More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Martin J. Blank

Martin J. Blank

GET UPDATES FROM Martin J. Blank
 

Shrinking Budgets Demand Smarter Schools

Posted: 05/21/11 01:00 PM ET

U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has warned of an ominous "New Normal" for public schools. This era of sky-high deficits and fiscal austerity for states and school districts threatens our ability to achieve better outcomes for all students, particularly the most vulnerable. That leaves us no choice but to work together and spend smarter.

Enter community schools. Built around the notion that education is a shared responsibility, community schools draw on the expertise and capacity of many local institutions, including universities, nonprofits, and government agencies to coordinate diverse services under one schoolhouse roof. When a school is a community hub, students and families can easily access healthcare, academic enrichment, social services and a range of supports that strengthen kids, parents, and neighborhoods.

Just as critically in this economy, community schools efficiently combine scarce school, local, public, and private funds to maximize the benefit to children and families. By marshaling complementary services, community schools eliminate waste and bureaucratic barriers to leverage a variety of funding streams and human talent. These multi-tasking campuses provide more comprehensive help to families than any one school or organization alone could. Working across boundaries educates the "whole child" and serves the whole family, which in turn, strengthens the whole community.

I saw this vision in action during a visit to the Schools Uniting Neighborhoods (SUN) community schools in Multnomah County, Oregon. This initiative links the county, the city of Portland, and six school districts to provide a range of supports for students that will help them to succeed. Thanks to sustained investments by the county, city and school districts, with strong local leadership, and support from existing health, higher education, youth development and other agencies resources, SUN Community Schools have grown from eight in 2001, to 60 schools today.

A coordinator at each school, hired by a lead community-based agency, strategically leverages the services and expertise of local nonprofits and other organizations in an intentional way that supports the school's core mission and addresses the myriad of challenges low-income children face.

The 4-H leader at Earl Boyles Elementary, a SUN community school, is funded from a juvenile justice grant, to help mentor at-risk youngsters. He was grateful for the community schools structure, which eliminates logistical hassles of coordinating with administrators, and allows him to focus on his real goal: reaching kids. Meanwhile, AmeriCorps volunteers engage families, a local charity provides summertime meals for parents and kids, and a gardening group helps students plant and care for a community plot. Teachers connect the work students do in the community garden with classroom learning: one child presented a class report on eggplants; part of the school garden's harvest.

Last school year, Earl Boyles Elementary partnered with 28 community agencies and businesses, resulting in nearly $30,000 in cash and in-kind donations, and nearly 200 hours of volunteer service. With so much community support -- and offerings ranging from chess club to youth service learning to financial literacy for adults -- Boyles students have boosted reading and math scores, and teachers report better attendance, homework completion, and participation.

Another SUN school, Woodmere Elementary, helps prepare the youngest children -- many with no preschool or Head Start experience -- for kindergarten through a special three-week program. Parents can take English, nutrition, and computer classes. Woodmere's 29 community and business partners offered direct services, generated nearly $69,000 in cash and in-kind donations, and volunteers contributed 670 hours of service last school year.

This multi-layered approach is made possible through money from Multnomah County, the city of Portland, school districts, state and federal grants, Title I funds, the resources of local partners, and the essential donation of supplies, and volunteer hours from groups such as the PTA, Portland State University, and Reed College.

Joining forces stretches limited dollars: A recent report by the Coalition for Community Schools found that every dollar invested in a community school generates 'three dollars' worth of services and opportunities for children and families. And that's a conservative estimate. When Duncan was CEO of Chicago Public Schools, he advocated for community schools, estimating that they capture even more value.

In the midst of Duncan's "New Normal," community schools make more sense than ever. Many different services and opportunities exist in communities -- but, a coherent and collaborative strategy for organizing them is missing. By uniting social and health services, enrichment, youth development, tutoring, adult education, and other opportunities under one roof, schools and communities save time and energy, and most critically, use their money in a smarter way.

Times are tough; today's children arrive at school with complicated challenges. Solving them demands that we work together toward a smarter solution that is both effective and cost-effective. That's just what community schools do.

 
U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has warned of an ominous "New Normal" for public schools. This era of sky-high deficits and fiscal austerity for states and school districts threatens our abili...
U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has warned of an ominous "New Normal" for public schools. This era of sky-high deficits and fiscal austerity for states and school districts threatens our abili...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:14 PM on 05/23/2011
I didn't realize the community school my kids attend was such an anomaly. I didn't realize it takes a bunch of charities and think tanks to raise kids either. Parents, just get involved in your kids education and make sure they work hard. If everyone did that, we wouldn't have all these "reformers" telling us what's best for us.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
broui
No d#%& cat. No d#%& cradle.
01:17 PM on 05/23/2011
The "new normal"...

It used to be we had parents and priests/pastors/imams/rabbis, PTAs, and communities in general doing much of the job we're being asked to do now with fewer of the essential resources than we had then.

I spend my own money on individual students' needs because their parents can't or won't and the district rarely returns the money.

I spend more time helping young high school students understand what being a student is - being a self-directed lifelong learner - and becoming stable young adults than I do teaching my subject because it is the "new normal".

The "new normal" is that despite all that, I am seeing my pay vs cost of living slowly shrink and the press and politicians and the corporate world suggest they've got a better way to do my job than I do.

Few are willing to accept the simple truth: We've got a deep American culture problem. We've lost our way. We need to address the growing disparity between rich and poor and we need to address how the community is raising the children.
photo
gravity defiant
Maybe reality has a liberal bias.
04:49 AM on 05/23/2011
Is anyone else concerned about the mission creep that's happening in public schools? Remember when schools were for teaching kids to read and do math? Now all of a sudden they're feeding kids (3 meals a day, in some cases, plus a backpack full of food for the weekend. Plus snacks, often purchased by the teacher out of her own pocket), providing clothes, providing backpacks and school supplies, providing health care, providing mental health care, offering parenting and ESL classes to parents, and doing a million other things.

I don't disagree that all of the above needs to be done in order for kids to learn; I just can't help feeling that it's unfair for it all to be the school's responsibility. And I don't see how adding to the list is a solution to a budget crisis. What I see (as a certified teacher working as a sub all over Multnomah Cty., including in some of the schools named in the article) is SUN school displacing classrooms out to portables, Americorps volunteers working out of closets, and community gardens taking away playground space for the kids. I love all these ideas in theory, but in practice they're not adequately supported, and take resources away from the reason school is there.
11:27 AM on 05/22/2011
Good teaching and guidance is vital to those students who are seriously trying to move up. Otherwise, family background and education dominate, as families that are focused upon their children's education will take care of learning outside the school. A bigger problem is the public culture that denigrates education and hard intellectual work. All parents have to struggle against the culture - as do teachers. I have no idea how to deal with the public culture issue and its implicit limitations on learning. I have observed that immigrant / partial immigrant families dominate the meetings for gifted / advanced placement classes. And many of the others are members of groups that have historically placed a strong emphasis on education.

While a handful of students can succeed via the athletics route, the academic route is far more open to students - many if not most of the students who pursue the academic route with discipline and energy will build a reasonable life-long career. Very few of the student athletes will make it to the majors, much less last more than a few years if they do make it.
02:23 PM on 05/22/2011
Bingo! You hit it right on the spot, our problems fall more on our culture. We have a culture that values Actors,Musicians,Sports and not education. When i walk around my college campus i see
the younger students walking around with there heads down focused on their blackberrys, and
concerned more about their tweets then their education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Venicelady
Ignorance is NOT bliss.
09:05 AM on 05/22/2011
Now if we could only get SMARTER students.....
09:00 AM on 05/22/2011
The best way to be smarter in education would be to deal with the NCLB "law" that demands that schools buy specific textbooks from specific companies. Do you think that maybe the government telling us who we must BUY from might not be a positive thing for our kids. The politicians are being bought by the textbook companies and taking that money and sending THEIR KIDS to PRIVATE schools.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
07:32 AM on 05/22/2011
Community schools would be a great way to further exacerbate the differences between the haves and the have-nots. Exactly what sort of community schools do you envision for communities that are wracked by poverty and unemployment, or in places where the major businesses are simply arms of corporations whose heads live far, far away?
photo
gravity defiant
Maybe reality has a liberal bias.
03:08 PM on 05/22/2011
Earl Boyles and Woodmere are most assuredly not high-SES schools.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booksnmoreforyou
Progressive educator, activist for good government
10:11 PM on 05/21/2011
One way they can be smarter is by dumping proprietary software and moving to opensource platforms like http://uberstudent.org of high schoolers and http://edubuntu.org for middle and elementary grades.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rodger leMonde
I call them as I see them.
07:06 PM on 05/21/2011
You get the future you invest in. Now that should simplify a lot of elections right there. Any politician that won't fight for education, out. When testing takes priority over learning, no. If a district has a problem, the teachers union is the go to source for a fix. If you have children and your community won't support the schools, move.
09:02 PM on 05/23/2011
The educational system could have invested in making double-entry accounting mandatory 50 years ago. Did the Republicans suggest that? Did the Democrats suggest that. No, Shakespeare is more important than accounting.

How many corporations used computers to do accounting as among the first things they did in the 50s and 60s? But now with cheap computers we are supposed to do social networking.

Most likely nobody sees a way to make a lot of money on truly making the best use of computers for education. It was demonstrated in 1987 that computers did a better job than lots of teachers. Vero Beach High School. Florida. No info on what computers and software they used though.

http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/500/421
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert horwitz
06:03 PM on 05/21/2011
Though it seems as though Arnie Duncan is trying to make a difference as I read this list of potential solutions I am struck by the thought that these are the sorts of things one does to try and save a system that is in the final stages of collapse just before the fall and I don't mean a season.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
07:28 AM on 05/22/2011
If the system is in the final stages of collapse, it is only because politicians have been systematically working to destroy it. It is a bizarre spectacle-- the gummint chops away at the limbs and heart of public education, while bemoaning that the patient is doing poorly.Duncan's making a difference, all right, and public education is poorer for it.
05:59 PM on 05/21/2011
People usually talk as though schooling and education are the same thing. Who decides what information is important? If double-entry accounting had been mandatory in all of the schools for the last 50 years would the economy be in the current state? Who decided that Shakespeare was more important than accounting?

How is it that the entire economics profession can just FORGET to talk about how much Americans lose on the depreciation of automobiles every year? What kind of EDUCATION did they get? But when Americans bought more cars the purchases were added to the GROSS Domestic Product but some how the economists failed to mention the NET Domestic Product for decades.

Who decides what SMART education is? Who decides what to do with these computers? The schools can't even point out that they are all von Neumann machines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dg96tefnEU

We have the problem of deciding how to use this technology but do the people running the schools want to question traditional paradigms which may now be obsolete? What has kept them from suggesting a National Reading List for decades? Is it because schooling is really about controlling the distribution of knowledge?

The Fourth R by George O. Smith
http://www.goodreads.com/reader/read/1660?percent=0.804073
photo
demockracy
Library cards are free
05:38 PM on 05/21/2011
The premise of this piece is that "sky-high deficits and fiscal austerity" are inevitable. After all, the economy is far worse than it was just before the "Great Recession"....right?

No. GDP is now larger than then. There is *no* shortage of money. Don't believe me, look at the graph in this chart: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/20/bush-tax-cuts-debt_n_864812.html

If we only spent on our military 300% of what the Chinese, our nearest military rival, spend, then there would be Federal budget surpluses as far as the eye can see.

Don't forget, we're incarcerating five times the world average (752 per 100,000). Canada, with similar demographics, and insignificantly different crime incarcerates only 111 per 100,000.

In other words, we'd apparently spend our blood and treasure suppressing people, foreign and domestic. My question: who tortured the population into believing that?

Meanwhile, this article looks like the same magical thinking that leads people to believe some super-heroic teacher will somehow save our bacon and our kids bacon if only we had merit pay! (or charter schools, or testing until the students' eyeballs were rolling around on the floor). If only we had celebrity teachers (Tony Danza!!!!).

See http://notwaitingforsuperman.com/, especially http://www.vimeo.com/18900900
04:53 PM on 05/21/2011
Second verse, same as the first. Sure, this will work in a particular community for awhile, but when the initial enthusiasm dies down and the funding is withdrawn (and it will), the schools will be in a worse place than before. A school system can't succeed, as a whole, if money is spread thin to support "new and innovative" programs and ideas. As a result, those may succeed for awhile, but many others will fail. Somebody is going to be left behind in the end. Here's an idea. Fund all schools equally and pass a law that guarantees a consistent (untouchable) budget for education.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
03:50 PM on 05/21/2011
Consistently starving schools of needed funds will destroy education. More than one governor has already proposed that teaching be seen as a short-term "public/charitiable service" option rather than a career. Face it folks, we MUST invest in our future, or we won't have one!
09:05 AM on 05/22/2011
Funding is a problem but so is blaming hard working teachers. What we need to do is trust that G-D has chosen who will teach our child. He knows better than we do. Then believe that the majority are good and decent. Yes, there is 1 out of 100 that reads a paper but still. That is not tenure it is LAZY ADMINISTRATION. Tenure does not make it hard to fire a teacher. Prejudice does PRE-JUDGEMENTS that teachers are bad is what is driving our schools to only teach the test and how to take a test. Wake up people the government is controlling the masses through education and making big business buddies rich.
03:19 PM on 05/21/2011
Well, some of these ideas seem good (have to look to see if it is really a corporate scheme) but quoting Arne Duncan does diminish your credibility to zero.