. Look them up! They are hard to find, but theuy are out there. I have some Democrats in the family that are Christians, but I am a Republican Christian. And I am not right wing, I am reasonable.
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
05:17 AM on 02/21/2012
"And I don't think Obama is a Christian! he may say so, but it isn't true."

So that church he went to for 20 years wasn't really a church and he spent 20 years trying to fool people?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denisehopes
2016--you will be in Clinton Country!
06:28 AM on 02/21/2012
How dare you "judge" who is, and is not Christians...are you GOD? Do you know people's hearts? From your nasty statements many would "believe" that YOU are not Christian....as for this "the President stayed in that church" nonsense....am I, and many Christians of other faiths, to believe that people are to be condemned for staying in a church where the pastor or "PRIEST" did one thing, while espousing another? if that is the case then all Catholics are not Christians because MANY of them have stayed true to their Catholic faith even after learning that HUNDREDS or maybe even THOUSANDS of, what you assumed were "good" priest raped and molested INNOCENT CHILDREN....are we too assume that these people listened to what sinful and filthy priest taught them for years, while they all sat in the peers, and many still sit there, while knowing that many of these priest STILL are teaching and giving communion??? Please folks stop throwing stones, when your own windows are already broken and busted...at least this President LEFT Wright's church, Insanity is still sitting, and taking his children to, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH...he is a HYPOCRITE...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NaaJane
Irony has a liberal bias.
11:43 PM on 02/20/2012
You seem unenlightened with a very myopic worldview. I would suggest you take stroll outside your house once a day.
photo
seltzer5000
GOD FAMILY GUNS COUNTRY
12:19 AM on 02/21/2012
Unenlightened? I think not. I just asked a straightforward question. Yet no one can answer it And You know exactly why.
By the way I love walking outside everyday.
Thank you for responding
07:16 PM on 02/20/2012
Yes,I believe women are second rate readers. I am a woman in my sixties and started a book club of my friends and I am so disappointed in what the women want to read. They are mostly
off the fiction list. There are so many books written at the seventh grade level and while
the stories may be somewhat interesting the writing is terrible. Give me Steinbech, Hemingway
and the great classics.and well written historical events. I think we should be learning and
expanding. I wish the women wanted to read more non-fiction . All they say, it was
on the best sellers fiction list and of course I think so what . Are we reading about worthwhile
people, and events and reading the truly fine authors. This Obama book is not worth reading
because he has done nothing memorable in my eyes. Let's uplift this society with good
books and good MUSIC.
09:09 PM on 02/20/2012
Pointtaken: Snookie's book was on the best sellers list :)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
artemes10
10:56 PM on 02/20/2012
You may be in the wrong book group, but don't throw out the baby with the bath water...Not all women are "second-rate readers." Just like the women who prefer "chick lit," there are also men who would rather read "di@k lit" than quality literature. But that doesn't give those of us who prefer our reading to be more intellectual the right to dictate for those who do, nor does it give us the right to deride them for their tastes. The problem with the labels (chick-this" and "di@k that") is that they are derogatory. Let's just laugh at them and then move on. The time for such silliness is past.
01:29 PM on 02/21/2012
I agree with your comment. At least they are reading. I had started my
book group myself with the intention of gathering hand picked women who wanted to
read "good literature". That worked for a while until others came into the group.
Oh well, I compromised.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mmmonetee
07:13 PM on 02/20/2012
When it comes to President Obama "THEY" will always find fault when he have done nothing wrong. My President I hold you to the most hioghest honor. A good MAN.
12:05 AM on 02/21/2012
LOL
07:00 PM on 02/20/2012
Calling anything "chick lit" (or "chick non-fiction") just seems so infantilizing and dismissive. It conjures up images of pink fluffy feathers and horribly written, inane passages about painting your nails. Okay, granted a lot of "literature" is that, but that's just BAD lit. It's wrong to slap "chick lit" on everything that's written by a woman, or that is about family and relationships. "Oh, it's about marriage? WELL, now THERE'S a topic that shouldn't concern men at all. Chick nonfiction!"
photo
kapalabhati
Lokah Samasta Sukhino Bhavantu
12:39 PM on 02/21/2012
Of course it is. Any work, literature, theater, film, what have you, in which a woman is the lead is considered "women's or chicks'." Women's roles are to be supporting, T and A, or to be "saved" by a man in order to be acceptable. Cripes, even the TV shows in which a woman is allegedly the star (with a few exceptions, Medium, the Closer, the Good Wife, I'm looking at you!) the female lead is objectified.
07:10 PM on 02/21/2012
A massive problem. "Chick lit" is totally offensive, but just the tip of the iceberg.