iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Martin Garbus

Martin Garbus

Posted April 3, 2009 | 07:17 PM (EST)

The Times May Be Changing



Now six years after Iraq started, nearly one hundred days into the new presidency, more and more information is coming out about the involvement of the Bush people in Iraq-related criminal acts. The legal memos and the statements of tortured detainees are only the beginning of what will soon be a flood of information.

The legal machinery is starting to build, case by case, a rejection of Bush's legal theories.
Today's decision from Federal Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that those detained in Afghanistan will have access to American courts builds on the recent cases that allow Guantanamo detainees access to the federal court. Judge Bates rejected both the Bush administration's view and the recently articulated view of President Barack Obama that habeas corpus is not available to imprisoned non-Afghans who are arrested beyond Afghanistan.

We are seeing a pattern in the Washington federal courts. The judges are not shying away from tacking tough issues. The concept that a man sitting in Baghram has a right he can enforce in an American court seemed impossible a few years ago. The constant rat-a-tat of the media, with pictures of the tortured prisoners clearly influences judges along with the rest of the population. Judges respond also when the president too set a higher standard.

Attorney General Eric Holder is the one who must start the criminal process against Cheney, Gonzales, Yoo and the others. He does not shy away from difficult choices, given backing that lets him know he is not alone. He can, and has, taken positions that are ahead of Obama.

He has taken on the hardest public and legal fights, "a nation of cowards" racism, the recent admission in the Stevens case that many members of the Justice Department acted wrongfully obtaining a wrongful conviction. An attorney general's admission of wrongdoing by prosecutors is rare. Prosecution of high and low level government officials for these kinds of criminal acts is unprecedented.

Holder's decision today is easier than it was yesterday, and as more and more stories of brutalized prisoners come out, it will get even easier. Judge Bates, and the judges before him, including the Supreme Court, have rejected the rationale of Bush's Attorney General and supporting lawyers that gave the President "unitary powers."

The public should let Eric Holder and the president know they support criminal prosecution of the Bush people.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:08 PM on 04/04/2009
What happened to the ABA while the Bush Administration was openly defying the law?

What happened to the bar leadership while the Bush Administration was approving torture, promoting the unitary-executive theory, and issuing hundreds of signing statements contrary to the legislation that he was otherwise signing?
JEP57
To the right of Genghis Khan
05:19 PM on 04/04/2009
I'm sure neither Bush,Cheney or anyone else in their administration is breaking a sweat over any of this. They understand that these accusations are mostly phoney and exaggerated attempts by the left to discredit conservative, masculine leadership in the war against our enemies, something that rubs them the wrong way psychologically. Yes, some people have gotten carried away and gone over the line, but most Americans would be grateful for the overall effort if the successes were accurately reported.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wesinohio
Energetic Progess
05:58 PM on 04/04/2009
You had better stay tuned, and it would be refreshing and constructive if you would conduct your discussion of important public issues in a mature and thoughtful way, rather than resorting to the typical, factless assertions, condescension and name calling that we hear from the shrinking, desperate minority that still supports the Bush-Cheney policies (elective war, secrecy, misrepresentation, torture, divisiveness, disrespect for pluralism, arrogance, oligarchy, conquest, disregard for the constitution, theft of public funds and the list goes on and on).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Articulator
10:52 PM on 04/04/2009
You are in denial.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NeoLiberal
Conservatism is obsolete.
04:17 PM on 04/04/2009
We need a reconciliation of W's and his Veep's years in power.

No one is above the law in the United States, no matter how painful or distasteful the process may be.

The law must win out, at all costs, otherwise we are not a nation of laws.
03:18 PM on 04/04/2009
Sadly, I have to agree, I seriously doubt that it will happen. The President appears to be much to much a part of the machine. We desperately need to treat the criminals of the last administration as any other criminals in this Country. I for one would be REALLY proud of my Country if it happened.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lisakaz2
Da ministero dell'interno di Snark.
03:01 PM on 04/04/2009
I am hoping Spain's desire to tackle some of the criminality of the past 8 yrs finally forces someone's hand here. THIS would be real accountability to those who have arrogantly thumbed their noses at it for so long.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
02:11 PM on 04/04/2009
The point is moot. Obama and the rest of Washington will thwart criminal investigation and trial for Junior and his cabal.
01:15 PM on 04/04/2009
Call me a pessimist, but I'll believe it when I see it.

As of now, the entrenched Washington elite are convinced of the need to avoid investigation (let alone prosecution) at all costs. The Justice Department under Obama have already demonstrated their support for several of Bush's "Unitary Executive" excesses. They are, quite simply, not interested in investigations as a matter of principle.

Ultimately, AG Holder is beholden to the President--NOT the people--and he will act accordingly. Investigation and discovery will only begin if and when sufficient evidence COMPELS the administration to act in response to OVERWHELMING public outrage. It's plausible, given that a majority of Americans already support opening investigations, that even WITH immense public pressure the Congress and the administration may choose to continue their apparent strategy of weathering the storm.

Washington will resist demands for accountability, literally, until they can't--and even then the response will be as it is now: blustery in public, tepid in private, and far from universally accepted among the political elite.
12:36 PM on 04/04/2009
PROTECT, BUT DO NOT PERSECUTE OR INTIMIDATE

A troubling legacy of the Cheney-Bush cabal is the use of the law-enforcement and judicial branch
of government to silence political opposition, dissent or anything which inconveniences power. In this respect, the Valerie Palme case was typical.

The law enforcement agencies police and all secret services ought to protect society from
crime, but

should not be used to INTIMIDATE or PERSECUTE media and citizens who exercise their right to

FREE SPEECH.

Pervasive electronic surveillance, watching over the Internet and private communications is a quickly-growing societal and international trend. This leads to insidious and pernicious SELF-CENSORSHIP.

For America to maintain its defining freedom, the deviant Bush-Cheney legacy must be rolled back legally and judicially by the Obama administration. It should be done fast.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:34 PM on 04/04/2009
This country will not begin any significant healing process until it has been determined how a tiny cabal of men were able to coerce this entire country into accepting - and dying for - their war of opportunity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
otiswaynehale
11:22 AM on 04/04/2009
The transparent investigation and prosecution of the Bush-Cheney cabal must be on the same par as the world economic crisis. If this nation keeps it policy to trample basic human rights into the mud, the entire free world is entitled to hold us in complete contempt. Our Constitution guarantees us that "All Men Are Equal", not just we Americans. Every human being held by us is entitled to due process, no matter how foul their deeds. Bush`s actions were, and are criminal, and he and his crew need to be held responsible for the damage done in all our names. Anyone who truly loves The United States Of America and the ideals of our founding fathers will not let this issue lie.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arion
10:24 AM on 04/04/2009
I've been reading the history of the Stuart Dynasty. The 'signing statements' of Charles II and James II are so remarkably like those of the Bush administration. Top priority for both monarchs was to get rid of habeas corpus and resort more widely to torture. Like Bush, both insisted that the executive could over-ride both parliament and long-standing guarantees of liberty. The similarities are striking. We must discover and root out and disavow every last trace of the Bush horror.
10:18 AM on 04/04/2009
I imagine there must have been, by now, a few thousand men and women serving in the military or civilian support force doing the mission in Gitmo. So how many have come out to detail torture there? Ummm, yes, a couple.........who the MSM have all but totally ignored. KInda appears torture is talked about by those with an agenda that furthers their political, journalist, or other professional career.
If we are to believe the torture charges then we are supposed to believe that all of those who serve(d) at Guantanamo Bay are dishonorable men and women who themselves took part in or sanction the torture. That none of the thousands would have the courage to say, "Stop! Enough." That none, even after free of further responsibility at that location, would bow to conscience to come forward to confess and thereby sooth their guilt.........oh yeah, a couple have. Except their story is askew and not enough to be sensationized in the print or broadcast media.
No, I'm not a supporter of the former administration. So I do agree.......c'mon Attorner General Holder and do investigate with all the power your office holds the purported crimes of Cheny et al. But he won't, 'cause there's too much political gain in mere accusations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:07 AM on 04/04/2009
This is an important FIRST step toward restoring American credibility around the world. It should be noted that conservative judges are participating. Our rights are just as important to them as to liberals. Gonzales, Yoo, et al, who were charged with enforcing American laws, is an excellent place to start. There are some challenging questions about the roles of Powell, Rice, and Ashcroft; all of whom dissented internally and then publicly participated with the lock-ups and lies.
We should also note that the world is beginning to come forth with indictments for crimes against humanity and violations of the Geneva conventions. We now have a whole generation of former public officials who fear to travel to large portions of the world, because they might be arrested and shipped to the World Court. This reminds me of Henry Kissenger and other Nixon terrorist who created Pinochet in Chile.
09:50 AM on 04/04/2009
The Obama administration has replaced the most criminal government in US history. (my opinion)

If Obama lets criminals escape the rule of law, it will be an unforgivabe legacy and further deterioration of the moral character of America.
12:04 AM on 04/04/2009
We must move forward to prosecute and executive who believes they are above the law, creates policy through signing statements, and operates illegally deeply inside their homemade bunkers.

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com