More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marian Salzman

Marian Salzman

Posted: February 14, 2010 09:20 PM

An Olympic Tragedy

What's Your Reaction:

A pall was cast over this year's Winter Olympics before they even started, when Georgian luger Nodar Kumaritashvili lost control at 88 miles per hour during a training run and flew over a corner at Whistler Sliding Centre. His death, at age 21, was unquestionably a tragedy, as well as a reminder that the risks of life can be awful -- it seems now that we're incredibly fragile creatures, all just a freak accident away from the end. The sadness is immense, as it is anytime someone dies so long before the expected time.

But all of those emotions are amplified tremendously by the fact that the accident happened during one of the most watched sporting events in the world. An international spotlight was trained on Vancouver to begin with, and today's right-now social media climate, with our constant news-as-it-happens updates, refracted the horrifying news and sent out it through so many prisms. The result was hard to take your eyes off of. For a few hours last Friday afternoon, it was a story we were all riveted to.

In 2010, news unfolds in real time. We know what's happening as it happens. Organizations can't hope no one learns what's going on, nor can they spin their way out of anything. In the immediate aftermath, the International Olympic Committee seemed to do all right. It called a press conference and announced that an investigation into the safety of the track was under way within hours, and it quickly posted a statement of "great regret" on the Vancouver 2010 website. John Furlong, head of the Vancouver Organizing Committee, said in that press conference: "Kumaritashvili came here to be able to feel what it's like to be able to call yourself an Olympian. We are heartbroken beyond words... When we know the substance of what happened, you will know it."

But as SportsIllustrated.com points out, it turns out there's much to be investigated. Many experts have criticized the excessive speed of the track, and a member of the U.S. Luge Association told SI that Olympic organizers had told him, privately, that the track was not meant to be so fast. Christoph Schweiger, secretary general of the Austrian Luge Federation, suggested in a press conference that the course's speed and difficulty are unsuited for less experienced athletes from smaller countries. He said, "Georgia is not a nation like Canada, Germany, USA, Italy or Russia."

But with 82 countries participating in the Games this year, shouldn't the course have been designed to be safe for all of them? Where were the safety wardens? Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili is asking the same question.

Another, arguably bigger, question is what happens to the adage "the show must go on" when the show includes social media. I'm sure no one thought the Games should have been canceled -- what about the lifetime of work the thousands of other athletes put in to get to Vancouver? But was the fanfare necessary?

The opening ceremonies reflected the organizers' struggle with this question. The show went on as planned, with a daredevil snowboarder jumping through a giant set of Olympic rings, then hit what CNN called a "somber note" as the remaining seven members of the Georgian delegation entered wearing black armbands. But after that sad intro, the next country was upbeat.

And by late Friday night, the IOC had changed its tune, releasing a coldhearted statement that blamed Kumaritashvili because he "did not compensate properly to make correct entrance into curve 16" and said officials had "concluded there was no indication that the accident was caused by deficiencies in the track."

This set the stage for the IOC's show to go on and prompted one angry sports reporter to write that the officials treated Kumaritashvili's death as "less a tragedy than an inconvenience." Instead of the promised investigation, they made quick changes to the track--contoured ice to direct sleds toward the middle and put up a high wooden wall near the fatal curve and padding on beams near the finish line--and announced that the men would start at a lower, slower point on the course. However, they positioned these changes as steps to accommodate athletes' emotional state, not to improve safety.

On Saturday afternoon the first round of the Olympic luge contest got under way as scheduled. The cable news coverage of the accident wound down. The sport fell off Twitter's trending topics. In real time, we too zipped past and kept going.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
06:27 AM on 02/16/2010
Thanks.
Best article on the subject so far.

Yes...the course should be designed for the least experienced of those who will ever use the track.

Don't forget, The Olympics is not about the best athletes in the world, but the best each country has to offer.

Everyone involved should face consequences for the death of the athlete.
06:59 PM on 02/15/2010
maybe instead of attempting to design course any luger could get down....qualifications ought to tighten so only the most experienced lugers go down the toughest courses

but a the end of the day....how safe can any extreme sport really be made..
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
06:34 AM on 02/16/2010
At the end of the day....Canada bough a track they expected would not throw an athlete from the track.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudman
12:02 AM on 02/15/2010
Yes this athlete's untimely death is tragic. It is also important for us as a species to acknowledge that life well lived has risks. To assume that all activities just be made zero risk is not reasonable. People die doing all kind of things - walking, running, swimming, mountain climbing, driving, flying. We should aim to minimize unneccessary risks, and further investigation of this accident may in fact reveal that there was negligence in the design of the track that created unneccessary risk, but we can't and shouldn't demand that activities carry zero risk.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
06:33 AM on 02/16/2010
The track was supposed to be designed for zero risk of death due to flying out of the track.
Not zero risk of injury...zero risk of death.
10:33 PM on 02/14/2010
So you are saying there is no risk in a sport where men and women soar at 85 plus MPH on a piece of wood?

It's a tragedy but please get real.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
06:31 AM on 02/16/2010
There should be no risk to life, due to poor track design.

ALL athletes take the "wrong line", especially when an athlete is learning a particular track. It is ridiculous, heartless and maybe worse...to blame the athlete.

Canada athletes getting 300+ runs and limiting access to other nations is contrary to the Olympic Spirit....AND a MAJOR safety violation.
The more training one has, the safer an athlete is.
02:52 PM on 02/17/2010
You are missing the point CigarGod - why do seek blaming someone? What is the point? It was an accident, a risk this man took for the thrill of the competition and gold and it cost him this one time. It is very sad and my heart goes out to his family but blaming someone doesn't change anything - I am sure because of his death they will change the sport/track requirements so that everyone will be on equal ground, the very skilled will suffer and the less skilled will gain an advantage. Regarding the blame game - whatever happened to taking ownership of ones actions? Stop the excuses, if an athlete picked this sport as their passion, knew their competition has 300+ runs under their belt...why didn't they go and do the same so that they didn't put themselves at risk? No one is being "ridiculous, heartless" they are just stating the obvious.