iOS app Android app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marvin Ammori

GET UPDATES FROM Marvin Ammori
 

Why Obama Should Run Against the Supreme Court

Posted: 04/ 6/2012 5:48 pm

(Published today in The Atlantic)

Just because its justices are not elected doesn't mean they're not political. It's time for some public accountability.

Recently, there has been considerable debate over whether President Obama should run against the Supreme Court as part of his reelection campaign. High-ranking Democratic Rep.James Clyburn has endorsed the idea, and Obama himself has seemed to test the waters with anticipatory criticism of a decision striking down his health-care law as unconstitutional.

But there's a strong case to be made that Obama should run against the Supreme Court however the health-care case turns out, and that his campaign should begin that effort today. He should run, specifically, against the five justices on the Court who span the spectrum from conservative to very conservative: Anthony Kennedy, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito.

There are two prominent objections to running against the court. But a closer looks shows why they should carry less weight than they now do.

Read the rest at The Atlantic

 

Follow Marvin Ammori on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Marvin_Ammori