As October passes into November and November slips into December we get more and more economic data and a better and better sense of public opinion. There seems to be a growing disconnect between the numbers, official pronouncements and public sentiment. This week we will try to take a look at why that might be and where it seems to be leading us. In order to do that with any modicum of competence we will need to review the recent economic news and official pronouncements.
The Recent Economic News
The general pattern in asset markets has been one of bad news, followed by rapid sell-offs and then a return to increasingly guarded optimism. Each new round of reported or forecast trouble adds toward critical mass and produces an eventual broad decline in asset prices. Fairly quickly, the dust settles and nervous and skittish money begins to re-enter the fray. Everyone waits for major earnings news from leading firms and government reports and pronouncements -- as always. Government news is far better than private sector news -- by and large. The housing sector and banks are in real trouble. The dollar is in real trouble. The GDP is growing fast and reported inflation is very, very low. In fact the GDP and income numbers are good because reported inflation is so low. Fed, Treasury and administration officials jawbone the good news and their great numbers. GDP, Personal Income, trade balances and productivity are turning in really good performances. This is based in part on the fact that many numbers are measured against low core inflation data that is being reported. Leading financial firms, housing and retail sectors are reporting poor numbers and signaling a near term future worse than the troubled present. It might be worthy to note that housing and housing -elated industries account for between 15-20% of the US economy and that 50% of the net worth of 50% of American families is compromised by ownership in the family home. Every few days we learn of more trouble. It is clear that the housing outlook will be horrible -- yes I said horrible -- through 2008. This story is and will continue to develop over the next 12-18months.
Trouble in the housing sector is now huge and growing. The below excerpt from the third quarter statement by Freddie Mac -- an agency that owns $1.5 trillion in US home mortgages -- seems important.
Credit-related expenses, consisting of provision for credit losses and real estate owned (REO) operations expense, were $1.2 billion for the third quarter of 2007, compared to $112 million for the third quarter of 2006. This increase reflects observed credit deterioration, particularly on 2006 and 2007 mortgage loan originations that have exhibited higher transition rates from delinquency to foreclosure, and higher expected severities of losses on a per-property basis resulting from slower home price appreciation and higher UPBs on those loans generating losses. Freddie Mac Third Quarter Financial Statement Press Release
In translation, the value of the home loans we own has declined at 10 times the rate it did this time last year. The value of our assets is melting down and we may have to sell some loans and will be buying fewer loans. Thus, our mission to support the mortgage market may be forced to run in reverse. We may sell into weak, over-supplied markets and buy less to stay within federally mandated credit guidelines.
Other areas of the economy will not emerge unaffected. Credit card and auto loan delinquency rates are rising. Moody's Investor Services reported the third consecutive quarter of increasing credit card delinquency rates on Monday 19 November 2007. The Financial Times of 20 November 2007 reports growing concern over rising rates of auto loan delinquency. You will be happy to learn that many credit card and auto loans are packaged and sold as asset backed securities (ABS) a la the fool proof method employed by mortgage lenders. Credit card asset backed security volume nearly doubled to over $15 billion in October 2007. I wonder where we will be shocked to see trouble developing over the next few months?
Pulled in Two Directions
Perhaps the most obvious disconnect between markets and the government is occurring around the chance of a Federal Reserve Rate Cut at the last meeting of 2007, 11 December. Bond prices and interest rates vary inversely. The more you have to pay for the stream of fixed income payments that bond ownership provides, the lower the interest rate. If markets expect a rate cut, they buy bonds pushing up the bond price and down the yield-think of a seesaw. The next scheduled Fed meeting -- after 11 December 2007 -- will not take place until the end of January 2008. Markets have adjusted the price of Treasury Bonds to reflect the likelihood of a coming Fed rate cut. The dollar has been pushed to fresh lows against the British Pound and the Euro as money leaves the US in advance of the expected rate cut. Markets expect the rate cut as economic news continues to signal recessionary conditions. The extent and breadth of trouble suggests Fed help. Optimists look to the good government figures and the strength of the rest of the world. Markets see bad news and expect help in the form of more and cheaper money from the Fed. The world sees this and sells dollars. Bond markets see this and bid up the bond prices and down the interest rates-seesaw. The December 11 cut may not happen as the Fed sees and reports positive data.
A de-coupling theory has gained many fans. It reminds me of the no-debt problem and housing bubble theory that was so popular 2004-2006. It goes like this: the world, excluding the US, is so strong that it will boom despite our soft patch and help pull the US out of any trouble. History suggests that when the largest national economy in the world and the globe's consumption machine sneezes, others catch colds -- or worse. Thus far, this has proven remarkably false. We are supposed to believe that the world has changed and no longer needs strong growth from the US. It is worthy of note that The EU and Japan appear to be slowing as well. We are left to believe that the strength of the fast growing, robust and still much smaller, rest of world category will pull the world's weight. You can add me to the list of folks who are interested in seeing this happened and impressed with how long it has already gone on. Go ahead and leave me off the roster of believers. I agree the word is changing and is ever less US-centric. I believe this is a long term process that will continue. I do not believe recent runs in global growth can be sustained with serious US weakness and sluggish European and Japanese conditions. It might be worth mentioning that the US, European Union and Japan accounted for approximately 60% of world GDP in 2006.
Where Does This Leave Us?
The public and market participants run the range from nervous to pessimistic in many quarters. Officialdom seems frightened but announces good numbers. Meanwhile, the dollar slides, oil rises and we wait for the next shoe to drop. I think it is going to get worse before it gets better. I believe that is true for areas of recent strength like, the emerging markets or developing world, tech companies, consumer companies in the US. Sadly, I am afraid that middle class America is in for a long cold winter. Recent Federal Reserve reductions in economic growth and forecasts of rising unemployment look like best case scenarios. I hope they are correct. It remains possible but, has grown less likely as more and more comes to light.
Posted November 21, 2007 | 11:34 AM (EST)