iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marielena Hincapié

Marielena Hincapié

Posted: February 3, 2010 05:00 PM

ICE and Big Business: Too Close for Comfort

What's Your Reaction:

Today, workers, along with immigrant and civil rights advocates, exposed evidence of a disturbing and dangerous attack on workers' rights by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Testimony in the case David et al. v. Signal et al. has revealed that high level executives of defense contractor Signal International worked closely with ICE and the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) to quash organizing efforts by courageous workers from India who were allegedly caught in a human trafficking ring.

The case should be alarming to all workers, because an attack on the rights of any group of workers puts all workers' rights at risk.

Lured by the chance to pursue the American dream, hundreds of workers from India were recruited in 2006 to work at Signal as part of a post-Hurricane Katrina reconstruction effort. These men, welders and pipe fitters, paid fees averaging $20,000 apiece to labor recruiters, who had promised them permanent jobs and green cards. When the workers arrived in the United States, they were subjected to horrific conditions in what Signal called "man camps," and tethered to Signal by short-sighted immigration laws. Under the current guest worker visa program, workers who enter the U.S. on temporary employment-based visas are bound to the sponsoring employer and become undocumented if they are fired or quit their job--even if they do so to escape exploitation.

Refusing to suffer in silence, the workers organized a campaign to assert their rights. Signal, instead of negotiating with workers to address their issues, sought guidance from ICE on how to deport workers who were causing "unrest." An ICE official advised Signal to "take [the Indians] out of line on their way to work, get their personal belongings, get them in a van...and send them back to India." According to the workers, Signal held a pre-dawn raid against its employees in March 2007. The deposition transcripts indicate that for the next two years, ICE met repeatedly with Signal and developed a plan for Signal to share information with ICE so that ICE could "send a message to the remaining workers that it is not in their best interests to try and 'push' the system."

In 2008, former Signal workers showed their faith in the American legal system by writing to the Department of Justice, stating that they had been victims of human trafficking and labor abuses, and asking the department to conduct a criminal investigation.

Our justice system is based on the belief that workers who allege abuse will receive a fair and impartial investigation. The Signal workers were denied this fundamental right. The evidence of collusion between ICE and Signal shows that ICE has a flagrant disregard for the rights of immigrant workers, which casts serious doubt on the agency's ability to effectively enforce federal immigration law. As a result of ICE's interference, the workers' ability to remain in the U.S. even long enough to plead their cases is in jeopardy.

The Obama administration must act swiftly to undo the harms caused by ICE under the previous administration and ensure that the current investigations proceed with full impartiality. The immigration and border patrol agents implicated in the case should be held accountable for their actions and violations. The Department of Homeland Security must sign a strong Memorandum of Understanding with the Department of Labor, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and other labor and employment agencies to prevent ICE and CBP from interfering in labor disputes.

Finally, Congress should hold oversight hearings to determine whether the disturbing evidence obtained in this lawsuit reflect an isolated case, or whether this is one of many examples of ICE interference in labor disputes. Congress must do more than simply wag its finger at ICE. Elected officials should hold the agency accountable for its actions and put protections in place to ensure that this abuse of authority does not happen again. Protecting labor laws for the most vulnerable workers keeps standards high for all workers. America deserves a justice system that is free and fair for all of its residents, not only a select few.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:53 AM on 02/09/2010
One should have to be a US citizen to join or form a union in America. Otherwise wages and benefits would suffer even more than they do now.
11:23 PM on 02/05/2010
(continued)

This country was supposed to be the “free world”, a place where anyone could come and practice their religions and beliefs freely. Do not forget America, that at one point you were the undocumented alien and that this land was stolen from its natives by your ancestors. Do not forget that if it were not for African Americans, we would not have the wonderful country we have today. Remember that if you truly get rid of all of the people who cook your food, make your bed, take care of your children, garden your lavish homes and wash your clothes, you will no longer be the powerhouse that you are.

Those of you against immigration reform are the same ones who reap the benefits everyday when you go out to eat for lunch or dinner and your cook and/or bus boy are undocumented or even when you stay at a 5 star hotel and housekeeping is undocumented. You turn a blind eye at that point but then think that you have every right to litigate what their destiny should be.
11:23 PM on 02/05/2010
This is a form of slavery in 2010!!! I am not sure if you all understand how immense this is. It has been 145 years since slavery was “abolished”, 42 years since Dr. Martin Luther King was killed while fighting for equality and only a year and a half after the US elected their first minority President.

For those of you whose argument is that undocumented immigrants should be sent back home because it is illegal… Well guess what? What was done to this group of Indian immigrants was also illegal.

We have all been fighting the war on immigration, immigrants and racism forever and I just want to bring something to light. Who do you think runs the corporations exploiting these immigrants? It is those who have been fighting against immigration reform. Why do you think that Signal went to Indian and got men from there to work here? Because there is not one person who has argued that immigrants are stealing their jobs who would actually do these jobs. They pay them less and abuse them physically, emotionally and verbally. (see continued)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NABNYC
04:50 PM on 02/05/2010
This is all a round-about way of saying that the workers want to stay here even though they do not meet the criteria of the immigration laws.

We need a national ID card. All immigrants should be advised that they have 60 days to go get a card, which would include fingerprints and a photo. After that, any employer can hire that person without fear that they are not legally allowed to work.

The truth is that the people who support illegal immigrants have fought hard against a national ID program on a variety of weak claims that it might not be completely accurate. It certainly would be better than the system we have now where contractors hire truckloads of illegal immigrants brought here by coyotes, exploited, victimized, living underground. A national ID card would allow everyone who is legally entitled to work to live in the open without fear of discrimination. It would prevent illegal immigrants from taking jobs in this country, which would undoubtedly cause many of them to leave. Which would be a good thing.

Then we should halt immigration until our unemployment rate drops to 3%. Nobody should be allowed to move here from another country and take an American's job unless we already are close to full-employment of our citizens.
11:23 AM on 02/04/2010
This just distracts from the legitimate raids that still need to happen, we need to start jailing those that hire immigrants without documentation. It's the law.

Good for these workers for organizing against another contract made by a corporation without morals. Sure glad they are considered citizens!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Kolken
Immigration Lawyer
10:45 AM on 02/04/2010
Par for the course.
lastpost
see biography
08:39 AM on 02/04/2010
“to escape exploitation”
And this season, we may see brown as the new black.

"take [the Indians] out”
Or ice ICE instead?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KellyJohnson
08:29 AM on 02/04/2010
I need to get this straight...are we blaming immigrants for wanting work, stealing work, or being lazy at work? LOL...it's funny how some people blame immigrants for trying to rise above their situations when that's all they preach when moaning and groaning about entitlements to the poor. I'm not sure how much hyprocrisy these people can maintain..... Wake up sillies.....Large Corporations are bringing in the illegals and the visa workers as slaves.....it's a fact....and if you think about it a bit the light bulb will go on......
09:04 AM on 02/04/2010
There is a rather significant difference between immigrants and illegal aliens.
09:48 AM on 02/04/2010
Your light bulb is burned out since your solution is to allow MORE slaves to come in. Companies bring these people in just as they do scabs during a strike. Do you think that we should be upset at scabs? All they are trying to do is get a better job and put food on their tables. So what is wrong with scabs? Leave them alone! Right?
07:38 AM on 02/04/2010
Those workers should never have been here in the first place. It's good to know that ICE finally saw the error of their ways and moved to deport them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Maddox
This time abolish the GOP WealthCare programs!
01:52 AM on 02/04/2010
ICE should have been involved to prevent the importation of these workers at the onset. The Labor Department should have insured that those imported workers that met training and skill qualifications for work were afforded protection that they were being paid a decent wage, housed in humane conditions, and provided the safety systems that American Workers would be provided.
The Union should have picketed every work site that employed imported workers if American workers were available to do the jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greybeard53
All Hail Marx and Lennon !
08:53 AM on 02/04/2010
Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama are "Right to Work" [read Right to Starve] states. No Unions to protect them. I know; I live and struggle to keep body and soul together in NC, another Right to Starve state.
And don't start telling me to move. I've looked into it; construction unions have frozen membership everywhere I looked. They can't take care of their own people with no building going on.
01:17 AM on 02/04/2010
I have been a union man almost all my life and been an official as well. It makes me mad to see the union NOT backing its workers. Instead the union official position is to fight against ICE and the US laws about legal immigration. Rather than being happy that Swift was forced to raise wages to get more legal American workers, the union complains because the workers who had committed a crime in illegal entry were punished for their crimes.

THAT is NO way to build a union! So who do you think the remaining workers thank for that wage increase? The UNION? Hell they are fighting against keeping illegals out and want them to stay and KEEP wages low! The union officials have more faith in the company being able to keep getting around the law than they do in forcing the company to increase wages. It is a travesty to call it a union with that kind of policy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Maddox
This time abolish the GOP WealthCare programs!
02:08 PM on 02/04/2010
I am a union member (retired), and I disagree with you to some extent. The workers in question did not come here intending to break laws or to deprive anyone else from being employed. If I understood the article, they actually paid a fee to come here and work. In responding to what seemed to be an opportunity, they were then placed into de facto slavery.
To protect them against forced labor, in unsafe conditions, at substandard pay, and deplorable housing was (and is) the correct thing for the Union to do. The Companies involved were the parties in the wrong, and they alone should be punished.
The workers should be returned whole and healthy to their homes, and the guilty parties should be punished.
12:44 AM on 02/04/2010
The next to last sentence is absurd about keeping labor standards high. The WHOLE POINT of bringing in foreign workers is to DRIVE DOWN LABOR STANDARDS! GET REAL! ICE should have been able to send ALL of them back. The real crime is that they were granted visas to do this work in the first place. All you folks are doing is helping the employers to keep wages down and protesting a few bad things. THAT is NOT being progressive.

ICE did a wonderful job when they raided the Swift plant in Denver and caught all the illegals working there. The remaining LEGAL American workers got a $3/hr wage increase when Swift needed to replace them with Americans. THAT is how to increase labor standards. It works and the UNION did NOTHING to get that increase at all. I know that the union hacks were really pissed off at being shown up for being incompetents and do nothings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greybeard53
All Hail Marx and Lennon !
08:56 AM on 02/04/2010
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I saw no mention of unions whatsoever in this article.
09:40 AM on 02/04/2010
The whole implication of the article is that if the workers had the same rights and could form a union, that would raise labor standards and wages. I simply point out that in a real life case, the union was worthless and it took an ICE raid to give the legal American workers a $3/hr raise. Just who do you think the workers will thank for that? The union or the ICE and enforcement of our laws?

The FACT is that the national union is AGAINST such raids too. I hardly think that will make the workers better union members when they see that.
10:50 PM on 02/03/2010
As someone who followed the Signal workers' courageous journey all the way to the steps of the Department of Justice in Washington, DC, I find this news to be horrifying. There are, however, ways to prevent workers from becoming entrapped, dare I say enslaved, by a broken immigration system. First of all, DOL has the authority to protect workers involved in a labor dispute from being deported with U visas. DOL needs to use its power, especially in heinous cases like the one with the Signal workers. Above all, comprehensive immigration reform must be achieved with workers--immigrant and U.S. citizens alike--front of mind. The labor market does not abide by the outdated, restrictive immigration system we have right now. That system must be modernized to respond to the needs of workers and businesses, so that the Signal situation never shames our justice system again.
10:44 PM on 02/03/2010
If the company felt that the "guest" workers from India were causing "unrest" they have every right to send them back to India. Companies across the nation fire people all the time, they can say whatever they want for the reason (lazy, bad attitude, poor work performance) for the firing as long as its not discriminatory. Which their is none talked about here. Signal sought ways to deport the workers because they were firing them and they could no longer stay in the US seems easy concept to understand for me. Where does it say that if the "guest" workers come to America to work they have the right to stay? People get deported all the time because their visas are up.
07:50 PM on 02/03/2010
It seems to me ICE was only doing it's job. If you think it is wrong to treat these Indian workers this way then let's all get together and stop the program that brings people from another country to perform manual labor here. I think there is nothing wrong with the system in place, and I doubt the people from India that paid thousands of dollars for the opportunity to live and work in America couldn't be replaced instantly. Outsourcing is good, how else are countries like India going to make their country better without income generation. The people who do jobs for less than you will must see some incentive in it. They can go back to their country with capital to invest in themselves or their family. People in America claim that the biggest problem is in educating the populace, but I think it's a matter of seeing th fruit of your labor feed and grow your family. Oh yeah Mexicans are better construction workers anyway and they don't require all that shipping. I'm sure the author would agree with that.