More

Hard Times and Easy Money


Statistics are cold and distant. No blood pumps through their veins, stress never causes their hands to tremble and no tears ever form in the corners of their eyes. They are a cold calculus of the pains and joys experienced by millions of American fathers, mothers, sons, sisters, daughters and neighbors. Hard times are pounding in the door of America's depreciating economic house. Let's survey the landscape and keep in mind that behind every number below there are vast numbers of real people with real problems.

In just over a weak between January 22 and January 30, The Federal Reserve (Fed) cut both of the interest rates under their sway by 1.25%. This is easy money on steroids. Last week hosted about the most feverish rate cutting ever seen. In an emergency meeting on January 22 and again at a scheduled meeting a week later, the Fed made huge cuts in the cost of short term credit to and between banks. By the second cut, the markets were jaded, had successfully pressed a flustered Fed into action and were no longer impressed. Wednesday's 50basis points, half of one percentage point, cuts were unable to keep any major US stock index above water. The Dow, S&P500 and NASDAQ all fell. Not too long into the future this will be understood as a turning point in the present financial turmoil. Hard times economic data are in a struggle with easy money. The hard times are plastered all over American faces. A GDP growth forecast for the end of 2007 at .6% growth means pain. A nasty, negative 17,000 December payrolls number means pain. These are the many reasons why super cheap and super easy money failed to save the day.

About six hours before the Fed cut rates, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released its advanced estimate of the economic growth for the fourth quarter of 2007.

Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 0.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007,according to advance estimates released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the third quarter, real GDP increased 4.9 percent.

Needless to say, this is a hard times number. Everything in the report is advanced estimate and therefore, subject to large revision. Fourth quarter advanced estimate GDP was reported 88% below third quarter GDP growth. That is a major tumble and was not forecast. The consensus estimates of fourth quarter GDP growth were in the area of 1.2%. We expected a poor number, nowhere near that poor. GDP is not the only jarring news. The BEA released Personal Income and Outlays December 2007. There was much bad news in this data as well. However, to see how bad it actually is you need to read the full report and make a few calculations. Therefore, it has largely gone unnoticed! The headline growth in December personal income is a strong .5%. Behind that number lurks the fact that income growth rates largely fell across essential categories.

Private wage and salary disbursements increased $21.4 billion in December, compared with an increase of $34.5 billion in November. Goods-producing industries' payrolls decreased $1.4 billion, in contrast to an increase of $6.8 billion; manufacturing payrolls decreased $2.0 billion, in contrast to an increase of $2.5 billion. Services-producing industries' payrolls increased $22.8 billion, compared with an increase of $27.7 billion. Government wage and salary disbursements increased$3.7 billion, compared with an increase of $4.0 billion. BEA Personal Income and Outlays December 2007

Greater bad news lurks in the data on spending and price level. The Fed's preferred prices index- that excludes food and energy- rose by 2.2%. This is above the stated inflation comfort level and was enough to erase all gains in personal spending, PCE or Personal Consumption Expenditure.

Real PCE -- PCE adjusted to remove price changes -- decreased less than 0.1 percent in December, in contrast to an increase of 0.4 percent in November. Purchases of durable goods decreased 0.3 percent, compared with a decrease of less than 0.1 percent. Purchases of nondurable goods decreased 0.2 percent, in contrast to an increase of 0.4 percent. Purchases of services increased 0.1 percent, compared with an increase of 0.5 percent.

The economic data is uniformly bad. Overall economic growth (GDP) is rapidly slowing, wage growth is slowing, adjusted for inflation there is no personal spending growth and price growth remains high. Slashing interest rates promises to increase price pressures and will take months- if successful- to provide broad economic support. The employment picture news came on the morning of February 01, 2008. These numbers are for January 2008. The news is just plain awful. More hard luck recorded, more hard luck in the forecast.

In January, total nonfarm payroll employment was about unchanged (-17,000), after edging up in November (60,000) and December (82,000).... Construction employment decreased by 27,000 in January and has fallen by 284,000 since its peak in September 2006. Over-the-month job losses occurred in residential building (-10,000) and residential specialty trade contractors (-18,000).Manufacturing lost 28,000 jobs in January. Over the month, small declines occurred among many durable and nondurable goods industries. Manufacturing has lost 269,000jobs over the past 12 months.

The Fed pulled out all the stops. It was easy money to the rescue on January 22, 2008 and January 30, 2008. Economic weakness is in the driver's seat. Hard times have arrived for many. Don't let the numbers and the hype hide the real distress that the above numbers signal. None of this is to say that things cannot or will not improve. They will. The issue at hand is to address and admit that we are in a genuinely painful economic downswing and that millions of folks out there are experiencing distress. The numbers can't tell you that plain and clear. Make no mistake about it, hard times are what these numbers announce in their own cold, hard way.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrcontinental
02:35 PM on 02/04/2008
Nice work Max; I always enjoy your analysis.
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
01:32 PM on 02/04/2008
The fact that there are few posts in response to this article, Max, simply means you hit the nail on the head.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:30 PM on 02/03/2008
It's OK. Bush knows the answer to everything--cut the income tax rates for corporations and the rich. That's how he got elected twice, so that must be what the voters want.

Of course it is crazy. Voters don't want sanity. Give voters a chance at sanity, and they will choose the crazy everytime. It's all entertainment. Voters just want a good show. So candidates who spout a script, which they've rehearsed and presented over and over and over again, look good.

If you have a better explanation for why voters can love a Reagan and a GW Bush (oh, sure not now but that doesn't matter) I'd sure be interested to hear it. Look how bad, how gross, how blatant the corruption has to get before voters even begin to pay attention.

The faith of the American is in Hollywood endings. That's why we don't even bother to vote.
12:43 PM on 02/03/2008
The easy-money fix of the fed is telling. A conservative would prescribe a cold-turkey approach and let the market discipline chips fall where they may.
There has been little talk (or thought) to the issue of savings rates as an inducement to save. The low rate, easy money policy of the fed also carries little rate incentive for people to save. There used to be an argument that savings rates were relevant and that banks would compete for savings deposits.
A look at the divergence (hist) between m-1 and m-2 is quite revealing.
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
09:56 AM on 02/03/2008
Can we vote out the incumbents now? Are the R's with their pretend Conservative(tm) credentials ready to let go of the lie that you can have a successful nation with no government or bad government? Are all you people ready to grow up and recognize that we are all in this together and do something to help out?

Not yet?

If not now, when? If not you and me, then who?

Adjusted for currency revaluation which has occurred after these rate cuts, oil price shifts etc, what do you think your portfolio is really worth today? Between 40 and 60% of what it was - and the munis you thought were safe?

I mean really, how hard does it have to be for you to wake up and smell the coffee. WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. And if you think you aren't, there's a bunch of folks who want to see you in the alley.

Thanks, Max. Love your work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitarsandmore
devoted father, community activist, musician, reti
08:41 PM on 02/02/2008
Stock Market Crash ? OH my GOD it’s a national emergency!

Social Security Disability – denied
Wellfare applicants – cancelled
Unemployment runs out – tough luck
Vets living under the bridges – so what
Job lay offs – ho hum boring


Stock market goes down
Wait a minute …. The stock market went down? ……… OH my GOD it’s a CRISIS!!
Quick Bushy and the boys must do somethin’ quick!

After all, the stock market is the main thing. Isn’t it? It’s all about the stock market right? When the stock market goes up food will magically appear in my refrigerator, the bills will get paid, and braces will appear on my kids teeth. All hail the stock market!
07:38 PM on 02/02/2008
Statistics may be cold and distant, but as Max has laid them out for us, the painful truth seems evident. All of this wouldn't be quite as disheartening if the average worker had cashed in from the most recent boom. Since average real wages have failed to increase even in the so-called good times, how will we, our families, friends, and neighbors survive the recession that is evidently already here?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
06:37 PM on 02/02/2008
Well, maybe if they'd taken issue with institutional corruption and wholesale fraud and larceny on Wall St. and elsewhere all this time instead of having 'oopsies' like Enron, there'd be less of an issue with hard times knocking at the door.

Oversight, stewardship, responsibility, choose your term, but point is, They Blew It. In more than one instance, on more than one occasion.
There's lots n lots of room for cases to be made to wrench back HARD on federal spending, probably abolishing excess agencies, and probably going heavily into some domestic manufacturing so that people can have legit employment instead of a government check. When you can support yourself off of fair wages, you don't need Government Helpy Happy Buddy, or their handouts. But, if the goal is to build a socially and economically dependent welfare/police state, then you have to say American Veal Calf. You're in a box, that they want you in. Your 'mission'? Get out of it.
And, the unfortunate problem? These folks all work together. They're basically in cahoots.
Your role? Redistribute your paycheck. And, they're always in the market for Fresh Suckers, hence the 'confusion' on 'immigration', AKA Cesar Chavez' worst nightmare come to life, wholesale usury of the US population, and moreover, the world, if they can manage it.
It's long past impeachment time, but you can add your 'vote' today at:
http://www.impeachbush.org
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mouselion
03:15 PM on 02/02/2008
In just over a >weak< between January 22 and January 30, The Federal Reserve (Fed) cut both of the interest rates under their sway by 1.25%. This is easy money on steroids.

A typo, but obviously on point.
02:32 AM on 02/02/2008
Or is it back to reality?

I admit confusion about statistics and principles. Like, GCP, how 70% of that is supposed to be Americans spending money they have no got on imported things they don't need.

All the expert advise, from May 21 last year: "the subprime market is largely contained" and then oops! and the 'freeze' (whatever happened to that?!) and one trillion est. funding for the banking sector -- which apparently only got them close of what reserves they should have had?

And now the 'economic stimulus' of money from helicopters (or somewhere) and who pays for that? Has anyone asked?

Plus a stock market that seems never satisfied with any ameliorative measures. Well, maybe it has gone so far away from reality -- fundamentals -- that it NEEDS a strong correction?

All I see is leveraged virtual money increased ad infinitum and playing musical chairs on the deck of the Titanic.