Reading Bill Kristol's Mind

Posted January 6, 2008 | 01:34 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Reading Bill Kristol's Mind   digg: Reading Bill Kristol's Mind   reddit: Reading Bill Kristol's Mind   del.icio.us: Reading Bill Kristol's Mind

Call me YHWH.

You longtime New York Times readers thought you owned this paper, didn't you? All those years of reading Tony Lewis and Tom Wicker and Anna Quindlen and Frank Rich fooled you into thinking that this op-ed page was some kind of Ivy League newsletter for you and your pals.

When Abe Rosenthal -- whose son hired me -- hired Nixon White House speechwriter Bill Safire, at first it freaked you out. How could the paper that fought Nixon all the way to the Supreme Court to print the Pentagon Papers offer the most prestigious opinion real estate on the planet to the pit bull responsible for the worst of the Nixon/Agnew anti-intellectual demagoguery?

But Safire seduced you. You forgave his ferocious Clinton-bashing, because he always said (even long after Likkud drove you crazy) that Israel could do no wrong. You tolerated his campaign to prove the Saddam-9/11 connection with the Atta-Prague connection, because his language-maven drag reminded you of sweet Miss Fussbudget from 10th grade. You could live with Safire's saying Bin Laden wanted Kerry to win, because Safire also freaked out about Bush's wiretapping. You didn't spit your morning coffee when he called Hillary a "congenital liar," or when he speculated recklessly about Vince Foster's "apparent suicide," because he always had a fun pun to tickle you, plus the occasional libertarian nugget to flatter your open-mindedness for reading him.

Well, let me tell you something. You're not getting squat from me -- no witty spoonsful of sugar to make the neocon medicine go down, no weak-kneed contrarianism to compromise my rightist righteousness.

Don't look to me to be some David Brooks doppelganger, either. He may technically have inherited Safire's parking spot on this page, but let me tell you something: David Brooks is a pussy. When the political wind shifted, he ran out on Bush just like that scumbag Paul O'Neill, or that scumbag Richard Clarke, or that scumbag Matthew Dowd, or that scumbag David Kuo, or that scumbag John Di Iulio, or that scumbag Eric Shinseki, or that scumbag Larry Wilkerson, or that scumbag Tyler Drumheller. Need I go on?

No, you're not going to get any that Obamba fawning coming from Brooks out of me. I don't turn my back on my tribe. Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, the Kagan family, Podhoretz pere, mere et fils, the whole PNAC clan: don't look to me for some panty-waisted agonizing reappraisal whenever the polls turn against us. You can also forget about that hobby of his -- that psychobabbling Brooks with his self-hating pop sociology. Brooks may get a kick out of mocking his own elitist class, but if you're looking for some kind of mitigating ironic self-awareness in my twenty inches of type, you're barking up the wrong fifth column.

I still can't believe that Arthur Sulzberger Jr. is letting me keep on working for Rupert Murdoch while taking a paycheck from the Times. (I wonder what part of being-shitcanned-by-Time he doesn't understand.) I also can't believe that Andrew Rosenthal thinks what he's getting in me is just some "opposing views" voice to bookend Paul Krugman. Krugman and I don't just "disagree." He's wrong. Wrong, people, as in evil. I will destroy him. I didn't get to be "a serious, respected conservative intellectual," as Andy called me, by toadying to Times readers. I did it by gaining the respect of seriousness-arbiters like Hew Hewitt, Fred Barnes, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin, Jonah Goldberg and Michael Savage. Our movement's goal isn't to enliven the marketplace of ideas with our views. Our crusade is to purify public discourse, to brand as a traitor and drive from that square anyone who dares disagree with us. Bill Kristol as the Adlai Stevenson of the right... HA! That's rich.

You pathetic pluralists think that facts and reason will always win out. Well, go ahead and keep thinking that. Lenin said, "The capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them." If Lenin were around today, he'd say, "The liberals will pay us for the words with which we will poison them."

Have a nice day, suckers. See ya every Monday.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
179
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)

There's no trick to reading Krystol's mind - he's a predictable and unimaginative Neoconservative drone. If I could read minds, I'd be more interested in what the New York Times was thinking. What is the last thing he ever wrote which was stimulating or insightful? Authoritarians love him because he makes submitting to authority and surrendering one's freedom sound like a reasoned intellectual exercise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 01/10/2008

I have met Bill Kristol.

He spoke at an event I managed during the first year of the Iraq war.

He told me then that he wanted the USA to invade Syria and Iran after Iraq.

This was after things were already going bad for us in Iraq.

He is out of his mind.

As a subscriber to the NYT, I am very upset but am not convinced that the readers of the Times are not smart enough to look at what Kristol writes as an insight into what our enemies think. Such insight can be helpful in defeating our enemies.

Subscribers and readers should take every opportunity to write in and challenge every word he puts on the page. Defeating his viewpoint on paper will humiliate him every week.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 01/09/2008

Well said Marty!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 01/09/2008

You have looked into the mind of Bill Kristol, sir.

Now go wash your eyeballs.

Use soap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 01/09/2008

When one reads the tea leaves of Bill Kristol's mind one sees war, war, and more war. Of course, this fantasy plays well with him as long as it is other nameless, faceless Americans who do the dying. I wonder if he knows one family personally who has lost a son or daughter in this war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 01/09/2008

Kristol's reference to government programs that help the poor and people with disabilities as a "nanny state" reveals a complete lack of commpassion for or understanding of the struggles of the "lower" classes in this nation. I was very angry when I read this phrase and refused to puruse the article any further.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 01/09/2008

Reading Bill "The Bloody" Kristol's mind would put me on suicide watch I think. The man is a war criminal.
*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 01/08/2008

I tried reading Bill Kristol's mind once, but all I saw was a travel brochure urging me to, "See Rock City."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 01/08/2008

Dear Professor Kaplan,

Just wanted to drop in and wish You and Yours a Happy New Year. Oh, excellence once again comes to mind when reading your post. Agape.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 AM on 01/08/2008

FOCKIN BRILLIANT my man! Now THAT'S what I'm talkin about! Thanks Marty!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 PM on 01/07/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Marty Kaplan›
 

 Site  Web ask.com