More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marian Wright Edelman

GET UPDATES FROM Marian Wright Edelman

Poor Children: Stranded at Sea

Posted: 03/18/11 05:47 PM ET

As Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Julia Cass prepared the recent Children's Defense Fund's report "Held Captive": Child Poverty in America, she traveled to the Mississippi Delta, the ravaged cities of New Orleans and Baton Rouge in Louisiana, and the birthplace of the suburban American dream in Long Island, New York to see several different sides of contemporary American child poverty. Despite the different circumstances children in these diverse communities faced, Cass found that there was something very familiar about the effects of child poverty everywhere she looked. The report's title came from 13-year-old Audrey, who Cass met in rural Lambert, Mississippi. Cass heard Audrey say something "that captures the feeling of poverty that only those caught in it know and that could have been said by most all the children I met while researching this report. I remarked that Audrey seemed isolated in this decaying town where 34.5 percent of households live in poverty. 'Yeah,' she said, 'Isolated. Remote island. Held captive.'"

For Cass, Audrey's words summed up a particular truth about poor children's lives. Cass found that most of the young children she talked to wished most for "ordinary things or experiences that most children who are not poor take for granted. Jillian, 8, who lives with her parents and brother in a single motel room in Hempstead, N.Y., described the bedroom she wants -- real big, purple, with a pink princess bed and purple and white shelves for Barbie dolls. Jason, 9, has lived in 11 places in his short life and now stays in a homeless shelter in New Orleans. He wishes he could be 'in an actual house with my own room and closet and stuff' and be on a swimming team and go to the beach and surf." But being "held captive" on the "remote island" of poverty, as Audrey describes it, puts even what may seem like ordinary childhood experiences impossibly out of reach. As Cass says: "For poor children... poverty means more than money. For them, it can be a life sentence of exile from the larger society... Poor children and children who are not poor live in utterly different worlds."

Cass continues: "All parents, no matter how much money they have, need all the help they can get to raise happy, productive children, but parents who are not poor have more time and money to invest in them. They raise their children in decent, safe neighborhoods, send them to good schools, take them on trips, buy them books, bicycles and computers, get them counseling or tutoring if they need it, and music, or art lessons if they want them. They read to them and become involved in their school and other activities. They do this because they know it makes a difference, and even in tough economic times, they struggle to offer extras to their children. Think of it this way: Children who are not poor live on land. They can see the horizon and make choices and plans as they move forward into the future. They have opportunities, experiences and supports unknown by poor children. They are on the playing field."

But, Cass says, "Poor children swim in a sea of poverty. It is all they know. They go to inferior schools and day care centers where everyone around them is poor. They live in poor, rundown, unsafe neighborhoods. Compared to other children, they are exposed to more family turmoil, violence, instability and chaotic households. They are read to infrequently by their under-educated parents, watch more TV, and have less access to books and computers. Their parents and almost everyone they know are poor and struggling. They lack nutritious food. They receive less social support. Most cannot see land no matter how hard they paddle. They give up and tread water. Too often, they flounder... Even a poor child who makes it onto land is not equally poised to be successful because the playing field is not even. Worse, many are left behind in the sea of poverty, never making it onto land at all."

Cass sums up her metaphor this way: "The banking system, auto industry and other businesses considered 'too big to fail' are being rescued and subsidized. Children are small, and they are being allowed to fail. America is allowing children like Audrey to flop around in the sea of poverty. Over the past 40 years, America has added a patch here and there to the safety net, but has never made a serious, comprehensive, sustained effort to bring children out of the captivity of poverty even though the well-being of children is at least as important to the future as the health of banks and major industries—and vital to the American ideal of equal opportunity for all." Like the child's drawing of a small figure in a boat in CDF's logo, we are leaving millions of poor children stranded on remote islands or drifting alone on a big sea.

Click here to read "Held Captive": Child Poverty in America.

 

Follow Marian Wright Edelman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChildDefender

 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:42 AM on 03/21/2011
I am heartbroken over how we decide to spend our nation's resources, with children at the bottom of the list of priorities.
photo
laymancanuck
Left of centre, because it works for everyone.
02:18 PM on 03/19/2011
With 25% of America's children living in poverty, the myth of upward mobility being debunked, this situations predicts untold social problems for America. Deeply entrenched in American culture is the personal responsibility belief. I would interpret that belief as stating that because society offers limitless opportunities, only determination and hard work is required to succeed. Therefore, if some one is in poverty it's their own fault. The social impact of that belief frees the haves in society from any reasonability and conveniently puts the blame on the victims of poverty. I believe their is a more mature social philosophy that would move America from denial and blame, to acceptance of America's most damaging social problem. Evolution is require in the cultural belief system from personal responsibility to social responsibility.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
12:32 PM on 03/19/2011
Unfortunately, this research contradicts the "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" beliefs of the conservative movement, which takes the position that poverty in adulthood is the result of personal moral failings, not social stratification and basic unfairness. How to shatter that frozen 'belief box' and demonstrate to conservatives that the world is not as they imagine it to be IS the challenge faced by all who aspire to create a humane and loving 21st century civilization that can truly lay claim to the title of "civilized."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
10:52 AM on 03/19/2011
Children make up the majority of our nation's poor.

A society should be measured by how it cares for its sick, its children, and its elderly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
12:39 PM on 03/19/2011
f&f - my very definition of "civilized" would be a society where ALL are naturally provided with what they need so they might explore their passions, discover their talents and hone their skills, and then fully and freely self-actualize to their highest capacity. Likewise, ALL individuals would be responsible - upon their mature self-actualization - for gifting whatever support they have to offer into the larger society that empowered them, sustains them and nurtures ALL forms of life, along with the planet.

Needless to say, we're not there yet.
photo
babybecks
"because I am involved in Mankind;"
08:41 AM on 03/19/2011
I don't know what to say after reading the piece above. It's just too sad. Every child deserves better.

The country's priorities are askew in every way humanly possible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Over40
04:02 AM on 03/19/2011
I recall seeing an ABC news segment on the children of Cambden, an impoverished town in New Jersey.
In it, a little boy (maybe nine or ten years old) described his dream of having a house with lace curtains,
and then confided, heartbreakingly, that he knew he would never have that home. I so wanted to tell him that
his good-for-nothing mother might never realize that dream for him BUT HE COULD if he stayed in school.
These children have the hope beaten out of them - often by their own families who recycle a hopeless (and
often angry) mindset from generation to generation unless it is broken. It shows the importance of having other, more supportive, adults in these children's lives to let them know they are not necessarily condemed to repeating the cycle and that there are ways out if they are willing to work and not give up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
10:48 AM on 03/19/2011
Odd, these adults you are attacking were children too not so long ago.

Most parents want good things for their children.

We are too wealthy a nation to be leaving so many families behind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
12:44 PM on 03/19/2011
It's important that, as we experience empathy for the children of the poor, we continue to look deeper still. Look deeply enough at the parents, and you will see the child within them that was never nourished, never offered good role modeling, never educated, never supported in the realization of their own dreams. However far back down that rabbit hole we choose to go, we will discover that no society has ever yet figured out how to care for its weakest, and bring forth their gifts, because as far back as we can peer we've been playing a win/lose game. Capitalism requires that there be many, many more losers than winners, because money (and wealth) is relative in that system. Prices fluctuate based on the amount of money people are willing to bid for goods and services, so the competition - which is DESIGNED into the system - demands there be winners and losers. The solution is not to blame the losers, but to redesign the system to a win/win game.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PTAOfficerforObama
A micro bio is a terrrible thing to waste.
10:24 PM on 03/18/2011
Children don't vote. I work in a small town that has 1 school. There is a set of haves and of have nots. It is so sad to see the kids who have nothing listen to those who do talk about their toys, trips, birthday parties. I was once asked by a student not to tell it was his birthday because he couldn't bring cupcakes (I did). I have kids whose only meals are free breakfast and free lunch. I shudder to think about weekends and vacations. We are losing a lot of good kids.
photo
babybecks
"because I am involved in Mankind;"
08:41 AM on 03/19/2011
Your cupcake story made me very sad, and happy all at the same time. It's a relief to know that there are people that truly care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
10:49 AM on 03/19/2011
Yes, but its sad that individuals have to pick up the pieces of our broken economy.
11:39 AM on 03/19/2011
Children don't vote. Government is beholden to old money and lobbyists who represent the past. The baby boomer generation (I confess to being a member), has robbed the kitty and stolen the loot leaving these kids with a bill they can't pay. I have worked in school grades 1-7 and seen how sensitive kids are to class/wealth divisions. You can't change the world. Just do your best, kid by kid.
08:39 PM on 03/18/2011
You hit this one on the nose Marian. You start wondering if politicians' values and ideals are different from ours... They seem to be constructed in tidal areas, just waiting to be swept away by the first wave of lobbyists and defense contractors.
David Strohm
boomkids.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
12:50 PM on 03/19/2011
Politicians, like everyone else, are trapped in the for-profit paradigm. They want to feed their families and hold onto their jobs, so they bow to the pressures of the moneyed interests that support their political campaigns. They rationalize that they can't do good for people if they're not in power, so if that means they have to do some bad things in order to be able to do a few good things, that's better than losing and perhaps not being able to do any good. At least that's how they sleep with themselves at night...but I bet on occasion it gets a bit schizophrhenic inside their heads.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Romaine Chritton
06:57 PM on 03/18/2011
Happy Edleman is still fighting the fight for the benefits and rights of children. Unfortunately, her fight has been going on for decades and no end is in sight. Poverty is alive and well in America, and will become more prevalent as politicians try to balance a budget at the expense of its most vulnerable citizens.
06:55 PM on 03/18/2011
Very well stated. Many kids simply never have a chance for a normal childhood with at least the basics needs filled. And if the teapublicans keep going like they have been things will only get worse.
06:42 PM on 03/18/2011
I betcha out of the few kids who "make it" out of this cycle of poverty end up contributing to society more so than the children of parents who "have". They are more inclined to appreciate the things that privileged kids take for granted, and work harder to improve the lives of those around them and "give back". For those who don't make it out, remember, wear a condom, otherwise, as is the common phrase, those who don't learn from the past, (or history) are doomed to repeat it. Until then, blame the government and the big fish "haves" who sold our country out, therefore making it impossible for our economic infrastructure to compete globally, therefore creating a large percentage of at least 2 generations to rely on, and wait for disability checks, welfare benefits, and unemployment checks as the norm, live beyond their means, and make Kurt Cobain, Jennifer Aniston, Jerry Seinfeld, Brittany Spears, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Lindsay Lohan more important than knowing the names of people such as their kids high school guidance counselors. This is insensitive, and people will gripe and scold me for this, but in these types of scenarios, I am so tired of watching our nation struggle under the weight of our own self created misery of poverty to the point that I would love to see forced sterilization of men and women who have children of whom they cannot provide for. Desperate times call for desperate measures. Until then, enjoy the toil people.
06:24 PM on 03/18/2011
I FULLY SUPPORT AFFIRMATIVE ACTION based on economics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
10:50 AM on 03/19/2011
We were making great strides as a nation.

Then Reagan came along.

Its been a retreat on all fronts since then.
06:11 PM on 03/18/2011
Our country continues to deny every child the right to healthcare and education. It should be obvious
that to do so is not only immoral but unsustainable. When more and more of our children are left
in poor health and fewer opportunities for higher education and decent paying jobs, we are courting disaster. When will the powers that be put the growth of human potential above and beyond their own greed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
05:45 PM on 03/18/2011
The took Buses into to New Orleans and gave people Vouchers to start over in a new place.

Why not do the same with people in the back woods of Mississippi and Alabama even Arkansas.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LisaViger
Vegan, Socialist, Atheist, Peace Monger
02:35 AM on 03/19/2011
Why should people have to leave their homes? There's nothing intrinsically poor about Mississippi or Alabama, or wherever (and poverty is in every state). The difference is how poverty and "poor people" and people in general are treated and what we choose to value.

Poverty is about a misuse of our collective attention and interest, nothing else.
photo
laymancanuck
Left of centre, because it works for everyone.
05:35 PM on 03/18/2011
Outstanding. This is the biggest issue facing America. Save the children or watch society decline. A hungry child will be a angry adult.