More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marty Kaplan

Marty Kaplan

Posted: October 28, 2010 12:10 PM

A polling firm looking for America's top consumer brands stumbled across something that I think comes as close as anything to explaining what ails this American moment.

According to Advertising Age, YouGov asked people about a bunch of brands' quality, value, their satisfaction with it, their willingness to recommend it and their general impression of it, and they came up with an overall index of favorability.

And then they sorted the answers according to the political party of the respondents. (We did something like that in the 2008 election, when we worked with Zogby to figure out how entertainment preferences correlate with political preferences.)

The number one most favored brand among Democrats appears nowhere among the top ten most favored brands among Republicans. Ditto the reverse: Republicans' favorite brand is nowhere among Democrats' top ten.

If you look at what those two brands are, you can infer a lot about America right now.

Republicans' top brand: Fox News Channel. Democrats: Google.

Fox News: a hermetically sealed bubble of unquestionable absolutes, with sacred sages, approved opinions, official history, bright-line boundaries, party-line facts.

Google: the cacophony of the crowd, the contest of contradictions, the boundless wild west, the jumble of truth and rumor, the burden on its users to sort science from fiction -- with all the anxiety, uncertainty, tentativeness and humility that comes along with that obligation.

On a good day for the network, a couple million or so Americans watch Fox News. On an average day, a couple hundred million or so Americans use Google or some other search engine. It's odd that the media frame the battle lines as Fox vs. MSNBC, when the real fissure may be the one between the zealots and the searchers.

 

Follow Marty Kaplan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/martykaplan

 
 
  • Comments
  • 510
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
11:41 AM on 11/02/2010
Howard Dean no longer says "fox news"....to him its just "fox"
12:16 AM on 11/02/2010
There's about 50% correlation between the lists.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:50 PM on 11/01/2010
It suddenly dawned on me that I don't even know what channel Fox News is on.

No need to find out....if I get curious I can Google it!
05:12 AM on 11/01/2010
One of the two major political parties in the country is run by a "news" network.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
04:06 PM on 10/31/2010
What was I supposed to learn here? I think I missed it!
05:13 AM on 11/01/2010
Fox = zealots
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No Yards
I never said most of the things I said.
05:42 PM on 11/01/2010
Then the best thing to do is search for it up on Google.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerome Healy
Average Mid-Western Dude
12:17 AM on 10/31/2010
Boy, this explains everything!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstrate
11:46 AM on 10/30/2010
Perhaps one of the big five personality traits--openness--distinguishes the Fox News watchers from the Google fans. A lot of liberals probably have the DRD4-7R allele (one or two copies) and had a lot of friends when young (How many liberal Google users also are on Facebook?) (Settle et al. 2010). Message to conservatives--lighten up a bit. It won't be too long before science discovers the genetic-environmental correlates of your rigid thinking.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mackbolan
Libertas inaestimabilis res est
05:30 AM on 10/30/2010
how many of those searches on google are porn related....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TalkingOutLoud
Have a vision not clouded by fear - Cherokee Prov.
08:05 AM on 10/30/2010
And the problem with that would be? Ok, just joking, however, I think it telling; the Right finds safety within the lines, hard boundaries. They love the line to be drawn, saves thinking and reasoning. Two activities that consume huge amounts of sugar to feed that brain activity.

When you're living from hand to mouth as the average rank-and-file Republican, you need to save that sugar to carry the unnecessary burdens placed on you. Worrying about your health care, finances, and security.
04:56 PM on 10/29/2010
So in the final analysis be careful who you let do your thinking for you if your too lazy to do it for your self. Listening republicans? The reason dems like Google is to find a range of sources so they can think for themselves. You have been sold a load of tainted goods by a foreign media mogul who isn't doing it because he likes you.
IMOPINIONH8D
because I want it empty...
08:36 PM on 10/29/2010
Truth.......fnndndfvd
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Harpe
Was young, now old.
03:40 PM on 10/29/2010
If they must be sheep, can we at least give them an honest shepherd who cares about their welfare as much as his own? Is there a way to do that?
10:34 PM on 10/29/2010
The CEO's and Corporate Captains, including Rupert Murdoch, have forsaken honesty because of their greed....
02:11 PM on 11/01/2010
Imagine what it must be like when the reach the end of their lives, The sudden crushing realization that all the wealth they accumulated means nothing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnminehan
03:30 PM on 10/29/2010
But Fox and Google are not apple to apple competitors. Fox is a sorce of information and opinion; Google is a tool.
05:48 PM on 10/29/2010
I think you have that ars* about face, Fox is the tool, and a very useful one, in the service of the Cons.
Google is the gateway to other worlds.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dannywanny
08:53 PM on 10/29/2010
Fox is primarily a source of opinion slanted toward a particular ideology and cloaked in an atmosphere of fear. Google is a tool that can lead to factual information from various sources, as well as opinion, used by everybody. Fox rarely deals with factual information.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mikyung Lim
02:09 PM on 10/29/2010
Interesting, very important point !
But in this election, this fact is not going to exert any of it power?
12:24 PM on 10/29/2010
WOW!!! did I say WOW!!!!?
how true...how telling, how germain...how gosh darned hit the nail on the head bravo moment!!!
thanks
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:30 AM on 10/29/2010
Marty, your quest to make a correlation makes no sense to me.
If you are looking for the brand that's getting all the attention, it's not FOX - it's Tea Party - the symbol of angst, frustration and anger at the long time incumbent Congress.
You all have it wrong in focusing on Palin. Sshe's the lightning rod - not the candidate. While Dems focus on her (the messenger) the real candidate is out there and no one is focused on that. That candidate will just blow Obama away, but you are watching Palin. What a misdirect.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cosatjockomo
11:24 AM on 10/29/2010
truth by committee vs truth by mob lies vs lies between truths wolf vs wolf in sheep's clothing google vs fox coke vs pepsi yankees vs mets Mindless fanaticism. Who's your team? I'm certain whoever it is, the other side is wrong. Problem is . . . so is your side.