Last week, the U.S. Senate passed a financial reform bill that was far stronger that what had been proposed by the Obama administration and passed by the House. Now it's time to hold President Obama's feet to the fire to ensure the strongest possible bill.
Not long after the financial crisis, it was clear that the "solutions" that would emerge from the administration would be weak. With Tim Geithner and Larry Summers in the driver's seat it was clear that there would be no bold transformative vision, no "New Deal" for the 21st century, but tweaks like a "systemic risk regulator" that would somehow endow failed regulatory bodies with the foresight needed to predict the next crisis and the backbone needed to take decisive action.
The Obama team set such a low bar on structural reform that public interest groups despaired. But a funny thing happened on the path to weak-kneed financial reform, democracy got in the way.
Voters Strengthen the Bank Bill
Two critical elections were held that raised the bar on financial reform. The first was the special election held to replace Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy. Republican Scott Brown swept into power in this democratic stronghold with a populist appeal against big bank bailouts. The very next day, Obama declared his support for the "Volcker Rule," a measure to crack down on risky proprietary trading. Even though the rule was opposed by Geithner and Senate leadership, it miraculously worked it's way into the Senate reform bill without a vote.
The second election is still underway. On June 8th, U.S. Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) faces a run-off election against Lt. Governor Bill Halter in the democratic primary. Halter was inspired to enter the race because of Lincoln's destructive role in the health care debate, where she blocked progressive reforms. Halter's meteoric rise in the polls and his successful fundraising among unions, MoveOn and other progressive groupings demonstrated that he was a serious contender. And when he took to the airwaves pounding Lincoln on her cozy relationship with the big banks, the Lincoln campaign needed a compelling response.
She canceled fundraisers and denounced Goldman Sachs. More importantly, she used her position as chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee to put forward the most radical reform to the fiancial sector yet proposed by any member of Congress or nation for that matter. Lincoln decided that the best way of separating Wall Street gambling from the taxpayer guarantee is to force the big banks that are responsible for most derivatives trades, to spin off their trading desks into separate corporate entities. They can continue to gamble, but the taxpayers will not be on the hook for their bad bets. In one fell swoop, her language restores much of the firewall between Wall Street gambling and Main Street banks, reins in reckless derivatives trading and shrinks the size of behemoth banks.
Lincoln herself said she thought her proposal would get stripped out in the Senate, but it stuck due not only to her tenacity but also to the fact that she and Halter were engaged in a tight primary. (In the race, Lincoln won by a narrow margin of 44-42 forcing a run off). If her proposals survive conference committee, it will be due in large part to the fact that she is still facing the voters. Win or lose, Halter's legacy may well be the best financial reform measure put forward by any nation in response to the crisis that devastated the lives of so many.
The Obama Administration Wants to Kill the Best Provisions
Lincoln's proposal has come under fire from all fronts. Big bank lobbyists went ballistic of course and they will admit that getting her language pulled from the bill is still their top priority. Behind the scenes, it is also the top priority of the administration and the Federal Reserve. Believe it or not the administration is fighting to preserve its ability to bailout any financial institutions that gets in trouble, not just commercial banks. Yep that is right. Instead of clamping down Wall Street gambling, the administration wants to keep reckless institutions on the teat of the Federal Reserve.
The battle lines are drawn. The biggest threat to the Lincoln language now is the Obama administration and the Federal Reserve. There will no doubt be a move to strip out the strong Lincoln language in conference committee where the House and Senate versions of the bank reform bill now go to be aligned.
On the surface, Congressional leadership is making all the right noises. "This is one of those rare occasions when the two bills really are very close to each other," said Mr. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat. "There's not a great deal of difference. We need to take the best parts of both bills and marry them together and present our colleagues in both chambers with our final product." This is the right plan, but it will not happen if the Obama administration continues to oppose the Lincoln language.
Taxpayers must refuse to back the Wall Street casino and tell Congress in no uncertain terms that a bank bill without strong derivatives reform is not a bank bill worth having. We need to make sure that the House-Senate conference committee is televised and every change is subject to a roll call vote. With all eyes on financial reform, we may yet achieve structural reforms worth celebrating.
And with this Admin sitting fairly pretty at the moment they see no reason to actually help people. They are paying back the Uber-Class that allowed this administration to ascend to power.
Until we see general strikes, and I really doubt that we will, the people will have no place at the table.
This happens regularly - you got somebody on the switch back there?
What can I say to a lol comment?
Oh, THAT Lincoln !
I thought you meant Obama v. Abe.
As in, when the banks get nasty, dirty and antagonistic, the government will use its existing powers to create the nation's money needed to meet our socio-economic needs in times fraught with citizen suffering as a result of the machinations of private bankers.
But Obama ain't Lincoln, despite his racial, locational and presidential connections.
But, you meant Blanche.
Yeah. her last-minute reprise of the "Ban bankers from trading with your money" is actually the radical approach out there right now, if you can believe that.
Look for a signing statement, penned by Summers, Geithner and Bernanke, if this thing actually makes its way to the President's desk as legislation.
How any progressive can see any value in anything Obama is doing for the economy these days is ample evidence of what the progressives lack - a true understanding of the money power in this country and around the globe.
Get yer heads out, progressives.
It's time for real change.