Environmental Justice journal recently published a new study by EPA officials and others that challenges the conservation movement to become more racially diverse.
The authors are right in challenging us.
Minorities currently comprise about one-third of the US population, and by 2050 will represent more than half of the American people. But their participation in the conservation workforce is woefully low.
Likewise, I recognize how our supporters tend to be somewhat homogeneous -- mostly white, older, middle-class and from suburban or rural areas.
While these long-time supporters have been essential to our success and we love them and their support, we really need to broaden backing for the environmental movement if we want to be successful in the 21st century.
Unfortunately, there is also a growing gap between nature and people, particularly among youth and urban communities. Kids spend far less time outdoors than we did 30 years ago - opting instead for video games, television and other indoor activities. And as the majority of Americans now live in cities, fewer people understand how their well being is inextricably linked to the health of the natural world.
The failure to fully engage minority and urban communities is not only bad for the environmental movement, it also gets in the way of minority communities having a direct say on the future of the lands and waters that provide people food, shelter and income.
We think it's time to engage minority students in conservation activities now so that they can become future leaders in environmental stewardship.
One initiative my organization has launched is called LEAF (Leaders in Environmental Action for the Future), and so far it shows great promise to make a big difference in children's lives as well as for the conservation movement.
The program brings high school students from largely poor and urban areas to nature preserves across the country where they participate in paid internships on Nature Conservancy projects, working throughout the summer alongside environmental scientists and conservation managers.
For almost all of these students, it is the first time they really leave the city to spend time in nature.
One of our students, Josh Carrera, was living in difficult circumstances in the Bushwick area of Brooklyn when he first joined LEAF in 2007. Josh spent his summer with LEAF working in a nature preserve in Vermont, planting trees and helping combat invasive species. While in the program, he visited the University of Vermont, and was later accepted with a full scholarship into the University's Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources.
Josh just finished a semester abroad in his home country of Ecuador studying the Andean Bear and is now in the Brazilian Amazon studying resource management and human ecology.
But Josh's story is not unique. A recent survey of LEAF alumni showed that 34 percent of the program's graduates have gone on to study life sciences in college (vs. 6 percent of the national average) and more than half of LEAF graduates volunteer for environmental causes.
LEAF currently partners with high schools in New York City, New Jersey, Connecticut and Atlanta, and we plan to grow the network of schools to Los Angeles, San Francisco and Chicago by 2012. This is in large part thanks to support from the Toyota USA Foundation.
LEAF is just one way the conservation movement can reach out to new and diverse communities. But it demonstrates the benefits this outreach can have on both people and nature -- today and into the future.
But I believe Josh said it best:
"When I chose to study the environment, I did not realize that I would be one of a handful of minority students that are pioneering a movement to help the environmental community become more diverse. The majority of conservation practitioners in America do not reflect the cultural diversity of this country, or the greater world. I believe that for conservation to truly succeed in the future, it must create more opportunities for students of color to become successful practitioners that reflect the communities they serve. I want to be a role model for other city youth to pioneer this movement with me."
Hear Josh and other students talk about their growing interest in conservation:
serve other urban youth. I can honestly say I would have never pursued
an environmental career path had I not become engaged at a young age
around environmental issues - first through my environmental high school
in the heart of Manhattan and then through LEAF - which connected my
desire to care for nature with a real life paying job. Growing up in a
low income household -- I was pressured to study a field that would
provide enough money by which to sustain myself - Medicine, Law, or
Business. For me, it is difficult to even fathom a career in the
environmental field without the exposure that LEAF provided - it was an
eye opening experience - not a blinding one. Today I am a junior at
University of Albany, triple majoring in global studies, urban studies,
and geography, with a concentration in GIS. My ultimate goal is to go to
graduate school to achieve my masters of science in environmental
outdoor education, and be an example for other urban youth.
Also Why are you encouraging young people of color to leave their environment to love the environment? I understand the idea of getting out to nature but you don't mention anything about how people learn to appreciate their own lived in environment. This post was the equivalent of the Blind Side goes environmental. Communities of Color don't need Conservation groups to show them the way. Conservation groups need to step back and led Environmental Justice and Climate Justice groups lead the way. The Big "Green" Groups like Environment America and NWF tokenized Minority voices during the push for the climate bill which led to unathentic representations. They also tried to silence the voices of Grassroots Environmental Justice and Economic Justice groups that were calling out the bill for being 1 too weak and 2 gave away too man giveways to big industry. That is why the Climate Bill failed because the groups pushing the hardest never worked to build real support amongst the full base. In my opinion we don't need mainstream conservation movements they need to sit down and take the lead from us.