Recently, the United Nations expressed new concern about a crisis many Americans know little about: the use of child soldiers in global conflicts, especially in Somalia. Somalia, whose government collapsed in 1991, has been in a constant state of conflict and tension for years and still has no legally recognized government. The United States joins Somalia as the only two countries in the world not to ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child, an international treaty recognizing the human rights of children that UNICEF points out is the most widely and rapidly ratified human rights treaty in history. One of the Convention’s provisions prohibits the use of soldiers younger than age 15 in conflicts. The United States did ratify a later optional protocol prohibiting the use of soldiers younger than 18. But in Somalia, both insurgent groups and the Transitional Federal Government—which is dependent on help from the West, including, especially, the United States—have been widely accused of violating this principle.
The United Nations estimates the Somali military is using hundreds of child soldiers, some as young as age nine. As one official from the transitional government told the New York Times, when it came time to recruit and equip their army, “I’ll be honest…we were trying to find anyone who could carry a gun.” The New York Times said, “Officials also revealed that the United States government was helping pay their soldiers, an arrangement American officials confirmed, raising the possibility that the wages for some of these child combatants may have come from American taxpayers.”
As shameful as it is that the United States may be inadvertently paying the salaries of Somali child soldiers, it shouldn’t be surprising. Our nation continues to allow gun violence to destroy thousands of children’s lives at home too. The Children’s Defense Fund (CDF) has documented the threat of gun violence against American children for nearly two decades since we learned in a Peter Hart Associates poll undertaken by CDF’s Black Community Crusade for Children that the number one concern of Black adults and youths was gun violence. So many in both generations feared they or their children would never reach adulthood because of pervasive gun violence. Although some progress has been made to reduce gun violence, it is at risk of being negated by the aggressive NRA pro-gun campaign and the U.S. Supreme Court decision relaxing the reach of gun control laws.
In our latest annual report, Protect Children, Not Guns 2010, and in a special section on gun violence in The State of America’s Children 2010, we show that in 2007, 3,042 children and teens died from gunfire in the United States—eight every day—as a result of homicide, suicide, or accidental or undetermined shootings. Almost six times as many children and teens suffered non-fatal gun injuries, which have serious physical and emotional consequences. Random violence, especially in poor communities, drives thousands of vulnerable young people into the pipeline to prison where they remain trapped with little chance of escape. Consider these other startling facts on gun violence from our research:
Since 1979 gun violence has ended the lives of 110,645 children and teens in America. Fifty-nine percent of them were White and 37 percent were Black. Fifty-six percent were homicides and 31 percent were suicides. The 3,042 deaths of children and teens from gunfire in 2007 nearly equaled the total number of U.S. combat deaths in Iraq through February 2010. More Black children and teens died from gun violence in 2007—1,499—than all the military deaths in Afghanistan since America’s engagement in that war began nine years ago. Black males ages 15–19 are more than five times as likely as their White peers and more than twice as likely as their Hispanic peers to be killed by firearms. White children and teens are six times as likely as any other racial or ethnic group to be victims of firearm-related suicide. The annual number of firearm deaths of White children and teens decreased by 54 percent between 1979 and 2007, while the deaths of Black children and teens increased by 61 percent.
Violence is a widespread problem for American youths. Almost one in five high school students admitted carrying a weapon in 2007; one-third of those students brought the weapon to school. One in 20 admitted carrying a gun. One in 18 high school students reported staying home from school because they felt unsafe at school or going to or from school.
There are over 280 million privately owned firearms in the United States, which is the equivalent of nine firearms for every ten men, women and children in our country. Recent court decisions challenging handgun bans could add to these numbers. Just as children should not be paid soldiers in armed conflicts half a world away, they also should not be forced to live in fear of the widespread armed threat in American streets, schools, and homes.
What is it going to take for adults in America to stand up and say enough to the violence that is terrorizing and killing our children? No enemy without poses as great a threat as the gun enemy within.
Follow this link to read our latest report, Protect Children, Not Guns 2010.
Follow Marian Wright Edelman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChildDefender
Dennis A. Henigan: Message to Progressives: Reclaim the Constitution!
What goes unsaid is their study includes shooting of 18 and 19 year old men by law enforcement. Is this intended to mislead people?? You decide.
You posted that same statistic a little over a year ago and will give you the same reply I posted then:
Did you also know that ages 14-25 are the peak ages for criminal activity? Did you know that living in urban areas provides more opportunities for crime (more offices, shops, houses, cars, etc)? Did you know that being a child in a working class home also makes you more likely to engage in criminal behavior? Sadly, all three of those criteria encompass a large number of black male youth. Naturally, black 15-19 males will be more likely to be killed by a firearm, because they are more likely to be engaged in criminal behavior.
I'd like to see some statistics that break out the why on this gun violence. How many children were defending themselves against rapists, another thing I witnessed as a child that wasn't treated very seriously since "they were just kids"? How many are suicides?
Everyone is opposed to gun crime. But I'm not convinced that guns and not crime are the problem.
According to the statistics I read in the report, the approx. 87% majority of the 3,000 deaths in 2007 were were in the 15-19 age range. Why does this report include the statistics on 18 and 19 year old adults, yet is labeled "Protect Children, Not Guns"? Are 18 and 19 year olds, who are legally designated adults and plenty of which serve in our military, considered children by the Children's Defense Fund?
One of the solutions offered by the report is for individuals and families to remove firearms from the home. Pretty blunt suggestion, but not sure if the report is suggesting voluntarily or if by legislation. I guess it can't hurt to suggest it.
The report does not call for an assault weapon ban, which is surprising to me. That's usually a staple of any report like this one. Wonder why they left it out?
Agreed. So let's address the causes of violence instead of being so obsessed with what objects they use.
Only when you include adults age 18 and 19. Remove the adults from the tally and the number drops in half. (Source: Centers for Disease Control)
It sounds so high-minded to be against using children as soldiers, but lets remember WWII, when many thousands of children took action against the Germans, Italians, Japanese, and Communists, and failure to do so could have prolonged the war significantly!
Semper fi
Semper fi
Semper fi
Why is this not a pervasive fear among white people?
Could it be that that #1 killer of black people are other black people?
We have child soldiers here in the US too. They're called gang members. Take a look at any densely populated urban city here in the US and you'll see a common theme; Gangs and the subsequent violence perpetuated by gangs. Take Chicago as an example:
2005) Victims of gang-related murders: 70% African American, 26% Hispanic, 3% white; 93% male. Offenders in gang-related murders: 76% African American, 20% Hispanic, 3% white; 99% male. Victims of domestic-related murders: 79% African American, 10% Hispanic, 11% white. Victims of armed robbery—related murders: 68% African American, 13% Hispanic, 19% white, 89% male. Offenders in armed robbery—related murders: 87% African American, 9% Hispanic, 4% white; 93% male.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Chicago
The problem with identifying gang violence? If you do so, you are a "racist." Although gang violence isn't exclusive to minorities, minorities, especially young african americans, make up a significant majority of gang affiliation and violence. What we need to do is identify the social and socio-economic factors contributing to this glaringly disporportionate gang participation. But we can't, because we'd be "targeting" minorities.
So instead, we demonize GUNS. Inanimate objects. Tools of the trade. Our failure to target gangs, with either social intervention or direct criminal enforcement is just as much an injustice as if the US KNOWINGLY paid child soldiers in Somalia out of our own pockets.
So why this disparity?