iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mary Anne Hitt

GET UPDATES FROM Mary Anne Hitt
 

New Report Follows Money Trail Behind Attacks on Clean Energy

Posted: 08/03/2012 4:38 pm

Every election season, more and more money is poured into campaigns. But there is a surprising new twist this year - fossil fuel interests are actually spending money to directly attack clean energy like wind and solar, as we reveal in a new report we are releasing today, "Clean Energy Under Seige" (PDF).

Over the past decade, renewable energy's strong growth and success has made it a target for unprecedented new attacks from oil, coal, and gas interests. The report reveals how the fossil fuel industry is using tactics such as financial contributions to political campaigns, faux "think tanks," phony intellectuals, and fake grassroots "astroturf" groups to shift public opinion and discredit renewable energy. This is, of course, on top of the millions fossil fuel companies have been spending for decades to land loopholes and weak standards that give dirty energy an unfair advantage, while regular Americans bear the burden of polluted air and water.

Here are just a few of the ways that fossil fuel interests are launching new attacks on clean energy:

  • Big Oil tycoons David and Charles Koch gave at least $85 million to dozens of right-wing "think tanks" and advocacy groups over the past decade and a half that are actively working to slow or stop the adoption of renewable energy and efficiency, including maintaining anti-renewable clearinghouses. 
  • Organizations like the Manhattan Institute and the Heartland Institute that defend oil subsidies while attacking renewable energy have received upwards of $600,000 each since 1998 from the oil company Exxon.
  • Fossil fuel interests are working through the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) to repeal state clean energy mandates, called Renewable Portfolio Standards.
  • Attempts to use Solyndra to tarnish the reputation of the entire clean energy sector are being backed by big money interests like Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS and Americans for Prosperity.

Clean Energy Under SiegeWith renewable energy seeing an 83 percent approval rating among all Americans - including 63 percent support from Republicans and 84 percent support from Independents - it seems counterintuitive that many politicians still oppose the development of clean energy. 

But that's where the industry's hundreds of millions of dollars come in. They continue wanting to put profits over public health and are threatened by the success of clean energy.

Wind energy has grown steadily in the past decade, doubling in size since 2009. In 2011, it accounted for roughly three percent of U.S. electricity production. During the first months of 2012, it topped four percent. Already, Iowa and South Dakota generate 20 percent of their electricity from wind power, and the wind industry is on track to produce 20 percent of America's electricity by 2030. 

A boom in the production of photovoltaic solar cells has not only cut the price of solar panels in half, but has also helped double solar energy's contribution to America's power supply

Now dirty industry has the Production Tax Credit for wind energy in its sights - and polluters don't care that letting the credit expire means major job losses. The wind energy Production Tax Credit helps support the more than 75,000 jobs in the wind industry, but if the tax credit is not renewed before the end of this year, as many as half those jobs could be lost.

This misinformation and dirty money must stop. As we face weather extremes such as drought and excessive heat, climate disruption is already on our doorstep. Plus, clean energy has become one of the few sectors that is actually reviving our struggling economy, and we need the growth of clean energy to continue. It's time to invest in and support clean energy to protect this planet and create a prosperous future for our children and grandchildren.

 

Follow Mary Anne Hitt on Twitter: www.twitter.com/maryannehitt

FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:33 PM on 08/10/2012
An excellent and timely article! It is so hard to counter the propaganda machine created by the fossil fuel industry.

Solar and wind are the future! Do everything you can to support great jobs and clean air.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
01:05 PM on 08/07/2012
If solar and wind are as good as their proponent make them out to be, it shouldn't mater what the big bad think tanks say. The media are, in general, on the side of solar/wind and they will make sure the 'clean energy' voice is heard. The media doesn't do a very good job of pointing out the problems with wind/solar which leaves an information gap for the fossil fuels industry to fill. Seem to me the left only wants to hear one side of the issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy Thocher
my doG looked in the mirror and saw God
05:22 PM on 08/06/2012
There is no long term profit in renewables for people like the Kochs. They know they can rape the consumer on oil and gas, playing with the commodities market to maximize their own wealth. This is not the case with renewables. The price of a solar panel or wind turbine will be set by the demand, and the long term profit is in maintaining the equipment, which is again driven by profits. Renewables also offer a way to break the hold of the energy grid, which is controlled by large energy corporations. If people can generate their own electricity, and pull their own heat from the free atmosphere, the rich and greedy will suffer in the only area they care about, their bank accounts. It is the false idea of a free market capitolist system that inhibits are ability to move toward renewable and sustainable energy. Our democratic socialist friends in Europe, have taken the greed out of energy to a large extent, making it easier and less confrontational to go green. It is greed and the threat of dwindling returns that makes it impossible for America to move forward on energy, at least until there are no more mountain tops to blow off.
04:02 PM on 08/06/2012
"End Fossil Fuel Subsidies" petition has received over 1 million signatures. While other countries prove alternatives are profitable for both citizen and state, our N. American leaders gag scientist and technology. endfossilfuelsubsidies may be onto something.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
02:42 AM on 08/06/2012
John Prine....now recognized by the Smithsonian...
"Then the coal company came with the world's largest shovel
And they tortured the timber and stripped all the land
Well, they dug for their coal till the land was forsaken
Then they wrote it all down as the progress of man."
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
08:57 AM on 08/05/2012
Continuing...

You talk about dirty money in politics fighting you, and frankly I'm cheering them on! There are a lot more of me out there than you and we are seeing you rob every one for your cause. Well it must stop and it will stop. There are millions of people being hurt economically and the tables are turning!

The XL pipeline will be built, there is enough natural gas and shale oil to make this country self sufficient and wind and solar are not going to be economical for at least another 100 years. I propose we stop the clean energy insanity and use that money to help feed people! There are billions of people starving and the money we waste on green energy subsidies will go a long way to help feed them and teach them more modern farming methods. That will have an impact for good within months of redirecting the money.

So 3 cheers for the organizations lobbying against you. They will win, it is just a matter of time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
02:36 AM on 08/06/2012
independentfrom no one but himself......
I spent a week in Texas in June due a death in my husbands family. That time was spent between the hill country north down to the city of Corpus Christi, where Koch Industries spent decades of covering up the thousands of tons of benzene they were knwoingly pumping into everyone's air. It took 3 days, without antibiotics, for my lymph nodes to return to their normal size and state.

Your comments are solely based on profit and lots of it, in addition to nothing else. (I love your feigned attempt at concern over feeding people! Gave me a real chuckle.)

By the way, you won't win. Like the aged Koch brothers and any and all like their ilk, they are short lived now that they are in their 70's. The younger generation is already demonstrating their ability to consider how short sighted the DOW, Chevron and Monsanto chemicals are, just as thousands of Indian farmers that drank Round-Up due to their crop failures since it's introduction.
Consideration to more powerful minds like the late Ray Anderson of FLOR and David Suzuki could provide some beginning tutelage.
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
07:06 AM on 08/06/2012
You are welcome to your opinions. We will just have to see what happens. I hope you recovered from your benzine problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy Thocher
my doG looked in the mirror and saw God
05:29 PM on 08/06/2012
It will be hard to feed the starving when the tillable areas of land become a dust bowl once again. When fresh water becomes more valuable then oil, and millions die because of its scarcity, crops will be the least of the worlds worries. Luckily, you over estimate the number of ignorant, selfish people like your self. You will win a battle here and there, but one way or another, you will lose the war. Either because of us or because of nature.
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
08:52 AM on 08/05/2012
Mary Anne,

Where would you be without subsidies and mandates? Why do you think you have the right to spend my hard earned tax dollars on this stuff? Today wind and solar have significantly more real costs than either coal or natural gas. The Feds subsidies these wind and solar farms, and everyone who uses electricity from them pays more for it! I live in Austin, Texas and it costs AE about 5-6 cents per kilowatt hour (kwh) to generate electricity for the city. It costs about twice that for wind and solar with the subsidies and because you can't be sure winds will be available and sun doesn't shine at night, these sources still need 100% back up power!
Then Austin Energy spent $2.4b building a biomass plant. This boondoggle will generate electricity for over 20 cents / kwh.
This is a very significant tax to everyone who uses energy in Austin and will suck up money that could have been used for something much more productive. We are talking hundreds of millions here and the mandate to get to 30% renewable energy will add greatly to everone's electric bill.

Continued in next post...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
02:38 AM on 08/06/2012
Sometimes you have to part with some cents to save dollars and life, later on.
Good luck with that Texas air.
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
07:19 AM on 08/06/2012
It is not a few cents, but $300m yearly. What about the lives of all the people who starved to death last week and will starve too death this week and the next? You must be a very strange person to ignore the reality in this world today, vs some imagined problem in 100 years. That is cruel.

The air here is just fine, thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy Thocher
my doG looked in the mirror and saw God
05:31 PM on 08/06/2012
2.4 billion? not any where close to the billions we give to oil and coal in government subisdies, while the rape the consumer for 100's of billions in profits. it is funny you have no problem with giving my tax dollars to the greedy criminals in the oil and gas companies.
07:16 AM on 08/05/2012
l'argent malpropre pour attaquer les énergies propres !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fabricius
05:19 AM on 08/05/2012
You need clean energy, not only because of the environment, but also because you simply use too much energy. In order to produce 1kWh power you use 2,5 kWh worth of coal. We (in Denmark) use 1.02 kWh. Why because the wast energy is used to regional heating. We have now wind turbines that produces betwween 20-25% of the power. A calculation based on the average energy consumption of a Dane and A US citizen shows that if you consumed the same amount as we do (and we have a similar standard of living as you) and had to buy it at the present prici in the US, Each US citizen could save 2500 dollars a year. Add that up with HC expences compared to European and military expences you in total spend 8000 dollars pr american . A family of 4 makes 32,000 dollars and you have to earn at least 35-40,000 dollars to pay for that taking into account the tax. That is my best guess the full income om a clerk, or any other middle income . That is a lot of money. SO your clean energy will have to make you rethink your energy consumption, not only for your envrionment but also for your wallet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Find the Truth
Spencer and Little Girl
01:47 AM on 08/05/2012
Excellent article Mary Anne...only one correction, it's not misinformation, it's DISINFORMATION as in deliberatley false!
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:08 PM on 08/04/2012
Great article. Vote for the Kucinich, Grayson, Warren CPC-progressives the GOPT call commies in the primaries and the lesser of evils Obama and the dems in the general.

It's your last chance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bertiemcn
Sheba1
10:04 PM on 08/04/2012
Romney supports,We need clean air and clean water!
the fossil fuel industry is using tactics such as financial contributions to political campaigns, faux "think tanks," phony intellectuals, and fake grassroots "astroturf" groups to shift public opinion and discredit renewable energy. This is, of course, on top of the millions fossil fuel companies have been spending for decades to land loopholes and weak standards that give dirty energy an unfair advantage, while regular Americans bear the burden of polluted air and water.ig Oil tycoons David and Charles Koch gave at least $85 million to dozens of right-wing "think tanks" and advocacy groups over the past decade and a half rganizations like the Manhattan Institute and the Heartland Institute that defend oil subsidies while attacking renewable energy have received upwards of $600,000 each since 1998 from the oil company Exxon. •Fossil fuel interests are working through the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) to repeal state clean energy mandates, called Renewable Portfolio Standards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Dave
Be like water
08:45 PM on 08/04/2012
Clean energy is a hoax to discredit the job creators. Koch Brothers 2012 ! ! !
03:47 PM on 08/04/2012
If you take the time to look around the world you will find major success stories with renewable energy. Take a good look a Germany. If we had imposed a 10% import fee on imported energy when Jimmy Carter was advocating a national energy policy and devoted the money to wind and solar we very could well be energy independent by now. Like so many other problems we need leadership that will support long term solutions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweaver
Scientist, businessman, semi-retired
02:11 PM on 08/04/2012
Following the money is always fun. All too often, what passes for science is "advocacy science" pushing anti-aquaculture campaigns (something I do know about). Tracing the money often leads back to environmental eNGO's like the Sierra Club, PEW Environmental, Packard Foundation, etc., who pull the strings in coordinating and funding the anti-aquaculture campaigns. For example:

Both sides may actually believe the nonsense they are selling. But truth is the first to go in any of these campaigns, as in any war. Truth is too complex and messy and requires a basic scientific knowledge level in order to assess the validity of those who would twist "science" to support their political/social agenda. Complexity is not good for PR campaigns, including the Sierra Clubs campaigns.