iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mark Green

Mark Green

Posted: January 11, 2009 08:09 PM

10 Big Goals for Obama's First 1460 Days, as Proposed by Progressive Policy Leaders

What's Your Reaction:

Based on his 2008 campaign and 2009 exigencies, President Obama's mandate includes two huge and imminent priorities -- an unprecedented "stimulus" to revive the economy and a plan that gets us out of Iraq.

And then?

Eighteen months ago, John Podesta, head of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, and I agreed to collaborate on a volume that gathered together the best progressive scholars, advocates, and experts to specifically describe agency-by-agency what a progressive 44th president could do on Day One, Year One, Term One. Then, of course, John had to recuse himself in August after he was tapped to run Obama's official transition -- and this month CAPAF and my New Democracy published the results -- progressive leaders pooling their best ideas and practices into a program we call:

"Progressive Patriotism."

As Obama prepares to take his oath, expectations are sky-high. Rightly so. The planets appear to be in alignment for a possible political realignment: Obama won by triple Bush's last margin; conservative stock is at Lehman Bros. levels, after a preventive war of choice, a deregulated economic meltdown and the conservative compassion of Katrina; Democrats now enjoy a 10 percentage point edge in voter registration, which is likely to grow given minority, youth and suburban professional trends; Democrats appear more united than anytime in recent memory, with no obvious DLC-Moveon fights over wars or deficits; and there's an authentic crisis that trumps pious platitudes about the free market and "family values."

Now, rather than stale left-right debates, there's a new mainstream for more progressive values, as surely represented by the shift of 13 U.S. Senate seats and 54 House seats over two congressional elections. This may not be 1932 but it's a bigger attitudinal shift than the one in 1980 to Reagan and "Reagan Democrats," when National Review publisher Bill Rusher prematurely gloated that "liberalism is dead."

Anticipating this shift, our Citizens Transition Project developed scores of workable solutions built on four cornerstones: more democracy, diplomacy, economic opportunity and green collar jobs. Since ad hoc policy-making can peter out unless the public sees changes being thematically interconnected -- like the "New Deal" -- we linked proposals to these core values of Progressive Patriotism. Especially after what Jared Bernstein called the failure of Yo-Yo Conservatism ("You're on Your Own"), what could be more pro-American than the idea of progress?

Hence these 10 Big Goals by 2012 or 2016. For if you don't know where you're headed, you'll never get there.

Some stipulations: given space constraints, ideas are merely asserted -- for more development, one can go to the chapters by the authors themselves in Change for America. If proposals sound familiar, it's perhaps because a) they've been rising for years and become a consensus agenda, and b) so many of the authors have been recruited into the Transition and/or new Administration (Podesta, Carol Browner, Greg Craig, Elena Kagan, Dawn Johnsen, Josh Steiner, Van Jones, Jack Lew, Jeanne Lambrew, Christopher Edley, Jr....).

Nor do we think it useful for Democrats to fret whether it would be better for the new President to be more incremental than bold. One reply is-- the only thing we have to fear is fear itself. Frankly, where's the political will or majority now to stop an Obama initiative? And where is it written this moment will last? The only two other progressive windows of opportunity this past century-- 1933 and 1965 -- ended, respectively, with the continuing Depression and WWII, and Watts and the Vietnam War. Going slow risks some unanticipated event that'll snuff out the current rational exhuberance. Combining Obama's 65% popularity, congressional majorities, a supportive public, a winning program -- as well as crisis demanding that Washington rise to the occasion -- why not throw long? Again and again?

President Obama should be guided by the well known ethic, "Make no small plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood." Often wrongly attributed to Winston Churchill, this observation originated with Daniel Hudson Burnham, the noted Chicago architect who designed the 1893 World Exposition and before that helped rebuild the Windy City after its disastrous 1871 fire. So history repeats itself, as another Chicagoan makes big plans to rebuild after Bush's consuming disasters.

1. Reduce poverty a third by 2016. With poverty increasing by five million in the Bush years - and with only Great Britain having less upward income mobility than the U.S - the country needs to reduce the 37 million indigent (nearly equal to the State of California) by a third by 2016.

So the 44th president should strive to: increase the bi-partisan Earned Income Tax Credit; raise and index the minimum wage and move toward a "living wage"; better link inner-city residents to good jobs in the regional economy; create a national program to help ex-offenders successfully integrate into society; seek a temporary increase in food stamp benefits as part of any stimulus package (since $1 in benefits generates $1.84 in economic activity); make a national commitment to pre-K for all as part of an overall system of developmental care for children; establish a national version of the very successful Harlem Children's Zone, an after-school program that stays with children through their education; and make a renewed effort at bi-partisan, comprehensive immigration reform so one in 20 undocumented workers get out of the shadows by paying taxes and fines and learning English on the path to citizenship.

2. Enhance Democracy to stop special interest vetoes.
Pro-democracy reforms often take a back seat - in campaigns and governance - to bread-and-butter, life-and-death issues such as economy, war and health. But process is policy, especially if a flawed democracy allows big commercial interests in the legislative and administrative arenas to stymie change.

So the new administration should push for: universal voter regulation (adding up to 50 million to the rolls); matching public funding of congressional elections; protective measures for electronic voting; criminalization of voter suppression techniques; national standards in a Fair Elections Now Act; instant run-off voting; a requirement that all agencies catalogue and post all information in a timely and feasible way; a comprehensive national broadband strategy so all Americans have access to an affordable network of at least 100 megabits per second; national standards to give state redistricting responsibilities to a neutral body - and ideally establish a "Democracy Czar" within the White House to make sure that all such often-ignored reforms are this time advanced and enacted.

3. Get economic growth rates back to at least 3% of the Kennedy and Clinton years.
The world now understands how Bush's tax cutting, deregulation, laissez faire approach has led to slow growth, no growth or near economic collapse. From Enron to e Coli Bacteria to imported Chinese toys and drugs to the subprime mortgage criss, it turns out that laissez wasn't fair.

So even beyond the consensus for a super-sized "stimulus" plan, the new president should do everything feasible to bolster the squeezed middle-class and those seeking to enter it by: pushing for tax reform that increases top rates back to 38 percent while reducing rates on families suffering real income losses this decade; proposing an Innovation Agenda involving Research Fellowships and employment-based permanent immigration visas; including enforceable labor and trade standards in all future trade agreements; experimenting with wage-loss insurance; developing a long-term national surface transportation policy emphasizing light-rail and a national infrastructure bank; expanding one-stop job centers especially given rapidly rising unemployment as places to both obtain training and get placement in available positions; creating a 90 day moratorium on home foreclosures; and restoring enforcement of securities, anti-merger and labor laws at the SEC, Justice Department and Labor Department.

4. Move to a clean, green low-carbon economy.
With a scientific unanimity that an increase of even 2Ëš C above pre-industrial levels would be a global disaster, it's surely inadequate for a country with 3 percent of human oil reserves using 25 percent of all energy to focus on drilling and production. Yet while man-made global warming was burning the planet in the past eight years, two oil men in the White House simply fiddled away.

So the new president will be creating a new White House National Energy Council that directs his energy/environment agencies (EPA, DOE, DOT, DOA, DOI) to develop a comprehensive energy plan that a) replaces carbon-based energy with clean, renewable energy and b) promotes policies for millions of green collar jobs. Consistent with that effort, the 44th president should: alter the government's procurement process by giving "energy points" to contract bidders who demonstrate more efficiency and utilize more renewable energy; establish a national Clean Energy Corps to help cities and neglected rural communities retrofit and weatherize homes, business, school houses and public buildings; require the EPA to promote "total appliance efficiency"; increase auto fuel efficiency standards to European levels of 43 mpg by 2020; pursue a joint R&D project with China to develop new carbon capture-and-storage technologies for coal-fired plants; and prepare legislation to create a carbon cap-and-trade bill reducing fossil fuel use and generating $100 billion+ to mitigate negative effects on low-income consumers.

5. Reduce the costs - and expand the coverage - of health care. Over 70 million Americans are either uninsured or under-insured, leading to more illness, death and overtaxed emergency rooms. We have both the most expensive and least effective health care system in the industrialized world.

So the new administration should: expand coverage of S-CHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program) to cover all children in need; create a Prevention & Wellness Trust Fund to provide more preventative services for long term cost savings; order the FDA to focus on and reduce obesity and tobacco use by adolescents; invest in health care information technology to avoid medical errors and better spread effective research; investigate the causes of racial disparities in health care and mandate that HHS reduce them; provide better long-term care through assisted living technology to allow home monitoring, as well as more community health workers and home health aides; require the Surgeon General to issue annually a publicly understandable report on the nation's health; and eventually move to a universal healthcare system that's citizen-based, not job-based.

6. Elevate science over politics in federal decision-making.
While most presidents will weigh facts which lead to conclusions, Bush deployed the reverse methodology of "Lysenkoism" - conclusions led to "facts." Repeatedly, political appointees from affected industries ignored data because of partisan or religious concerns, especially in the area of climate change.

So the new administration should: issue an executive order to permit federal funding for embryonic stem cell research on all ethically derived stem cell lines; re-establish the White House Office of Science and Technology; make the Research and Development tax credit permanent; and appoint only qualified experts, not industry cronies, to science-related positions.

7. Restore the rule of law and human rights as American values. Constitutional scholar David Cole, challenging friends to name constitutional rights that Bush-Cheney didn't try to sabotage, concluded, "After the right to bear arms and not quarter soldiers, the game will be over." Apparently, when W swore to "faithfully execute the laws," he took it literally.

So a new president - who's a constitutional law professor to boot - should: pay a "decent respect for the opinions of mankind" (Jefferson) by closing the prison camp at Guantánamo and assigning to federal civilian courts the task of trying terrorist suspects; unequivocally ban the use of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by any U.S. official or contractor; greatly restrict presidential "Signing Statements" to obviously unconstitutional provisions; renounce the blatant politicization of the Justice Department as occurred during Gonzalez's tenure, appoint judges based on merit, not only ideology; repeal the "Global Gag Rule" which prohibits Non- Governmental Organizations that receive federal funding from promoting or performing abortions in other countries; end the "don't-ask-don't tell" policy for military services and ban discrimination in the workplace due to sexual orientation; and create either a congressional or presidential independent, bi-partisan commission to investigate and expose alleged illegality over the past eight years in order to deter future misconduct--a government that can't impeach or prosecute such illegality for political reasons needs to find some way to deter such corruption.

8. Educate children better for the global economy. In an increasingly global economy based on information - and with production techniques duplicatable anywhere - education is the new gold. Unless our children are better educated and more innovative, they and we will lose out in a world of open trade.

So the new administration should: push expanded learning time for all students especially in low-performing and high-poverty school; expand Early Head Start because of the proven success of high-quality pre-school for all; invest particularly in middle schools with high concentrations of low-income students who, in a sense, start dropping out of college in the 7th grade; enact a college tuition tax credit so that middle-class families can write off up to $4,000 per child; create a federal "Grow What Works" fund to identify and document the best practices to be shared; pay more to teachers who assume added responsibilities or work in challenging schools or in a shortage subjects; and create a program that focuses on teacher recruitment, and preparation and professional development since the difference between a good and a bad teacher can be the equivalent of a full year of school.

9. Fight terrorism by working more cooperatively with allies.
Terrorism by non-state actors is a palpable threat to American interests that cannot be diminished merely by invading countries or overreacting with apocalyptic, belligerent language. Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups have grown since the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.

A new president should utilize the patient deployment of all instruments of national power, emphasizing intelligence, information operations and covert action. Specifically, the U.S. should: repeal the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war and exit Iraq as quickly and as safely as possible; undermine al Qaeda recruitment by developing a counter-narrative for at-risk Muslim youth that impugns its reputation and enhances ours; schedule a major address on terrorism by the new President in a Muslim country; focus on regional diplomacy in the Middle East by engaging other states (Syria, Jordan, Turkey, Egypt) in a conference to coordinate post-war Iraq policy; cooperate better with other intelligence agencies to treat terrorism as in part a police matter; and create a process of engagement between the U.S. and Iran both to discuss common interests and warn Teheran of the consequences of supporting terrorism and a nuclear weapons program.

10. Reduce nuclear proliferation.
Because the greatest threat to America - economic threat and national security threat - is the detonation of a nuclear device in a major American city, a top priority for President Obama is to reduce that risk and to announce the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons.

So he specifically should: push to develop technologies allowing all air and sea cargo to be inspected by 2012; compile an inventory of all nuclear weapons and materials on earth to determine the best strategy of securing them from terrorist acquisitions; consider unilaterally announcing plans to reduce U.S. forces to 1000 weapons and extending the warning time for the launch of U.S. ballistic missiles, urging Russia to do the same; implement the agreement to end the North Korean nuclear program; prevent the lapse of the U.S. Russian Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START; and maintain the interlocking network of treaties, export controls and security pacts to discourage 183 non-nuclear states from starting a cycle of nuclear weapons competition.

These 10 are top goals now and benchmarks for 2012 or 2016 to measure the success of the new administration.

For America is on the brink of a possible new progressive era due to Obama's big win, big skills, a big crisis, the big popularity of reforms like expanded health care, pre-school programs and green-collar jobs, and a big agenda that's "shovel-ready." But there's one more element necessary for a real realignment to occur: citizens and citizen action.

January 20 is not only about one man who'll alone save us from conservative clutches -- or as one cheeky satirical website puts it, "IthoughtObamawouldgetmelaid.com (admission: this is my adult son's website). No president can go much farther than his constituency wants. Historian Doris Kearns Goodwin put it well in The American Prospect: "When you look at the periods of social change, in each instance the president used leadership not only to get the public involved in understanding what the problems were but to create a fervent desire to address these problems in a meaningful way." Recall here the oft-told story how Labor Secretary Francis Perkins was urging a sympathetic FDR to adopt labor reforms, and the politician- in-chief replied -- fine, now make me do it.

Fortunately, the decline of conservatism and advent of Barack Obama is occurring at the same time that there's a new on-line technology capable of harnessing citizen energy nearly cost-free to pressure for a program of Progressive Patriotism, much as the internet, social networks, and ardent bloggers helped lift Obama into office.

Then, if he and his base can credibly claim success by 2012 or 2016 in, say, 7 or more of these 10 goals -- especially health care and democracy -- President Obama will be regarded as a 21st Century FDR and credited with inspiring an era of positive progressive governance.

Mark Green is co-editor of the just-released "Change for America: A Progressive Blueprint for the 44th President," and president of Air America Media.

 
 
 
Based on his 2008 campaign and 2009 exigencies, President Obama's mandate includes two huge and imminent priorities -- an unprecedented "stimulus" to revive the economy and a plan that gets us out of ...
Based on his 2008 campaign and 2009 exigencies, President Obama's mandate includes two huge and imminent priorities -- an unprecedented "stimulus" to revive the economy and a plan that gets us out of ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:28 PM on 01/13/2009
James A. Swanson, Los Altos, CA
www.bushleagueofnations.com

Real progressive transformation of our nation must be driven from the grassroots up, not from the top down by business-as-usual career politicians.

I’m alarmed that Obama has appointed so many business-as-usual politicians. Time will tell if he has the strength—and the will—to withstand their toxic influence.

Also, Big Oil, Big Insurance, Big Pharma—the list goes on—and their lobbyists have not left town.

Electing Obama was the easy part. The real work begins today, and again tomorrow, and again every day thereafter.

We must stay engaged, take names, and never give up. Let’s redouble our efforts.

We have the advantage of knowing what to expect from Neanderthals in the Republican Party. They are thus “reliable.” As for our Democratic leaders, we trust them at our peril.

We must keep our friends close, our enemy closer, and our Democratic leaders closest.

Jim Swanson, Los Altos, CA
“The Bush League of Nations”
www.bushleagueofnations.com [for FREE download of entire book]
01:01 PM on 01/12/2009
Fight Terrorism Boycott Isreal

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090126/klein?rel=hp_currently

naomi klein's idea, not mine....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:35 PM on 01/12/2009
(#9) fight terrorism by working more cooperatively with allies. These countrys you call our allies, will not want anything to do with us until after we make a full accountibility of Bush's war on terror, which amounted to a string of war crimes and human rights abuses. If the U.S. does'nt investigate Bush and his administration would be like saying the U.S. believes that what Bush did was right and that they agree with what he did. So somewere between #8 and #9 the U.S. needs to investigate Bush's conduct in the war on terror. The U.S. unprovoked war of agression against a sovereign nation, made possible the horrors of Abu Ghraib, the distruction of Fullouja and Ramadi, the tens of thousands of Iraqi deaths, and civilian massacres like Haditha,
11:45 AM on 01/12/2009
We already have nationalized health care its called Medicaid and Medicare. Why cant we allow more people access to both systems by lowering the age barriers and raising income requirements? You shldnt have to be dirt poor to get medicaid and why do you have to be 65 to get medicare? True its going to take some cash to fund these but it wld save us money in the long run bcz people wont have to use emergency rooms for their care.
12:13 PM on 01/12/2009
Because they are bankrupt as it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TN60
I Hope You'll Dance
10:58 AM on 01/12/2009
Get rid of all insurance companies. Nationalize and subsidize all pharmaceuticals companies. Build tons of railroads for product shipping and get rid of big rigs on the interstates. Mass transit and high speed rail to transport passengers across country and in cities. Get rid of what passes for financial institutions and let the healthy community banks prosper, weaker ones be taken over and sold.

Tax big corporations back to the level of the Clinton administration and have fines leveled against those Corporations that are shipping jobs overseas.

The idea of having college level courses taught beginning in the 10th grade for an AA degree and for those that do not plan on going to college, transfer to a trade school is good. I don't know who purposed this, but it is sensible. I can say for sure that I never learned a great lot in high school past the 10th grade. Most was repeat or Latin courses. Senior year was a get out of school pass.

Do whatever it takes to start jobs, slow the home mortgage bankruptcies for those that can afford to stay in their homes and put the rest in a new lending arm of the government. Take these out of the hands of the financial wizards that got us into this mess.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:52 AM on 01/12/2009
My user name will tell you I don't consider myself a liberal but I do see myself as more center-left than anything else. I was fortunate to hear John Podesta speak at Politics & Prose this summer and agreed with most everything hesaid as I do in this post. But I'm not sure that I agree with eventually going to a single-payer model. I did at one time but the changes the healthcare system must go through will take years; perhaps our lifetime. National healthcare, however is a mustl. As a policy analyst I have definite ideas but all change in this area must be incremental and I know that flys in the face of the premise of this blog. But I think grand gestures would lead to grand mistakes.
10:30 AM on 01/12/2009
What happens then? The "stimulus" won't do anything, and we'll be in the same place, but far deeper in debt. The price of the debt will rise as foreign countries lose faith in the dollar. The government will be forced to admit the reality the rest of the world is facing and scale down it's size tremendously. At the same time, our enemies will see our economic weakness and begin testing us militarily, which will prevent any reduction in defense spending. Obama will have to raise taxes to support the absurdly bloated government, or he'll have to cut government spending drastically. If he raises taxes, productivity and stardards of living will plummet, as productive private labor is reassigned to digging up holes and filling them again. If he cuts government spending... well why even think that. They never, ever cut government spending. Look for high interests rates, negative growth, low productivity, and no money for the government to spend on new "initiatives", except protecting their own bloated benefits packages.
03:02 PM on 01/12/2009
Overdog

I am sure glad you are not in a position to call the shots.

Talk about the glass half full. How or why do you want
to get up in the morning?

Check out Ed deBono's writings on lateral thinking.
All is lost only if we believe there is no creative way
to solve our problems

Consider a serious study of Buddhism and a regular
routine of meditation.
10:29 AM on 01/12/2009
Did I miss immigration reform that is based on humane treatment of immigrants, whether legal or illegal?
And why is healthcare for everyone only vaguely a goal in an unspecified distant future?
09:39 AM on 01/12/2009
how about stop the republican re-distribution of wealth from the lower and middle class to the wealthly. As long as the ultra-wealthy are conducting class warfare on the rest of us all those other dreams will be hard to implement and PAY for.
09:33 AM on 01/12/2009
I just wonder why we keep calling this an unprecedented stimulus? Paulson handed over a trillion and a half to banks and insurance companies without any authorization from congress at all. This was before the 700 billion request. So it seem to me that O's stimulus plan may not be enough. I think we need upwards of 2 trillion dollars.
10:15 PM on 01/12/2009
Oh, why not 3 trillion, or 4, or 20? It's not like it's your money after all...

sheesh...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gurukalehuru
cwtc7
09:10 AM on 01/12/2009
The thing that I think should be priority number one is buried towards the end of item 7.
If the Bush administration is allowed to get away with the blatant criminality of the last 8 years, then it is almost guaranteed that it will happen again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
08:50 AM on 01/12/2009
You would think that a major goal would be to give people expendable income by lowering the cost of basic human needs like electricity, water, insurance and health care. It is expendable income that will get us through this.

Why is there no call to buy back utility companies that have been raising rates with NO added services for the last 10 years? Imagine consumers having 40% of their electric bill in their pocket each month.

I just finished a study on a "Non-profit" utility in Orlando, Florida. The bottom line was this; Usage has declined for 3 years straight, due to foreclosure and conservation. Overall fuel cost fell by 30% in those years, yet rates increased 15%. They are asking for another increase on Jan. 27th.

We need a moratorium on all utility and basic human need costs.

While companies worldwide are taking massive hits in profit margins, utility, food, water and sewage keep going up and up, and nobody seems to care.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PATina
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
11:58 AM on 01/12/2009
That's actually a great idea.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
pfrogger
08:59 AM on 01/13/2009
well said, great idea, will never happen

read Cleveland, OH Congressman Dennis Kucinich on His Battle With the Banks (http://beavercountyblue.org/2008/12/17/cleveland-oh-congressman-dennis-kucinich-on-his-battle-with-the-banks/)
"his determination to prevent privatization of the utility company had saved the city nearly $200 million"

wind turbines and solar power can be effectively combined to generate all the electricity (or at least the vast majority) of America's needs
an initial investment by tax payers (instead of 700+ billion that we will never see a return on) plus minor maintenance costs would provide free clean renewable energy.
the rest of the world is already doing it, including China, Europe, etc...
and so are the utility companies in this country
why would any sensible person pay someone ad infinitum for renewable energy that can be had after an initial investment. it doesn't make sense. it is NOT capitalism. the utility companies in this country are building wind turbines and solar power plants with government subsidies, and government tax breaks and then charging us for this even though after the initial investment, they only have minimal maintenance costs
what do we pay taxes for? so we can give breaks to the utility companies who charge us for essentially "free" energy falling from the sky, even though buying the wind turbines and solar plants would actually be cheaper by a 1000 fold
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joebhed
Greenback Revolutionist
08:35 AM on 01/12/2009
Mark,
As usual you have framed the great political transformation into policies that we can all embrace.
But, as usual for those of US on the progressive side of the political spectrum, you leave out the one major political step that is necessary to make ALL the rest of that stuff happen.

First to quote international banker Mayer Anselm Rothchild:
"Permit me to create and control the nation's money, and I care not who makes its laws".

All those who recognize the need to re-prioritize the nation's agenda, and therefrom, the world's, need to come to grips with that statement.

Dennis Kucinich is the one of our leaders who has laid out the necessary monetary reform that will, in turn, lay the foundation for all other progressive reforms.
See his speech last week here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR2EtMteHCg&feature=channel_page00

What it boils down to is this fact, Mark, if we do NOT permit the private bankers to create and control the nation's money, then it DOES matter who makes the nation's laws.

It's time for the progressives to unite behind a coherent national monetary policy of debt-free, government-issue of the nation's money.
Plain and simple.
Only thus can we do those ten policies, and more.
Monetary transformation is the foundation of economic democracy and of political reform.
Let's get on with it.
Thank you Dennis Kucinich.
07:42 AM on 01/12/2009
Things can be done simply to solve many of the problems now facing Americans. Do a pilot program for single payer health based on what Senators recieve for a year, free. See what the costs are, then payroll tax accordingly. Free public university education for those with the desire and good grades. Gov't sponsored daycare for lower wage earners. Revisit all trade agreements and insist on worker parity, safe conditions and wages, tariff the differences to bring factories home. End H1B visa program. End caps on Social Security contributions. Eliminate corporate personhood, which effectively removes First Amendment rights for corporations, thus dramatically reducing influence of our electeds. One of the primary reasons for the fall of Rome was an overextended military. Close overseas bases, end all overseas occupations and provide for home and coastal defense. Return bailout money to the Fed since lenders have reneged their promises to lend. End war on drugs, regulate and tax, empty our prisons of user/ offenders. Institute a new WPA and CCC.

It can be done, just takes willpower.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
08:41 AM on 01/12/2009
But that would be REAL change man... Stuff that makes sense and actually would work.

:-)

Just the thought of pacifying the republicans on any issue at this stage makes me wanna punch someone. I just don't get it.

Great comment.
04:12 PM on 01/12/2009
We already have the perfect vehicle for piloting universal health systems. It's called the states.

There is no such thing as as "Free public university education". There is only self-financed education and education financed by others. Why not have the costs be paid by those that receive the services?

Gov't sponsored daycare will only lead to lower wages. Gov't sponsored really means taxpayer sponsored. Again. Why not have the costs be paid by those that receive the services?

I think we should phase out the H1B and remove all trade agreements. Allow individual citizens to decide which nations they wish to purchase goods from. Nations that place tariffs on our goods will basically be subsidizing our consumers at the expense of theirs.

If SS is no longer an "insurance policy", can't we get rid of the payroll tax altogether. What is the purpose?

I'm for removing first amendment rights for corporations as long as I can restore it to American citizens.

I am definitely okay with reducing our foreign military presence and returning to more of a defensive stance. Bailout money? Should have never been given in the first place. War on Drugs? Should end immediately (at least at the Federal level). WPA/CCC? Absolutely not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert234
07:03 AM on 01/12/2009
Super minus TWO: STOP the war on drugs which is a war on people, and STOP murdering innocent children then calling them collateral damage.