iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Megan Smolenyak

GET UPDATES FROM Megan Smolenyak
 

A Second Chance to Be a Genetic Pioneer

Posted: 08/02/2012 11:05 am

2012-07-31-Chip.jpg

Whenever I address an audience of new genealogists, I tell them that they were smart to wait. Though I have no regrets about having started my sleuthing in the pre-Internet Dark Ages, those taking their first steps today can often learn more in a day than I did in a month. The same can now be said about genetic genealogy.

Genetic genealogy -- DNA testing done for the purpose of learning about one's roots -- has been around for about a decade, but a recent development suggests that we've reached the pioneering sweet spot -- that window of time during which it's still early enough to be a trendsetter, but not so early that you pay dearly (both in terms of cost and learning curve) for the privilege.

2012-07-31-Kit.jpg

The recent development is the announcement of the pending introduction (anticipated in October) of Geno 2.0 by National Geographic. True, more than half a million have participated since the Genographic Project first launched in 2005, but that still makes new participants bleeding edge in our global population of seven billion. And as the website explains, it's learning more about that global population that the Project is focused on:

"The Genographic Project is an ambitious attempt to answer fundamental questions about where we originated and how we came to populate the Earth. Through your participation, you can play an active role in this historic endeavor."

So why were you smart if you decided to wait for version 2.0? Because a little swabbing will go a long way in telling you about your deep ancestral past. An entirely new GenoChip has been designed to provide participants impressively detailed information -- much more than was possible previously. For $199.95, a portion of which supports this non-profit (and non-medical) initiative, you will learn your:

  • Deep-clade Y-DNA haplogroup
  • Deep-clade mtDNA haplogroup
  • Bio-geographical heritage estimate
  • Ancient population estimate


If you could picture a family tree of mankind, your haplogroup is the branch you belong to. The Y-DNA version tells you about the direct paternal branch of your family. In many cultures, surnames are also passed down through this same line. The mtDNA version does the same thing, but for the direct maternal line -- your mother's mother's mother's (etc.) branch. Your Geno 2.0 results will reveal the history and migration associated with both your Y-DNA and mtDNA if you're male and with your mtDNA if you're female (Note: Since only males possess a Y-chromosome, women may wish to encourage a brother, father, or paternal uncle or cousin to test). The familiar "Where are you from?" question will take on a whole new meaning once you explore these results.


2012-07-31-results_yourstory_mainpane.jpg


If you've ever seen someone swabbing on one of those celebrity roots shows, then you already have a sense of what's meant by your bio-geographical heritage. During an appearance on Who Do You Think You Are?, for instance, I explained to Emmitt Smith that his DNA results indicated that he was approximately 81% African, 12% European and 7% Asian (a proxy for Native American). This is the same idea, but with a considerable leap forward with results that will be far more specific than before. If you're adopted and want to learn about your ethnic makeup or perhaps have a tale of Native ancestry rattling around your family tree or are just plain curious, this may well be the information of greatest interest to you.

And to round things out, you'll also learn whether you've got a lingering dash of Neanderthal or Denisovan heritage -- and who doesn't want to know that?

So if you haven't swabbed yet, you might want to consider signing up for the upcoming Geno 2.0 launch. But I suppose I should offer the disclaimer that the Genographic Project can be something of a gateway drug pulling you into the addicting world of genetic genealogy, so don't say I didn't warn you.

 
 
 

Follow Megan Smolenyak on Twitter: www.twitter.com/megansmolenyak

FOLLOW SCIENCE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:48 AM on 08/06/2012
Hi Megan, I've been reading a lot about 23 and Me seeking FDA approval. But I don't think I understand what FDA approval will do for the industry. Will this be a public endorsement of 23 and Me over other DNA testers? Or does FDA approval just mean that DNA testing will "do no harm?"
11:34 AM on 08/03/2012
Is the autosomal test at Family Tree DNA that tests across all family lines accurate? Is it better than Y-DNA or mtDNA? I've never heard of anyone using it so far.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Megan Smolenyak
genealogy expert
03:17 PM on 08/03/2012
It's not better per se, but it is different. It all depends on what you want to know. Y-DNA and mtDNA testing both tell you about a specific branch of your family tree -- the direct paternal (Y-DNA) or direct maternal (mtDNA). Autosomal testing addresses your entire ancestry. Geno 2.0 will use it mostly to provide a sense of your ethnic heritage. As it happens, Family Tree DNA will be doing the testing for Nat'l Geo. Their autosomal test (Family Finder) is mostly used to find cousins and other close relatives. Autosomal frees us from the tyranny of direct gender lines, but it's trickier to use for genealogical purposes since freshly discovered cousins can be on any branch of your family tree. Still, I know of many success stories using it, including at least one adoptee who found his birth family this way. If you happen to have my latest book (Hey, America, Your Roots Are Showing), you might want to check out the "Grandma Stepped Out" chapter to get a better sense.
04:53 PM on 08/03/2012
Good information. Thanks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SDGypsy
Don't wait the time will never be just right
01:42 AM on 08/03/2012
I had my mtDNA (I am a female) processed by Family Tree DNA about 6 years ago. I have the sequencing for HVR1 and HCR2 and have been identified in Halogroup T2. Should I update my test?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Megan Smolenyak
genealogy expert
08:44 AM on 08/03/2012
It really depends on what you want to know, but if I were in your shoes (especially given your "don't wait the time will never be just right" perspective!), I'd be tempted. You've taken what would now be considered a low resolution mtDNA test that pertains to one branch of your family tree. This would represent an upgrade to your mtDNA testing, but more to the point, would also include autosomal results that would provide some insight into the whole of your ancestry (e.g., a sense of your ethnic makeup), as well as some other information. But it's obviously up to you whether that's of interest, and I'm a bit of a DNA test junkie, so can't pretend to be unbiased!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SDGypsy
Don't wait the time will never be just right
11:41 AM on 08/03/2012
Thank you for the information, that is exactly what I was looking for. Do you have a suggestion to whom would be the best, least expensive of all the companies, or should I just go back to Family tree DNA. I love your blog!
07:40 PM on 08/02/2012
This has always interested me but the cost has always made me hesitate. I always figured that waiting would allow them to expand the results and drive the cost down. This is the first I have seen about the National Geographic project. Do you know how it compares to the AncestryDNA product that is available on ancestry.com?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Megan Smolenyak
genealogy expert
08:53 AM on 08/03/2012
The AncestryDNA product is similar to Family Tree DNA's Family Finder and 23andMe's Relative Finder, though Ancestry's offering is newer, so still in its working-out-the-kinks phase. Geno 2.0 will be much more precise in terms of its assessment of your ethnic heritage, but unlike these other tests, it's not designed to help find cousins of recent vintage. If you're interested in finding, say, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. cousins, this won't be as useful (there will be a cool tool to help you spot those participants most closely related to you, but that's not a primary focus as with the other test). Also, depending on which company you test with, you may or may not be told of your mtDNA and Y-DNA haplogroups -- information which Geno 2.0 will provide.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Olderandwiser55
getting older and wiser....
01:23 PM on 08/02/2012
Wow, that's fascinating! Tempting....and a great project.

"The results give you an unprecedented view of your lineage. You will discover the migration paths your ancient ancestors followed thousands of years ago, and learn the details of your ancestral makeup—your branches on the human family tree."

Amazing.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Megan Smolenyak
genealogy expert
08:55 AM on 08/03/2012
I have an admitted bias, but have to agree with you. I count myself very fortunate to live at the first time in the history of mankind that it's possible to peek into your past by just swabbing!