More

Mark Nickolas

Mark Nickolas

Posted April 11, 2009 | 05:12 AM (EST)

Obama Financial Policies Already Paying Off?


Yesterday, Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit said his bank was profitable during the first two months of the year and is enjoying the best quarter-to-date performance since 2007.

Today, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said the company has been "solidly profitable" so far this quarter.

Hmmm. That's only two of the big banks but might this be an early signal that the financial intervention that President Obama has been leading on, since the very moment he won the election, is working?

Again, it's early but these are some very encouraging signs. Even CNBC just said that it does seem that the big banks which took TARP money are starting to see a turnaround.

Anyone else wonder what is being muttered in McConnell's and Boehner's office right now?

Mark Nickolas is the Managing Editor of Political Base, and this story was from his original post, "Obama Financial Policies Already Paying Off? "

 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadeba
12:06 PM on 03/13/2009
Could it be that the banks lied all around? You attach a few strings (no bonuses, retention awards, threat of nationalization) and they don't seem to need the funds anymore. Surely, they would have greedily taken money if they'd been able to do whatever they wanted with it - no strings attached.
12:57 AM on 03/13/2009
Wrong remember the talking points " we inherited this mess" so Bush gets the credit for fixing the banks as it happened on his watch and with the TARP funds HE spent not obama, nice try though
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadeba
12:10 PM on 03/13/2009
wrong. The only thing 43 did was make this mess.
10:44 PM on 03/12/2009
At some point, when the cash donations without strings are piling up in the center of my mattress, I too will have to declare myself to be making a profit. But don't stop that money, because then all the profits will go away! As long as you keep supporting me with vast amounts of cash, I'll be okay. Really. I'll even declare myself... above water. If I have to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lgillooly
04:35 PM on 03/12/2009
Oh no!! Obama might actually turn the economic mess aroud...now what do we say...Get Rush and Hannity on the phone right away! They will know how to handle this and then all of the parroting hosts on right wing radio can spreads the word...we just need them to tell us what the words will be..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montemalone
oenophile, aquarist, francophone, radical moderate
04:12 PM on 03/12/2009
The only reason these banks are suddenly profitable is to avoid having to turn over the books to an auditor.
All they've done is move some commas and decimals around on the ledger.

Losses were for tax breaks, to be applied retroactively to previous years profits.
Now that won't work, so voila, they have a profit.
10:45 PM on 03/12/2009
That's what I said later, before. Although I forgot to mention NO PEEKING at my mattress.
02:55 PM on 03/12/2009
If the banks' ledgers are balanced and the banks are ready to lend again then the policies will have begun to pay off.
12:01 PM on 03/12/2009
If making the bankers more profitable was the goal, then it appears that Obama's policies may be working.

Obama and Geithner have persistently claimed that solvency and general financial health was their goal. The banks have not increased their loans. They have increased their already outrageous credit card rates to consumers.

CNBC and the other financial news organizations, like WSJ, have a single point of view - the financial crowd. Their measure of approval is utterly irrelevant to the average person. They have no remaining credibility.

What Obama has accomplished is a transfer of wealth from taxpayers to bankers. Nothing else.
I suppose that's important to bankers and brokers. The other 302,000,000 of us got nothing and are paying for it.

Thanks Obama.
10:22 PM on 03/12/2009
ROFL! Now THAT was hilarious!

Dow down? Blame Obama.
Banking system not fixed? Blame Obama.
Now....Banks begin showing a profit? Blame.....Obama. Accuse him for helping Wall Street.

But wait -- President Obama instituted the most sweeping tax CUT for the middle class -- 95% of working Americans at the dismay of Republicans in Washington -- who made him REDUCE the tax cut..........
11:28 AM on 03/12/2009
Do their "profits" include their bailout funds? If they lose $25b but received $45b, does that mean they profitted $20b? I call bulls**t.
09:10 AM on 03/12/2009
Citi...sh**y. Longtime cardholder, never late for a payment w/ plenty of creditline left. They raised my % on cards from 8% to 15%. Think of the billions of $$$ on everyone's cards and you can see why they are starting to make a profit.
photo
Helzapoppin
Don't Piss Down My Back And Tell Me It's Raining.
08:00 AM on 03/12/2009
Horse-hockey

The banks are seeing "profits" because they are bleeding consumers dry with 30+% interest rate hikes on their credit cards and other unsecured loans.

I'm going to keep saying it until someone gets it. All the stimulus in the world isn't going to mean squat if the benefits to consumers get gobbled up with higher and higher credit debt payments instead of getting pumped into the general economy.

And all the efforts to get banks "lending again" will be for nothing if, by the time they do, millions of Americans have had their credit so decimated by delinquencies, defaults and bankruptcies (forced by the banks themselves) that they no longer qualify for credit.

If the next big looming disaster on the horizon is credit card defaults, it is largely due to the banks themselves for their recent actions against their cardholders across the board. It seems the banks are determined to destroy the economy from one end or the other.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Apphouse50
07:09 AM on 03/12/2009
Yeah, well, Ari Fleisher told me that's another thing Obama ought to be sending George W. Bush a thank-you note about.
10:23 PM on 03/12/2009
lol!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
uoiltl
06:42 AM on 03/12/2009
Why more than ten of treasure department’s appointees are blocked by lawmakers? GOP led by Limbaugh implicitly wants the president to fail. Is this the sneakiest, but effective, way, to make Obama administration to fail by paralysing his economic team?
01:03 AM on 03/12/2009
One can hope these reports are based on honest accounting. I will remain skeptical due to the gourmet meals cooked up in some of these bank's accounting offices over the past several years. Are they simply trying to avoid being nationalized?
sarabono
Oldie but Goody
10:55 PM on 03/11/2009
I doubt it. Both Banks received their TARP money from the first 350,000 Billion awarded by Paulsen under Bush. No other TARP money has yet been distributed.
12:30 AM on 03/12/2009
Don't you mean 350 billion or 350,000,000,000?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
10:43 PM on 03/11/2009
I don't give the president the blame for the mess he inherited, so I can't give him all the credit for this bright spot. The numbers reported here are mostly due to factors in place before he took office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timm553
In vino veritas
02:35 PM on 03/12/2009
And which "factors" are you referring to, sir / madam?