More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Matt Kepnes

Matt Kepnes

Posted: December 2, 2010 04:52 PM

Did you know that only about 20% of Americans own a passport? This number may be on the rise, but it's only because Americans are now required to show a passport when visiting Mexico, Canada, and parts of the Caribbean. The number of Americans who have traveled overseas, however, has been on the decline since 2006 (Source: OTTI). So while more of us have our passports, Americans are still not traveling abroad. We are still shunning the rest of the world. We have no new love of travel just because we now have passports. So why is it that America turns a blind eye to the rest of the planet and staying home?

I believe there are a few reasons:

First, America is huge. It is a well-known fact that the majority of American families go on vacation in other parts of America. Why? For one, the U.S.A. is not only massive but it also shelters a diverse range of environments. If you're looking for a beach vacation, go to Florida. If you want the tropics, go to Hawaii. How about the desert? You'll find it in Arizona. Visit Alaska's frozen tundra or temperate forests in Washington. This attitude is best summed up by a response I got from a friend in Iowa, who said, "Why would you want to go to Thailand? It's far away and scary. If you want beaches, just go to Florida." Americans simply don't see the need to go anywhere else when they can do it all in their own backyard.

But is geography a valid reason? Not really. If geography played a role in determining where people travel, no one would ever travel. Everything would be too far. Yet New Zealand is in the middle of nowhere and how many more Kiwis do you meet traveling than Americans? How many more Aussies? Tons. These countries are far away from everything. Outside of each other, it's a 6 hour trip to somewhere and if you go across the Pacific, it's 15 hours. The world is much farther away from them than it is us. Yet they travel. We don't. Size doesn't matter.

It's not that America's size makes travel prohibitive, its size is important because people feel there is no reason to leave. We don't need to travel to "big, scary places" when we have deserts, tropical islands, mountains, endless summer, wilderness, snow, and more. Every landscape can be found within America's borders. You can have everything you want here. When you feel this way, you aren't going to travel.

Which brings me to my second point: Fear. I think most Americans are scared of the world and when they see they have everything around here, it only reinforces their perception they don't need to go overseas. Just take a look at the recent election and you'll see what I mean. Sharron Angle warns of Sharia Law. The Chinese are to blame for all our problems. Mexicans are stealing our jobs. And the ground zero mosque, which is really a community center, is just a secret way for Al Qaeda to enter the country. Paranoia runs deep in this land. In this post-9/11 world, Americans have been taught that the world is a big, scary place. There are terrorists outside every hotel waiting to kidnap you. People don't like you because you are American. The world is violent. It's poor. It's dirty. It's savage. Canada and Europe are O.K., but if you go there, they will still be rude to you because you are American. No one likes Americans, right?.

Even before 9/11, the media created an environment of fear. In news, if it bleeds, it leads right? Prior to 9/11, the media played up violence at home and abroad. Pictures of riots in foreign streets, threats against Americans, and general violence were all played up to portray a violent and unsafe world. After, 9/11, it only got worse. Politicians now tell us, "they hate you" in the same way that former NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani did during his campaign. It's US vs. THEM! And the media still perpetuates this idea.

Politicians and media paint the world as a scary place, filled with crime, hate, terrorists. Bill O'Reilly, a man who clearly has never been to Amsterdam, has called that city a cesspool. (Twice!) We are constantly told that there is anti-Americanism in the world -- wherever you go, people will dislike you. (This is a fallacy that is rarely disproven in the media). Moreover, America's hegemony since WW2 has ensured that we have been the dominant force in the world. Despite the rise of China, Brazil, and India, our politicians tell us everything in America is the best (yet we are #38 in health care). Countries will always do what they want. America is the leader. It is the city upon a hill. Yada. Yada. Yada. When you think you are the best, why go to "godforsaken" countries where they hate you for being American, are cesspool, and you might get robbed? Bombarded by this "news" and "facts" for decades, Americans think this myth is reality and don't want to leave the states. It's no wonder that when I tell my older friends and relatives I am going to Central America, they still think of the dangerous 80s and tell me to watch out for the Sandinistas.

Finally, I think Americans don't travel overseas because of cultural ignorance. Americans are ignorant, and when I say this, I mean ignorant that people are simply uninformed about what is going on outside the borders, not that they are dumb. I can't say I blame them. When you are told the world is scary, why would you want to care about it? Why would you want to go to places where they want to kill you? The result is that Americans don't put an emphasis on learning about the world. We don't learn a second language, we don't enroll in overseas programs, we don't have a travel culture, we don't do gap years, and we don't talk about our world in schools. Our schools teach one foreign language: Spanish, and that is only because we have a large Spanish speaking population in the country. Moreover, as education budgets continue to get slashed, humanity courses are usually the first to be cut from curriculum. This means that people learn very little about world history. In some states, the whole world has to be explained in one year.

The media doesn't focus on the world except if it relates to something bad and our politicians encourage us to erect walls not break down barriers. Additionally, surveys show that news agencies devoted only 10.3% to foreign coverage in 2008 (source) while oddly, 13% went to some polygamy case in Texas. We barely know anything about geography. Americans are simply not told about the world or clamoring to know about it.

In May, violence broke out in Thailand. I remember seeing it as front-page news in Europe and on CNN International. There was a small hyperlink at the bottom of the page on CNN US and Fox News. Lindsey Lohan was the number one news story that month. Again. We are more concerned with our celebrities than world events. Let's talk about Kim Kardashian instead of the EU debt crisis or Brazil's effort to clean up its slums.

The sad irony of all of this is that we created the world we are so afraid of. America's push for a globalized world brought many players onto the world stage. It helped the Chinese dragon emerge from its cage, it brought India into the game, helped Brazil, and tore down communism. We championed globalization, technology, and freedom around the world. Now that we helped foster that, we don't know what to do. Now, we look at the world and we're scared that we no longer understand our place in it. Instead of trying to learn more, we erect barriers, play to xenophobic fears, and bury our head in the sand.

I am hopeful though. The future of the world requires more integration, and it requires more young Americans who -- growing up in this post 9/11 environment -- are more interested in learning about other countries than shunning then. I think the future will be bright so long as political leaders don't wall us off completely before then.

 

Follow Matt Kepnes on Twitter: www.twitter.com/nomadicmatt

 
 
  • Comments
  • 76
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:32 AM on 12/09/2010
You hit on some good points. I have been constantly surprised at how many people tell me they wish they could travel, but yet when I explain how they could they have a gazillion poor excuses. I, too, have heard people express a great amount of fear. They're stunned when I travel overseas by myself. "You're going by YOURSELF?!" they ask with great shock. I have also seen the ignorance you mention, and have had people in the countries express their notice of it. In Paris people thought I was British "because Americans don't usually bother to try to learn the language."
photo
robin360
Obama: Not perfect, but pretty good.
03:48 PM on 12/07/2010
Matt, I pretty much agree with you. To some, the world is a scary place. If people don't want to travel outside of the U.S., then don't. I think they are missing out, but they have their reasons. I like to try to help people overcome those fears by sharing my experiences. I am a petite gal and I have been traveling for 20 years, sometimes on my own (China, Japan, England) sometimes to visit friends oversees (New Zealand, Germany, Ireland) and with a friend or two from here (Europe). Here is what I have learned:
1. Tokyo does not have to be expensive.
2. If I need help, people have always been kind enough to help me.
3. There is less violent crime in Europe and Asia than there is here; I have never been robbed.
4. Even if you have no sense of direction (that would be me), you'll still get there.
5. Not everyone hates Americans; people in Europe and Asia are politically aware enough to not confuse citizens with their government.
6. There is bottled water everywhere I have gone.
7. Even in eastern europe I was able to find vegetarian food.
7. I have never been hospitalized when traveling nor have I been injured.
8. Lots of people enjoy practicing their english with me.
9. Yes, Paris is as beautiful as you have heard, Venice has remarkable food, Japan is a wonderland, New Zealand is drop-dead gorgeous and you'll never know unless you go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just-a-Guy
11:13 AM on 12/07/2010
It's not that we're ignorant of the world's problems, Matt. In fact, we are usually the ones ponying up the money to fix them. Whether it's a tsunami in Sri Lanka or an earthquake in Haiti or an ethnic cleansing in Bosnia...or almost any human catastrophe that's occurred in recent history...it is America who is called upon to come to their aid.

You may be partially correct that Americans don't have a desire to travel to "unsavory" places...but I think the larger issue is that people do not have the money to travel the way that they used to.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
TravelSort
03:19 PM on 12/06/2010
While I've enjoyed living and working abroad for 7 years in various places from Nagoya to Moscow (which has a great subway, btw--see our post on Moscow Metro stations http://huf­f.to/fXkro­b) there's a lot more planning involved now that I have a very active toddler, and I don't think Matt takes into full account the changes to one's travel that occur when one has small children in tow. On the financial front, I would also argue that even for young people, they tend to be more burdened with student loans than the typical European or Australian, where university is either free or substantially less expensive than our universities and graduate schools.

I think many Americans would absolutely love to go abroad, but need to save up for it not just financially, but in days off from work and in terms of planning, especially if it's a family with young kids. Traveling on long international flights with a very active toddler is *not* conducive to relaxation, it is a workout that has to be extensively prepared for. Many families want a relaxing vacation close to home (again, emphasis on relaxing, not on necessarily being afraid of other cultures) and/or want to use the little vacation time they have to visit family, and who can blame them?
02:42 AM on 12/06/2010
Obviously Matt Kepnes is sufficiently affluent to be unconscious of the fact that many Americans aren't traveling overseas because they have neither the money nor the credit necessary to embark on what Matt Kepnes takes for granted.

The rich, you see, aren't like you and me.
12:36 AM on 12/09/2010
One can fly to Costa Rica from Denver for cheaper than they can fly to Florida, and the cost of food, hotels, and transportation is far cheaper there than anywhere in the US. As Matt points out, many people don't realize it isn't as expensive to travel as one may think, and one doesn't have to fly to the other side of the world to have had the experience of being in another place, culture, and "world."
11:27 PM on 12/05/2010
I don't know about that second point.. the main reason that people from Canada, UK, Europe, etc. travel more than we do is because there are no good beaches in those countries. Why would your average American take his/her family to a beach in Mexico when they could take them to Florida or California for half the price and half the hassle? Also, Americans take shorter vacations so travel time is another important factor. Your average American isn't any more or less ignorant than your average European.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
11:34 PM on 12/05/2010
there are no good beaches in Europe? some of the most famous beaches are in Italy, Spain, France, and Greece which is a nation made up a whole of islands in the Aegean. you are right about shorter vacations in the United States.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cyjames1975
11:38 PM on 12/06/2010
I agree that there are beaches in Europe, but the beaches in the U.S. are, generally, nicer and more plentiful (We have MUCH longer stretches of sandy coastline that aren't rocky). The amount of vacation we have in the U.S. is pathetic, so the rare lengthy vacations most take are along with their children and traveling a long way (esp. flying) with children gets pricey fast.
01:12 PM on 12/05/2010
I have traveled widely throughout North & Central America. I have always found Canadians to be super cool. I have heard more than a few negative comments towards Americans while in Central America though - mainly from Aussies - go figure.

I think the reason folks don't travel overseas much is about time. It is hard for most of us to take more than one week off at a time - it seams to me that you need to allow at least 10 days to two weeks to make a trip abroad meaningful.

Personally, I like to drive on my vacations. There are a lot of great off the beaten path places to visit within 500 miles of my house - jump in your car and head in any direction. You will always find something new or something overlooked in a previous excursion. What is cool about america is the rich cultural diversity that each region offers. Great food as well!

Driving across the states is still fairly cheap and can be adventurous.
photo
Aikaterina
A Greek-American living in California
10:32 AM on 12/05/2010
Ignorance and fear top the list of reasons why Americans don't want to venture outside North America. The only inconvenience I've ever experienced travelling aborad, is with communication (knowing their language). Not all nations' citizens are fluent in French or English, especially outside of hotels and upscale restaurants. However, usually hand-gestures, or knowing a few essential phrases to get directions, find a restroom, etc. in the native language of the place one visits, is prudent.

Americans are ignorant of history as well as geography. We don't even know our own history well, yet abroad most ordinary people have studied their own as well as world history. Most Americans can't find some countries (or even some states) on a map, whereas most foreigners easily and effortlessly do.

Traveling abroad deepens the appreciation of the US, and does not diminish it. It affords an opportunity to expand one's knowledge, see first-hand the millenia of historical-cultural artifacts. By far the best part of foreign travel is that one gets the opportunity and pleasure to meet, mingle with, and know local customs, people, traditions and for them to get to know Americans as something other than cowboys and gangsters...it breaks down prejudices.
09:29 AM on 12/05/2010
"quite cheap you know" -Mrs. Stoller says to her son after showing her passport in the film, Breaking Away. It's clear in the film, Mrs. Stoller is never going to be able to travel to a foreign country.
A passport is something you get when declaring your intention to travel abroad. In the least, it buys one the dreams of being able to do so. And the fact that only 20% of American actually bother obtaining one is a damning piece of evidence.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Anne Peterson
I like snacks.
06:02 AM on 12/05/2010
I find your articles constantly dis non travelers, which seems to be in direct contradiction to the fact you are sick of being dissed because you are a perma-traveler. When you ask of people to accept your lifestyle, can you really not accept theirs?

I just started traveling because I got a great job in the Middle East that affords me the luxury to do so. Before than I was a middle class college student who's parents couldn't afford to send me abroad. I spent the extra money I earned on my films for college and not on jaunts to Europe, Asia or Africa.

What about the fact Americans don't have tons of vacation time and the travel time to get abroad alone eats into that? Of course I'd LOVE for Americans to have more vacation time but that simply isn't the reality.

Plus, the cost of travel abroad is very limiting, especially once you have a family.

Please stop painting Americans as fearful ignoramuses. You sound like an American who travels so much you don't actually spend time with many Americans and simply digest the misguided theories of the foreigners you meet abroad.

Most Americans I know fall into three categories:

1. People who travel
2. People who don't travel because they don't have the time/money
3. People who don't travel because that is not their passion and they throw themselves into their obsession be it their family, art, dance, politics or whatever.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Kepnes
01:59 PM on 12/05/2010
In relation to time, the Japanese and Koreans work just as much as Americans yet they find the time to go overseas. I only have two weeks is an awful excuse. I used to work in a cubicle. I still went places for two weeks. It's only impossible if you think it is.

I don't diss non-travelers. In fact, point out where I ever say "you don't travel, so your lifestyle is meaningless." I don't because I don't feel that way. However, there are a lot of preconceived notions about travel, including "it's expensive" or "I don't have the time." My goal is to simply show that travel is affordable and can be done by anyone.
02:35 AM on 12/06/2010
I'm going to make the same argument for the Japanese that Durant makes for Europeans below. I lived in Japan for 4 years, and it was usually much cheaper (and often easier) for me to take a trip outside of the country than it was to go to another city or island within Japan. Not only is the train particularly expensive in Japan (usually much pricier than flying!), the cost of accommodation and food is much more expensive within Japan than it is in neighboring Asian countries. My Japanese friends would often jet off to Korea for a long weekend in the same way Americans might fly to New York City or Vegas.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Anne Peterson
I like snacks.
01:38 PM on 12/06/2010
And I definitely appreciate you trying to get people to travel in a way that both budgets their time and money, but I don't think calling them fearful and ignorant is a really motivating way to do that.
04:54 AM on 12/05/2010
USA IS LARGE AND BIG COUNTRY AND RICH TOO, BUT PEOPLE ARE SCARED RIGHT, BECAUSE NOT CONFIDENT OF THEMSELVES. OTHER PARTS OF WORLD AND HUMANS ARE SAME TYPE OK . JUST GO OUT OF YOUR WELL AND DONT BE FROG IN THE WELL[ THINKING THAT'S THE WORLD]. NO ONE TROBULES ANY ONE UNLESS YOURSELF INVITE ?.VISITING OTHER PLACE OF EARTH IS ENTIRELY INDIVIDUAL CHOICE OK.THERE ARE HUMANS BORN AND DIED IN ONE VILLAGE IT SELF NO WONDER RIGHT.
photo
durant
Editor & publisher of Europeforvisitors.com
07:08 PM on 12/04/2010
I publish a European travel-planning site, so I'm all in favor of overseas travel, but I think Mr. Kepnes is reading too much into the fact that most Americans don't go abroad. It's easy (and cheap) to travel internationally if you live in London, Amsterdam, or Duesseldorf where foreign destinations are closer than the distance between Minneapolis and Chicago or L.A. and San Francisco. The U.S. certainly has its share of xenophobes and yokels, but for many Americans (especially families, and especially in the current economy), the high cost of flying overseas makes a trip to Florida a lot more practical than a vacation in Hamburg, Haifa, or Hong Kong.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Anne Peterson
I like snacks.
05:55 AM on 12/05/2010
Exactly, thank you for saying this so I didn't have to!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Kepnes
02:03 PM on 12/05/2010
This is a huge misconception. It's no more expensive to go from LAX to London than to go from London to Bangkok or Sydney. Prices work out the same. Yes, it is cheaper to go from London to Amsterdam but the U.S. does not have a higher cost to long distance travel than other countries. Moreover, flights to central and south america are quite cheap. You don't need to go from LA to India. Abroad simply means outside the U.S., wherever that may be.
photo
durant
Editor & publisher of Europeforvisitors.com
10:56 PM on 12/06/2010
But if you live in London, Amsterdam, or Duesseldorf, it's hard to AVOID traveling internationally unless you stay close to home. Your motivation may have nothing to do with being a cosmopolite: You fly from London to the Canaries not to meet Spaniards, but to see the sun and keep warm. And, thanks to the likes of Ryanair and EasyJet, you can do it for a song.

I'd also point out that having stamps in one's passport isn't necessarily evidence of sophistication, cultural awareness, or open-mindedness. Sometimes it just reflects a collector's mentality, whether the travelers are well-heeled retirees who cruise the world with their own kind or young backpackers who hang out with their own kind in the third-world country du jour.
photo
Indigo1941
Time Traveler
04:07 PM on 12/04/2010
I agree with your points, Matt, but unlike you, I don't have much hope for a brighter tomorrow. It's scary out there on the rest of the planet partly because we've made it scary. Cultural ignorance is laziness enshrined, I'll grant you that, but the remedy isn't readily available because the remedy requires an open mind. We don't see a lot of that around any more. In fact, we never did. In The Leatherstocking Tales, Americans are afraid of the French and the British and those "savage" Indians. By the time Mark Twain was writing, Americans were self-consciously "innocent" when overseas and now . . . we just go blow things up and come home again. So . . . I don't see a brighter tomorrow in the wonderful world of travel. After all, the fantastic glories of the rest of the world are a well kept secret in the US. I kind of like keeping it that way so I can go enjoy Nepal while others fuss about Cancun's beaches.
02:59 PM on 12/04/2010
Matt's on the right track, even if he doesn't go into costs. Lots of people support the comments below that traveling is expensive, but it isn't. Two weeks in Colombia will cost less than one week in Florida, for example, including airfare.
Also, you don't have to wear your country on your sleeve. If you lay low and eat where locals eat, travel how locals travel, most people you will come in contact with are too busy with their own lives to care where you are from, which is how you want it.
http://thedromomaniac.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cyjames1975
11:46 PM on 12/06/2010
I agree. However, it's impractical to think that people who are going to Florida (i.e. families) are going to load their kids up with the requisite shots, buy plane tickets, guide kids through a long flight and customs, and then land in South America feeling like they're relaxed and ready for vacation. Plus, taking a trip to Colombia takes much more planning and organizing. I think people should travel more. I think it's educational. I travel all the time. I'm single. I have no kids. I think LOTS of people are just tired. And they just want to relax. Dragging children - esp. young children - around the globe isn't relaxing.
12:52 PM on 12/04/2010
I have had the good fortune to travel outside of the U.S. and will admit the first time I went to Europe I was a little apprehensive. However once I arrived and met the people and experienced the cites the fear factor was gone. My mother on the other hand has never traveled outside of the U.S. and has no desire to travel out of the U.S. and to this day is still concerned when I leave our shores. She is OK with me walking the streets of New York but is concerned about me being out at night in Paris !!! SMH
Fingers crossed hope to go to Costa Rica in the spring...GO Me!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Anne Peterson
I like snacks.
06:04 AM on 12/05/2010
So true. One thing that annoys me about the travel section is the writers who list in their bio the number of countries they've traveled to. As though every hashmark signifies exactly how much better they are than you.
photo
robin360
Obama: Not perfect, but pretty good.
03:19 PM on 12/07/2010
Good for you,Wanda!