Dealing With the Bear Market if You're Close to Retirement

Investment gurus have been urging us all to sit tight through the stock market roller coaster: Don't panic, don't sell out at the bottom. And that's good advice if you're still years away from retirement and have time to recover.

It's a different story if you're close to retirement or recently retired. Unfortunately, many of these folks appear to have been far too aggressive in the amount of equities they've held approaching retirement. According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, 38 percent of 401(k) investors age 56 to 65 had more than 80 percent of their portfolios in equities as recently as 2006. Most financial planning pros advise reducing exposure to stocks as retirement approaches, to somewhere around 50 or 60 percent.

But that doesn't mean you're helpless if you retired recently and have been hammered by the bear market in stocks, or if you need to retire soon. Smart strategic options are available to you -- although they're not painless.

The key is maintaining a long-term perspective, because the goal here is to make sure your retirement nest egg lasts many years into the future. So, the question isn't really what your portfolio looks like today -- but how you'll manage it over what could be a 30-year period, assuming today's longevity rates.

T. Rowe Price recently analyzed possible outcomes for investors who had the bad fortune to retire into a bear market. The investment management company did a Monte Carlo probability analysis to determine which investment management decisions would allow investors to stretch their nest egg savings over a 30-year retirement.

The analysis looked at 10,000 simulated portfolio outcomes using actual stock performance data from 2000 to 2002 -- a bear market during which the S&P 500 fell 42 percent. The analysis assumed a tax-deferred portfolio invested 55 percent in equities and 45 percent in bonds.

Rather than sell, the smartest move is to adjust your plans for withdrawing funds -- especially in the early years of retirement. Most financial advisers suggest withdrawing four percent of a nest egg balance in the first year of retirement, and increasing annual withdrawals by three percent annually to keep pace with inflation.

But in one of T. Rowe Price's hypothetical scenarios, the retiree holds off on taking any inflation adjustments for several years, until the market rebounds. That decision has a huge, positive impact on portfolio longevity; in fact, it yields an 89 percent probability that the retiree's funds will last 30 years.

In a much more aggressive hypothetical, T. Rowe Price assumes that the retiree reduces planned withdrawals by 25 percent. That restores a 99 percent probability that the funds will last 30 years -- but it's too draconian a cut for most people. Still, it does illustrate the potential available to you in holding back on withdrawals. (One caveat: Since tax-deferred accounts require that you take minimum distributions starting at age 70-1/2, T. Rowe price assumed that these distributions are re-invested in taxable equity accounts.)

No doubt, these scenarios represent belt-tightening. After all, we're talking about a bear market and likely a painful coming economic recession. But remember -- the main objective is to maintain your nest egg to support a long life.

Another important option to consider is putting off retirement or going back to work, if that's an option. I've written frequently about the many benefits of working past the minimum retirement age -- as defined by Social Security rules -- of 62. Among others, working a few additional years most likely will fatten up your Social Security payments considerably over a lifetime, as the rules generally are written to penalize people who file for benefits early.

Just as important, every year you work is a year you won't drawing down any 401(k) savings; instead, you'll be making payroll contributions to your plan, buying stocks at bargain, bear market rates. Those investments will pay off down the road when you retire and the market rebounds.

T. Rowe Price estimates that working until age 65 will boost annual retirement income from investments by 28 percent.

I've posted more on this over at RetirementRevised.com.

Comments

[WOW-Online]

This is great information for elders to have and I think it is important to make sure we get resources like this into their hands as much as possible. However, the advice of maintaining a nest egg is contingent upon an elder"s economic status prior to retirement. Elders who are counting solely on their gains in the stock market to support them after retiring are less likely to be draw upon those funds periodically in order to remain economically secure. Especially during an economic downturn, the stock an elder currently has could go down in a year, leaving them with less money to withdraw. Working past retirement age is something many elders are being pressured to do to maintain their standard of living and it is important to understand what components make up that standard of living to know how to better support elders. Wider Opportunities for Women"s Elder Economic Security Standard Index is an up-to-date tool that provides credible information about how much elders need to be economically secure in today"s economy.
For more information about the Elder Economic Security Standard Index visit http://www.wowonline.org/ourprograms/eesi/eess.asp
You can also post your thoughts about economic security for elders on the Elder Economic Security blog at
www.wow-eesi.blogspot.com

[robinhood1]

Most employees didn't have much in their 401K plans even when the markets were better. Now many have even less. They will be working until they drop. The US government seems to be doing its best to follow Argentina down the road to insolvency. How many special interests can it bail out before US government bonds turn to into junk? I hope things hold up for a few more years. If you are a member of Gen X or younger, good luck. You're going to need it.