iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mark Joseph

GET UPDATES FROM Mark Joseph
 

The Invisible Elephant in the Room: If Romney Loses,There Will Be One Overwhelming Reason Why

Posted: 09/09/2012 6:54 pm

Although it's usually "liberal elites" who are accused of being out of touch with the values, passions and interests of the heartland, when it comes to Mitt Romney and the Mormon question, I am finding that the entire political spectrum, from far right to far left, are in some sort of a passionate group-denial about the fact that as things stand now, millions of Americans are simply not going to vote for him because of his Mormon faith. Of course, Democrats who will be the major beneficiary of this prejudice can be forgiven for not noticing or caring about this issue, but it's the GOP which now has 60 days to come to grips with reality and craft some sort of a strategy to counter this if they have any hope of winning back the presidency.

I wish I could say that I had always known about the major stumbling block that is Mitt Romney's faith simply because I am so in touch with the average American, but that's not the case. Several years back my friend and sometimes client, filmmaker Adam Christing, an expert on the Mormon faith and a member of the Mormon History Association told me that he was going to write and direct a documentary on the founder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Joseph Smith, called A Mormon President, so named because Smith had run for the presidency in 1844. Adam traveled across America and came back with unbelievable tales of anti-Mormon sentiment that I had simply not understood up until that point.

According to Adam, there are pockets of deep anti-Mormon fervor in several states across the Midwest that are different from the common objections to Mormonism that are most prevalent among devout Christians for whom Mormons clearly fail the theological test that separates Christians from non-Christians. No, this is a different kind of anger, the kind that is passed down from generation to generation, with a generalized feeling that someone somewhere back in history offended someone in their family and they're not going to let go of it.

The other night at a social event, I found myself in the company of three A-list cultural figures, all whose names you'd recognize if you follow media and politics. One was a diehard liberal, one a strong conservative and the other something of a centrist. As we chatted about politics, I told them that in my opinion the Mormon issue was proving to be a powerful problem for many voters and that if Romney were to lose as I believe to be entirely possible, that would be the reason. In unison, they all poo-hooed my thought as though I was from another planet.

But I am from planet earth, and although my friends are very nice people, they are still members of the elite, right, left and center, and either aren't listening to the vox populi or are choosing not to hear what the heartland is saying.

Here are the facts: Mitt Romney looks like a guy whom central casting might send back if asked to produce a president. He is some kind of a conservative who somehow managed to win in a very blue state. He's running against a president who is in the throes of a horrible recession. By any reasonable standard, Romney should be up by anywhere from five to ten points. But he's not. He's down by three or four. And I know the reason why, the reason nobody wants to acknowledge: because he's a Mormon.

Two weekends ago I sat out by the pool and listened to a distant relative tell me that he had made up his mind whom he was going to vote for this election. He is a union man but is fed up with the Democratic party's liberal positions on social issues and just can't pull the lever for Obama. His solution: he's writing in his neighbor's name instead. Why? Because he is a devout Christian and doesn't want to promote the Mormon religion which is what he believes will happen if Romney is elected president.

Last week at a public event held at a church, I listened in amazement as a Q&A session about the election quickly devolved into a discussion of religious dogma when a woman in her late twenties asked an obscure question about Mormon doctrine and wondered aloud how others in the room could in good conscience vote for someone who held such beliefs.

To be sure, many conservative Christian leaders are scrambling to explain to members of their flock that they should be able to separate a candidate's religious beliefs from their politics, but I'm not sure the flock is listening to such sophisticated arguments. Rather, they're going with their gut and with 60 days to go, are trying to decide between writing in their neighbor, staying home altogether or going with the guy whose policies they may not agree with, but who can tell you when and where he accepted Jesus Christ as his personal savior.

I don't think the elitists in the Republican establishment have any idea that any of this awaits them on Nov. 6 and unless they radically rethink their current approach, which is to pretend this objection doesn't even exist, they're in for a rude awakening come election day. The ugly truth may be that the election of 2012 may not be decided on any high-minded issues that it should be -- the future of health care, of America's role in the world or of the role of government -- but rather, on the fact that for many Americans the Mormon religion is so foreign, so incredibly out of bounds of what is acceptable religious practice, that they would rather elect a man with whom they disagree on the issues they care deeply about, than vote for a Mormon.

If most of my friends on the right, left and center seem to be in willful denial about all of this, I think it's because they want to believe that we are beyond these sorts of prejudices. To be sure we are largely past many of them that have to do with race and gender and many religious differences. But we won't get past the Mormon question by shutting up debate or pretending it doesn't exist and Mitt Romney certainly isn't going to make it to the White House unless he speaks candidly and forthrightly to voters like my distant relative, speaking to and alleviating his fears and prying his vote away from his neighbor.

 
 
 

Follow Mark Joseph on Twitter: www.twitter.com/markmjm

FOLLOW POLITICS
Although it's usually "liberal elites" who are accused of being out of touch with the values, passions and interests of the heartland, when it comes to Mitt Romney and the Mormon question, I am findin...
Although it's usually "liberal elites" who are accused of being out of touch with the values, passions and interests of the heartland, when it comes to Mitt Romney and the Mormon question, I am findin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 487
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
06:38 PM on 11/03/2012
I voted for Mit Romney because I feel that he would be the better choice to get us out of this recession. As far as Mormans go some are pretty strange in my opinion. I use to go to a Morman church back in the early 90s for Boy Scout's because my neighboor was a devout Mormon. My Morman friend was not allowed to drink coke, tea, play on Sunday's/watch tv, can not watch the Simpsons, could not see pg-13 movies and some PG movies, could not have sleep overs and was not allowed to trick or treat because his parents said it worshiped the devil. He was also worked to death in my opinion for house hold chores. There were many more strange things that he could not do but I can not remeber as of now. After the 4 years the church spent trying to convert my Dad unsucessfully they gave up on me and started to become nasty. Some Mormons just started to become mean to me and I could see the hate in their eyes when they would talk to me. I do not know if Mit Romeny is of the same caliber? If Mit Romney would have a drink I would feel a lot better about voting for him. This would prove to me that he would be more in touch with the American people and not his fictitious profit. I fear that he might just be another pupet of the current profit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builder101
VOTE!
07:27 PM on 09/17/2012
All I know is the Tea, Coffee and Sprits
Industry hopes that the Mormon church does not grow, talk about bad for business!
photo
MIWoman
Spreading nuggets of wisdom across the internet
12:13 PM on 09/16/2012
I think there may be some truth in what you say, but the main reason that I'm not voting for Romney is he's an out of touch elitist. I grew up in a family with mixed religious beliefs, so the issue of religion was never a consideration for me. However, I know that it is for many and think it could be highly problematic for Romney.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brownies4breakfast
Stand as a witness of God at all times & places
03:38 PM on 09/13/2012
If Romney loses the election over his religion, the evangelicals and Protestant churches can only blame themselves. LDS bashing with words like cult, non-Christian and hieratical are common practice. There're a lot of good Protestant/Evangelical folks out there. But when your preacher/Sunday school teacher tells you to stay away from Mormons because they're evil and you're 12 years old, you're probably going to do it.
This is what happened to my daughter who was invited to an Evangelical church, and while she was in Sunday school, the topic of Mormons came up and the teacher said “remember Pastor John said to stay away from Mormons because they are evil.” Needless to say, the friend never invited her back. Anyone raised from their youth in this environment is going to be scared, suspicious and extremely hesitant to vote for a Mormon. Especially is they don’t know a Mormon. That happened over ten years ago. I was hoping that relations have improved over the years. Regardless of the election results, both LDS and evangelicals need to learn from this and move forward with our common goals and put aside our differences.
Bigotry by LDS may be less common because so many LDS converts used to be members of other Christian faiths. LDS make a considerable effort to stick to teaching our doctrine and what we believe and not what other faiths believe. I think all Christians should strive to do this. They're churches start to grow again.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mirabai305
Are you Jeff Vader?
08:18 PM on 09/11/2012
"To be sure, many conservative Christian leaders are scrambling to explain to members of their flock that they should be able to separate a candidate's religious beliefs from their politics"

I am only willing to separate a candidate's religious beliefs from their politics when they are capable of not using politics to attempt to legislate me to conform with their religious beliefs.
03:23 AM on 09/12/2012
Then should be easy in the case of Romney running for president. President's can't pass laws. And while Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints encourages people to vote their beliefs on moral issues, it is strongly against the establishment of a state religion.

Romney himself is very careful about not confusing his personal beliefs with his duties as a government official. He does not see "sin" as something that should be legislated. Instead he looks at "crime", "rights", and "social good" as his duty.

Any fear about Romney trying to legislate his religion is irrational.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa SpomerKrasnoff
10:15 AM on 09/12/2012
As a Mormon Bishop, isn't he required to put his faith, first and foremost? Isn't it his duty? Or is he giving up his Bishophood?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mirabai305
Are you Jeff Vader?
10:30 AM on 09/12/2012
Hmm, except for the GOP party platform wanting to reverse Roe v. Wade and make ALL abortion illegal even in cases of rape and incest. Why? Because their religious beliefs dictate that abortion is wrong. 
Except for the part about returning DADT to practice and expelling outed gay people from the military. Why? Because their religious beliefs dictate that homosexuality is wrong. 
Except for promoting higher pay and job preference for men, because the bible says the husband shall be superior to the wife. It goes on and on. The entire party platform is built on religious beliefs. The only people who are irrational are those that cannot see this for themselves.
Romney's concept of "social good" consists of only that which benefits his rich friends. The rest of us are the serfs that only exist to support his lifestyle.
05:54 PM on 09/11/2012
I really don't care about the Mormon thing but could we please stop photographing him with a pretend halo? I remember when GW was often photographed in front of glowing and/or circular things. Can we stop now?
05:37 PM on 09/11/2012
Most of the Leftist secular anti-Mormons would never vote for a Republican. Most of the right-wing Evangelical Republicans who are hard over on their religious prejudice live in Red states where the majority is going to vote for Romney anyway. How many people in swing states are Evangelical Republicans who are so stupid they think they will be helping Christianity by allowing Obama, the advocate of gay marriage and forcing religious schools to pay for contraceptives, to win? If they do that, they will prove that Obama was right, and that they are ruled by their hatred rather than their brains.
photo
gentlewomanfarmer
Make hay while the sun shines.
12:50 PM on 09/11/2012
Then Romney, a resident of a glass house, had better stop throwing stones, eh?
10:46 AM on 09/11/2012
The odd thing about this article is that it proposes that Romney is a good candidate because of his looks?!?!? Really? His skin color? Are you more concerned with prejudice against people's faiths rather than prejudice because of skin color? I'm having a hard time being sympathetic to what your article suggests. Perhaps people aren't impressed with Romney because of his business practices? Either way, Obama is contending with the bigots because of his skin color and Romney is contending with them because of his faith. Does this even out? Surely there are statistics on this. Can you produce them?
10:41 AM on 09/11/2012
I really hope you're wrong, but it may be that you are not. Prejudices run deep on Mormonism, particularly among evangelicals. However, the Foundation for Religious Diplomacy is working to respond to such things and to prepare people of various religious traditions for understanding, relationships, and conversations about real religious differences without compromise, and yet in civility and fairness. I work with the Evangelical Chapter, we have a Mormon one, and there are others in the traditions of Islam, Judaism, and Islam as well. You can learn more at www.fidweb.org. Soon we will have our World Table of Religions online forum for peer-reviewed dialogue ready to launch, and our documentary film that touches on the issue raised in your essay will be ready for distribution.
10:29 AM on 09/11/2012
Think about it. As a mormon I'm a saint. As a Baptist I'm a sinner. DUH!
08:59 PM on 09/13/2012
People often misunderstand the term Saints in the name of the church. It is simply meant as those seeking to follow Christ. It is not meant as holy or perfect ones.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
07:32 AM on 09/11/2012
There is a chunk of the population that will vote for a head of lettuce if it has a (R) or a (D) next to it, a sizeable chunk. there is another block who simply won't vote or who will intentionally spoil or waste their vote with write ins or third parties. I'm sure there are some Mormon haters in the tiny slice of voters who don't fit into any of the above categories, and probably some who still have issues with having a black president.
03:14 AM on 09/11/2012
Just as the Tea Party cannot admit in the light of day that they will not vote for a black man, the Fundalmentalists, the Evangelicals, cannot say out loud that they will not vote for a Mormon. But Linkins is right—some of them will not. And that is not necessarily showing up in polls.

The Democrats know the racists will not vote for their man. But the Republicans are seemingly oblivious to their problem with prejudice. They have been running the Southern strategy for decades, happily exploiting the racism of a certain portion of the electorate while pretending they are not.

Although I decry prejudice, there is a certain amount of poetic justice in their situation—facing a prejudice that they cannot overcome without a change of candidates.
10:49 AM on 09/11/2012
Interesting how the article says "Mitt Romney looks like a guy whom central casting might send back if asked to produce a president." Is he astounded that the religious prejudice might be trumping the racial prejudice? How can he write this article and overlook the prejudice that both candidates face. It's really obnoxious.
Mochilero
Have backpack, will travel
03:09 AM on 09/11/2012
A hollow man is not capable of speaking candidly and forthrightly. To do so he would need to have actual convictions.
11:14 PM on 09/10/2012
Is this why Romney is courting the Religious Right? Don't they ask what his religion is? And his running mate is a Catholic. So the only Protestant running is President Obama.