iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Matthis Chiroux

GET UPDATES FROM Matthis Chiroux
 

Skinner Box Elections and the Political Slot Machine: Why Young People Won't Play in 2012

Posted: 11/04/2011 2:28 pm

The last time I voted was in a little steel box in a Brooklyn elementary school in 2008. "So this is what democracy looks like," I thought. "A little steel box with some levers."

I felt like a caged rat clicking a metal switch, waiting for a pellet of food to be disbursed from somewhere on democratic high. A Skinner Box and a voting booth bear remarkable resemblance to each other. Not just in appearance, but also in effect. Both carry with them an illusion of autonomy created by engaging user input, and as long as both provide a little incentive from time-to-time, all parties keep coming back for more!

Slot machines in Vegas are known to create a similar effect. And as long as you keep pulling that lever, the house goes right on getting paid. If President Obama has taught young people anything, it's that elections, like slot machines, are always in essence a gamble. Just because you win once or twice doesn't mean you break even in the long run, and just because 'our guy' is in office doesn't mean the house isn't going to get paid.

And now, having learned this, with our eyes and ears a little more open, the campaign promises start to sound like the hustle of an old Coney Island carnie working over an easy mark. "Hey, better luck next time, buddy! Take another shot? One more time for the lady?"

But it's not just Obama we see as peddling this shady carnival. This whole damn system, elections and all, seems but a crapshoot to us at some crime boss' casino. And the house being the 1% have 'Knuckles' and 'Dozer' employed, and they always collect for their bosses, even if they themselves are the 99%.

That's why likely you won't see us young people in next year's general election.

Now don't panic. I'm sure even if he doesn't get the youth vote, Obama will have no problem dispatching all comers from the current field of Republican challengers. So now, really, is the time for people on the left to be asking themselves the critical questions -- the ones that underpin the larger political dilemmas of our day. Does voting satisfy your thirst for democracy, or do you, like me, feel like a rat in a cage? Are these Skinner Box elections going to stop this ship from sinking, or are they simply a way to keep us rats from running to solid ground?

Certainly we have long been comfortable making some very serious critiques of our system. Oftentimes, our rhetoric can even take on a doomsday feel. "If we don't do something now, it'll be too late. Pretty soon we'll go beyond the point of no return." I've heard this plenty of times about issues ranging from the economy, to the environment to developments within the state, especially regarding its relationship with big business. At some point, we must acknowledge the fact, that if there do exist points of no return as we have postulated, perhaps we've already crossed a few. Perhaps voting's too little too late.

Included at the core of the Occupy Wall Street movement's appeal to young people is a belief that America's electoral system is broken beyond repair. We don't even see a reason for winning, anymore: not after three years of Obama. We know this government to be a plutocracy, and the plutocrats who run it, both elected and unelected, do not serve the 99%. We have no interest in Skinner Box voting or political slot machines on loan from the state!

The Occupy movement is not just a protest. It's a roadmap that leads from the election booth to the public square. It challenges the conventional wisdom of the ballot, and instead points to something more democratic and collaborative. It has the audacity to say that it matters less who you vote for and more who is underwriting the entire power structure (the 1%). That power structure is what's being challenged by this movement, not just the men and women who run it.

We've nearly all heard Einstein's definition of insanity as trying the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result. Young people in this country aren't crazy, and for better or for worse, have learned that voting for change in elections doesn't create the change we need. We want to create a new, shared power in this country; one which can undermine the buying power of the 1%. While we've yet to see if the Occupy movement is the birth of that modern, shared power, it at very least hails its coming as somewhere on the horizon.

Even if winter rolls in and freezes our movement out of the streets, the current gains of Occupy at this point are thoroughly consolidated. A basis for horizontal organizing and individually autonomous movements now exists within the population here that didn't seem present even a year ago. That, in and of itself, gives us great hope and energy looking to the future and contemplating new ways of challenging the fortified power of the 1%. While many are still looking to Congress and the president to fight on our behalf, the concept of the General Assembly is suddenly taking root.

Many critics of the movement have found fault with the General Assemblies for not having placed specific or plentiful enough demands on the government. Some have argued that if like the Tea Party, the Occupation movement would work simply to elect our members to office, we could take control of the system and manifest a vision of power that could better serve the 99%.

Our answer is simply a restatement of our goal. We don't aim to take over the Congress and effectively become the 1%. Our vision of power is to replace it ... with a Directly Democratic General Assembly ... coming to a public space near you.

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:06 PM on 11/06/2011
This is a Republicans favorite post. It worked out well for all in the midterms.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:14 PM on 11/06/2011
If money is speech why don*t we burn some as a symbolic protest?
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
12:22 PM on 11/06/2011
Its only a Skinner box if you have no choice, or dont educate yourself to what your choices are. I am always proud to vote locally, my representative in DC even has a voting record that I will continue to support. In Atlanta we don't have a party system so much -- its a very liberal city. I will show up to oppose our current mayor, as he lied to Occupy Atlanta and the city. All ego, no substance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
11:20 PM on 11/05/2011
The American political system is broken and non-functional, but it is not beyond repair. Ridding the system of corporate money would immediately restore it to perfect health. But Supreme Court justices who find that corporations are people and money is speech make recovery impossible. We need better justices, and so we need Democratic presidents to appoint them.

The first step to fixing the system is key: Vote for liberal Democrats. Always.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enemyofgod72
I do not care if you like me
12:25 PM on 11/05/2011
Thank You! What an excellent observation. Our government and financial systems are broken they can't be fixed they need to be replaced. I see the Occupy Movement as the first step in making that happen. If we coudl fix these problems from the inside by electing different people to office we would have done so by now but it hasn't happened. I knew once Obama went along with the bank bailout that he wasn't the change we needed and began thinking about what else could be done. Then I began to think why do we need Congress in it's current form or the Presidency in it's current form or event the Supreme Court with it's lifetime appointments. We have a 19th century system when we live in the 21st century. It's time to do as our forefathers did over 200 years ago and change the system from top to bottom in the pursuit of "a more perfect union".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patricia Hinchliff
teach peace
11:27 AM on 11/05/2011
this sad fact of life sucks........ for the Dems ./......and anyone
who want to keep the laws of California to legalize the things in California that apply to California's people and NOT the Rest of the States,
ie........Just What WE CAN .......and can NOT............ Grow!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
bump00000
The Seventh Chakra, amazon
02:50 PM on 11/05/2011
States rights is more of a Republican thing. Check out Ron Paul.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patricia Hinchliff
teach peace
05:25 PM on 11/05/2011
I Like Ron Paul he is the best rebub ..lick can;t He has great ideas
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:15 PM on 11/06/2011
Do The Republicans support states rights as regards medical Marijuana?
My wild guess is they don*t.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Texas Justice Party - Chairperson
08:26 AM on 11/05/2011
I think you underestimate the power of the Occupy Wall Street movement to bring change. With the power of the Internet to unite disparate groups nationwide, the OWS movement may leapfrog the political environment and unite behind candidates that promote the agendas they desire. A non-politician candidate offering to meet their demands could easily split the vote between the Democrats and Republicans resulting in a run-off of epic proportions in the House. With horse trading this third party candidate could get the VP slot or even the Presidential slot by aligning with one of the others. For the first time, we have an opportunity where enough disaffected voters could change the outcome. Nothing is perfect and November is a year away. A lot can happen in a year, I predict it will be a roller coaster ride of historic proportions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enemyofgod72
I do not care if you like me
12:34 PM on 11/05/2011
Respectfully, I think you miss the point sir. The system is broken. It's too late to fix it from the inside. It doesn't matter who is elected when once inside the power of money rules out any significant real change. Until a politician stands up for the abolishment of money once and for all I can't see anyone that I would support. We have to tear it down and rebuild. Your job as a politician is to sell us on the current system but the system is the problem and even one well meaning politician is not the answer when the power of money will insure that the status quo is overall maintained.
photo
bump00000
The Seventh Chakra, amazon
02:41 PM on 11/05/2011
Sounds like anarchy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Texas Justice Party - Chairperson
08:25 PM on 11/05/2011
I fully support changes to the system through a Constitutional Convention. Money can be taken out of the equation through public financing or extreme limitations on donations but that has to be done through an amendment. You correctly identify money as the problem but solving the money issue does not require tearing down the system, just fixing it. The power of the 99% can fix the system. If you try to tear it down, the money interests will fight and a lot of good people will get hurt in the process. I want non-violent change.
10:20 PM on 11/04/2011
This comes off as sounding like preemptive excuse making for simultaneously claiming to represent 99% of the population and then having no appreciable impact on the process of selecting representatives in subsequent elections.
09:16 PM on 11/04/2011
I don't think the 1% wants people not to vote. If anything, they want people at the polls because they already own both parties and the electoral process itself, so either way, they win. If everybody voted in an election they own, then really they could claim total support no matter what the partisan breakdown was. If anything, having low voter turnout should indicate to them that people are withdrawing their consent.

Now if there were real alternatives at the polls or real alternatives to the polls, there might be a different story. But Democrats and Republicans are looking the same to more and more young people. Don't expect us to be a force for the Democrats at the polls in 2012. Last time we got burned.

And don't blame the government on good, non-voting citizens. We're not the ones who voted to put the crooks in office! :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:19 PM on 11/06/2011
If they wanted everyone to vote it would be mandatory and a holiday and not a cold Tuesday in November.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
Give bees a chance
08:34 PM on 11/04/2011
If you won't vote you will have no right to complain over the results that will occur from the actions of the people that do. Have fun.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BOBinPS
Really?
08:16 PM on 11/04/2011
Direct democracy doesn't work. Look at the mess CA has made with the referendum process. What we need is elected legislators who represent the will of the electorate. Not the will of special interests. That reform cannot come about by not voting. We just need a candidate worth pulling the lever for. We don't have one. So, in lieu of that, we have to pull the lever for the least bad candidate. But we still have to pull the lever. Yes, discouraging.......

The other thing we have to do is try to inform the electorate. So far, Occupy is succeeding. The discussion IS changing. Monied interests will not go without a huge fight. They have Fox news and have intimidated the corporate dominated media. We have to fight. We have to insist on campaign finance reform. We have to fight to get people like Geithner out of the west wing. That will only happen when we take the effort to make it happen. Occupy is a great start!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:54 PM on 11/04/2011
Nice ideas but get real. Building a new power structure? Like nobody's had that idea before! So far nobody has accomplished anything close to this kind of revolution. It ain't easy overthrowing the system.

Obama has been a terrible disappointment. But it should be obvious that a Republican president would be a catastrophe. So give up your vote at your peril.
07:25 PM on 11/04/2011
Avoiding the ballot box is the one thing the 1%'ers want you to do. If the OWS has a clue, then front your own candidates. If the 99% are with you, they will win. If not, then accept it and work within the system for the change you can. In the last 20 years I've voted for 1 candidate (in a primary). I've made the rest of my votes AGAINST who I felt was the worst.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
05:18 PM on 11/04/2011
Then don't vote. You have that right.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SageFire
Research Vote by Mail
03:51 PM on 11/04/2011
Whereas it is a fantastic show of intent and ideals that I support, taking to the streets will get you nothing but air time and will not change any laws. A country without laws looks like Somalia. If you want a better government also occupy the ballot box, the door to door campaign, and the mailing room of progressive candidates.

The only thing broken about our system is us and our refusal to take it seriously and actually participate. We HAVE the right to vote which our forefathers and mothers gave their lives for, if we don't bother to do so then maybe we have the government we deserve and we are far less honorable people than they were.

I donated to Occupy Supply last night so I do support the cause. If you all don't support the rest of us back via your vote that will be a very sad and wasted state of affairs and will prove correct those on the right who don't think you should be taken seriously.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
05:17 PM on 11/04/2011
Most people don't take these protesters seriously anyway.