NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mary Gabriel

GET UPDATES FROM Mary Gabriel
 

Marx The Man Vs Marx The Myth

Posted: 10/11/11 06:32 PM ET

Ask anyone on the street if they have heard of Karl Marx and the answer more often than not would be yes. Ask those same people what they know about Marx and the responses will be wildly different - and usually wrong.

More than 128 years after his death, not to mention the countless wars and governments fought and formed in his name, who is Karl Marx? I would wager few truly know, and yet he continues to be part of our political dialog, as controversial today as he was unknown during his own time.

In fact, there were two Karl Marxes - the myth and the man. Marx's theory has been used to create the myth of the socialist god or demon, but the man can be found in just one place, among his family. That is the only place one can truly learn to understand him: the place where Marx developed the ideas that would change the world.

And yet, I discovered, that is the area where he has been least often sought. Part of the reason was that his personal story had become yet another battleground, between those who wanted to erase its more sordid details and those who believed as I do that unless one is introduced to Marx's life it is nearly impossible to comprehend his theory. This tug of war over Marx's legacy began immediately after his death in 1883 but intensified as his following grew. Somewhat surprisingly his family was on the side of full disclosure.

Shortly after Marx's youngest daughter, Eleanor, discovered in 1895 that her father was not the exalted being she had devoted her life to serving, she began to distinguish between Marx the political thinker and Marx the man. She needed to separate the two to survive.

The latter Marx -- the impoverished, irresponsible, and cruelly selfish Marx -- had just been painfully revealed to her: she discovered that one of her closest friends, a 45-year-old man named Freddy Demuth, was actually her half-brother. Eleanor learned that having abandoned this child to a foster family in 1851, her father never materially supported him or offered him the consolation of his love.

Like her mother and two sisters, Eleanor had built her life around her father. She believed in his vision of a society without exploitation like a religion, and accepted without complaint a lifetime of personal sacrifice because her father said it was necessary. Their shared goal was much bigger than themselves or their individual needs. Indeed, even after the revelations concerning Freddy, Eleanor still believed in Marx's cause. Her faith in the private Marx, however, was shaken.

It took Eleanor a year to recover from her shock and come to the conclusion that it was important that both sides of the incredible man she called father deserved to be understood. Members of his "party" -- those young followers who claimed socialist and Marxist mantles -- weren't so sure. They feared any personal failings on the part of "the man, the mere man" would reflect negatively on their fledgling organizations and they worked to sanitize Marx's life story.

Eleanor shrugged off the efforts, even allowing some of her father's personal letters to be published. She may have continued to wage that fight but she didn't live long enough to do so. Eleanor killed herself in 1898; the weight of her problems and disappointments had become unbearable.

And so, at the start of the twentieth century, when Marx's name finally gained the currency that eluded him during his own lifetime, the Karl Marx that emerged was nearly more myth than man. To some, he was a stern oracle whose words could be manipulated to support repressive governments, justify massacres, and fight wars. To others, he personified political and social evil. These viewed him as anti-freedom, anti-religion, anti-family, and anti-progress.

To many others -- those tens of millions without food or shelter, those children condemned to work long hours, those men and women exploited as the rich became richer -- he was the beneficent father who offered the hope of a meal and a bed, and ultimately a brighter future. But all of those visions of Marx were muddled. They reflected more on the beliefs and aspirations of the person or party that conjured him up than on the Marx who lived from 1818 to 1883, devoting his life to the study of man's interaction with other men.

The confusion that arose then, and continues to arise today, was due in part to the fact that the people acting in Marx's name did not know him (perhaps did not care to know him); they knew a version of his philosophy. His personal story had either been buried, some of it under orders by Stalin, or altered to suit political purposes.

Against this backdrop, as Marx would have wished, scholars have focused primarily on his theory. There are libraries of books, in nearly every language, dissecting Marx's words. Brilliant pieces have been published by dedicated historians and political scientists analyzing Marx's ideas.

But I found that Eleanor's quest to introduce her father as a man, a husband, and a father -- for better or worse - had languished. In the dozens of biographies of Marx in English alone, I found a slightly personalized version of the myth, but not the flesh and blood creature I had hoped to discover. In 2003, I decided to try to find the real Marx myself.

After digging through archives in four countries, and reading thousands of pages of letters, the man I discovered - brilliant, exasperating, funny, and passionate - bore no resemblance to the legend whose face scowls down from communist propaganda posters.

He was a man, a mere man (as his followers had so feared), which made him all the more approachable and sympathetic. His theories became more comprehensible, too, because there was a story behind them. I knew what he had lived through while writing them. I knew of the physical and mental sacrifices he and his family made along the way. Marx's philosophy was no longer remote.

It became for me the document of a life's struggle - his and our own.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capitaldysfunction
White male never voted Republican
12:49 AM on 12/04/2011
Mary Gabriel's interview with Charlie Rose was broadcast today (12-03-2011) on the Bloomberg channel. She comes across as an exceptional intellect and, even more incredibly, a real and well centered person. I am ordering her book forthwith.
12:12 AM on 10/14/2011
Just bought the book. Reviews were great and this article clinched the deal. Looking forward to reading it!
photo
Readbetweentheelevens
"You can't turn the wind, so turn the sail."
04:07 PM on 10/13/2011
His brothers were very funny.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
12:50 PM on 10/13/2011
This sounds like a really interesting book. I think it can only be a good thing to highlight a person's humanity when their memory or persona has been taken over by myth.
photo
Wild Thang
Born to be wild--and free!
11:48 AM on 10/13/2011
Mary, yours has been such an impassioned undertaking that now
benefits all of us who need a deeper understanding of Marx. The
clarity and unity of your article entices me to want to join you on
that journey of discovery into Karl Marx, the man, from the
perspective of his family, especially his daughter.

I'm so ready to read your book!

Thangs,
Wild Thang~
photo
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
02:58 AM on 10/13/2011
If only Karl had google at the time... the world would've been a much happier place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
05:30 PM on 10/13/2011
I'd rather that folks bother read book two of "wealth".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Badger
02:28 AM on 10/13/2011
This is an interesting story, Marx was a human being not a prophet, but he was a human being who was ahead of his time in many respects. And as a materialist, I'm sure Marx would want us to view him as that.

Another fact many don't know about him is that he and President Lincoln wrote to each other.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:40 AM on 10/13/2011
There are more people in history than you can shake a stick at, that the general public has stereotyped in a bizarre caricature counter to reality. We enjoy bumper sticker slogans to sum up entire careers and lives, so that we can easily file it away for expounding trivia to people equally uninterested in facts or real history.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnyraindog
Hi Mom!
09:49 PM on 10/12/2011
It is impossible to comprhend the history of the 20th century without taking into account the ideas and perverse appeal of marxism any insights or different prescpective of marx and his philosophy is valuable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
05:31 PM on 10/13/2011
Why is the appeal of Marxian ideology perverse?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnyraindog
Hi Mom!
10:27 PM on 10/13/2011
The history of its application.
photo
WoodsideCraig
Author of the blog "The Weiler Psi"
03:38 PM on 10/12/2011
Who is Freddy?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bellanova
I'm nobody. Who are you?
02:45 PM on 10/12/2011
Myth and the man, how different these two always are. More often than not, our giants have feet (and/or other body parts) of clay. The revelation of his daughter's suicide almost does not surprise. Show me a famous man, and I'll show you a trail of destroyed women behind him.

Thanks, Mary -- can't wait to read it.
InLosAngeles
Speaking Truth to Groupthink
08:27 AM on 10/13/2011
What does that say about women that chase famous men?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bellanova
I'm nobody. Who are you?
02:11 PM on 10/13/2011
It is not entirely clear who chases whom, is it.
photo
Wild Thang
Born to be wild--and free!
11:39 AM on 10/13/2011
Great comment, friend! I especially like
your analogy of "other body parts [of clay]"!

Best,
Wild Thang~
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bellanova
I'm nobody. Who are you?
02:09 PM on 10/13/2011
Thank you.

P.S. Aren't you a wildly enthusiastic thing, Wild Thang! :)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
csmith14
12:15 PM on 10/12/2011
I am sorry, while Marx's family life is of some peripheral interest, the real Marx is found in the four volumes of Capital and some other associated writing. It is in these volumes that his intense research into political economy, both reading economists and looking at actual economic data, find their expression in his conclusions about the economic world.

If you read these you will find that Marx admired much of the work of Adm Smith and David Ricardo and found the labor theory of value in what they wrote. He greatly admired Benjamin Franklin as an economic observer.

Marx wrote at a time when the 12 hour work day, six days a week for workers aged 10 and over was just leaving the scene in England, due to Government intervention, not the working of the "free marker."

Republicans, especially Ron Paul, would dearly love to take us back prior to this era, where there was not effective government intervention. Has anyone asked him if we should repeal child labor laws?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bellanova
I'm nobody. Who are you?
06:06 PM on 10/12/2011
You are right about the wrong-wing agenda -- their demonization of Marx and his work is directly proportional to the threat his ideas pose to the unjust, rapacious capitalism which destroys our nation, but fills their coffers.

But I very much would like to read about the real Marx, i.e., the man, and not just stop at his ideas. Far from it being a peripheral interest, getting to know personal details of one's life -- especially if this is an influential person -- helps us (me, at least) appreciate his work more fully, not to mention enriches our (my, at least) knowledge and understanding of people in general.
photo
Wild Thang
Born to be wild--and free!
11:40 AM on 10/13/2011
Another great comment. Thanks with a fave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
05:32 PM on 10/13/2011
If only every capitalist would bother read book two of "wealth".