More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Mariana Caplan, Ph.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Mariana Caplan, Ph.D.
 

Psychology and Spirituality: One Path or Two?

Posted: 09/ 1/2011 8:53 am

There is great debate, and in many cases a sharp divide, between practitioners of psychology and those of spirituality. On one end of the spectrum, most of mainstream psychology does not concern itself with issues of consciousness and spirit and rejects what is not scientifically quantifiable. On the other end, many contemporary spiritual traditions view the psyche as an unreal construct and believe that psychological work is an indulgent reinforcement of the story of the false self.

In between these poles lies a variety of approaches that take into account both the personal and impersonal aspects of our experience, validating that some aspects of our experience can be empirically confirmed while others remain mysterious but equally "real." Meanwhile, many mainstream psychotherapists and their clients continue to miss out on the benefits of spiritual wisdom, and many teachers and students of Western spirituality make grave errors by rejecting the psychological domain, and thus not cultivating skills and practices to work with it effectively.

Ultimately, psychology and spirituality do not need to be distinct, but it can be helpful to make distinctions between them in order to understand the primary function of each in relation to the other. We can then discover how these approaches complement and support one another, together forming a more complete approach to human understanding than either one alone can provide.

Spiritual understanding comes from a direct perception of a greater intelligence, force or power. Some people call it non-duality; others call it Christ, Allah, spirit or God. Spiritual technologies help us access an experience of consciousness itself, and sustained spiritual practice supports us in learning to anchor ourselves in a more abiding sense of that greater reality. Meanwhile, psychological work helps unravel the complex strands that constitute our personal psyche -- patterns and wounds that, if not tended to, can impede our growth and block our perception of spiritual realities.

In 1994 I lived and studied in India for a year, and during that time I rented a room from a European man, who we will call Hans. As a child during World War II, Hans spent several years imprisoned in Japanese concentration camps, during which he experienced extreme trauma produced by torture and separation from his family. As a young adult he set out for India, and by the time I met him he had lived there for more than five decades.

By intellectual standards, Hans was a genius. Highly intelligent by nature, he had also become a great scholar of Hindu religion. He was a warrior practitioner, engaging demanding spiritual disciplines and austerities over sustained periods of time, and he had experienced repeated high states of mysticism.

When I met Hans, near the end of his life, he carried with him a deep sorrow at his failure to realize his spiritual aspirations, accompanied by an unspoken sense of having been betrayed by God because he had given everything to the spiritual path but had not accomplished his goals.

From the outside, however, it was quickly apparent to those who knew him well that he was a man who had been unable to face and digest the impact of his childhood trauma. He continually attempted to suffocate his pain by increasing the intensity of his spiritual practices and austerities, resulting in severe narcissism and pathological spiritual bypassing. While he dazzled those around him with esoteric rituals and encyclopedic knowledge of Vedic ritual and Hindu mythology, I longed to take him into my arms and let the child within him cry until the ocean of tears wore down the stone walls that kept his tender heart from letting human and divine love penetrate him.

It is very important to understand that our psychological blocks can actually impede our capacity to open to spiritual understanding and experience. Trauma and a sense of betrayal in childhood, which many have experienced to some degree, can result in a failure to trust the divine and life itself and in great difficulty in surrendering to the unknown. We learned from a very young age that the world was not a safe place, and that whatever "God" existed was not a god who would protect us from child abuse.

Feelings of abandonment and isolation in childhood can make it much more challenging to encounter and open to the experience of spaciousness that meditation offers, as it can be difficult to distinguish between non-dual emptiness and the experience of profound lack and psychological emptiness. Disappointment in childhood authorities, teachers and religious leaders can make it very difficult to trust spiritual teachers, teachings and even the divine itself. Undigested emotions from our past profoundly color our relationship to spiritual concepts, practices and experiences.

On the other hand, we can get so wrapped up in psychological processing that it becomes a kind of narcissistic self-involvement, leaving us trapped in a cul-de-sac that neither brings about the powerful capacity for compassion and wisdom that can be discovered through spiritual practice, nor produces the sense of social responsibility that Hillman claims the field of psychology has failed to pay attention to.

Many schools of mainstream psychology have routinely failed to take into account a broader spiritual perspective, frequently reducing profound spiritual insights to neurotic fantasies, infantile regressions and idealized projections. For example, I once consulted with a psychologist in her late 30s who was experiencing tremendous confusion about her spiritual life because her therapist had convinced her that her relationship with her spiritual teacher was purely a romanticized projection based on unmet childhood needs and a failure to individuate from her father.

A chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and I am convinced that most spiritual scandals, as well as disillusionment among spiritual seekers and practitioners, are the result of spiritual teachers who have significant areas of psychological blindness. They assume their great spiritual insight has taken care of their psychological wounds when it has not. We are not weak, but courageous, when we dare to again face the things that we would rather not see and confront but in the end continue to blind us to the wholeness of all that we are.

Adapted from "Eyes Wide Open: Cultivating Discernment on the Spiritual Path" (Sounds True, 2010)

 
There is great debate, and in many cases a sharp divide, between practitioners of psychology and those of spirituality. On one end of the spectrum, most of mainstream psychology does not concern itsel...
There is great debate, and in many cases a sharp divide, between practitioners of psychology and those of spirituality. On one end of the spectrum, most of mainstream psychology does not concern itsel...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
karunaray
Heart-infused
05:30 PM on 10/29/2011
I'm so glad someone came out and said it!
05:30 PM on 10/13/2011
Wow. This piece truly hits home in my experience. I had much demanding and emotional work to accomplish before I could start on my path 10 years working with a therapist 20 years traveling the path of the mysteries (and yes, that would make me over 50) :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
soma77
Author, Speaker, Retreat Facilitator
10:05 PM on 09/12/2011
No one has ever encompassed the depths of pure consciousness because it reaches out to Infinity, and no one can encompass Infinity. One only enlarges one's capacity to know and to experience it. In our present state of awareness we are standing with our eyes next to the painting and only see one small patch of colors at a time, but in our pure consciousness we see the whole picture. The whole picture or pure consciousness can't be divided so enlarge your awareness with a psychotherapist, minister or shaman. It doesn't matter as long as you are enjoying the colors.
01:56 PM on 09/07/2011
Nice post. I personally found my need for spirituality due to work with a psychotherapist after a very tough period in my life. The therapist has been a support for me as I learn to live a centered life. I am grateful to her as well as the Buddhist teachings I have studied. The two work together for me. Perhaps others should consider the combined approach.
01:43 AM on 09/07/2011
Regardless of all the psychological, philosophy, scientific, and religious logic presented here, no one can say, or even claim, life is not the source of their physicality, and conscious awareness. The issue being dealt with here is two-fold. That of the existence of an unknown source which is the inertia for the activity of living in the physical, and whether there is free will of choice to choose how to live in the physical.

To deal with the latter, which is effect is always the easy route to take because of sentient conscious senses. And because only a few has found how to move through the mind to get beyond the mind, effect is always the plate of food to eat from. This is why no guru, no one of a high intellect, no suppose man of the cloth, scientist, mathematician, quantum physicist, no one believing in, building, and living of the human intellect exclusively can awaken to a new dimension of life, a spiritual dimension.

The dimension of source which the Masters described as the kingdom not of this world, because it is a state of consciousness other than the three dimensional one. A state of consciousness to experience totally unknown on the human level. That state of consciousness which the world is seeking, even though it does not realize quite what the goal is or how to attain it. But know it is real and the driving force which stump them intellectually as here in this thread.
11:44 AM on 09/04/2011
I am surprised that your essay does not include mention of Transpersonal Psychology.

Wikipedia provides the following high level definition of Transpersonal Psychology: "Transpersonal psychology is a form of psychology that studies the transpersonal, self-transcendent or spiritual aspects of the human experience.

A short definition from the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology suggests that transpersonal psychology "is concerned with the study of humanity's highest potential, and with the recognition, understanding, and realization of unitive, spiritual, and transcendent states of consciousness" [1]. Issues considered in transpersonal psychology include spiritual self-development, self beyond the ego, peak experiences, mystical experiences, systemic trance and other sublime and/or unusually expanded experiences of living.

Transpersonal psychology developed from earlier schools of psychology including psychoanalysis, behaviorism, and humanistic psychology. Transpersonal psychology attempts to describe and integrate spiritual experience within modern psychological theory and to formulate new theory to encompass such experience. Types of spiritual experience examined vary greatly but include mysticism, religious conversion, altered states of consciousness, trance and spiritual practices. Although Carl Jung and others explored aspects of the spiritual and transpersonal in their work, Miller [2] notes that Western psychology has had a tendency to ignore the spiritual dimension of the human psyche. "

There has been controversies around TP that have distracted it's proponents from continuing scholarly research in this area, but their theories are fascinating and serve to highlight the chasm between psychological science and spiritual growth. To me, these two aspects of the human psyche are completely intertwined.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yvonne Serocki
wellness is inspired
06:20 PM on 09/09/2011
What do you see as the controversies around transpersonal psychology?
08:02 AM on 09/04/2011
From what I can see and experience, the same veils that separate the immortal from the mortal, or the mystical from the worldly, are also there for the spiritual and psychological. They are tapped into from different parts of ourselves and to say one exists and not the other, or that one can overcome the other's concerns, is naive. Just as we are here on this earth are dealing with out everyday earthly things, so are we charged with dealing with our spiritual and non-earthly concerns. Some choose to go one way only, while others choose to give one more emphasis than the other, and most seek to balance the two, with the hope they will live side-by-side ... creating a richer experience of life. There is no one right way or wrong way to do this, but it is more empowering to at the least deal with facts. If either was able to heal the other's wounds, this would be a different world. It is easy to forget that humans have been dealing with spiritual issues for centuries versus the virtual newness of psychology and it's studies. It is the most loaded and weighted debate mankind participates in. The one has never been resolved to everyone's satisfaction, and the other is in it's relative infancy. That's the bottom line reality.
03:06 PM on 09/03/2011
Psychology of perception (how our senses trick us) and neuropsychology (how our brain tricks us into patternicity) show that this is not only a problem of language but also that trust on "direct" experience is misleading. It gets even worse if done in a group as group phenomena as “groupthink” (Janis) and pressure for conformity or even mass psychosis have to be taken into account as well. Absolute propositions are not possible as long as we live in a developing and relative world. So we will always have to remain skeptic of what we try to point out, use multiple methods, try to reduce and be aware of the impact of ourselves on what we experience and give the frame in which we make an assumption. If our assumptions are "framed" then they are no statements about an absolute anymore. Furthermore the dozens of integrating approaches to spirituality themselves need clarity. Seldom the teacher, the teaching, the community, the practice, the concrete phenomenology and the staging of practice is being defined. Whats necessary: 1) The leaders have to develop a more moderate self-conception (maybe Genpo Merzel is on the way), 2) they have to tell this to the people they attract, 3) they have to publicly comply to standards in the field of psycho-social professions and define what they do in form of a negotiated agreement, 4) they have to refrain from traditional and misleading nomenclature as e.g. "enlightened" (here the term” wise” might be more helpful).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Saijanai
Micro bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro bio...
12:58 PM on 09/04/2011
"Enlightened" has a specific meaning in TM Speak. DId you miss the memo?
02:58 PM on 09/03/2011
Developmental psychology and neuropsychology can help better understand unusual experiences people interpret in their mindsets which derive from the spiritual contexts their culture offers often. The culturally dependent specific forms these interpretations take are very different though. Instead of speaking of "one spirituality" we should learn to accept that no form of spirituality equals these experiences and that there are also psychological techniques which address consciousness in a more culture-free way. To try to reduce psychology to a subordinate science till one is able to truly integrate the wisdom of an enlightened person does not help as it sticks to the illusion of enlightened teachers. Your writing "Spiritual understanding comes from a direct perception of a greater intelligence, force or power. Some people call it non-duality; others call it Christ, Allah, spirit or God." seems to commit the “fallacy of the myth of the given” (in Wilber’s words). The psychological self that creates this "myth" in the first place and then interprets the experience cannot be seen as separate from the experienced.
04:37 PM on 09/02/2011
It's absolutely right that you can't separate spirituality from psychology. I have a post on my blog along those lines, "Will enlightenment help me lose weight?" You can read the whole thing here:

http://always--home.blogspot.com/2011/07/will-enlightenment-help-me-lose-weight.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vajara
vajara
03:37 PM on 09/02/2011
"On one end of the spectrum, most of mainstream psychology does not concern itself with issues of consciousness and spirit and rejects what is not scientifically quantifiable." This assumption about psychology is not accurate as the DSM and their disorders, every version, has neither been evidence based, valid or reliable scientifically quantifiable evidence related to their labels or codes, nor have their drug treatment prescribed for these "disorders." For example, Post Traumatic Stress is not a 'disorder', but rather a serious comprehensive injury that affects the whole being,not just the mind or brain as psychiatry pretends. Psychiatry is not a science but rather a drug dispensary program for the BigPharmas and their partners. Has the mental health of our Nation deteriorated to the degree that 45% of our population is diagnosed with some disorder and these chemicals are their best option--Not!!! Perhaps 99% of the T-Party and the Repubs would fit their category of disorder, illness or disease.
photo
french queen13
my beloved is mine and I am his
08:13 AM on 09/03/2011
Well said! Equating mainstream psychology with the 'hard' sciences, the quantifiable, physically testable stuff, is way off.

It just struck me how ironic it is that people who dismiss any sort of spiritual or mystical feelings or experiences are quite likely to talk in terms of 'delusion' or throw psychiatric terminology around in their appeals to science - not much of an argument at all, come to think of it! :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vajara
vajara
12:03 PM on 09/03/2011
Psychiatry, since Freud and Jung, has been looking for a quick fix and quick buck since the late 60's & 70's.. Most of these mental health docs only do medication and diagnostic evals. I don't really know if they know any better way to provide health interventions, are indifferent, or just reckless. I have known many terrific psychiatrists and psychologists and learned about integrataive medicine-health from them. They were/are very interested in viewing the person physically, mentally, emotionally, spiritually and socially-- interacting with their whole person in the context of their assessments and practices-- Fritz Perls, Joseph Downing, John Lilly and Claudio Naranjo to name a few. In fact, the school of Gestalt Psychology was founded by these great psychiatrists. I worked with all of them except Perls.

Anyway, psychiatry has gone down hill and deteriorated with the advent of the belief that mental health requires drugs and labels. They just don't realize that their services do not promote health and wellbeing and generally their passive services are harmful when they do not explore and try all of the integrative health practices and programs before prescribing their toxic meds. Thanks French Queen for all of your brilliant responses.
10:51 AM on 09/02/2011
Interesting that a great deal of interest has been shown in 'mindfulness' based therapy which itself borrows heavily from zen. It has rekindled my interest in meditation whilst not filling my head with silly religious beliefs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Saijanai
Micro bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro bio...
02:51 PM on 09/02/2011
Personally, I believe that "mindfulness" type meditation is an erroneous attempt to create a situation that naturally occurs in enlightened people. The fact that the technique[s] have side-benefits doesn't change what I believe is the fundamental error of practicing such techniques in the first place: they are based on a misunderstanding of what enlightened people are saying about their own internal state -that they are alway "mindful" [non-judgementally aware] of everything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Saijanai
Micro bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro bio...
05:46 PM on 09/02/2011
The reason WHY enlightened people say that they are always mindful is because, for an enlightened person, their "self" is pure consciousness, which is the basis of being aware of anything at all.

It isn't that they try to be mindful. It is that they define their "self" to be awareNESS in the first place, and awareNESS isn't judgmental: It just is.
12:30 AM on 09/02/2011
It is not an either/or choice it is an "and". Learn to harmonize the left and right sides of your brain, your mental and spiritual. Balance and discern. One of my favorite quotes is from Steve jobs, which I think brings to light the phenomenal ability of harmonizing both. At a Stanford graduation address he said this:

"...Have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Every thing else is secondary." - Steve Jobs
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Saijanai
Micro bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro bio...
02:53 PM on 09/02/2011
Actually, spiritual is harmony between the left and right halves of the brain, which are more properly (well sorta) described as intellectual and emotional.
11:19 PM on 09/01/2011
Thank you for this intelligent and well written article. As a clinical psychologist living and practicing in a large spiritual community I often hear the refrain, “I don’t need psychotherapy, I need meditation and yoga.”

People who have been traumatized often experience initial psychological and spiritual gain through their practices and spiritual techniques. However, some individuals begin to experience what Freud called, “The return of the repressed.” For these individuals the injury of past trauma begins to surface and coexist with heightened spiritual development.

Nature gives us many faculties to utilize to develop higher stages of human development. Knowing when to use the intellect, when to float in meditation and when to use psychotherapy can make the difference between the experience of suffering or bliss.

Dr. P
researcher
researcher
03:37 PM on 09/01/2011
well written article but as you know you are going to take some hits. but always remember this by a pretty famous person: · "Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds."

now my turn to take some hits with my reponse to your statement.

"On one end of the spectrum, most of mainstream psychology does not concern itself with issues of consciousness and spirit and rejects what is not scientifically quantifiable"

qualitative evidence for consciousness and awareness resides in the world of spirit is available to those that do the study and research into these mysteries of life. you wont find much evidence in the study of religions, but this evidence does exist and once you find it dont bother to share it with unreceptive minds for they shall only demean your good intentions.

isnt it interesting that those that hold strong religious and the materialistic beliefs that those beliefs are so powerful one cannot share anything outside their religious and materialistic cherished beliefs for they shall reject them outright before any study or investigation.

we see this rigid beliefs as blinders in politics and religion the very best. I am sure you experience this every day in your profession. :-)

The ways are but two: love and the want of love.
Chinese sage: Mencius 300 BC

again a well article. best to you.