More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Mark A. Barondess

Follow the Example of Howard Stern

Posted: 04/11/11 11:02 AM ET

Let me begin by reassuring you that you read the title of this article correctly-I am advocating that everyone going through a divorce should heed the example of media giant Howard Stern--at least in certain respects. Let me additionally disclose that I have never met Mr. Stern or his former or present wives, so my conclusions are based only upon what I have heard during Mr. Stern's radio broadcasts, his various television appearances and his enlightening recent interview as the cover story on the Rolling Stone.

I have always respected Stern's willingness to push the limit of the envelope and his fervent passion for the First Amendment, even when he would be mocking one of my clients. He has earned a reputation for his outlandish exploits on the air that have included insights into matters that would be considered extremely personal to most of us -- including the miscarriage of his former wife's pregnancy. But he does intelligently self impose certain significant limits on his freedom of speech, which all of us should follow.

Let me explain: For years, Stern had always spoken lovingly about his former wife and his children while he shocked the morning drive time of our nation. Then seemingly, out of the blue, he was separated. And then he was divorced. I do not know what the reasons were behind the divorce, and to my knowledge Stern has never revealed what those reasons are. He has only expressed the pain the divorce caused him and his family. But to my knowledge, he has never once spoken publicly about the details of his divorce or maligned his former wife. I have never read anything any that Stern's former wife has stated about her ex-husband or the divorce. When Stern remarried, there was no public rancor regarding his decision. Not from the husband, not from the ex-wife, not from the present wife and not from any of the lawyers. The children of the family were never mentioned. Everyone handled what was no doubt a very stressful experience with respect and dignity.

I am sure that some cynics will state that Stern probably is restricted by his settlement agreement from making any comments about the divorce. You are probably correct and that shows the good judgment of their parties and their attorneys by including such a provision. But I candidly think it is more than that. I am sure that the Stern's wanted to keep such a highly personal matter as confidential as possible. Too many people don't realize the long-term harm of a short-term decision to verbally attack or disclose information pertaining to a spouse, especially when children are involved.

Another example--Alec Baldwin was very wrong when he lost his temper with his daughter. But he did so after having endured what must have been an insufferable divorce experience. He apologized, was obviously devastated by his words and has hopefully mended his relationship. Nonetheless, the conduct that was even more outrageous than his words was the release of the voice mail message by someone that had to be extremely close to the family, if not part of it. Hurting Baldwin was done at the expense of an innocent child, and that is shameful.

I believe that matters of marriage and the reasons for separation and divorce are inherently private, and should be kept that way. So whoever might think that Howard Stern does not set a good example is simply wrong. Like Stern, understand and appreciate what is appropriate to disclose and what is not. Fight the urge to hurt your former or soon to be former spouse with words and actions that can never be undone. Your children and your conscience will ultimately thank you.

 
 
 

Follow Mark A. Barondess on Twitter: www.twitter.com/markabarondess

 
 
  • Comments
  • 157
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
07:24 AM on 04/14/2011
Howard is an interesting case study. People have such visceral reactions to him. That speaks to the superficial flaws of humanity.

Howard's a stand-up guy. People forget, he's a neurotic Long Island Jew. Cut off his hair and shave a foot off his height and he's Larry David's cousin.

He is not depraved--his guests often are. It's because he is the complete opposite of them, and finds them fascinating.

I take Howard at his word when he says he's never cheated in his life. He's an obsessive compulsive, neurotic person, and that's why I believe his wife divorced him. They were getting older and she realized he wasn't going to grow up. She wasn't going to have her dream of growing old with a man and traveling and becoming worldly with him. He was going to be obsessed with his work for years and years to come.

The way Howard tells it, his wife told him, they were in tears for an entire weekend, the kids took it really hard, and they were separated. There was no dirty laundry, no leaked photos, nothing like that, simply because he always left the fame at the door.

He's a flawed guy with issues who goes to therapy. He's also a really good husband and father who gets furious over mistreatment of animals.

You know what they say, about judging and books and covers and all that stuff.
07:45 PM on 04/13/2011
Mark, I enjoyed article and completely agree with your observations regarding Howard's divorce from his first wife and the manner it which it played out. I think you will find that most, if not all, of the Stern-bashings come from people who have never listened to his program and do not know him or his production team as they rely only on hearsay and hatred to mold their opinions. Howard has been dealing with these people all of his professional career and nothing that anyone can say or write will dissuade them from their ignorance.
09:29 PM on 04/13/2011
Thank you for your kind words. The article was not written to extol the merits of The Howard Stern Show, although I do believe that Mr. Stern is one of the most uniquely talented broadcast
interviewers ever heard on radio. The purpose of the article was to offer my admiration of how two former spouses/parents embraced privacy and good judgment in the context of their divorce for their own benefit and for that of their children. My hope was that all readers going through a divorce would follow the Stern's example. What if Mr. Stern had acted like Charlie Sheen presently acts towards Denise Richards? Now that would be something to "bash" about. Perhaps his antics should be the subject of my next blog....
06:20 PM on 04/12/2011
While I am flattered by all of the comments regarding this article, I find it very disturbing that so many people seem to miss the central point of the article and instead elect to engage in rants bashing Howard Stern. I would appreciate it if anyone could find an authentic example of Howard Stern maligning his former wife or his former wife maligning him. Until I see and validate that, I stand by my thesis that Howard Stern's approach regarding privacy and respect to a former spouse spouse a divorce is an excellent model to try and emulate.
06:40 PM on 04/12/2011
My apologies for the typos-here is the correct last sentence: Until I see and validate that, I stand by my thesis that Howard Stern's approach regarding privacy and respect of a former spouse is an excellent model to try and emulate.
07:33 AM on 04/13/2011
Hi Mark - I completely get your point. The worst mistake I made in my divorce was answering the people who came up to me at the gym, the grocery store, and local restaurants, every one of them opening the conversation with the seemingly innocent question, "so what happened??" It's harder than you may think to resist answering, particularly when they go on to insinuate that they have heard some tidbits from the other side. As the Don Henley song goes, people love dirty laundry, but worse than that, they love to stir up crap. Only now, five years later, can I fully appreciate the lasting harm that I did to my relationship with my ex-wife, as she did also. Although it is hardly justified, it fuels her rage toward me to this day. Both sides need to clam up and keep all details private. Of course, the best way to ensure that this happens is for the divorcer to be forthright and honest from the very beginning with their spouse about a) the fact that they are leaving them and b) why they are leaving them. I credit the Sterns for their discretion, but I also suspect that they talked openly and honestly with each other first before speaking with anyone else.
11:52 AM on 04/13/2011
Excellent observations and advice. Probably like you, I also find it interesting that none of the Stern detractors have posted any information that meets my earlier challenge. I am still waiting to be corrected.
03:01 PM on 04/12/2011
By the time Stern left terrestrial radio I was exhausted with hearing how unhappy he was.. his show was a daily attack on his underlings that brought out the worst in all of them.

Just started listening a couple of months ago and I'm astounded at what a different person he is. He's actually genuinely happy and somehow has become wise and mature.

BTW... I think these are pretty innocuous comments, but the moderators here refuse to post nearly 90% of what I write. Why? I never get an explanation about what I have said that's objectionable.
02:17 PM on 04/12/2011
Can you guess who said this: "...When my listeners tell me they don't care for Stern, I always think it reveals a regrettable narrowness of vision." Ira Glass, host of This American Life. Here's his essay on Stern: http://nyti.ms/hzq136 To Time Magazine he said, "...in our house, the show that is most on is Howard Stern. That is just the happiest show in broadcasting, and I say to people who don't listen to Howard, It's not what you think. People who don't actually listen to the show just think it's about girls taking off their tops."
01:49 PM on 04/12/2011
'Hoo hoo hoo
That's right, Robin. I invented family values and accoustic music.
Tell em', Fred.
hoo hoo..'
zenbamboo
U.S. Marine Corps veteran
01:11 PM on 04/12/2011
I don't listen to him anymore, but I remember very well the few years that transitioned from marriage to separation to divorce to dating and then marriage again. His personal life doesn't reflect his public personality. I thought he handled the whole ordeal with class and dignity, not two words that most people would use to describe Howard Stern.
12:29 PM on 04/12/2011
Bababoey Bababoey Bababoey
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dakotadude
giv a hoot don't shoot
11:07 AM on 04/12/2011
KING OF ALL divorces!?
11:07 AM on 04/12/2011
As much as Howard skewers others, he does the same to himself. He is smart and hilarious. And Baba Booey to you all.
photo
Rude Monk
No God can stop a hungry man
11:04 AM on 04/12/2011
Stern is a washout.Guess teenage antics and bathroom humor can only go so far.
Also,he's no role model.The fact is that he's embroiled in a lawsuit right now and he needs good PR.
10:52 AM on 04/12/2011
Why is Howard Stern even relevant?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
too young but old enough
I already know how this is going to turn out...
04:41 PM on 04/12/2011
Mostly because of the millions of people who pay for the privilege of listening to him, but also because he is so insightful.
10:11 AM on 04/12/2011
You have a good point. My pops has been married so many times and has been with more women than Hugh Hefner (and far less loyal) but it was his behavior that speaks-- even when polite. I wonder if stern cheated with his almost child bride after being married to a woman. Divorce hurts everyone. Mostly children. But parents seldom make good choices in madness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bmattix
Don't label me, bro!
10:49 AM on 04/12/2011
Well, his "child bride" is nearly 40 years old, and he started dating her about 6 months after the divorce.
11:25 AM on 04/12/2011
Yeah, I'm pretty sure they started dating when Beth was 27 and married when she was 35-36 so I dont see how she is "almost a child bride".
09:37 AM on 04/12/2011
Probably not but he looks really old lately.
10:16 AM on 04/12/2011
He is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheMilesHome
In the Conservatory, with a Pipe Wrench.
09:21 AM on 04/12/2011
Been listening to Stern for decades. The most important thing that happened in his career was satellite radio. I'm not sure why anybody else listens to the show, but in three hours he brings in more interesting topics than anybody in the industry. When he brings in music talent, it's garage band style in-studio makes other live performances on the visual medium pale on a listening quality level. (He even starts his show off with a past performance tune. It's something that starts my day off nice).

His team and his guests are some of the best in the business. When he interviews a star-quality guest, his questioning style is disarming, entertaining and probing. He rarely lets a big story get away. Some of his in house guests are friends and fans that we, as media consumers, are big fans of. In recent months, his guests included David Arquette (a huge media buzz), Chris Rock (who is always saying how much he loves the show while his wife hates it and Howard), Jeff Propst, Jimmy Kimmel and Jerry O'Connell (all three of which consider themselves superfans) and an interview with Billy Joel that, IMHO, was the best interview I've ever heard about and from the artist.

About a month ago, he actually transformed Twitter in a way that all others are trying to imitate. He gave us his view of his movie WHILE we were all watching it live. The King of All Media lives.

BaBaBooey to all.