Today, maybe even right now, you can turn on the TV and see pictures of Julissa Brisman, shot three times and murdered by the so-called "Craigslist" killer. The pictures of Julissa are not meant to be anodyne. These photos are provocative. They're sexual. And that's why they keep airing the photos on TV.
Please, watch the news today. You will see camera shots lingering on Julissa Brisman's body, before the camera makes its way to her face. Can you please tell me why this part of the story is news?
It's not. It's exploitation. Sex sells, and in this case, although Julissa Brisman died a horrible, horrible death, the media is still selling her sexual image in order to entice viewers.
It's simply wrong. I have no expectation for the tabloid press, but the bigger news outlets should not commit themselves to such exploitation. It's shameful.
Yeah, it's just a thttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-littman/how-the-media-is-exploiti_b_189762.html#abloid show, but blaming the victim is completely unacceptable.
Lapsed license or sex work, she didn't deserve to die for it. John Walsh was already on the Insider* yesterday and today, using the photos to insinuate that she was somehow asking for it.
*note, I'm not trying to flood-- I flubbed a previous attempt to post this story.
Prostitutes are targets for violence because they can't seek protection from the law.
Legalize it and the women can be protected and tested. With a legal and safer alternative, the johns would move the demand to legal brothels. This would isolate the underage and the "sex slaves" still left on the black market making it easier for police to sift through to bust them.
Win. Win. Win.
That's why I'm sure we'll never do it.