iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Matthew Lynch, Ed.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Matthew Lynch, Ed.D.
 

Creating a Gender Responsive Learning Climate for Girls

Posted: 10/26/11 11:34 AM ET

In a responsive model of instruction, teachers seek out and include examples of achievements from both genders. While women have come a long way since the days of Dr. Edward Clarke, it is still difficult to find a curriculum that reflects an equitable picture of female accomplishments. Progress has been slow to incorporate gender-fair terminology into textbooks. Girls need to read about role models in science and mathematics -- not just see pictures of women in lab coats with occasional references to females in the text.

The accomplishments of minority women, women with disabilities, local women from the community, and working class women all are important to help present a complete, realistic and equitable picture of female role models in society. It is valuable for young women to see the variety of ways in which females can impact their communities and their society, regardless of race, ethnic background or financial status. Teachers help overcome gender inequities and change present perceptions by presenting accomplishments, and experiences, of both men and women.

A balance of the particularistic and the inclusive is required. It is not healthy or productive to promote the historical female experience as completely negative -- or to emphasize the struggles and minimize the triumphs -- such an approach presents an unrealistic picture and may produce bitterness. Nor is it positive to emphasize men as the "oppressors" -- this fosters resentment. Balance promotes equitable, respectful, and cooperative relationships with men in society.

There are many important reasons to emphasize women's achievements. One of the most important is to build girls' self-esteem. Blame the magazines, the movies, the models -- blame Barbie -- pin it on the pin-up girls, but the fact remains: girls struggle with the mixed messages about body image. Particularly impressionable adolescent girls struggle with bulimia, anorexia and the obsession with weight, and sometimes self-inflict injuries and other damage to their bodies.

Many girls who are bulimics and/or cutters have indicated that these actions are the only aspects of their lives over which they have control. Teachers lack the ubiquitous influence of the media to manipulate girls' self-image. Advertising often pitches to the fundamental needs of the subconscious mind. Sex sells, to be frank -- and while we cannot deny it, we do have some means to counter it.

Girls must be guided to see their potential in areas other than the physical. One helpful strategy is to acquaint young girls with the accomplishments of great women, including: Phyllis Wheatley, Marian Wright Edelman, Rosa Parks, Clara Barton, Mary Shelley, Jane Addams, Shirley Chisholm, Elizabeth Blackwell, Sacagawea, Wilma Mankiller, Isabel Allende, Deborah Sampson Gannett, Dolores Huerta, Frida Kahlo, Maya Angelou, Sonia Sotomayor, Margaret Sanger, Unity Dow, Sally Ride and other women who overcame great odds to be strong and successful.

Each of these women is a standout figure in history or in society because of her hard work, her inner strength and her determination. In a society where supermodels and sex appeal are overvalued, adolescent girls must be reminded of their important inner qualities.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:55 AM on 10/27/2011
Great article Matthew and I agree with your opinion. As a researcher of female self-esteem, these issues are relevant and need to be brought to the table. I'm reminded of the quote " You can't be what you can't see." Role models are a must.

http://dr-carol.com
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matthew Lynch, Ed.D.
Professor, Author & Activist
07:02 PM on 10/27/2011
Thanks Carol, this indeed was was the purpose of the article. It seems that some of the commenters miss it.
12:02 AM on 10/31/2011
perhaps the boost in young women's self esteem is because of boy's abhorrent performance in academics, and the constant positive reinforcement they've been receiving for decades. young male disenfranchisement is kind of like the elephant in the room, which in my opinion gets a disrespectful lack of attention. young men are choosing to end their lives at nearly four times the rate of women, yet it's the latter's self esteem that needs boosting?? what century is this??
07:48 PM on 10/26/2011
I don't this this is either important or particularly relevant in the US. Girls are doing better in school than boys, all the way through college and graduate studies.

What other evidence to you need that this is not a significant issue here?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matthew Lynch, Ed.D.
Professor, Author & Activist
11:37 PM on 10/26/2011
Yes, girls are doing better academically, but in a reality show obsessed America, most girls want to be Kim Kardashian and that's a problem.
12:42 AM on 10/27/2011
I actually wouldn't know. We have one TV in the house which is used primarily for Netflix. The only TV channels we receive are a few European and Russian channels which my wife watches occasionally. The kids video allotment is blown on the Netflix, which we filter. My 10th grade daughter reads a few web comics, but has no time for anything else as she is carrying 6 IB/AP courses as she prepares for engineering college next year.
01:38 AM on 10/27/2011
I don't have a good answer for the corrupting attractions of the popular culture. I have done my best to raise my kids outside of the modern popular culture. They have of course adapted a bit, and I have been more successful with my daughter than my son, but even he is far from popular values. Essentially no TV. Limited video time. Lots of reading. Reinforcement to study harder.

They might have seen a "reality" show at a friend's house. They have certainly not seen one at home.
05:54 PM on 10/26/2011
Every time I read articles such as this I cannot help but wonder what universe the writer is from. We have had years and years of programs designed to boost girls self-esteem and achievement. These must have been successful if one assumes success is measured by the number of girls in college and in post-graduate programs as well as their performance in elementary and high school. Meantime boy are falling behind and no one seems serious about addressing this issue in any meaningful manner. Too bad the writer doesn't spend more time writing about the crisis with boys instead of pontificating about how girls need more role models in the curriculum. As if Betsey Ross, Sojourner Truth, Amelia Earhart, and Madame Curie aren't enough to help boost any girl's self-esteem.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matthew Lynch, Ed.D.
Professor, Author & Activist
11:34 PM on 10/26/2011
Robbie, in addition to academics, there are other areas of growth and development that schools should focus on. I have written extensively on the educational needs of boys. I have written several articles for www.educationnews.com on the subject.
11:56 PM on 10/30/2011
again, the fact you have written articles about young men doesn't seem to clarify the relevance of this article.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tomdavis
11:08 AM on 10/26/2011
I have two daughters who are excellent students. Both of my nephews are lagging behind in school. This is a common story. At my daughters' school they're concerned that boys are lagging behind the girls and falling farther and farther behind every year. The point is, the current system, which you say is biased toward boys, isn't helping boys in the least. Based on what I can see, and after talking to my kids' teachers and school administrators, you're proposing a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.They're much more concerned about the boys because, academically, the girls are leaving the boys in the dust.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matthew Lynch, Ed.D.
Professor, Author & Activist
11:30 PM on 10/26/2011
Just because girls are leaving boys in the dust academically doesn't mean that they we should neglect other areas of growth and development.
12:03 AM on 10/31/2011
what does it mean then?
12:08 AM on 10/31/2011
well, it seems that the idolization of kim kardashian is still a kink that needs to be removed from pop culture. despite her smashing success and popularity. once that's taken care of, then we'll worry about the well being of our young men. how about the negative portrayal of men/boys in nearly EVERY medium we're forced to watch in the media?? nearly every sitcom dad is a buffoon, every teenage boy a slacking goof ball, where are their role models?? the fact that women's self esteem needs bolstering in 2011 is frankly kind of absurd, and almost to the point of discrimination. hell, have you even noticed there is an entire section on this post dedicated EXCLUSIVELY towards women?? in certain instances, i'm not even sure this is legal.