Max Bergmann

Max Bergmann

Posted March 19, 2009 | 10:47 AM (EST)

McCain vs. Petraeus

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Gen-david-petraeus-mccain One of the real benefits of last year's election was that it dispelled the myth that McCain was a reasonable foreign policy centrist and exposed the fact that he was actually a reckless neocon. For instance, on North Korea, it was discovered that McCain was actually more extreme than Bush and opposed the administration's efforts - led by Chris Hill - to negotiate.

Now Hill has been appointed to replace Ryan Crocker - who departed last month - as U.S. ambassador to Iraq. Yet Hill's appointment has been held up by McCain, Lindsay "mini mac" Graham, and Brownback, because... well...Hill didn't want to bomb North Korea - which in McCain's neocon world makes his North Korea legacy "controversial."

It was always clear that McCain knew how to hold a grudge. But what makes this all the more interesting is that by blocking Hill, McCain is pissing off Petraeus - a man who McCain could not stop praising last year. Laura Rozen at the Cable writes:

Sources tell The Cable that Centcom commander Gen. David Petraeus, top Iraq commander Gen. Raymond Odierno, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates are frustrated by the delay in getting a U.S. ambassador confirmed and into place in Iraq, and support Hill's confirmation proceeding swiftly...Since the previous ambassador, Ryan Crocker, left the job Feb. 13, Odierno has complained of doing double duty: serving as the commanding general and the de facto ambassador.

The power vacuum in Baghdad comes at a critical juncture in Iraq's transition, sources noted. The U.S. mission is becoming increasingly focused on political stabilization and economic development over military missions; Arab-Kurd tensions are rising in the north; struggles for dominance within and across sectarian groups are heating up in the aftermath of January's provincial elections; the Baghdad government is facing tough budget choices due to declining oil prices; and national elections that will determine whether Iraq can consolidate its democracy are due by year's end.

..."This is all about retribution," said one Senate Democratic foreign-policy staffer. Conservatives blame Hill for nudging Bush's second term North Korea policy towards multi-party talks. "They want to give Hill a black eye."


Something has to give here... what will it be: McCain's love for Petraeus or his neocon vindictiveness?

 
Comments
2
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- sunny123 I'm a Fan of sunny123 11 fans permalink

Please Mr McCain, Mr. Lieberman and Mr. Graham go back under the rocks you crawled out from. You helped create the mess we are in and are part of the problem. You offer no solutions. War is dead, haven't you heard? It's time to get on with the living. Please, please go away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 03/19/2009
- MPeter I'm a Fan of MPeter 25 fans permalink

MCcain keeps injecting himself in President Obama's decisions. MCBush lost, he is irrelevant. He needs to go back to the senate and drool himself to sleep. He is a tired old, obstructionist. Go away, MCBush!!!!! You have over-stayed your welcome!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 03/19/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect