iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mark Stege

GET UPDATES FROM Mark Stege
 

When It Hits Home...

Posted: 04/22/2012 12:40 am

Around 10,000 years ago, while a group of 29 high volcanic islands crumbled back below the surface of the Central Pacific Ocean, tiny polyps banded together to form massive coral reef colonies, now known as the coral atoll nation of the Marshall Islands.

My parents kept a small retail store on one of the 29 atolls when I was very young, and from breakfast to dinner without stopping for lunch, I would swim and play with my cousins on the old bullet-ridden Japanese pier, beside manta rays jumping clear out of the water and Taroa, Maloelap's signature Terushima Maru listing to port. I still remember falling to sleep imagining that sunken WWII freighter guiding itself closer to dock.

Last week, after 16 years away, I returned to my childhood playground, the islands I grew up on. The journey normally takes about 25 minutes by plane, but this time it was 14 hours by boat. I plan to make at least two more trips this year, largely because the people who live there have given me a tremendous gift by electing me to represent them on the Maloelap Atoll Local Council. The first trip will be to collect different varieties of pandanus seedlings to plant on the urbanized capital atoll of Majuro, 100 miles south of Taroa. The pandanus is a deep-rooted tree with nourishing fruit, and is part of our limited arsenal to preserve both culture and coastline.

Some of my Marshallese friends liken today's warning of sea level rise to God's warning for Noah to "make thee an ark of gopher wood." As a result, Noah was prepared when sea levels shot up within 40 days and 40 nights. Will there even be a Majuro or a Taroa to speak of in 40 years?

Both my homes are now disappearing. Last week on Taroa, I saw that beaches have begun to creep inland, particularly during king tides. Coconut trees have fallen sideways, and even the Y-shaped pandanus branches now lean seaward, the sandy soil beneath inundated by the expanding ocean.

Thinking of it now, I am transported back to one youthful day on the Japanese pier on Taroa, when pink and orange clouds bedazzled the horizon. A few of us still remained after another full day swimming alongside manta rays, reluctant to go home. I sat transfixed by the fleeting sun, when a bright green flash of light suddenly burst out just as the sun sank below the waves. I was unsure of how refracted light could emit green amongst such different colors as orange and pink. I've only seen the green flash that one time, so I know it is rare.

It may be too late for the people of Taroa to hold back inundation, storm surges, erosion and other natural processes that are now amplified by climate change. But for now, the way I see it, climate change for Taroa will boil down to ensuring healthier coastlines, more sustainable methods of existence, and preparing our children to articulate their own imperiled future on or off these fragile islands.

I am reminded of plans raised last week on Tarao to establish a community-based Marine Protected Area, specifically to protect a school of mackerel that traditionally could only be harvested by scooping them out of the water with a special basket made from pandanus roots. Legend has it this school is magical and will never be depleted.

I think of all these things, and how they all add up to the enormous amount of work we must do, both because of and irrespective of climate change -- us on Taroa, the 53,000 others in the Marshall Islands, and the billions with whom we share this earth. There is so much work to do together. I think again of the old bullet-ridden pier, the green flash of my youth. Somehow, I know it will always be within my people's sight, and our home will not stay gone forever, but someday rise again, polyp by tiny polyp.

 
FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
08:15 AM on 04/25/2012
Denialists. A really good name for people who feel that their opinions on any issue trump those of historians, scientists, or other experts in their fields. Even eye witnesses.

Andrew Harvey and Orkneygal apparently feel that they are free to mock and criticize anyone they like. Even someone who is losing their homeland. They apparently feel free to mock and criticize someone who lives there, someone who sees it happening, and someone who states that "storm surges, erosion and other natural processes that are now amplified by climate change" are washing away his homeland.

I am guessing that Andrew Harvey and Orkneygal are associated with the Heartworm Institute..... That institute for all the special interests that really matter in the world...heartlessness from the heartless, for the heartless, and by the heartless. But that is just an opinionated guess on my part.

Have a nice day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Harvey
Don't F with the Jesus
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Excelsior!
09:14 AM on 04/23/2012
It would probably be best if you got your science from scientists, not editorials by non-scientists in conservative newspapers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:13 AM on 04/24/2012
The link is below. The peer-reviewed science is incontrovertible. The Washington Times editorial is spot on. The Pacific Islands are sinking due to plant food in the atmosphere meme has been thoroughly debunked,

http://tinyurl.com/295ncne
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
03:24 PM on 04/25/2012
Orkneygal: "The Pacific Islands are sinking due to plant food in the atmosphere meme has been thoroughly debunked"

Got any more climate science denier straw men, Orkneygal?

Of course you do.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
03:28 PM on 04/25/2012
Yup - that Washington Times anti-science OpEd is indeed BS.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
hazbro24
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro- HST
07:00 PM on 04/22/2012
Seahawks jersey, we are like brothers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roosevelt Democrat
05:46 PM on 04/22/2012
The Marshall Islands look like a perfect place to combine Off Shore Wind generation or even tidal generation with Bio-Rock.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071204-AP-bali-electrified.html

Using the superstructure of a series of Off Shore Wind Turbines as support for growing a barrier reef around these low lying islands. Using Bio-Rock, coral growths of 2 inches per year have been recorded. Imagine the network of coral that could be built in 25 years!

The islanders get electricity, they are sequestering large amounts of CO2 for the industrial nations, which with the right rules in the U.N. could be sold. These structures would slow down or reverse the trend of oceanic acidity increases. These structures would provide nurseries and habitat for marine life.

All Win Win!

Look we have been farming for thousands of years, maybe this is the next step?

Nothing man make is as effective in protecting coast line like a barrier reef. And a barrier reef gives back much more than protection!
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
04:52 PM on 04/22/2012
Good attitude. Making places as livable as possible. And I bet that if we do all the environmentally and socially wise things we should have done long ago, nature will not fail to notice and chip in with some help of its own. So althought "it's too late" to prevent sea level rise and other similar effects of warming, I suspect there is a sort of triumph of existence that can still be achieved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gas-Bag
There's nothing endearing about perfection.
04:43 PM on 04/22/2012
Exactly how long is 10,0000 years ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
05:00 PM on 04/22/2012
not long when talking about the earth's geology.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Excelsior!
05:19 PM on 04/22/2012
One year longer than 9,9999 years.
12:49 PM on 04/22/2012
I see that the serial climate deniers serially posting misleading, false and vacuous data are being more quickly and effectively countered by other commentors citing ACTUAL valid evidence - good work folks; it is time (past time) to spend less time on these 'gnats' of mis-direction because...there are actual challenging Grown-up choices that need to be made...and it seems that we no longer live in an actual Grown-up society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimspy
Quod quae operibus sufficit.
06:27 AM on 04/23/2012
My new style of countering deniers is not to address them directly but instead to direct my comments to the "silent readers," those who peruse these boards to get a feel for "who's winning" the debate. Because after all, they are the only ones I really care about reaching. The sock puppet deniers are apparently paid well not to change their minds, so I simply don't bother with them. I think if everyone used this technique, they might give up and go away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lawa
row, row your boat
12:41 PM on 04/22/2012
the 50's bomb testing dispaced peaceful people from their homes with empty promises from america. whats new huh/ i remember, i was there. operation redwing
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
10:23 AM on 04/22/2012
I have a theory.

The nations are racing toward renewables and the leaders are trying to trip up their rivals.

Intrigue, spies, and lies. Drama.

Like this country:

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2007/09/new-zealand-commits-to-90-renewable-electricity-by-2025-50075?null
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
09:29 AM on 04/22/2012
For a good reminder that our actions have consequences, please read this:

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-19/climate-change-has-nothing-to-do-with-al-gore
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChangeNow
Information over indignation
09:19 AM on 04/22/2012
Please don't think this question implies my denial of sea level rise. What I want to understand is how islands in a given ocean basin can experience higher sea level rise than the rest of that ocean basin. How can Tuvalu have a sea level rise over the avarage?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Excelsior!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChangeNow
Information over indignation
11:36 AM on 04/22/2012
Perfect! Thank you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
05:07 PM on 04/22/2012
and I raise you a link
http://www.real-science.com/poor-science-at-nasa
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marc1940
01:25 PM on 04/22/2012
If you look up Maldives climate change, you will read how the folks in the Indian Ocean are affected.
04:22 AM on 04/22/2012
I don't personally know atoll scientist Dr. Paul Kench -- who's study has erroneously been cited by climate deniers as "proof" that island nations were not in danger from climate change -- but admire his and Dr. Murray Ford's use of GIS to delineate a changing shoreline over the past 50 or so years. Kench has been working together with Tuvalu to map the lower, more flood prone areas. Ford has been working together with the Marshall Islands. Working together, together, together...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:07 AM on 04/22/2012
Pacific islands 'growing not shrinking'

Low-lying Pacific islands regarded as "poster child" examples of the threat from rising sea levels are expanding not sinking, a new study has revealed.

Scientists have been surprised by the findings, which show that some islands have grown by almost one-third over the past 60 years.

Among the island chains to have increased in land area are Tuvalu and neighbouring Kiribati, both of which attracted attention at last year's Copenhagen climate summit.

In the study, researchers compared aerial photographs and high-resolution satellite images of 27 islands taken since the 1950s.

Only four islands, mostly uninhabited, had decreased in area despite local sea level rises of almost five inches in that time, while 23 stayed the same or grew.

Seven islands in Tuvalu grew, one by 30 per cent, although the study did not include the most populous island.
In Kiribati, the three of the most densely populated islands, Betio, Bairiki and Nanikai, also grew by between 12.5 and 30 per cent.

Professor Paul Kench, of Auckland University, who co-authored the study ... said the study challenged the view that the islands were sinking as a result of global warming.

"Eighty per cent of the islands we've looked at have either remained about the same or, in fact, got larger.

"Some have got dramatically larger," he said.

"We've now got evidence the physical foundations of these islands will still be there in 100 years,"

http://tinyurl.com/295ncne
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimspy
Quod quae operibus sufficit.
01:35 AM on 04/22/2012
Ollier: "Indeed, the IPCC and CSIRO try to alarm the world with stories of the drowning of low islands, such as Tuvalu. But detailed mapping has shown that Tuvalu, and many other coral islands, have actually grown during the past 20 years."

Sea level at Tuvalu in the last 60 years has risen at almost 3 times the global average. See SkS post: What's happening with sea level at Tuvalu?. 10% of this trend is due to land subsidence.

The study referenced by Ollier (Webb & Kench [2010]) revealed that land area at select atoll islets in the Pacific had actually increased in the last half a decade - a result of sand and coral rubble washing ashore. It is notable that many of the Tuvalu islets in that particular study appear to be uninhabited - see figure 5 in their paper. It is not immediately clear how debris accumulating on uninhabited islets, or any islets for that matter, is supposed to help protect Tuvaluans from rising sea level.

-- Skeptical Science, at http://www.skepticalscience.com/Cliff-Ollier-Swimming-In-A-Sea-of-Misinformation.html

Still losing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimspy
Quod quae operibus sufficit.
01:37 AM on 04/22/2012
Further reading:
Between 1950-2009 sea level at Tuvalu rose at the rate of 5.1 (±0.7) mm per year. This is almost 3 times larger than average global sea level rise over the same period. http://www.skepticalscience.com/Tuvalu-sea-level-rise.htm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:33 AM on 04/22/2012
Sadly, the scientific data counters John Cook's fairy tale, yet again.

THE TRUTH ABOUT TUVALU

A New Zealand climate scientist and a Pacific Island writer give assurances Tuvalu is not sinking .


....Tuvalu reminds me of a comic song I used to sing of Gracie Fields called "He's dead but he won't lie down". Tuvalu persistently refuses to subside .

A tide gauge to measure sea level has been in existence at Tuvalu since 1977, run by the University of Hawaii It showed a negligible increase of only 0.07 mm per year over two decades It fell three millimeters between 1995 and 1999. The complete record can still be seen on John Daly's website: http://www.john-daly.com>www.john-daly.com Obviously this could not be tolerated, so the gauge was closed in 1999 and a new, more modern tide gauge was set up by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's National Tidal Center by Flinders University at Adelaide. But Tuvalu refuses to submit to political pressure. The sea level has actually fallen since then Tuvalu cannot be allowed to get away with it. So Greenpeace employed Dr John Hunter. a climatologist of the University of Tasmania, who obligingly "adjusted" the Tuvalu readings upwards to comply with changes in ENSO and those found for the island of Hawaii and, miraculously, he found a sea level rise of "around" 1.2 mm a year which, also miraculously, agrees with the IPCC global figure .

http://tinyurl.com/knovfc