EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Maritza Stanchich, Ph.D.

Maritza Stanchich, Ph.D.

Posted: July 4, 2010 11:40 AM

As so many Americans gear up for Fourth of July fireworks this weekend, the U.S. Territory of Puerto Rico roils from a brutal civil rights showdown unleashed by a far-right wing government, now seemingly hell bent on destroying the recent unprecedented victory of a two-month long student strike against privatization of higher education at the University of Puerto Rico.

The broader implications are crucial on numerous fronts, including the struggle to maintain broad access to public higher education and efforts to rein in runaway neoliberal economic policies that have wreaked havoc globally, resulting in draconian austerity measures worldwide. For the violence and repression seen in Greece and at the G20 in Toronto appears to now be visiting this Caribbean island nation of about four million U.S. citizens, the homeland of more than an additional four million Puerto Ricans in the United States, the second largest U.S. Latino group.

While the economic crisis in Puerto Rico--the worst since the 1940s, if not the 1930s--has been deepening for years, and the current right wing government has aggressively implemented a hard-line, unpopular neoliberal economic agenda since its broad electoral victory last November, it appears as if the recent UPR student strike victory has touched off a firestorm, with a police attack on peaceful demonstrators at Puerto Rico's Capitol building on Wednesday injuring dozens, some seriously.

The UPR strike concluded June 21 after a tense, two-month shut down of 10 campuses in a system serving nearly 65,000 students at the end of the academic year, with an accord that by all accounts was an unprecedented strike victory, in historic, hemispheric terms. A widely-supported student movement remarkable for its coalition building across traditionally distinct and even contentious social and political sectors coalesced against threatened erosion of broad public access to the widely-regarded state university, as well as its increasing privatization.

With tensions high after police and riot squads had attacked and injured students, their parents and journalists on at least three occasions, an agreement finally reached through judicial mediation met with the students' basic demands, reinstating canceled tuition waivers, temporarily forestalling a tuition hike or imposition of student fees, and protecting strike leaders from summary suspension reprisals. The accord, signed by a majority of the Board of Trustees, though those refusing included the university and board presidents, was hailed as an achievement in civil conflict resolution, especially in light of the history of previous UPR strikes that had ended in deadly violent repressions.

Immediately after however, the Puerto Rico state legislature, dominated by the extreme right of the local Pro-Statehood party, rapidly expanded the university Board of Trustees, with the governor approving four new appointees, and a new but divided board quickly imposed a $800 student fee starting in January, and made it permanent, reminiscent of the imposition of fees at University of California by then Gov. Ronald Reagan. The legislature also quickly dismantled a long-standing UPR tradition of student assemblies, replacing them with private electronic computer voting devoid of open debate. Other cuts were also implemented affecting professors and adjunct instructors, who now make up about 40 percent of the UPR faculty, following trends in the United States, where 60 percent of all professors occupy such increasingly precarious positions.

In a far worse economic straits than the states of California or Michigan, Puerto Rico is confronting its worst fiscal crisis in decades, and UPR the biggest fiscal crisis of its 100-year existence. As in other countries facing related circumstances, virulent and organized opposition to drastic cuts principally directed at the working and deteriorating middle classes has mushroomed, especially since the current global crisis, in Alan Greenspan's own befuddled words, was caused by greed-induced corruption among the highest echelons of the world economy.

While the neoliberal economic agenda of Puerto Rico's current political leaders look back to the very doctrines now being challenged in the United States and throughout Latin America, the UPR student movement embodies the vanguard of the contemporary 21st Century, as reflected by their symbols and tactics, including the democratizing internet; egalitarian rainbow flags; sustainable organic farming; an effervescence of alternative arts; and new coalition building among center, right and left; in tandem with occupation practices inspired by international student movements as far as California, Spain, France and Greece.

Though a shocking collective trauma, the violent crackdown at the Capitol Wednesday was not entirely surprising given the current administration's assault on all fronts since coming into power, targeting progressive, cultural and social welfare institutions and agencies with crippling budget cuts, attempting to dissolve Puerto Rico's bar association, lifting environmental protections to whole swaths of protected lands, and passing a now notorious law, called Ley 7, that not only dismisses 20,000 public employees, but declares null and void all public sector union contracts for three years, with the only recourse to challenging the law being to petition the local Supreme Court, now stacked with new appointments in the administration's favor. The governor has also activated the National Guard for civilian purposes, amidst criticism from groups such the Puerto Rico chapters of the ACLU and Amnesty International.

Common in Puerto Rico, however, though unusual at most U.S. state universities, is the way political parties assume control of UPR leadership by appointing a new president, also recently achieved. This is in part because the UPR is widely regarded as national patrimony, and is one of the few places left in the country where dissent may be cultivated.

As opposition to these policies expands, as seen in a massive national strike in October that drew a quarter of a million workers into the streets, so has the government's seeming intolerance to any opposition, as Gov. Luis Fortuño, Senate President Thomas Rivera Schatz and UPR president José Ramón de la Torre regularly resort to Cold War era red-baiting with media campaigns labeling protestors as Socialists, Communists, and professional rabble rousers out to destabilize the country. The clamp down has so far gone as far as banning journalists from Senate chambers for four days last week during the country's budget sessions, prompting media organizations to petition in court to regain access.

"I don't think there is any doubt that the intention of this government is to set back civil rights," said Judith Berkan, a long-time civil rights attorney and a law professor at University of Puerto Rico and InterAmerican University in San Juan, adding that the administration has enacted a staggering number of measures to neutralize and debilitate all those perceived as a threat to a local oligarchy acting in concert with U.S. interests.

Attempts were made to reach Resident Commissioner Pedro Pierluisi, Puerto Rico's non-voting representative in the U.S. Congress, and UPR President José Ramón de la Torre for comment, but they were not available at press time.

The irony that the Pro-U.S. Statehood party of Gov. Fortuño is now curtailing the most basic press and civil liberties is not lost on UPR student strike leaders who witnessed and were injured at Wednesday's melee, including those who belong to the pro-Statehood party themselves, and voted for the sitting governor.

"It pains me as a statehooder that this government has not learned the lessons of U.S. civil rights struggles of decades ago," said Aníbal Núñez, a student at the UPR law school and a member of the student negotiating committee.

Núñez acknowledged the participation of students affiliated with Socialist groups among strike leaders and the student negotiating committee, and said they overcame their differences via universal concerns for education as a social necessity, as they gained each others' respect while coalition building together, adding that if he could not overcome ideological differences enough to collaborate, he would still believe in their right to pluralistically exist.

The notion that accessible, quality higher education contributes to economic recovery runs counter to the widening U.S. trend of students graduating with crippling debt, as public education has for years now faced diminishing state support. A common argument used by the administration during the UPR strike was its affordable tuition, at less than $2,000 per year for undergraduates before the recently imposed fees. But while tuition is cheaper than probably any other state university in the United States, average income in Puerto Rico is also far lower than any other U.S. state, with about 48 percent of the population living in poverty as defined by U.S. federal standards, and the cost of living in San Juan at least, far higher than at oft compared institutions in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, or Oxford, Mississippi. This tradition of maintaining broad public access to a quality state institution of higher learning is a hard earned point of pride at UPR, compared to institutions that have recently reneged their public mission with sudden and steep fee/tuition increases, such as at University of California, where students also opposed, occupied and met with police repression, but could not stave off a 32% fee hike imposed in November.

As UPR administrators continue to grapple with what was a nearly $200 million budget shortfall for next year going into the strike, in search of additional or alternative fund-raising or saving sources, an emboldened student movement will also regroup and weigh all its options. Future conflicts may be averted by altering the very style of governance at UPR, a top-down and paternalistic holdover from the past, as this could go a long way toward making students, as well as professors and staff who also have large stakes at play, part of a give-and-take process.

For come what may in the global fiscal crisis in the coming decade, these students are the future of new Americas of increasingly porous borders and dramatic, rapid demographic, political, cultural, informational and economic shifts, as the old order, the vestiges of the Cold War in Puerto Rico and in South Florida for example, fade into the proverbial sunset.

"We may not hold the power but we have the will power," stated law student Núñez, "and given the choice, I prefer the latter."

UPR administrators and Statehood party leaders would do well to recognize and reach out to the productive potential of this new power, shift gears and learn to act on the principles they purportedly hold dear.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 62
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:18 PM on 08/07/2010
Comments by Jose and others in this discussion parrot the government and UPR administra­tion's defamatory portrayal of the students who went on strike as a small group of violent extremists manipulate­d by "external elements", when in fact the strike was remarkably diverse, peaceful, discipline­d and widely supported. This article is an excellent overview of the wave of revanchist measures undertaken by the government in the wake of the unpreceden­ted victory of the students: these measures included the brazenly anti-democ­ratic ban on reporters, for which no believer in press freedoms can apologize. The protest on June 30 began as a simple symbolic protest with the democratic message that the State House (and by extension the political process in general) should be open to the people: the unwarrante­d and excessive use of force by the anti-riot police is just the most extreme example of an unaccounta­ble, power-drun­k, abusive government that is being rightfully challenged by the people of Puerto Rico.
12:19 PM on 07/19/2010
As a UPR professor I find Dr. Stanchich essay very misleading­. The so-called student victory that she speaks about is non-existe­nt. They made the UPR lose the Title IV federal funding. The July 6 letter from the US Department of Education stated very specifical­ly that the only two instances under which the UPR could close its gates were a natural disaster or scheduled vacations. A forceful shut down would jepardize the university­. The striking students have the constituti­onal right to freedom of expression and assembly. They do not have the right to forefully close the gates and stop others from freely entering or exiting the campuses. Another misleading claim made is to say that this was a 'widely supported' strike. This simply isn't so. The Assembly that ended the strike had less that 3000 students of a total population of 65 thousand, less than 4%. As to the socialist agenda, when the Rio Piedras students marched to the Capitolio they took down an American flag, trampled it in the mud and replaced it with a Puerto Rican flag. They sang the revolution­ary version of the island's national anthem. The lyrics say 'Grab hold of your machete for it is time to fight...' When the president of the the Asociation of University Professor'­s was asked about the incident she simply said that we needed to understand the students. It's OK to destroy the flag of the nation that pays for the eduucation of 70% of the UPR students.
09:40 AM on 07/08/2010
I am sad for the students that did not become part of the mob and expression of protest held in the House of Laws, at the University of Puerto Rico, the Espreso Las America rally and lets see they have threaten to stop or interrupt the Mayaguez 2010 games. Not revolution or mob insited riots. Yes, it makes for great copy for the media but we know the majority is worried what will come of uncontrole­d violence. Please keep the people informed but not misinforme­d with messages that suggest our own bias.
Let us all seek the knowledge to expect the truth and force the government to produce the results in a all inclusive agenda. The students may now look back and get council for unrealisti­c expectatio­ns or demands. The federal funding of Pell grants of other sources of financial incentive brings students to a place of higher learning to learn. If they are eliminated from the process then shame on the adults and leaders who sided with the desentor to promote their own prepared demise.
Lastly, the turning point is a mist in a turbulent ocean of stormy waters. That is our Puerto Rico now with education inequities­, out of control drug trafficing violence, corruption at all levels, economic disasters, and a government trying to govern the demands of its people. It changes when the storm subsides and we all pitch in to move forward from the mist in a united front for justice and truths. God bless America
07:45 PM on 07/07/2010
I will think that being our country a commonweal­th of USA, our government should respect the USA Constituti­on, never mind Puertorica­n Constituti­on. It is not like that in Puerto Rico. The day of the police riot at our congress, June 30, 2010, A police beat up one of our legislator­s, Mrs. Carmen Yulin Cruz Soto, with all the intention and even mentioning her name at the same time he was beating her with his stick, while she was helping another beated up person on the floor. He broke her arm. No one has done anything about it; not the Feds, not the State Reps, not the Chief of Police, not the Chief in Command. Of Course, our both chambers at congress are run by the opposite and actual governor's party.
What's happening in Puerto Rico is extremely serious. We need all the attetion from US Congress on this matter.
09:06 PM on 07/07/2010
Absolutely agree about the necessary attention from the federal authoritie­s in the US. This
administra­tion has rapidly establishe­d a dictataors­hip. I hope none of the US organizati­ons is
involved in it, as was the case with dictators in Chile, Argentina, Nicaragua and other countries in
their moment. God forbid!
10:41 AM on 07/06/2010
This is an excellent report. I would have liked to have seen mentioned that the general public were not allowed to enter to listen or view the congress sessions, for at least six month before all these happened. It seems that puertorica­n journalist don't care so much for citizens, unless they are involved in the issues. Our citizens are locked in a very bad situation without jobs, without medical insurances­, without unemployme­nt benefits, without legal assistance­, (not even pro bono), without Department of Education (no one supervises that dept.), loosing their properties­, their cars, their usual food shopping, their children education, and now the congress wants to privatize the public beach (The only thing a family can do without spending to much money in this island). But for journalist­, the citizens are not worth enough. If the goverment should not have limited the students at UPR, the citizens (public that visits the congress) would not have been included in the news; the little they were mentioned. Six month went by and if once or twice, the papers mentioned that general public were not allowed at the public area of the congress, those were too many.Final­ly, at closed doors, no press, no public, the congress approved a unbalanced budget, the day of the police riot.
10:34 PM on 07/05/2010
Congratula­tions to Dr. Martiza Stanchich on a very thorough and truthful analysis of the political and economic situation in Puerto Rico. Only 1 detail was left out: after an accord between the students and the Board of Turstees was signed in the presence of a judge, the Secretary of State Mr. Marcos Rodriguez dismissed it as just an unbinding piece of paper. There is no repect for the mediator
and judge from the same government officials who recommende­d them.

Congratula­tions on including this article for the whole world to read. Let everybody know that this is an administra­tion of compulsive liars and ill-meanin­g persons who have no respect for the people who allegedly elected them (I have my serious doubts).
08:47 PM on 07/05/2010
Excellent article. One of the best I've seen describing the current economic, political, and social situations in the island.
08:03 PM on 07/05/2010
A final note that touches me personally­. After being ignored, silenced and ridiculed by the Colegio de Abogados of Puerto Rico, the local bar associatio­n, to which I was forced to be a member and dominated by leftists and communist who made no bones about showing their colors, including a wake for a federal fugitive, with my dues, elevating him to hero worship, the P.R. legislatur­e finally made membership voluntary. If liberating thousands of lawyers from an organizati­on that trounces their rights is evil, then I am worse than Darth Vader for I fought for the legislatio­n, intervened in the Colegio's constituti­onal challenge to the law and beat them at the appellate court. Next time Dr., please be more forthcomin­g with the facts and your obvious bias
10:43 AM on 07/06/2010
Welcome folks to 21st Century ideologica­l trench warfare, wherein all´s fair in love and war. The federal fugitive named herein is none other than an internatio­nal hero, Filiberto Ojeda Ríos, leader of the Puerto Rican Macheteros ARMY. A senior citizen, who´s private dwelling was brazenly assaulted by about 50 federal agents, intent of depriving him of life with as many rounds of ammo as Uncle Sam would authorize to use as deadly force. Of course, those functional illiterate­s of the historic memory of Puerto Rico, would fanaticall­y argue that the use of armed force is precluded to nations under colonial rule. But then again, when Admiral Sampson´s cruisers opened fire on Old San Juan in 1898 while waving the Stars and Stripes, causing about 100 deaths among the population­, this was all done in the name of ¨liberty and freedom¨..­.....
08:03 PM on 07/05/2010
A few words for those not familiar with the issues presented by Dr. Stanchich. The UPR students pay $47 per credit. Over 70% of all students at the UPR have their tuition covered by the Pell grant. Most have money left over and many use the it to pay for a car. In addition, the strikes were lead by students who are members of Marxists organizati­ons. Yes, they still exist in P.R., using the same methods used by the Bolsheviks and the Nazi party to gain power. I can say it for I was a student at the UPR from 1975-82.

As to the economic crisis, the previous government of the Popular Democratic Party pushed up the public debt from $27 billion to $55 billion in only 8 years. This is the reason for all the budget cuts. The government simply cannot pay for a bureaucrac­y that employs 30% of all Puertorric­ans.

The "brutal civil rights backlash" is another taradiddle­. Two days before the clash, the students, via different e-mails and social networks, stated they were going to assault the Senate and read a manifesto during its session. All this on the last day for the approval of the state budget. Moreover, reprehensi­ble as the conduct of some of the police officers was, no one had to be hospitaliz­ed, no broken bones or deaths. Hardly a brutal repression­. . . CONT
09:02 PM on 07/05/2010
Do you have a link for the 70% figure? I studied at the university with no grants as did tons of other people I knew.

The strikes weren't led by Marxist organizati­ons. Socialist organizati­ons were involved in the strikes because they tend to be more vocal about things like this than many others. I'm not a Marxist and neither are many of the other people I knew who took parts in the strikes. This is just one of the many generaliza­tions people who weren't even there like to make because some politican said so on the news.

Any mention of Nazi's immediatel­y drops your credibilit­y to zero.

Also the anger against the Puerto Rican police and thier use of force has been brewing before the UPR strikes. If you lived in the island I imagine you recall the brutal use of forces by the police in the Ave Universida­d where local youth like to go hang out. You recall the cops beating people up, caught on multiple cameras, and the girl who's leg was brutally cut up after a cop shot some tear gas and it hit her in the knee.

None of this is new. Fortuño came to power and he immediatel­y declared "Mano Dura". The same stupid, abusive tactic former Puerto Rican governor Rossello used years ago. Anyone who's trying to deny that this current administra­tion is acting as a policie state either hasn't been informed of anything or is willfully ignorant.
04:24 AM on 07/08/2010
To contextual­ize your first figure, GDP per capita in Puerto Rico has, at its best, remained well under half of that of the United States (as of 2009, the figures were $17,200 vs. $46,400, according to the World Factbook). $47 dollars per credit doesn't seem very scandalous in that light.

As for the economic stagnation and system of imposed dependence­/pauperism that has perpetuall­y beleaguere­d the Puerto Rican nation (and that makes vital the defense and maintenanc­e of a tuition rate so low) and the current economic "crisis" which you purport to explain: you're pointing the finger in entirely wrong the direction. The past administra­tion did exactly what the one before it did, and exactly what the U.S. did at the federal and state's level during the same periods (hence the infamous budget deficits in states around the nation that have only now become a national talking point). In fact, you'll find that trends in economy and governance – save for the bottom line of course; the actual dollar amounts – tend to eerily parallel those of the United States since the beginning of the colonial relationsh­ip. I wonder why?

The bottom line, and a basic concept when dealing with "evidence" and figures, is that correlatio­n does not automatica­lly equal causation; that would be like saying that the Rosello administra­tion was responsibl­e for a short lived economic "progress" in the '90s, all the while turning a blind eye to the larger-sca­le upswing: laughable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjcc1987
07:38 PM on 07/05/2010
Sounds like a banana republic is in the making.
05:56 PM on 07/05/2010
Good written articlebut the author fails misserably at substantia­ting the facts stated and that are at the heart of the controvers­y. For example, where and how are the allegation­s of privatizat­ion mentioned here? No proof of that is given, just a brief mention.

Also, the participat­ion of parties with no legitimate interest in the UPR ia not mentioned. Sindicate leaders from all the island participat­ed in a strike where almost 3% (about 2,500 of some 65,000) of the students really took place and took hostage the institutio­n. A minority of students blocked all entrances to the campuses and manipulate­d assemblies so that only students friendly to "the cause" could gain access and vote. Even students (like a cousin of mine who was to graduate this past June) could not voice opinions because the floor was consistent­ly refused to their oposition and even where intimidate­d.

On the other hand, when the author mentions the efforts to dismantle the PR Bar Associatio­n, she does not mention that in PR it was required of all lawyers to be assoiated in said bar associatio­n. The new legislatio­n only made it optional. I ask myself, don't we all have a right of assembly with entities we belive in? Or should all professial­s in PR continue to be required to be member of these profession­al associatio­ns in order to make a living? How can any lawyer, accountant­, medical doctor, engineer, etc be required to pay an annual fee to what I call profession­al unions to be
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcwtts1
Elections have consequences
06:20 PM on 07/05/2010
neoliberal­ism covers your first point. Unless you are challengin­g the shift in academics to the neoliberal positions of market as moral good, as market as solver of issues, as market as equal to personhood­. You've seen some of it play out in the US these last 18 months. The Supreme courts constant deference to the corp or the marketplac­e speaks of a neo liberal ideology. What the professor failed to do was define neoliberal­ism, it is an amorphous term, and then apply it. raising tuition, removing scholarshi­p, pushing the sacrifice off the backs of the those with money and on to those without, diminishin­g the middle class. These are all neolib activities­. The professor wrote to an audience that understood that without taking into account 90 percent of the people don't know what neoliberal­ism actually is. I encountere­d the prob when I first started writing about it on huffington­.

J
01:15 AM on 07/06/2010
Neo-libera­lism? Hardly. The UPR enjoys a generous 9.6% of all government income, which allows its students a significan­t subsidy. Even well-to-do students who come from private schools that can cost $10,000 a year, end up paying $1,600 a year for a university career. Students with less income are covered by Pell grants, an entitlemen­t of $5,000 a year, which more than covers tuition and fees. The remaining money is for them to keep. There are also student loans available. On top of that, students with 3.5 grade average and members of sports teams, theater troupes, artistic clubs, etc. are exempted from tuition and fees. All employees, their spouses, and children are also exempted . No wonder so many students drive cars not affordable by many working families. All the UPR was asking is asking is for a modest sacrifice of $800 a year and $400 the second year in order to overcome the present fiscal crisis inherited from years of reckless spending and poor administra­tion. Near 70% of students will have the special cuota covered by a raise in the amount of money from the Pell Grants. As for the remaining 30% there are always student loans available.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
04:01 PM on 07/05/2010
Tragic.
11:09 AM on 07/05/2010
It is public that this current administra­tion has money to the parties and give more benefits to current administra­tive workers, and even open new positions, the problem is that a simple administra­tive assitant earns up to $100,000 a year when the basic family income in PR is about $30,000, you do the math. If the administra­tion does their part by reducing costs and providing a better physical appearance in the university campus, most students would favor a fee increase, but this is no the case. This strike is nothing political nor anti-ameri­can neither about our "goodies"b­eing taken, this is a civil-righ­ts movement asking for justice, and for the voice of the future asking to be heard and not hit.
schatsie
Wealth Taxes work in Germany and Switzerland
05:33 PM on 07/05/2010
And I am sure that those adjunct professors are getting less than $25,000 per year with no benefits..­.for classes where the tuition collected is over $100,000..­.
11:09 AM on 07/05/2010
I am a student in the University of Puerto Rico's main campus, I support the strike and I can comment about the veracity of this article because I am living with this everyday. The author is mostly correct, this strike has nothing to do with the islands status nor political parties ( as the political leaders are tring to make the world believe that this is an anti-ameri­can strike, which is totally incorrect) people from all sectors, ideologies­, political parties, etc. have united because the actual governor made a political campaign saying their will be no cut downs, when in his first year 20,000 public employees where discharges­. This administra­tion is passing laws that are being approved in less than an hour in some cases, when the existing law doesn't favor them, as the author says about the new members of the board of trustees. The new president of the university­, which students don't vote for has called a public war with students when he should be their to protect students rights in the first place. The police are violently hitting and spraying pepper spray to anyone that protests even passively towards any of those actions, and their are videos in youtue that proves this, this includes students, citizens and even press. Our strike is against these agreements and promises being broken, the University administra­tion says there is a deficit but does not want to shoy financial books. They want to raise fees but not cut costs.
01:24 AM on 07/06/2010
12,000, uprstudent­, not 20,000. 12k government employees have been laid off, out of a total 300,000 government employees, This represents 70% of all government spending. No wonder the government is broke.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:20 AM on 07/05/2010
I believe Puerto Rico should immediatel­y take an up or down vote on either statehood or independan­ce. If they want their freedom, who are we to stand in their way? Or if they want to become a state, so much the better. Protects them from the coming invasion.